Battlestar Galactica -- "The Oath" -- 1/30/2009
#28
Re: Battlestar Galactica -- "The Oath" -- 1/30/2009
I see what you're saying, but didn't they finally agree that it would be all humans that did the upgrades and the Cylons would only be able to watch and advise?
#29
#30
Re: Battlestar Galactica -- "The Oath" -- 1/30/2009
I guess the thing that bugs me the most is that I never understood how Adama and crew could trust these Cylons so wholeheartedly. Or his complete disdain of the Quorum.
#31
Moderator
Re: Battlestar Galactica -- "The Oath" -- 1/30/2009
I guess the thing that bugs me the most is that I never understood how Adama and crew could trust these Cylons so wholeheartedly. Or his complete disdain of the Quorum.
That explains everything
#32
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: San Diego, Calif
Re: Battlestar Galactica -- "The Oath" -- 1/30/2009
Happens all the time, especially when there's a strategic military advantage to be gained.
Just using the latest as an example, Iraq, many commanders have struck alliances with tribal/insurgent leaders who used to attack them in order to have a partner against the terrorists and forge peace accords.
Just using the latest as an example, Iraq, many commanders have struck alliances with tribal/insurgent leaders who used to attack them in order to have a partner against the terrorists and forge peace accords.
In the end, this is just a plot device--the writers need to keep things moving, and most viewers aren't going to question the move enough to stop watching.
#33
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Battlestar Galactica -- "The Oath" -- 1/30/2009
This isn't just an alliance--they're permitting these cylons to become members of the fleet with full citizenship in return for technology that the humans don't even understand. It's more like allowing a tribal/insurgent leader to become a citizen and live in the same nation that they once attempted to destroy.
In the end, this is just a plot device--the writers need to keep things moving, and most viewers aren't going to question the move enough to stop watching.
In the end, this is just a plot device--the writers need to keep things moving, and most viewers aren't going to question the move enough to stop watching.

I have no issues with how things are going. Earth was a bust. Cylons have been faithfully serving in human roles for years, and at every step they find more and more evidence that the races are linked in every way. The people rebelling are looking at it as too black and white, us vs. them. It is not that clear cut, and I think the writers have done an AMAZING job of tying these threads together and leading it to a climax.
You want to see writers who make it up as they go along, check out LOST. I enjoy the show, but they had no idea what they were doing with that story for the first four years of the show. When it wraps up, there will be TONS of unanswered questions, because the writers have forgotten they even posed them.
#34
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: San Diego, Calif
Re: Battlestar Galactica -- "The Oath" -- 1/30/2009
And it doesn't, mainly because they did murder all of humanity. This is genocide, not a cold war.
#35
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Battlestar Galactica -- "The Oath" -- 1/30/2009
I think it really comes down to personal trust and experiences.
Adama trusts Tigh. Always has, always will. The fact that he turned out to be a Cylon hit Adama hard and they've worked through that now. Everyone, including Tigh, Tyrol, Tori, and Anders (as well as Six, D'Anna, Sharon, Leoben) believed in Earth. Believed there was a 13th tribe of Kobol Humans out there. A new world.
Some of the Cylons (Cavil, Aaron, Simon?, Ellen?) wanted to get there to destroy them.
Now they've found Earth and got hit with the same 13th-tribe-were-Cylon game-changer as the rest of us, the entire paradigm has shifted.
But even all of this is AFTER the Cylon civil war. The Cylons that are allied with the humans now are not the same Cylons that nuked the Colonies, at least they don't have the same goals as then.
The Humans can't change what happened. Nuking the "friendly" toasters would be understandable and justifiable, but it is short-sighted. They need each other at this point. They each have information the other needs. Working together is the quickest and surest way to get to where they're each going.
If that alliance is based on the trust Adama has for Tigh and Tyrol, Roslyn has for Tori, and Starbuck has for Anders then the Gaetas and Zareks either have to accept it or incite a revolution/mutiny.
