Gamespot goes Insider
#1
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Space Junk Galaxy
Posts: 2,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gamespot goes Insider
#4
Retired
Ridiculous. Luckily there are lots of fan sites that post the same news within hours of the big sites getting it. I refuse to pay for internet content beyond my ISP fees. If all VG sites start charging, I'll just use EGM for my gaming fix. It's not like VG news is life or death, need to know it the minute it happens, or anything. These online sites aren't written well enough to pay for, as opposed to EGM, IMO. To hell with them.
#8
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: MD
Posts: 3,137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Gamespot goes Insider
Ahhhh !#$@!........well actually I think creatureX is right though I did see it coming sorta....they have about 20 movies per game, steaming video even in multple formats. And they also had those Video Reviews that must have costed mega bandwidth dough, but they didn't really need those IMO. I like gamespot a lot, it seemed like they updated their site constantly, and the gamespotting section was pretty cool. I'll still visit, but if it gets too intrusive then...
#11
DVD Talk Hero
Originally posted by AgtFox
Good, we can finally put the "But Gamespot is free" quotes to rest
Good, we can finally put the "But Gamespot is free" quotes to rest
josh, I normally totally agree with you, but it seems silly to say that you won't pay for an internet site but you will pay for a magazine.
I don't need to know about games RIGHT AWAY either, but when I pick up an EGM to see the game they are previewing is one I'm already playing, it does seem to date itself pretty badly.
IMHO, the writing is not a WHOLE lot better in EGM anyway. I'll happily pay for both Insider and Gamespot, since I feel that, as Flay said, $1.66 a month for daily updates and reviews doesn't seem to bad.
The internet won't be completely free forever you know...
#13
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Originally posted by Gromit
I expect our flat rate internet access to go away eventually. I think that within 5 years we'll be back to paying by the hour for internet access.
I expect our flat rate internet access to go away eventually. I think that within 5 years we'll be back to paying by the hour for internet access.
#14
Retired
I'm just not a huge Internet fan. I much prefer sitting down and reading a magazine or newspaper as opposed to reading news or whatever on the Internet. So I feel magazines and newspapers are worth my money and Internet sites are not.
If the Internet is not free for ever, so be it. I'll quit using it. My life doesn't depend on it.
Personally I think there will always be free sites out there offereing nearly the same material, although maybe not as timely as the pay sites.
Even if Video game fan sites go away, there will always be forums like this where people post the news and discuss it. I get most of my online gaming news fix here already anyway as I usually read something here before I see it elsewhere.
If the Internet is not free for ever, so be it. I'll quit using it. My life doesn't depend on it.
Personally I think there will always be free sites out there offereing nearly the same material, although maybe not as timely as the pay sites.
Even if Video game fan sites go away, there will always be forums like this where people post the news and discuss it. I get most of my online gaming news fix here already anyway as I usually read something here before I see it elsewhere.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Gromit
I expect our flat rate internet access to go away eventually. I think that within 5 years we'll be back to paying by the hour for internet access.
I expect our flat rate internet access to go away eventually. I think that within 5 years we'll be back to paying by the hour for internet access.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Did you guys actually read the details on what they are doing? It's not like IGN or other pay services entirely. All news, reviews etc. will be available FREE for the first 7 days. Reviews will still have some screen shots and movies available. With the Gamespot complete you just get more and also unlimited downloads and NO ADDS. In order to get past news and reviews you need to subscribe.. But $19.95 for a year is not that bad. And no adds alone is a great thing. It's not nearly as annoying as IGN IMHO. And their format is alot easier to read than IGN.
#17
Retired
I'm not sure about the reviews. I read the available for 7 days thing, but another part telling what's available for non-subscribers said "Gamespot review scores" rather than whole reviews, and "reader reviews." I'm not sure if that means the whole reviews will be available for 7 days, and then only the scores for non-subscribers, or if the scores is all non-subscibers can ever get.
#18
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Little Rock
Posts: 1,462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by draven-x
I don't need to know about games RIGHT AWAY either, but when I pick up an EGM to see the game they are previewing is one I'm already playing, it does seem to date itself pretty badly.
IMHO, the writing is not a WHOLE lot better in EGM anyway. I'll happily pay for both Insider and Gamespot, since I feel that, as Flay said, $1.66 a month for daily updates and reviews doesn't seem to bad.
I don't need to know about games RIGHT AWAY either, but when I pick up an EGM to see the game they are previewing is one I'm already playing, it does seem to date itself pretty badly.
IMHO, the writing is not a WHOLE lot better in EGM anyway. I'll happily pay for both Insider and Gamespot, since I feel that, as Flay said, $1.66 a month for daily updates and reviews doesn't seem to bad.
#21
Retired
Originally posted by Flay
Then enjoy EGM's coverage of E3.
Then enjoy EGM's coverage of E3.
#22
DVD Talk Legend
Damn everyone boasting about how great EGM is nowadays how things have changed. I remember back when I really used to read gaming magazines that the only one worth my time was Gamefan. I was so pissed when they went out of business. Such in depth reviews, and great screen grabs to go along with it. I still don't think EGM is that great a magazine at all personally, but to each his own. I have a subscription because it's free. Personally I think the writing on Gamespot is more than adequate, and I don't see any leap onto the magazine format. Everytime I read one it seems like they cover less and less.
#24
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: MD
Posts: 3,137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Gromit
I expect our flat rate internet access to go away eventually. I think that within 5 years we'll be back to paying by the hour for internet access.
I expect our flat rate internet access to go away eventually. I think that within 5 years we'll be back to paying by the hour for internet access.
As for EGM, I got a free issue a few months ago (the one with resident evil on the cover) and it was fairly good, and there was enough information, articles, and screens in it to keep me occupied for awhile. Not sure if i'd pay for it though but it didn't seem "that" bad. Besides most of the corporate sites have their own E3 sections which they''re probably working on right now, I'm pretty sure nintendo and sega had one last year on their own websites.
How'd we get so far off topic. Back on track, I read the details about the complete package and its actually not as bad as I thought, they have all news for 7 days with a few screens, but if you subscribe you get the whole deal and no ADs which is nice. Its a lot better than clicking on every link brings to a pay screen. Again i don't know if i'll pay for it until it happens. A good strategy would be to get the free trial during E3 so you get the unlimited downloads. They reported stuff live from the show last year and had these "shows" in which they broadcasted through streaming video.
#25
Well crap. Since Gamefaqs is affiliated with Gamespot, I went over there to see what the word was:
I wish places would understand that making ads "bigger and bolder" tends to run away customers, not bring new ones in; that's exactly what IGN tried to do before they went Insider.
It's funny. I won't pay for Gamespot, which will be charging, but I WOULD pay for gamefaqs, which isn't charging.
With today's announcement of the new GameSpot Complete service (which charges for primarily for their archives, all of their new news and reviews will still be free), the questions and speculations have already started rolling in. While the advertising may get a little bigger and bolder over time to keep up with costs, you don't have to worry about paying for what you get today for free.
It's funny. I won't pay for Gamespot, which will be charging, but I WOULD pay for gamefaqs, which isn't charging.