![]() |
Re: Game of Thrones (S5E03) -- "High Sparrow" -- 4/26/15
Originally Posted by Hiro11
(Post 12464396)
Easily the best episode of the year so far. Fantastic television. I really like how they're tightening up everything from the book, clarifying motivations and eliminating characters that add limited value.
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
|
Re: Game of Thrones (S5E03) -- "High Sparrow" -- 4/26/15
Originally Posted by Decker
(Post 12464520)
The Hand of the King has been officially relieved of his duties.
I also agree with all that Hiro said re: changes being overwhelmingly positive. And also agree with those who say that Sansa is a lot more cunning now & has learned from her own tragedies & from Littlefinger's tutelage. Maybe Dark Sansa will emerge to wreak havoc upon the Boltons. |
Re: Game of Thrones (S5E03) -- "High Sparrow" -- 4/26/15
I forget. Did Sansa ever find out about Theon "killing" Bran and Rickon? Certainly the arrival of Sansa might finally be enough to stir Theon out of his petrified servitude.
Speaking of Bran and Rickon...I know Bran not supposed to be on this season, but are we going to hear about Rickon again. I guess that could be a way to bring the Greatjon back into the story. |
Re: Game of Thrones (S5E03) -- "High Sparrow" -- 4/26/15
Jon Snow beheaded Janos Slynt so quickly that I think it was less for disobeying him and maybe more as taking advantage of an opportunity to get revenge for turning on Ned Stark, so a head for a head.
And a "Wow!" moment for me was the bridge where Varys and Tyrion got off their coach because it is clearly based on the historic "London Bridge" (the one that was "falling down" in the well-known song which is why it eventually had to be replaced) because it also had buildings on it exactly like that. (I wonder if this version of the bridge has a name in GRRM's books?) |
Re: Game of Thrones (S5E03) -- "High Sparrow" -- 4/26/15
I am disappointed we will not get
Spoiler:
The Margery and Tommen situation might also create somewhat of a necessary deviation from the books. Since Tommen is not the young tyke he is in the series , Spoiler:
I am a book reader, but not a hardcore one, and I think the changes are find and for the better. I will still read to see what is different, but take comfort in knowing that a truncated version can be enjoyed while I am still waiting on the "real" one to finish..... That said, if D&D really want to get people talking and "go there".. Spoiler:
|
Re: Game of Thrones (S5E03) -- "High Sparrow" -- 4/26/15
Reading a Game of Thrones thread is like listening to rap on FM radio :lol: I just can't open those spoilers though.
Great episode! Things are really getting intriguing. I thought the beheading scene was a great throwback to (I believe) the very first episode when Ned beheaded that guy and had his sons watch.
Originally Posted by funkyryno
(Post 12464368)
Game of Thrones boobies!
-other- |
Re: Game of Thrones (S5E03) -- "High Sparrow" -- 4/26/15
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/5Krz-dyD-UQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
|
Re: Game of Thrones (S5E03) -- "High Sparrow" -- 4/26/15
Originally Posted by johnnysd
(Post 12464552)
Book purists over at westeros.org are clawing their eyes out over the changes, but to be honest there is just a lot of quite boring filler in books 4 or 5 that need to be revised and I am caustiously optimistic in the direction they are going
All the other stuff going on, we had Qyburn (who never lets a good dwarf head go to waste) in his mad scientist lab with a body under the sheet! I would've predicted that it would be cut out from the books, but now maybe we'll get Spoiler:
|
Re: Game of Thrones (S5E03) -- "High Sparrow" -- 4/26/15
Originally Posted by brainee
(Post 12465077)
Haven't delved much into the book series forums ... do the majority of book fans really hold books 4 and 5 in the same esteem as the first three? Everyone I talk to in person (and on this forum) agrees with you.
All the other stuff going on, we had Qyburn (who never lets a good dwarf head go to waste) in his mad scientist lab with a body under the sheet! I would've predicted that it would be cut out from the books, but now maybe we'll get Spoiler:
|
Re: Game of Thrones (S5E03) -- "High Sparrow" -- 4/26/15
Reek is planning something. He has that look in his eye.:wacko:
|
Re: Game of Thrones (S5E03) -- "High Sparrow" -- 4/26/15
Originally Posted by brainee
(Post 12465077)
Haven't delved much into the book series forums ... do the majority of book fans really hold books 4 and 5 in the same esteem as the first three? Everyone I talk to in person (and on this forum) agrees with you.
All the other stuff going on, we had Qyburn (who never lets a good dwarf head go to waste) in his mad scientist lab with a body under the sheet! I would've predicted that it would be cut out from the books, but now maybe we'll get Spoiler:
Spoiler:
And yes, over there, it seems the majority, at least the vocal one, holf Books 4 and 5 in the same esteem as the first three. Personally I think Book 3 is the best fantasy book I have read, but Book 4 and 5 are just really unfocused, have no momentum, are perversely complicated, repetitive, and often boring but have some very cool things happen in them usually after 300 pages of build up. Those cool things will be very cool to see in the series, and I see nothing that they are doing really to not continue to hit all the stories key plot points. |
Re: Game of Thrones (S5E03) -- "High Sparrow" -- 4/26/15
Please let Littlefinger and Sansa save the awful Theon/Ramsey storyline.