Adama trusts Tigh. Always has, always will. The fact that he turned out to be a Cylon hit Adama hard and they've worked through that now. Everyone, including Tigh, Tyrol, Tori, and Anders (as well as Six, D'Anna, Sharon, Leoben) believed in Earth. Believed there was a 13th tribe of Kobol Humans out there. A new world.
Some of the Cylons (Cavil, Aaron, Simon?, Ellen?) wanted to get there to destroy them.
Now they've found Earth and got hit with the same 13th-tribe-were-Cylon game-changer as the rest of us, the entire paradigm has shifted.
But even all of this is AFTER the Cylon civil war. The Cylons that are allied with the humans now are not the same Cylons that nuked the Colonies, at least they don't have the same goals as then.
The Humans can't change what happened. Nuking the "friendly" toasters would be understandable and justifiable, but it is short-sighted. They need each other at this point. They each have information the other needs. Working together is the quickest and surest way to get to where they're each going.
If that alliance is based on the trust Adama has for Tigh and Tyrol, Roslyn has for Tori, and Starbuck has for Anders then the Gaetas and Zareks either have to accept it or incite a revolution/mutiny.
#36
Re: Battlestar Galactica -- "The Oath" -- 1/30/2009
Personally, I understand the need for an alliance. The problem is the way it has been handled. Rosalin should have made her little motivationsal speech much earlier when it could have made a real impact.
Instead, she has thrown in the towel and refused to step down to allow new leadership to take affect. While she and Adama may not have always agreed with Zarek, he seems to always have had the fleet's best interest at heart. Perhaps if they had reached out to him and the quorum in the past, they would be able to work together.
Instead, she has thrown in the towel and refused to step down to allow new leadership to take affect. While she and Adama may not have always agreed with Zarek, he seems to always have had the fleet's best interest at heart. Perhaps if they had reached out to him and the quorum in the past, they would be able to work together.
#37
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Battlestar Galactica -- "The Oath" -- 1/30/2009
She did say she was going to resign, though. Sure she may have decided she was just going to "ride the current out to sea" which the apparent failure of the prophecy and going off her meds/treatments.
But when faced with the reality of what was coming down the pike, she's stepped it up and put her big-boy pants back on.
That's not going to be a woman you want to frak with, I suspect.
But when faced with the reality of what was coming down the pike, she's stepped it up and put her big-boy pants back on.
That's not going to be a woman you want to frak with, I suspect.
#38
DVD Talk Special Edition
Re: Battlestar Galactica -- "The Oath" -- 1/30/2009
When I as a viewer hear that Cylons are interested in installing their FTLs on Fleet ships, I instantly make the connection to the old "Networked Ships" plot device that allowed the Cylons to disrupt the fleet in the first place. Galactica was being decommissioned and therefore was not networked at the time.
I wish that would at least be mentioned by the characters when doubting the intentions of the Cylons wanting to install their technology now.
As it is currently, their only defense to not doing it is, "Nuh-uh!!!"
I wish that would at least be mentioned by the characters when doubting the intentions of the Cylons wanting to install their technology now.
As it is currently, their only defense to not doing it is, "Nuh-uh!!!"
#39
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Battlestar Galactica -- "The Oath" -- 1/30/2009
When I as a viewer hear that Cylons are interested in installing their FTLs on Fleet ships, I instantly make the connection to the old "Networked Ships" plot device that allowed the Cylons to disrupt the fleet in the first place. Galactica was being decommissioned and therefore was not networked at the time.
I wish that would at least be mentioned by the characters when doubting the intentions of the Cylons wanting to install their technology now.
As it is currently, their only defense to not doing it is, "Nuh-uh!!!"
I wish that would at least be mentioned by the characters when doubting the intentions of the Cylons wanting to install their technology now.
As it is currently, their only defense to not doing it is, "Nuh-uh!!!"
