DVD Talk Forum

DVD Talk Forum (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/)
-   TV Talk (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/tv-talk-14/)
-   -   I just started Buffy... (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/tv-talk/467728-i-just-started-buffy.html)

wergo 07-06-06 03:50 PM

The one thing I can remember distinctly is your complaint regarding
Spoiler:
Willow's activating the potentials and how that left a bunch of possible demon-powered serial killers out there (I don't believe you commented on how unfair the women's events in the Olympics would become) and someone else mentioning that the issue would be addressed on a season five episode of 'Angel.' Just one more instance of the Angel writing staff cleaning up the Buffy writing staff's messes.


By the way, if you still, have questions regarding the final season of Buffy, many of them are answered HERE: http://www.boilsandblindingtorment.c...nsevenfaq.html

wergo 07-06-06 11:22 PM

That episode has one of the funniest commentary tracks EVER (Joss, Marti and Seth)- but don't listen to it until AFTER you've at least made it through season six; it's chock full of spoilers.

Slayer2005 07-06-06 11:46 PM


Originally Posted by darkessenz
Angel is currently only okay, I feel like the production/special FX could use some work. Also, I am not sure I feel comfortable with the 3 chars and their interactions. Doyle is sorta awkward sometimes, and when Angel tries to be funny....well it doesn't seem quite natural. The direction of the plot seems a little haphazard also, meandering a bit. I like Cordelia's harsh experience with reality in the city though:)

They all grow into their roles big time. You ain't seen nothing yet. The show becomes so great you will look back on the beginning and appreciate it 100X more than you did at first.

TruBuffyFan 07-06-06 11:46 PM

Season 4 was my least favorite... And I am a Huge fan of the show... This is my #1 favorite show of all time... I have all the collectors Items to prove it... lol... Anyways season 4 was the weirdest... Some cool eps, but I hated the big bad and the iniative and the fanale... It was so boring... It was so boring that I had forgotten that it was a fanale... Season 5 is my all time favorite Year! The best big bad of them all! And the END! OMG... SAD! lol
I love all other season... Season 6 I did not get to watch when it aired because after season 5 we moved to NC and they did not have UPN! It was the worst year ever... My favorite show was on but I was not allowed to watch... I did get to catch 3 eps when I went to LA for a week, but it was a tease! Luckily right before Season 7 started to air... Like a day before UPN was a channel that we just got! And I downloaded Season 6 before to watch... The entire series is in my opinion the best show of all time... Angel the spinoff was also great even though its final season was not my cup of tea! Still graet though!

Slayer2005 07-06-06 11:50 PM


Originally Posted by TruBuffyFan
Season 4 was my least favorite... And I am a Huge fan of the show... This is my #1 favorite show of all time... I have all the collectors Items to prove it... lol... Anyways season 4 was the weirdest... Some cool eps, but I hated the big bad and the iniative and the fanale... It was so boring... It was so boring that I had forgotten that it was a fanale... Season 5 is my all time favorite Year! The best big bad of them all! And the END! OMG... SAD! lol
I love all other season... Season 6 I did not get to watch when it aired because after season 5 we moved to NC and they did not have UPN! It was the worst year ever... My favorite show was on but I was not allowed to watch... I did get to catch 3 eps when I went to LA for a week, but it was a tease! Luckily right before Season 7 started to air... Like a day before UPN was a channel that we just got! And I downloaded Season 6 before to watch... The entire series is in my opinion the best show of all time... Angel the spinoff was also great even though its final season was not my cup of tea! Still graet though!

The season 4 finale was fantastic IMO. So unique and interesting. Not to mention the things it foreshadowed. Brilliant Brilliant episode. So different than their typical Buffy/Angel finale too (which in season 4's case happened one episode before the finale). How anyone could say a Joss Whedon written and directed episode is boring boggles my mind. :) Everytime he writes and directs an episode "TV masterpiece" usually comes to mind.

