DVD Talk Forum

DVD Talk Forum (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/)
-   TV Talk (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/tv-talk-14/)
-   -   At the Movies is Back! (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/tv-talk/579079-movies-back.html)

Double_Oh_7 09-10-10 03:44 PM

At the Movies is Back!
 
Roger Ebert is relaunching the show on PBS...

http://www.movieline.com/2010/09/rog...the-movies.php

dx23 09-10-10 04:49 PM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 
http://forum.dvdtalk.com/movie-talk/...ry-2011-a.html

dolphinboy 09-10-10 04:49 PM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 
I must admit that I miss it. It's been a fixture since my dad and I watched it at an age I can't even recall and Siskel and Ebert were not nationally known, but that weird guy with the fuzzy hair and freaky 'stache was the big time reviewer on The Today Show (is he dead?).

Still, I resisted liking Roeper for a long, but eventually got to like him and he's basically gone now. Then they messed with the format with the two Ben clowns and, even though I didn't like anything about it, I still watched most of the time.

But these last two guys might not have had a lot of charisma, but I really thought they did a really good job and had some of the same chemistry as Siskel and Ebert did, without some of the insults those two used to toss out at each other, which we'll never seen again anyway.

I don't know the two new people, but I just wish the other two (Phillips and Scott) were coming back as well.

Quatermass 09-10-10 09:20 PM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 
I like Phillips and Scott, too. I think they were just getting comfortable when the show got axed. I think Christy Lemire used to write for DVDTalk.

Edit: I might be thinking of somebody else.

Double_Oh_7 09-10-10 09:35 PM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 

Originally Posted by dx23 (Post 10363926)

Yeah, but it's a TV SHOW... belongs in TV TALK doncha think?

dx23 09-10-10 11:07 PM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 

Originally Posted by Double_Oh_7 (Post 10364223)
Yeah, but it's a TV SHOW... belongs in TV TALK doncha think?

Yes, you are right. I think the other thread should be moved here and merged with this one.

RoboDad 09-11-10 01:15 AM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 
I watched the "preview" video on the Sun-Times site, and there seems to be some good chemistry between Lemire and Mitchell, and they do seem more passionate about their opinions than Phillips and Scott (well, at least more than Scott). And while I realize this was not the finished product, I LOVED seeing the balcony back!

But, the downside for me is that I don't need to hear Lemire and Morgan preaching about how "derogatory" it is to refer to a film as a chick flick. To that I say, "grow a thicker skin". There are stereotypes about both sexes and their taste in movies. And, I'll be honest. When Mitchell extolled the virtues of scatological humor, I was more than a bit surprised, and not in a good way.

Still, I think the good FAR outweighs the bad for me, so I'll be there every week, as long as my local PBS affiliate decides to carry the show.

JuryDuty 09-11-10 09:32 AM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 
LOL Unbelievable. Good to hear though. I hope my PBS station carries it.

calhoun07 09-11-10 11:16 AM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 
This should be mandatory at PBS stations, with some of the costs to carry it to all the PBS stations picked up by the parent station. If they don't carry it here in Kansas City I am going to harass them constantly until they put it on the air. This is going to be a ratings winner, I am sure. And hopefully in HD!

tommyp007 09-11-10 11:22 AM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 

Originally Posted by dolphinboy (Post 10363929)
I must admit that I miss it. It's been a fixture since my dad and I watched it at an age I can't even recall and Siskel and Ebert were not nationally known, but that weird guy with the fuzzy hair and freaky 'stache was the big time reviewer on The Today Show (is he dead?).

Still, I resisted liking Roeper for a long, but eventually got to like him and he's basically gone now. Then they messed with the format with the two Ben clowns and, even though I didn't like anything about it, I still watched most of the time.

But these last two guys might not have had a lot of charisma, but I really thought they did a really good job and had some of the same chemistry as Siskel and Ebert did, without some of the insults those two used to toss out at each other, which we'll never seen again anyway.

I don't know the two new people, but I just wish the other two (Phillips and Scott) were coming back as well.


http://www.toptenz.net/wp-content/up...ene-shalit.jpg

Gene Shalit....still alive!

mwbmis 09-11-10 12:05 PM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 
I really grew to like Phillips and Scott (after the Ben & Ben debacle...video pick of the week, go online and read about the new Twilight movie coming out in a few months), but I'll give this one a chance. It's nice that it's back though. Everyone knows about the big movies, and I like to see reviews of those as well, but that's information available in other sources. This show in all it's permutations helps me find smaller movies that I might not have ever heard of otherwise.

