![]() |
Re: Mad Men -- "Hands and Knees" -- 09/26/10
This episode with Don was not just tense, but intense. I was really surprised he confessed his past to Faye. I agree with Dragon, it's an entirely different matter between having a Pete Campbell try to blackmail you, and being investigated by G-men. I was really surprised that Pete sucked it up and took the fall for losing Pioneer Aviation. Now it will remain to be seen how Pete holds that over Don's head. Really good stuff! Oh, was also surprised to see that Trudy hadn't popped yet. I would assume based on the watermelon under her dress that next week's episode will include their child being born.
|
Re: Mad Men -- "Hands and Knees" -- 09/26/10
Hamm does a great job of acting nervous and showing that his world is about to end. You can just see the tension in his face.
Loved the shot Lane took. I get the feeling that telling Faye his secret will bite him on the ass later on - especially if he starts to bang his secretary. A pregnant Trudy is still a hot Trudy. The show needs Peggy. I wonder what Don would've done if he knew SCDP was losing Lucky Strike. Would he give himself up knowing that the NAA contract is that much more important to the firm staying alive at that point? So many damaging secrets from all these characters. |
Re: Mad Men -- "Hands and Knees" -- 09/26/10
Originally Posted by macnorton
(Post 10395598)
As I said last week, give Hamm the Emmy now...he does deserve it.
|
Re: Mad Men -- "Hands and Knees" -- 09/26/10
Pete knows how important Don is to the agency, and thats why he sucked it up.. His face told the whole story when Don told him he could run the whole company. And Pete, talks a good game about being virtuous, but he has his own skeletons in his closet as well.
|
Re: Mad Men -- "Hands and Knees" -- 09/26/10
Originally Posted by Fist of Doom
(Post 10397088)
With Bryan Cranston out of the running
|
Re: Mad Men -- "Hands and Knees" -- 09/26/10
Originally Posted by skiman
(Post 10397344)
Why is he out of the running?
|
Re: Mad Men -- "Hands and Knees" -- 09/26/10
thanks. these summer shows get me all confused.
|
Re: Mad Men -- "Hands and Knees" -- 09/26/10
Can someone please help me out on this question? I haven't really concerned myself with it much before because it hasn't been, in my mind, the most interesting part of Mad Men.
Why is it THAT big a deal that he switched dog tags with Draper? Don didn't desert, he was discharged for a purple heart injury. That's not desertion. Either Draper or Whitman would have been honorably discharged for the injury, despite rank, right? The only thing that "Don" could be accused of is receiving a higher pay rate for his benefits and false identity...which would be be almost a non-charge considering the affected family knew the truth for a long time. Am I missing something? |
Re: Mad Men -- "Hands and Knees" -- 09/26/10
If I recall correctly, Draper had only a couple months left to serve, while Dick Whitman had years to go still. Once Dick recovered, he would most certainly have had to serve out the rest of his enlistment. By switching names he got an earlier release date from the army than he would have had. That's desertion, and the stealing of someone's identity.
A likely long sentence at a military prison even with an outstanding lawyer. |
Re: Mad Men -- "Hands and Knees" -- 09/26/10
Originally Posted by Three Day Delay
(Post 10397614)
Am I missing something?
Don Draper [in 1960] is also an ideal. The handsome breadwinner for an upper-middle-class nuclear family. His life is a billboard for the American Dream of the just ended 1950s. And because Don Draper is not who he claims to be, he is (again) a metaphor for the falsity of that lifestyle and its promise of happiness and contentment. That the Don Draper, who bestrode the 1960 offices of Sterling Cooper like a royal surveying his kingdom, would be deconstructed by the changing times of the ensuing decade is a reflection of how every assumption about the American Dream would be tested in those same years. Don fears that the revelation of "the lie" will bring his world crumbling down around him, when the truth is the lie of his world is going to crumble anyways. So I guess the answer to your quoted question is that if you really analyze it, Dick Whitman assuming Don Draper's identity might not be a big deal. However, the premise that it is a big deal provides dramatic drive to [what is actually] a TV show. |
Re: Mad Men -- "Hands and Knees" -- 09/26/10
Originally Posted by meritocracy
(Post 10397627)
If I recall correctly, Draper had only a couple months left to serve, while Dick Whitman had years to go still. Once Dick recovered, he would most certainly have had to serve out the rest of his enlistment. By switching names he got an earlier release date from the army than he would have had. That's desertion, and the stealing of someone's identity.