Nick Martin 07-07-06 12:00 AM


Originally Posted by Slayer2005
Everytime he writes and directs an episode "TV masterpiece" usually comes to mind.

Personally, I resented the fact that the WB had to go as far as mentioning a Joss - directed episode in the promos...to me it was more proof of Whedon's notable lack of involvement with ANGEL until season 5 - it was so rare that the network had to promote it!

Not that the series suffered in any way - I recall reading that he preferred not to write the big "event" stories on ANGEL - He wanted to just do more basic episodes, whereas with Buffy he did do most of the big shows.

All I'm saying is that Joss Whedon isn't nearly the first person who comes to mind for me when thinking about the best ANGEL had to offer.

The season 4 finale was intended to be a series finale IF it wasn't picked up...of course it was all a last-minute decision to bring the show back with 13 episodes. It was a testament to the greatness that is writer/producer Tim Minear - off the show for an entire season, only to return for that one great episode.

Nick Martin 07-07-06 12:09 AM


Originally Posted by Slayer2005
They all grow into their roles big time. You ain't seen nothing yet. The show becomes so great you will look back on the beginning and appreciate it 100X more than you did at first.

That is ABSOLUTELY TRUE!

I look back at those days in 1999 when it was just Boreanaz, Carpenter and Quinny...such humble beginnings!

I think it's supposed to feel awkward - remember that these three people don't even know each other that well...Cordy had some minor interactions with Angel before this series, but they were mostly the 'he's so hot, thanks for saving the day even though you weren't the hero, but you're so dreamy I'll give you the credit anyway' type of interactions.

They're all a bit new to L.A., they're new to this whole investigation gig...
It's more believeable that way.

chrisih8u 07-07-06 12:28 AM

I have a question for people who watched the series live as it aired. Its in regards to season 5 (or maybe 6. I forget)

Spoiler:
What was the reaction like when Dawn was introduced? I remember being really confused at first but I thought it was brilliant that they just added someone like that with no explanation at first. I watched it on dvd and was like "What the fuck?? Did I miss an episode?? Or a whole season??" Was it surprising to everyone watching live? IIRC, they just had her show up at the end of an episode and didnt really explain anything for a couple episodes.

Slayer2005 07-07-06 12:55 AM


Originally Posted by Nick Martin
Personally, I resented the fact that the WB had to go as far as mentioning a Joss - directed episode in the promos...to me it was more proof of Whedon's notable lack of involvement with ANGEL until season 5 - it was so rare that the network had to promote it!

Not that the series suffered in any way - I recall reading that he preferred not to write the big "event" stories on ANGEL - He wanted to just do more basic episodes, whereas with Buffy he did do most of the big shows.

All I'm saying is that Joss Whedon isn't nearly the first person who comes to mind for me when thinking about the best ANGEL had to offer.

The season 4 finale was intended to be a series finale IF it wasn't picked up...of course it was all a last-minute decision to bring the show back with 13 episodes. It was a testament to the greatness that is writer/producer Tim Minear - off the show for an entire season, only to return for that one great episode.

Accoding to David Greenwalt Joss Whedon played a big role in some of the seasons, season 3 specifically. Those were his own words. Despite whose name is on the credits for writing they may not deserve all the credit. Joss is known to go over them and make big changes and add plenty of his own stuff. Even on Buffy some of the writers said they got credit for many of Joss' added funny lines and such.

Here's an intereview I found (this one mentions Joss' involvement in season 2):

"Joss Whedon was heavily involved with Angel during its first year. How much involvment will he have this year?

Greenwalt: There are two words one can say about Joss Whedon: Greenwalt's coattails. Just kidding. Joss is very heavily involved again this year. I thank God nightly on one knee that he is. He is, without a doubt, the single most talented person I've ever worked with in the business in 25 years. ... There's not a story that breaks that isn't something that Joss and I do together, or that he's come up with a great idea. Every script is read by Joss. Many of them are polished by him. ... Although he gets credit, ... there's lots and lots of writing in the show that comes directly from Joss that one isn't seeing. And he's continuing to work eight days a week on the show, to my great relief. ..."

