![]() |
Re: We need more vulgar TV (OTA/Basic cable)
Originally Posted by PopcornTreeCt
(Post 10931911)
I can only imagine how Mad Men would be on HBO. Titties, titties, titties.
|
Re: We need more vulgar TV (OTA/Basic cable)
Originally Posted by wz42
(Post 10935159)
If the show has an obscene quality to it the moral minority side will automatically try to dismiss it and destroy it - that Family Guy page has convenient links to affiliates and advertisers for people to write and complain about the show.
People like this has been slowing castrating TV (and movies for that matter). If we don't do something to counter them slowly but surely over time they will win. I won't argue that our country has some whacked out views about sex, but displaying more obscene material on TV or in movies is as simplistic as a solution as saying teens should only be taught abstinence for birth control. |
Re: We need more vulgar TV (OTA/Basic cable)
Originally Posted by Supermallet
(Post 10935924)
I won't argue that our country has some whacked out views about sex, but displaying more obscene material on TV or in movies is as simplistic as a solution as saying teens should only be taught abstinence for birth control.
|
Re: We need more vulgar TV (OTA/Basic cable)
Originally Posted by buzzdalf
(Post 10935241)
4 - The flip side of your 45/55 split would be that the networks, who are expected to serve an extremely wide audience could stand the chance to turn off over 50% of their viewers. Do you attempt to serve the minority (45) and have the un-intended consequence of losing the majority (55)?
There's clearly a % of peeps who voted in this thread who want more obscene media and who, if they're like me, are ready to pay for it. |
Re: We need more vulgar TV (OTA/Basic cable)
So Law and Order has gone into OTA syndication (starting from season one) and, for the second time I've noticed a BLEEP despite this show airing OTA on a major network in the '80s.
This time they censored the word "ass" from what I can tell. |
Re: We need more vulgar TV (OTA/Basic cable)
I'd prefer all TV to be unfettered by decency restrictions and let the creators do what they think is best for the show.
Though I wouldn't go as far to say "we need more vulgar TV", that makes it sounds like we need more vulgarity for its own sake. |
Re: We need more vulgar TV (OTA/Basic cable)
Originally Posted by SpanishTechno
(Post 11121108)
I'd prefer all TV to be unfettered by decency restrictions and let the creators do what they think is best for the show.
Though I wouldn't go as far to say "we need more vulgar TV", that makes it sounds like we need more vulgarity for its own sake. However, since the moral minority crowd (Focus on the Family, Parental Advisory Council etc nutjobs) is out there, as someone who pays for their content I'm inclined to avoid programming that isn't R rated or above just in case they've been influenced directly or indirectly by the moral minority. |
Re: We need more vulgar TV (OTA/Basic cable)
Originally Posted by wz42
(Post 11121160)
I'm inclined to avoid programming that isn't R rated or above just in case they've been influenced directly or indirectly by the moral minority.
|
Re: We need more vulgar TV (OTA/Basic cable)
Originally Posted by the big train
(Post 11121618)
Next you'll be demanding that all TV episodes be at least two hours long.:D
but :lol: yeah...I guess that'd translate over to TV-MA for TV talk. When the Tipper Gore Parental Advisory Warning label came about in the '90s I'm surprised that somebody didn't start a chain that only sold CDs (and now DVD's) that had a warning label/R/TV-MA rating. |
Re: We need more vulgar TV (OTA/Basic cable)
Originally Posted by boba fett
(Post 10931920)
if vulgar was equivalent to funny, then kevin smith would be the funniest man alive.
I'll take witty and intelligent over vulgar any day. Every time I watched Fawlty Towers, I kept thinking, "If only they could say poo-poo, this would really be a funny show." |
Re: We need more vulgar TV (OTA/Basic cable)
On second thought, I totally agree with the OP.
What the world needs now are a whole bunch of Jackass Channels. Think of how our society could be improved if we just had a few more vomit omelets. |
Re: We need more vulgar TV (OTA/Basic cable)
Originally Posted by creekdipper
(Post 11122592)
On second thought, I totally agree with the OP.
What the world needs now are a whole bunch of Jackass Channels. Think of how our society could be improved if we just had a few more vomit omelets. |
Re: We need more vulgar TV (OTA/Basic cable)
Originally Posted by wz42
(Post 11122008)
Well there is shorter fare like Duck Soup :p
but :lol: yeah...I guess that'd translate over to TV-MA for TV talk. When the Tipper Gore Parental Advisory Warning label came about in the '90s I'm surprised that somebody didn't start a chain that only sold CDs (and now DVD's) that had a warning label/R/TV-MA rating. |
Re: We need more vulgar TV (OTA/Basic cable)
Originally Posted by majorjoe23
(Post 11122650)
I'm not. Stores usually like to make money, and limiting your potential products like that would be suicide.