A likely long sentence at a military prison even with an outstanding lawyer. |
Re: Mad Men -- "Hands and Knees" -- 09/26/10
Originally Posted by Count Dooku
(Post 10397651)
Don Draper is a false identity, a self-constructed illusion built upon the foundation of a lie. In this, Don Draper is a one man metaphor for the entire advertising industry, suggesting the premise that is why he is so successful in that world.
Don Draper [in 1960] is also an ideal. The handsome breadwinner for an upper-middle-class nuclear family. His life is a billboard for the American Dream of the just ended 1950s. And because Don Draper is not who he claims to be, he is (again) a metaphor for the falsity of that lifestyle and its promise of happiness and contentment. That the Don Draper, who bestrode the 1960 offices of Sterling Cooper like a royal surveying his kingdom, would be deconstructed by the changing times of the ensuing decade is a reflection of how every assumption about the American Dream would be tested in those same years. Don fears that the revelation of "the lie" will bring his world crumbling down around him, when the truth is the lie of his world is going to crumble anyways. So I guess the answer to your quoted question is that if you really analyze it, Dick Whitman assuming Don Draper's identity might not be a big deal. However, the premise that it is a big deal provides dramatic drive to [what is actually] a TV show. |
Re: Mad Men -- "Hands and Knees" -- 09/26/10
Originally Posted by Count Dooku
(Post 10397651)
Don Draper is a false identity, a self-constructed illusion built upon the foundation of a lie. In this, Don Draper is a one man metaphor for the entire advertising industry, suggesting the premise that is why he is so successful in that world.
Don Draper [in 1960] is also an ideal. The handsome breadwinner for an upper-middle-class nuclear family. His life is a billboard for the American Dream of the just ended 1950s. And because Don Draper is not who he claims to be, he is (again) a metaphor for the falsity of that lifestyle and its promise of happiness and contentment. That the Don Draper, who bestrode the 1960 offices of Sterling Cooper like a royal surveying his kingdom, would be deconstructed by the changing times of the ensuing decade is a reflection of how every assumption about the American Dream would be tested in those same years. Don fears that the revelation of "the lie" will bring his world crumbling down around him, when the truth is the lie of his world is going to crumble anyways. So I guess the answer to your quoted question is that if you really analyze it, Dick Whitman assuming Don Draper's identity might not be a big deal. However, the premise that it is a big deal provides dramatic drive to [what is actually] a TV show. |
Re: Mad Men -- "Hands and Knees" -- 09/26/10
Originally Posted by meritocracy
(Post 10397627)
If I recall correctly, Draper had only a couple months left to serve, while Dick Whitman had years to go still. Once Dick recovered, he would most certainly have had to serve out the rest of his enlistment. By switching names he got an earlier release date from the army than he would have had. That's desertion, and the stealing of someone's identity.
A likely long sentence at a military prison even with an outstanding lawyer. |
Re: Mad Men -- "Hands and Knees" -- 09/26/10
Originally Posted by Three Day Delay
(Post 10397666)
Am I wrong, or aren't soldiers receiving the Purple Heart given an option to go home?
|
Re: Mad Men -- "Hands and Knees" -- 09/26/10
Originally Posted by Count Dooku
(Post 10397651)
Don Draper is a false identity, a self-constructed illusion built upon the foundation of a lie. In this, Don Draper is a one man metaphor for the entire advertising industry, suggesting the premise that is why he is so successful in that world.