Joss is known for getting less credit than he deserves. I recall reading that he actually wrote a large majority of Toy Story, but his credit is downlplayed quite a bit.

wergo 07-07-06 08:46 AM


Originally Posted by chrisih8u
I have a question for people who watched the series live as it aired. Its in regards to season 5.

Spoiler:
Yep. That was pretty much what it was like. Everyone was shocked and surprised and VERY amused. Then, of course, over the next few episodes we were left wondering if she was gonna be the big bad. The thing is, most of season four had been taken up with the core group disintegrating - Giles was unemployed and lonely, Willow was keeping Tara to herself, Xander was feeling left behind, Buffy was feeling more and more isolated. By the time the enjoining spell metaphor kicked in, everyone was wondering whether or not this "Dawn" factor was gonna tear them all apart again or bring them closer. NO ONE on the show had ever had a sibling before. And no one was sure how this would affect the characters. (But pretty much EVERYONE predicted that eventually it would have Buffy defending Dawn against the others by season's end. NOTHING is introduced without it causing SOME conflict.)

Sessa17 07-07-06 09:17 AM


Originally Posted by darkessenz
Angel is currently only okay, I feel like the production/special FX could use some work. Also, I am not sure I feel comfortable with the 3 chars and their interactions. Doyle is sorta awkward sometimes, and when Angel tries to be funny....well it doesn't seem quite natural. The direction of the plot seems a little haphazard also, meandering a bit. I like Cordelia's harsh experience with reality in the city though:)

Angel Season 1 sucks, I think I totally just bitched about it when it began. I hated Doyle, thought Boreanez was boring & hated, hated, the female cop (can't remember her name). All I can say is you have to get past the first season. Boreanez really just gets better & better. The only thing I never liked about him was any time Angelas (sp?) shows up. The only thing I liked in the beginning was Cord, but they ended up completely ruining her. What made Angel sooooo much better for me is the cast, & I don't think any of them show up in the first season
Spoiler:
maybe Wes but I don't remember
.

wergo 07-07-06 10:00 AM


Originally Posted by Sessa17
What made Angel sooooo much better for me is the cast, & I don't think any of them show up in the first season
Spoiler:
maybe Wes but I don't remember
.

Spoiler:
Wes shows up halfway through season one, replacing the recently deceased Doyle. It wasn't supposed to be that way, though. Wes was always supposed to come in around episode 10, but he was supposed to be Doyle's buddy. When Quinn turned out to be impossible to work with, Whedon fired him and later brought in Gunn as Wes's foil (and soon-to-be rival for Fred's affections). Of course, the Wes that appeared is the one you hated from Buffy. Super-cool Wes didn't appear until Cordy started to disintegrate into the blonde saint persona. The good Whedon giveth and the good Whedon taketh away.

Sessa17 07-07-06 11:00 AM


Originally Posted by wergo
Spoiler:
Of course, the Wes that appeared is the one you hated from Buffy. Super-cool Wes didn't appear until Cordy started to disintegrate into the blonde saint persona. The good Whedon giveth and the good Whedon taketh away.

Spoiler:
No, not at all, I liked Wes as soon as he came to Angel, he wasn't the same Wes from Buffy. On Buffy he was just whiny British-tool, he wasn't funny at all. I like that he gave all that up & left the watchers (or kicked out from what happened to Faith I don't remember) to become a bumbling rogue demon hunter. And most of Wes's good slapstick moments came in the beginning.

Nick Martin 07-07-06 11:09 AM


Originally Posted by Sessa17
Angel Season 1 sucks, I think I totally just bitched about it when it began. I hated Doyle, thought Boreanez was boring & hated, hated, the female cop (can't remember her name). All I can say is you have to get past the first season.

So why bitch about it again?

I loved season 1, and Doyle was my early favorite.

