![]() |
Re: House of the Dragon (S1E07) -- "Driftmark" -- 10/2/22
Well, I thought I paid attention really well and I did NOT know that was Laenor with a shaved head until I read a recap. :lol:
I assumed Laenor's "friend" was going be offed on the way to the escape ship as a way for Daemon to close the conspiratorial loop. But that meshy, gauze-ish darkness: fuck that shit. |
Re: House of the Dragon (S1E07) -- "Driftmark" -- 10/2/22
Originally Posted by fujishig
(Post 14172723)
There is a relation, though. Laena is the daughter of Corlys and Rhaenys, and Rhaenys is Daemon's cousin (I think). So Daemon had kids with his cousin once removed (and Rhaenyra was married to her second cousin). And in addition to the uncle/niece wedding we just had, we're about to see a sister-wife, so...
|
Re: House of the Dragon (S1E07) -- "Driftmark" -- 10/2/22
Originally Posted by GatorDeb
(Post 14172831)
I thought he was asking between Aemma and Viserys.
|
Re: House of the Dragon (S1E07) -- "Driftmark" -- 10/2/22
Originally Posted by maxfisher
(Post 14172553)
This is good enough to keep watching, but I’m not sure I’ve ever seen such an unsympathetic sack of assholes. I’m surprised they didn’t add at least one or two characters for the audience to identify with. While GoT had plenty of characters in the murky to evil range, there were always plenty of characters who were generally decent, or at least attempting to be.
|
Re: House of the Dragon (S1E07) -- "Driftmark" -- 10/2/22
The only likeable character in the entire show they recast....Milly Alcock. Character had potential when she played her but now they added that beat in about letting Laenor live because they release there is nothing likeable about the characters. It's not in the books at all. VinVega is right little honor or anything else in these characters even when you try and add stuff to make it seem there is....sadly.
|
Re: House of the Dragon (S1E07) -- "Driftmark" -- 10/2/22
I thought it was a clever way to put in something that would not be recorded in a history book (which is what the source material basically is) and yet fleshes out the characters a bit more.
And the recasting had nothing to do with how likeable a character is if their actions would've been the same either way. |
Re: House of the Dragon (S1E07) -- "Driftmark" -- 10/2/22
Originally Posted by MrX
(Post 14172275)
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/...140909433.html
Sounds like HBO received a bunch of complaints about how dark everything was. Cinema has existed since the 1890's but HBO apparently doesn't know how to shoot properly lit night scenes. |
Re: House of the Dragon (S1E07) -- "Driftmark" -- 10/2/22
Originally Posted by mike7162
(Post 14173102)
Cinema has existed since the 1890's but HBO apparently doesn't know how to shoot properly lit night scenes.
|
Re: House of the Dragon (S1E07) -- "Driftmark" -- 10/2/22
Wrong it's just fine on an OLED. And so was The Long Night episode. But this one did seem different or badly done even compared to The Long Night.
|
Re: House of the Dragon (S1E07) -- "Driftmark" -- 10/2/22
Originally Posted by VinVega
(Post 14172906)
I agree that the majority of the characters are detestable or weak in some way. I do feel like Rhaenyra concocting the plan to let Laenor live his life as would make him happy and NOT kill him puts her slightly ahead of most of the other characters. Daemon going along with the plan and not killing Laenor showed a glimmer of humanity in him. It's hard to really "root" for any of the characters like we did for the majority of the Stark family in GoT. There's very little honor in any of these characters.
In GoT, we had the Starks (& Jon Snow), Sam, Tyrion, Brienne, Daenerys (for most of the run at least), Jorah, Davos and I'm sure others I'm forgetting. All were shades of gray and imperfect, but fell far enough on the side of right for the audience to root for them. I feel like HotD would really benefit from introducing some characters to give the audience someone to care about. Even if they were minor and/or eventually suffered terrible ends, it would make it a more engaging story. At this point in the show, I'm indifferent to the fates of pretty much everyone on screen. If most of the audience feels that way, I'm not sure the show can keep viewership up over multiple seasons. |
Re: House of the Dragon (S1E07) -- "Driftmark" -- 10/2/22
MEANWHILE: ‘Do NOT buy that book’: Why ‘Game of Thrones’ fans plan to boycott George R. R. Martin’s new novel (msn.com)[img] II=[/img]
The Game of Thrones franchise has been having a positive resurgence lately thanks to the release of the prequel series, House of the Dragon. And the franchise’s creator, George R.R. Martin has no plans of stopping as his upcoming new book will showcase more of the Targaryen history. However, fans are not keen on this book’s release. Not because they’re tired of hearing about this fictional family and their interest in incest. But rather, it’s the co-authors that worked with Martin on the book and their supposed history of writing allegedly offensive and racist posts. |
Re: House of the Dragon (S1E07) -- "Driftmark" -- 10/2/22
Originally Posted by maxfisher
(Post 14173240)
Even with letting Laenor live, they murdered some other random person to have a body to throw in the fire.