Don Draper [in 1960] is also an ideal. The handsome breadwinner for an upper-middle-class nuclear family. His life is a billboard for the American Dream of the just ended 1950s. And because Don Draper is not who he claims to be, he is (again) a metaphor for the falsity of that lifestyle and its promise of happiness and contentment. That the Don Draper, who bestrode the 1960 offices of Sterling Cooper like a royal surveying his kingdom, would be deconstructed by the changing times of the ensuing decade is a reflection of how every assumption about the American Dream would be tested in those same years. Don fears that the revelation of "the lie" will bring his world crumbling down around him, when the truth is the lie of his world is going to crumble anyways. So I guess the answer to your quoted question is that if you really analyze it, Dick Whitman assuming Don Draper's identity might not be a big deal. However, the premise that it is a big deal provides dramatic drive to [what is actually] a TV show. |
Re: Mad Men -- "Hands and Knees" -- 09/26/10
Originally Posted by majorjoe23
(Post 10397736)
Don't bring your over-thinkin' college ways in here! Everyone, more complains about Betty being a bitch!
|
Re: Mad Men -- "Hands and Knees" -- 09/26/10
I always wondered why Don Draper was not in World War II, instead of Korea. They previously mentioned he was born in 1925, which makes him the same age as my father. My father was drafted for WWII right out of high school graduation in 1943 and went and served in Guam until the war ended.
|
Re: Mad Men -- "Hands and Knees" -- 09/26/10
You mean Don Draper or Dick Wittman? Do we know how old Dick Wittman really is?
|
Re: Mad Men -- "Hands and Knees" -- 09/26/10
Originally Posted by Count Dooku
(Post 10397651)
Don Draper is a false identity, a self-constructed illusion built upon the foundation of a lie. In this, Don Draper is a one man metaphor for the entire advertising industry, suggesting the premise that is why he is so successful in that world.
Don Draper [in 1960] is also an ideal. The handsome breadwinner for an upper-middle-class nuclear family. His life is a billboard for the American Dream of the just ended 1950s. And because Don Draper is not who he claims to be, he is (again) a metaphor for the falsity of that lifestyle and its promise of happiness and contentment. That the Don Draper, who bestrode the 1960 offices of Sterling Cooper like a royal surveying his kingdom, would be deconstructed by the changing times of the ensuing decade is a reflection of how every assumption about the American Dream would be tested in those same years. Don fears that the revelation of "the lie" will bring his world crumbling down around him, when the truth is the lie of his world is going to crumble anyways. So I guess the answer to your quoted question is that if you really analyze it, Dick Whitman assuming Don Draper's identity might not be a big deal. However, the premise that it is a big deal provides dramatic drive to [what is actually] a TV show. |
Re: Mad Men -- "Hands and Knees" -- 09/26/10
Originally Posted by Dragon Tattoo
(Post 10397789)
She was actually pretty good in this episode. I was surprised.
|
Re: Mad Men -- "Hands and Knees" -- 09/26/10
Originally Posted by Red Dog
(Post 10398009)
You mean Don Draper or Dick Wittman? Do we know how old Dick Wittman really is?
|
Re: Mad Men -- "Hands and Knees" -- 09/26/10
Originally Posted by Jadzia
(Post 10398122)
I am pretty sure he was born in 1925 (as Dick Whitman). Because I instantly was like "Wow, he's my dad's age." It's been interesting watching the show through that angle.
But I assume not every last male of that age necessarily went to war (obviously there was a draft and it was likely a very high pct drafted of that age). Maybe he was called up for WWII service but never saw overseas combat action....and perhaps that's why he did get selected to go to Korea. |
Re: Mad Men -- "Hands and Knees" -- 09/26/10
Originally Posted by Jadzia
(Post 10398122)
I am pretty sure he was born in 1925 (as Dick Whitman). Because I instantly was like "Wow, he's my dad's age." It's been interesting watching the show through that angle.
|
Re: Mad Men -- "Hands and Knees" -- 09/26/10
Originally Posted by FantasticVSDoom
(Post 10398053)
I agree... I commented on how she seemed human to my wife during the episode.
Originally Posted by Jadzia
(Post 10398122)
I am pretty sure he was born in 1925 (as Dick Whitman). Because I instantly was like "Wow, he's my dad's age." It's been interesting watching the show through that angle.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:27 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.