Nick Martin 07-07-06 11:14 AM


Originally Posted by Slayer2005
Accoding to David Greenwalt Joss Whedon played a big role in some of the seasons, season 3 specifically. Those were his own words. Despite whose name is on the credits for writing they may not deserve all the credit. Joss is known to go over them and make big changes and add plenty of his own stuff. Even on Buffy some of the writers said they got credit for many of Joss' added funny lines and such.

Joss is known for getting less credit than he deserves. I recall reading that he actually wrote a large majority of Toy Story, but his credit is downlplayed quite a bit.

I recall an interview with David Fury who basically said Joss was not there nearly as often.

Whatever...I don't care. Joss being 'there' or not didn't impact the quality of the show, so it doesn't really matter.

Tim Minear...now he's my favorite writer.

Slayer2005 07-07-06 03:00 PM


Originally Posted by Nick Martin
Joss being 'there' or not didn't impact the quality of the show, so it doesn't really matter.

That's true, but had he not been there it could have impacted the show negatively and I believe it would have big time. Just remember that whenever you're watching your favorite Angel writer's script and you are laughing or thinking a particular moment is great it could easily be something Whedon added that someone else is getting credit for. Happens all the time according to the writers themselves. :) Of course Joss doesn't really care about getting credit for any of that.

BTW, he doesn't physicaly have to be on the set to have a huge part in everything. He can and does work from home often and invites the team over to his house. :)

He clearly only cares about making a great show and that's great. One quote of his has stuck in my mind (it may not be exact word for word though): I'd rather make a show that 100 people NEED to see than a show that 1,000 people would like to see. I thought that was a great quote, because it summed up all of his series perfectly.

Nick Martin 07-07-06 03:29 PM

You make it sound that Joss is the one and only creative force behind everything you see and hear on his shows. Isn't that a little much?

nodeerforamonth 07-07-06 03:59 PM


Originally Posted by darkessenz
Its funny because my x g/f was a total buffy-freak and I made fun of her alot for it...

She always says things like "it doesn't get good until season 5, we just watch the original episodes because they give the back story..."

Season 5?!??! Wow! I thought that season completely sucked big time! Every episode was completely depressing! That's one season I'll skip over when I'm going through my sets again.

Slayer2005 07-07-06 04:20 PM


Originally Posted by nodeerforamonth
Season 5?!??! Wow! I thought that season completely sucked big time! Every episode was completely depressing! That's one season I'll skip over when I'm going through my sets again.

While I definitely do not agree that it takes until season 5 to become great (that's just ridiculous) you're probably in the minority when it comes to your opinion of season 5. There was some depressing moments, but season 6 felt far more depressing as a whole. Season 5 had the best long story arc of them all IMO (and the best mystery). Not to mention that if featured two of the best episodes every done on the show: The Body and The Gift. Actually, I liked the 3rd to last, a ton too. Not to mention Fool For Love. Great season. Ranks right up there with 3 as a whole IMO. Three had the better character moments, but 5 had the better and more epic story.

Slayer2005 07-07-06 04:34 PM


Originally Posted by Nick Martin
You make it sound that Joss is the one and only creative force behind everything you see and hear on his shows. Isn't that a little much?

Nah, I just don't like it when his role is downplayed for whatever reason, especially since you've shown a bias for Angel (not that there's anything wrong with that. :)). Several of your post have mentioned that Whedon had very little to do with Angel and it's well known that you prefer Angel over Buffy, so it seems that you wanted to take as much credit away from Whedon as possible. I just wanted to point out that the guy you respect so much would tell you otherwise and since he actually works on the show his input holds a lot more weight.

However, MANY of the best lines and moments from other writers' scripts have come from Joss. That doesn't mean I think he's the only creative force behind the show. It just means I think he's one of the, if not THE, most important creative force. I think they all deserve a HUGE amount of credit though, the entire staff, but all of them will tell you how great Joss is and that no one should ever downplay his credit just so someone else could be given more credit. They all deserve a ton of credit, but I don't believe Angel would've been as great as it was without Whedon and I'd bet everyone on the staff would agree with that.

