Originally Posted by riley_dude

Lost was reviewed in this weeks Entertainment Weekly. Here is an exerpt:

The show is anticlimactic, teasing, and a bit hollow. A solid mystery is a glorious thing-sly clues can float a show for quite a while. Like two and a half seasons.
Now Lost is treading water
The Others-so wonderfully, eerily introduced are now about as ominous as Dockeers-clad suburban neighbors

Originally Posted by DVD Josh

I'm telling you guys, it has nothing to do with Charlie actually dying, just Desmond being willing to allow him to die.

Originally Posted by DodgingCars

I really like EW. I subscribe to it -- But their TV writing staff is horrible. It actually seems like they hate television.

Originally Posted by riley_dude

Lost was reviewed in this weeks Entertainment Weekly. Here is an exerpt:

The show is anticlimactic, teasing, and a bit hollow. A solid mystery is a glorious thing-sly clues can float a show for quite a while. Like two and a half seasons.
Now Lost is treading water
The Others-so wonderfully, eerily introduced are now about as ominous as Dockeers-clad suburban neighbors

Originally Posted by Michael Corvin

I can scan it tomorrow and post. It also mentioned the neutering of Sawyer.

Originally Posted by riley_dude

and how the coincidences of everyone knowing each other is getting pretty old.

Originally Posted by DodgingCars

I really like EW. I subscribe to it -- But their TV writing staff is horrible. It actually seems like they hate television.

Originally Posted by vegasbaby

A couple of things hit me after seeing this episode:

1) The sticker on the wine bottle said 1955, was it the same sticker that was on the bottle of whisky that Whidmore drank from in FBYE?