Kinda like porn stores wouldn't sell bibles and a Christian bookstore wouldn't sell Penthouse. |
Drinking in films encouraging kids to drink:says BMJ
The British Medical Journal did the study. On the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation's morning news just now the reporter said that this could be the start of limiting drinking in movies like they did with smoking.
I know it's for movies but I can't see why this couldn't affect TV as well... One of the comments in the article echos this: The BBC made Sherlock Holmes into a non smoker what next Rebus as a orange juice drinker more left wing nonsense. I just wish he wouldn't have brought politics into this since there are plenty of prudes on both sides of the political spectrum. And the gentrification continues... |
Re: We need more vulgar TV (OTA/Basic cable)
Originally Posted by wz42
(Post 11123479)
I hear what you're saying but I wasn't thinking 'limiting' as in a pre-existing store sending back all their G and PG type fare but an entirely new chain devoted to programming for adults to carve out a market segment.
Kinda like porn stores wouldn't sell bibles and a Christian bookstore wouldn't sell Penthouse. It just seems like such a store would have a hard time making it clear what they did and didn't have. Rather than go and chance that your store might have The original Star Wars trilogy and not just Revenge of the Sith, I would probably just go somewhere I knew I could get the movies I wanted. |
Re: We need more vulgar TV (OTA/Basic cable)
It's all about context.
I voted no. While I don't think we need more vulgar content, we do need to place it in context. Sometimes a situation paired with an intended audience can benefit from more explicit content, but to put it in just for the sake of vulgarity is childish. |
Re: We need more vulgar TV (OTA/Basic cable)
If vulgar you mean of the quality of Curb Your Enthusiasm, then I say yes. If vulgar you mean of the quality of Jersey Shore, then I say no. ;)
|
Re: We need more vulgar TV (OTA/Basic cable)
Originally Posted by mcnabb
(Post 11123753)
If vulgar you mean of the quality of Curb Your Enthusiasm, then I say yes. If vulgar you mean of the quality of Jersey Shore, then I say no. ;)
http://forum.dvdtalk.com/10931714-post2.html However I'd contend even trash like Jersey Shore does help to cast the net wider for what's allowed on TV so even if most of it is trash the quality stuff like Curb will benefit from the spin-off of the expansion of what's allowed. |
Re: We need more vulgar TV (OTA/Basic cable)
Originally Posted by majorjoe23
(Post 11123496)
But it still seems sort of arbitrary. What if a David Lynch fan comes in looking to get all his movies, you would have to send him somewhere else for The Straight Story and The Elephant Man. And there are plenty of bands that have some discs with warnings, but not others. But it's like like the unlabeled discs are suddenly kids discs.
It just seems like such a store would have a hard time making it clear what they did and didn't have. Rather than go and chance that your store might have The original Star Wars trilogy and not just Revenge of the Sith, I would probably just go somewhere I knew I could get the movies I wanted. |
Re: We need more vulgar TV (OTA/Basic cable)
Was there a thread about how cable has now strayed from its porn or softcore roots and the USA network had a lot of softcore porn type programming and Rhonda Sheer a while back or is this that thread?
I guess when cable started producing quality shows in the mid 2000's that era disappeared. I think you can only watch softcore porn on HBO Zone late at night and maybe HDNET. |
Re: We need more vulgar TV (OTA/Basic cable)
Originally Posted by JeffTheAlpaca
(Post 11251592)
Was there a thread about how cable has now strayed from its porn or softcore roots and the USA network had a lot of softcore porn type programming and Rhonda Sheer a while back or is this that thread?
I guess when cable started producing quality shows in the mid 2000's that era disappeared. I think you can only watch softcore porn on HBO Zone late at night and maybe HDNET. I guess some examples of what's out there would be that Dave Attell making fun of old porn movies on Showtime or this scene from Curb Your Enthusiasm I linked as an example in the second post: <iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/sGjElvt4nP8?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> I've gone OTA because of how bland cable became and grab the little good stuff like Curb, Californication and Louie etc on disc. It just seemed like cable was mostly filled with repeats of shows I could DVR on OTA anyways (Law and Order so it's not like OTA is better but at least I'm not paying for it) or cooking shows or shows on TLC about midgets or whatever. Even Dream On from HBO years ago was more risque that a lot of stuff on cable today. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:47 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.