JuryDuty 12-15-10 03:17 PM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 
New news...

Critical decision near for Eberts’ movie show

Former New York Times movie critic Elvis Mitchell has been dropped as a critic on the new “Roger Ebert Presents At the Movies,” set to debut Jan. 21. The program will be shown on more than 190 public television stations and on the Armed Forces Network, according to Ebert.

Armed Forces Network reaches an audience of nearly 1 million members of the military and their families in scores of countries.

When producers Roger Ebert and wife Chaz Ebert announced the new program in September, Mitchell was paired with Associated Press movie critic Christy Lemire, who is still with the movie review show. But since that announcement, there had been growing concern about whether Mitchell was the right person for the job. One source who had seen the pilot shot earlier this year with Lemire and Mitchell said it showed little on-air chemistry between the two.

The Eberts are now under pressure to find the right person by Jan. 1 for the show to debut on schedule. One dark horse candidate believed to be under consideration is a young male in his mid-20s with little or no experience as a movie critic or as a TV talent. Another possible option, sources said, would involve a pairing of Lemire with another critic described as a female version of tart-tongued former “American Idol” judge Simon Cowell.

Ultimately, the Eberts will have the final say on the second of the two sparring critics on their new movie review show review. “This will be an enormous decision with enormous consequences,” said one source.
I don't like the idea at all of hiring a mid-20-something with no experience at all. But I also don't like the idea of two females. I'd prefer a male and a female, assuming each could hold their own.

Christy Lemire: http://www.rottentomatoes.com/critic/christy-lemire/

Elvis Mitchell: http://www.rottentomatoes.com/critic/elvis-mitchell/

EDIT: I just realized Elvis Mitchell is the critic in a newspaper I regularly used to read. I always thought he was HORRIBLE. His critiques were almost always negative and when he liked a movie, it was never anything anyone would actually see. Glad to see his rear was canned.

aynrandgirl 12-16-10 08:19 AM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 
Can Roger even talk? After they removed a part of his jaw to remove the cancer I thought he couldn't.

zekeburger1979 12-16-10 08:34 AM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 

Originally Posted by aynrandgirl (Post 10546752)
Can Roger even talk? After they removed a part of his jaw to remove the cancer I thought he couldn't.

No he can't. He has a program on his computer that does the talking for him. A company in England made it for him using audio files from old episodes of Siskel and Ebert/At the Movies.

Tracer Bullet 12-16-10 08:37 AM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 

Originally Posted by zekeburger1979 (Post 10546773)
No he can't. He has a program on his computer that does the talking for him. A company in England made it for him using audio files from old episodes of Siskel and Ebert/At the Movies.

Actually, they only used the handful of DVD commentaries he recorded. They wanted to use the TV footage, but they couldn't- there was always music or cross-talking.

Double_Oh_7 12-16-10 09:27 AM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 

Originally Posted by Tracer Bullet (Post 10546777)
Actually, they only used the handful of DVD commentaries he recorded. They wanted to use the TV footage, but they couldn't- there was always music or cross-talking.

Actually they used both. There was still some usable audio from episodes of At the Movies, etc.

Damfino 12-16-10 11:58 AM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 

Originally Posted by JuryDuty (Post 10545843)
I don't like the idea at all of hiring a mid-20-something with no experience at all.

This would be a disaster. I understand the desire to find someone telegenic, but the show would have no credibilty without established critics. It took along time for Richard Roeper to earn his credibility. I don't understand why Michael Phillips and AO Scott arent being considered (or maybe they already opted out?).

I do fear a potential worst case scenario: Kathy Lee Gifford's son Cody is in this age group and he wants to be a film critic.

Numanoid 12-17-10 08:33 PM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 

One dark horse candidate believed to be under consideration is a young male in his mid-20s with little or no experience as a movie critic or as a TV talent.
Isn't that what blogs are for?

Gizmo 12-17-10 08:35 PM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 

Originally Posted by zekeburger1979 (Post 10546773)
No he can't. He has a program on his computer that does the talking for him. A company in England made it for him using audio files from old episodes of Siskel and Ebert/At the Movies.

I had no idea. That sounds pretty amazing.

Norm de Plume 12-17-10 08:44 PM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 

Originally Posted by Damfino (Post 10547135)
This would be a disaster. I understand the desire to find someone telegenic, but the show would have no credibilty without established critics. It took along time for Richard Roeper to earn his credibility. I don't understand why Michael Phillips and AO Scott arent being considered (or maybe they already opted out?).