#41
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Re: Battlestar Galactica -- "The Oath" -- 1/30/2009
She did say she was going to resign, though. Sure she may have decided she was just going to "ride the current out to sea" which the apparent failure of the prophecy and going off her meds/treatments.
But when faced with the reality of what was coming down the pike, she's stepped it up and put her big-boy pants back on.
That's not going to be a woman you want to frak with, I suspect.
But when faced with the reality of what was coming down the pike, she's stepped it up and put her big-boy pants back on.
That's not going to be a woman you want to frak with, I suspect.
#42
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Battlestar Galactica -- "The Oath" -- 1/30/2009
Yeah, but it might not have been the right venue to voice those concerns
Maybe earlier instead of his little "and you alone get to make that decision?" hissy-fit.
Maybe earlier instead of his little "and you alone get to make that decision?" hissy-fit.
#43
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Battlestar Galactica -- "The Oath" -- 1/30/2009
Very good episode. It's good to see Gaeta playing a greater role in these final few episodes, though something tells me he won't be around to celebrate whatever conclusion we're left with. It's a shame, as he's been something of the moral center of the show, though he's never had much power until the present situation. The writers want the viewers to side with Adama and the suddenly cylon-laden crew, but this whole FTL business is a tissue-thin plot device. At the end of the day, the military is becoming increasingly autocratic while crawling into bed with the species that wiped out humanity. And for what? Improved technology that they didn't have a desperate need for during their first four years on the run. I'm incredulous that anyone, much less an admiral, thinks this is a good idea. The writers are pulling a fast one.
Nice to see Starbuck and Lee up and moving again. Kara just doesn't work unless she's allowed to shoot something every week.
Where did Tori go in all of this?
And has there ever been a sci-fi show where paunchy, unarmed 60-year-old men weren't able to overpower multiple guards?
Nice to see Starbuck and Lee up and moving again. Kara just doesn't work unless she's allowed to shoot something every week.
Where did Tori go in all of this?
And has there ever been a sci-fi show where paunchy, unarmed 60-year-old men weren't able to overpower multiple guards?
#45
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: OHIO
Re: Battlestar Galactica -- "The Oath" -- 1/30/2009
Just chiming in to say I was at the point of DVR'ing all the BSG episodes and saving them for a rainy day. I am glad I ran out of other shows to watch and caught this episode already.
Wow! Exceleent episode.
Now I am back to wanting to watch live
Wow! Exceleent episode.
Now I am back to wanting to watch live
#46
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Battlestar Galactica -- "The Oath" -- 1/30/2009
What can I say that others haven't already? Just a great frakkin' episode. I think it was all the more "tense" to watch because we know the end is coming, and therefore NONE of the characters are "safe" (anyone could be killed off).
#47
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Battlestar Galactica -- "The Oath" -- 1/30/2009
I think a big reason why this episode worked so well was due to it's director, John Dahl (Red Rock West, Last Seduction, Rounders). The writing was about average for BSG (or just above average), but Dahl's direction elevated it above even that.
#48
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: Battlestar Galactica -- "The Oath" -- 1/30/2009
Just stepping in to echo what everyone else is saying: Amazing episode. I loved that Adama just killed that other Marine without even hesitating; I don't think another show would have had it's commanding officer kill one of his own men outright, traitorous or not. I'm really curious to see if this ends up in Adama's favor, that lots of people who were involved might just be airlocked.
#49
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#50
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Battlestar Galactica -- "The Oath" -- 1/30/2009
Just stepping in to echo what everyone else is saying: Amazing episode. I loved that Adama just killed that other Marine without even hesitating; I don't think another show would have had it's commanding officer kill one of his own men outright, traitorous or not. I'm really curious to see if this ends up in Adama's favor, that lots of people who were involved might just be airlocked.
Expect the number of survivors to plummet in the near future when the hostile Cylons strike an unprepared fleet.