In GoT, we had the Starks (& Jon Snow), Sam, Tyrion, Brienne, Daenerys (for most of the run at least), Jorah, Davos and I'm sure others I'm forgetting. All were shades of gray and imperfect, but fell far enough on the side of right for the audience to root for them. I feel like HotD would really benefit from introducing some characters to give the audience someone to care about. Even if they were minor and/or eventually suffered terrible ends, it would make it a more engaging story. At this point in the show, I'm indifferent to the fates of pretty much everyone on screen. If most of the audience feels that way, I'm not sure the show can keep viewership up over multiple seasons. |
Re: House of the Dragon (S1E07) -- "Driftmark" -- 10/2/22
Harder than watching the invisible scenes is keeping track of how all the damn kids are related to each other and the rest of the cast.
|
Re: House of the Dragon (S1E07) -- "Driftmark" -- 10/2/22
Just want to say I may as well be watching this with shades on. Looks like shit.
|
Re: House of the Dragon (S1E07) -- "Driftmark" -- 10/2/22
Originally Posted by HeIsTheZissou
(Post 14172240)
There's no question that a couple GoT S8 episodes were so poorly lit that they were difficult to watch, but everything looked crystal clear for me in this episode. Were you all watching it in a brightly lit room or something? I like all the lights out, theater style.
I'm sure it looked muddy as hell on a cheap set though. |
Re: House of the Dragon (S1E07) -- "Driftmark" -- 10/2/22
Originally Posted by Bill Needle
(Post 14173515)
Harder than watching the invisible scenes is keeping track of how all the damn kids are related to each other and the rest of the cast.
|
Re: House of the Dragon (S1E07) -- "Driftmark" -- 10/2/22
Originally Posted by hdtv00
(Post 14173223)
Wrong it's just fine on an OLED. And so was The Long Night episode. But this one did seem different or badly done even compared to The Long Night.
I was distracted by seeing obvious shadows during the scene on the veranda. That could have easily been set during golden hour/sunset as opposed to twilight. The beach and dragon scenes made more sense. |
Re: House of the Dragon (S1E07) -- "Driftmark" -- 10/2/22
Originally Posted by fujishig
(Post 14173572)
I mean there's two white white haired kids and their sister, a couple of brown haired boys and their baby brother, and two black white haired girls. Now that one of the white white haired kids has an eyepatch, they should be easy enough to differentiate, I'd think. The only reason it's hard to tell their relation to each other is because of all the incest.
Is blondie's brilliant plan in marrying her uncle to have a true Targaryen (hey, spell checker knows that word!) son so none of the bastards will ascend to the Iron Throne? |
Re: House of the Dragon (S1E07) -- "Driftmark" -- 10/2/22
Originally Posted by Jason
(Post 14173789)
Well, the dark haired kids are the least related of all of them.
Is blondie's brilliant plan in marrying her uncle to have a true Targaryen (hey, spell checker knows that word!) son so none of the bastards will ascend to the Iron Throne? |
Re: House of the Dragon (S1E07) -- "Driftmark" -- 10/2/22
Originally Posted by Jason
(Post 14173789)
Is blondie's brilliant plan in marrying her uncle to have a true Targaryen (hey, spell checker knows that word!) son so none of the bastards will ascend to the Iron Throne?
|
Re: House of the Dragon (S1E07) -- "Driftmark" -- 10/2/22
Originally Posted by Bill Needle
(Post 14173515)
Harder than watching the invisible scenes is keeping track of how all the damn kids are related to each other and the rest of the cast.
The oldest boys are the youngest boys' uncles and Bug Girl is their aunt. The trio are Rhaenyra's younger siblings. The two older girls are Rhaenyra's uncle's kids, so they are Rhaenyra's cousins. |
Re: House of the Dragon (S1E07) -- "Driftmark" -- 10/2/22
^Now all I need to do is pause the show and read that paragraph you typed out each time they wander into a scene. :lol:
Of course in an episode or two they will all probably be portrayed by different actors. |
Re: House of the Dragon (S1E07) -- "Driftmark" -- 10/2/22
Originally Posted by Bill Needle
(Post 14174109)
^Now all I need to do is pause the show and read that paragraph you typed out each time they wander into a scene. :lol:
Of course in an episode or two they will all probably be portrayed by different actors. |
Re: House of the Dragon (S1E07) -- "Driftmark" -- 10/2/22
Originally Posted by fujishig
(Post 14173202)
I don't think it's that, I think they shoot it in the daytime and then use post processing to make it seem like night, and that's messing something up with some modern tvs.
|
Re: House of the Dragon (S1E07) -- "Driftmark" -- 10/2/22
Originally Posted by fujishig
(Post 14173202)
I don't think it's that, I think they shoot it in the daytime and then use post processing to make it seem like night, and that's messing something up with some modern tvs.
That said, HBO Max should be doing a better job at keeping this kind of extreme lighting to an absolute minimum. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:51 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.