I agree with all of this. Dump Lemire, too. What little I saw of her was not impressive. Please do not bring on some glib whippersnapper. That was clearly a disastrous decision with that Lyons schmuck.

calhoun07 12-17-10 10:10 PM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 
I vote for Ben and Ben to be brought back! Ratings GOLD, Jerry!

But seriously what...did Ebert burn his bridges with AO Scott, Michael Phillips and Richard Roeper where neither of them could be the lead critic? Or vice versa? Were any of them ever in consideration?

wm lopez 12-18-10 02:44 AM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 

Originally Posted by Damfino (Post 10547135)
This would be a disaster. I understand the desire to find someone telegenic, but the show would have no credibilty without established critics. It took along time for Richard Roeper to earn his credibility. I don't understand why Michael Phillips and AO Scott arent being considered (or maybe they already opted out?).

I do fear a potential worst case scenario: Kathy Lee Gifford's son Cody is in this age group and he wants to be a film critic.

Credibility with the average movie goer is more important than some liberal in sweater & sport coat telling me to go see a Woody Allen movie instead of the new SAW movie.

Bob_Bobbson 12-18-10 04:04 AM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 
Hmm... I really hope they don't go the route of getting an unestablished 20 something critic. Although I have enough faith in Ebert that if he did that, he would pick someone who was actually worthy of the spot and not another Ben Lyons.


Originally Posted by GizmoDVD (Post 10549569)
I had no idea. That sounds pretty amazing.

Yeah, it is.

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hMyxgSLESz8?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hMyxgSLESz8?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

OldBoy 12-18-10 11:47 AM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 
give it back to Richard Roeper and call it a day.

zombeaner 12-18-10 12:05 PM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 
Ebert has been all over twitter this morning denying the "20-something with little experience" rumor.

Jack Straw 12-18-10 12:47 PM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 

Originally Posted by Numanoid (Post 10549567)
Isn't that what blogs are for?

:lol:

Jack Straw 12-18-10 12:53 PM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 

Originally Posted by Bob_Bobbson (Post 10549895)
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hMyxgSLESz8?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hMyxgSLESz8?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

That is awesome!

mike7162 12-19-10 05:42 PM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 

Originally Posted by Jack Straw (Post 10550275)
That is awesome!


Yes, awesome; incredible technology and somehow very depressing...

bluetoast 12-19-10 09:46 PM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 
Even though I agree that a mid-20's guy with no experience is a bad idea...Ebert himself started writing for the Sun-Times at 25.

Fist of Doom 12-19-10 10:06 PM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 

One dark horse candidate believed to be under consideration is a young male in his mid-20s with little or no experience as a movie critic or as a TV talent.
Congratulations, Solid Snake PAC!

bluetoast 01-04-11 11:10 AM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 
The new host isn't 25...he's 24!

http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2011...he_movies.html

Chew 01-04-11 11:20 AM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 
Hmmm, "Vishnevetsky and Lemire" doesn't exactly roll off the tongue like 'Siskel and Ebert' did.

Quatermass 01-04-11 11:52 AM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 
How about "At the Movies with Iggy and Chris"

Damfino 01-04-11 02:56 PM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 
I'm willing to give Iggy a chance. He already seems to have more credibility than Ben Lyons.

JuryDuty 01-04-11 03:49 PM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 

Originally Posted by Damfino (Post 10573366)
I'm willing to give Iggy a chance. He already seems to have more credibility than Ben Lyons.

LOL an empty seat might have had more credibility than Ben Lyons. :lol: But I agree. I'll give him a chance, especially since Ebert likes him. I'll just be glad to have a (hopefully) serious movie review show back on the air.

Bob_Bobbson 01-04-11 04:30 PM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 

Originally Posted by Bob_Bobbson (Post 10549895)
Although I have enough faith in Ebert that if he did that, he would pick someone who was actually worthy of the spot and not another Ben Lyons.

Looks like I was right about that part. I've read some of the guy's stuff, pretty good.

Here's his blog.

OldBoy 01-04-11 06:12 PM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 
is this airing anytime soon and accessible by most?

Fist of Doom 01-04-11 06:26 PM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 
^It debuts Jan. 21 on PBS. They say it's airing on "48 of the top 50" markets, but I haven't seen any specifics. You'll need to check your local station.

zekeburger1979 01-04-11 09:13 PM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 
Roger's article on his new show with a link to a PDF of the stations carrying it.

bluetoast 01-04-11 11:03 PM

Re: At the Movies is Back!
 
Here's more about where he works/volunteers:

http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/eber...s-day-job.html


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:31 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.