It was nice to be spared from Khaleesi this week, although it was good to see Mormont again. Great to see Jon behead the coward. |
Re: Game of Thrones (S5E03) -- "High Sparrow" -- 4/26/15
Originally Posted by superdeluxe
(Post 12465157)
Some hold that ANY change from the book is blasphemy. I think most reasonable folks are loving how D&D are steamlining the show a bit, cutting off the fat and telling the stories that will be important in the end game.
|
Re: Game of Thrones (S5E03) -- "High Sparrow" -- 4/26/15
Originally Posted by B.A.
(Post 12465261)
Great to see Jon behead the coward.
(I guess the rule is don't be a coward who he also hates) |
Re: Game of Thrones (S5E03) -- "High Sparrow" -- 4/26/15
Originally Posted by B.A.
(Post 12465261)
It was nice to be spared from Khaleesi this week, although it was good to see Mormont again.
|
Re: Game of Thrones (S5E03) -- "High Sparrow" -- 4/26/15
Originally Posted by dhmac
(Post 12465274)
And this after Jon was so much nicer to cowards back in Season 1
(I guess the rule is don't be a coward who he also hates) In this case, Snow didn't have much choice in the matter. If he just sat there and took the insults he would lose the respect of the men under his command. |
Re: Game of Thrones (S5E03) -- "High Sparrow" -- 4/26/15
Originally Posted by johnnysd
(Post 12465189)
Personally I think Book 3 is the best fantasy book I have read, but Book 4 and 5 are just really unfocused, have no momentum, are perversely complicated, repetitive, and often boring but have some very cool things happen in them usually after 300 pages of build up.
So yeah, every change so far is for the better... |
Re: Game of Thrones (S5E03) -- "High Sparrow" -- 4/26/15
Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
(Post 12465298)
Slynt wasn't executed for cowardice, he was executed for insubordination.
I guess I could have gone a more obvious way in a joke response to that posting saying Jon beheading "the coward" by replying: "WHAT!!?? Jon beheaded Sam!!!" |
Re: Game of Thrones (S5E03) -- "High Sparrow" -- 4/26/15
Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
(Post 12465298)
Slynt wasn't executed for cowardice, he was executed for insubordination. He publicly refused orders from the Lord Commander of the Nights Watch. Probably not the best time for him to decide to finally grow a pair.
In this case, Snow didn't have much choice in the matter. If he just sat there and took the insults he would lose the respect of the men under his command. As I recall in the books, Jon approached Slynt earlier as Slynt going to that location was part of a larger plan of Jon attempting to refurbish all of the abandoned forts on the wall. Slynt refused him then, and Jon warned him that it wasn't a request. What happened next was similar to the show. |
Re: Game of Thrones (S5E03) -- "High Sparrow" -- 4/26/15
Originally Posted by mwbmis
(Post 12465346)
As I recall in the books, Jon approached Slynt earlier as Slynt going to that location was part of a larger plan of Jon attempting to refurbish all of the abandoned forts on the wall. Slynt refused him then, and Jon warned him that it wasn't a request. What happened next was similar to the show.
I'm enjoying many of the comments from readers of the books in regards to the changes and streamlined story for the show. |
Re: Game of Thrones (S5E03) -- "High Sparrow" -- 4/26/15
Originally Posted by Eric F
(Post 12465176)
Reek is planning something. He has that look in his eye.:wacko:
not that she uses it anyway |
Re: Game of Thrones (S5E03) -- "High Sparrow" -- 4/26/15
Originally Posted by mcnabb
(Post 12464293)
My take on Sansa is that she is alot more street-smart now and she wont be taken advantage in this situation like she was in the past.
This was a strange episode (probably more for the non-book readers). Some very odd scenes. But also a couple of big moments, especially the Sansa story line. We finally have a direction for that one. |
Re: Game of Thrones (S5E03) -- "High Sparrow" -- 4/26/15
I missed what Littlefinger is getting out of the arranged marriage between Sansa and the Bolton. If I'm not supposed to know yet, don't tell me...
|
Re: Game of Thrones (S5E03) -- "High Sparrow" -- 4/26/15
Originally Posted by bralph
(Post 12465478)
I missed what Littlefinger is getting out of the arranged marriage between Sansa and the Bolton. If I'm not supposed to know yet, don't tell me...
|
Re: Game of Thrones (S5E03) -- "High Sparrow" -- 4/26/15
Basically alliance leading to power. What Littlefinger has always wanted.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:57 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.