Just my opinion. :)

BTW, let us not forget that he wrote arguably the best series finale ever, "Not Fade Away".

Sessa17 07-07-06 04:52 PM


Originally Posted by Nick Martin
So why bitch about it again?

The OP had the same problems I did, so I was just telling him to not give up & get past the shitty first season b/c it gets so much better.

wergo 07-07-06 07:35 PM


Originally Posted by Slayer2005
BTW, let us not forget that he wrote arguably the best series finale ever, "Not Fade Away".

What, you mean the one where
Spoiler:
Angel thinks that Tim Conway was in the premiere episode of The Carol Burnette Show? :lol: This from the guy who claimed to have a photographic memory! -ohbfrank-




Originally Posted by darkessenz
-How does a vampire determine via blood-sucking whether someone is going to die or become like them? I thought it was simply the volume of blood taken, but then in another episode I heard them say that the victim has to drink the vampire's blood...well most people don't do that voluntarily...so how do they do it?

The vampire drinks until the victim is near death; if they want the victim to turn, they let them drink from them (you get this is one great big metaphor, right?) Supposedly, even those who swear they won't drink will when they're that close to death. (Though plenty of people on the show have been turned voluntarily, including some major characters) Then they die and the demon takes over. How long they remain dead depends on what the plot of the episode requires. Usually they get buried and rise from the grave the next night, but sometimes they turn right away. The volume of blood drunk will cause the victim to die, but to turn them the vampire needs to take action themselves.

During the first season, the watcher's council (via Giles) liked to make a big stink about how, once a person has turned into a vampire, they may have the same memories, (presumably to make the slayer's job less morally ambiguous) that it's just a demon inhabiting the dead person's body. That turned out to be a bunch of hooey, though, as EVERY SINGLE VAMPIRE that has EVER been on EITHER show has shown that to be a bald-faced lie. Its kind of a "who are you gonna believe, me or your lying eyes?" kind of thing.

It gets a little confusing at times, because supposedly vampires don't have souls, just a demon animating them, yet demons have also been said to have (non-human) souls at times (and possession has even been referred to as being taken over by a demon soul). Seeing as how it's the humans that get to say who does and doesn't have a soul, and they aren't above just making stuff up and/or talking about stuff they don't actually know the first thing about, it usually turns into another way to justify how the slayer can just kill them without moral qualms. All we've been shown on the shows is that when a human dies, their soul leaves their body. That soul can be reinstated, however (and I'm not going to open THAT hornet's nest at this time) and when a vampire is dusted (killed) the soul apparently remains in the aether (possibly it withers and dies after a time?) - regardless, the one time a vampire was brought back, they didn't remember anything about what happened when they were dead; their soul just ceased to be an issue.

Nick Martin 07-07-06 11:00 PM


Originally Posted by Slayer2005
Several of your post have mentioned that Whedon had very little to do with Angel and it's well known that you prefer Angel over Buffy, so it seems that you wanted to take as much credit away from Whedon as possible.

BTW, let us not forget that he wrote arguably the best series finale ever, "Not Fade Away".

I want to take credit away from Whedon...now THAT is a bit much. Actually it's way too much, and way too ridiculous.

You don't like it when Joss doesn't get credit for everything he's done, and I don't like when Joss or anyone, for that matter, gets more credit than everyone else.

I wasn't basing anything I've said on bias, just observation and interviews.

About "Not Fade Away" - that's a prime example of what we're talking about: You neglected to mention that it was co-written by Jeffery Bell, so it sounded as though Joss did the whole thing himself, which isn't right, because it makes it seem like Bell's name was there for nothing, even though he also directed it. Joss was supposed to but was busy prepping "Serenity".

Slayer2005 07-08-06 01:16 AM


Originally Posted by Nick Martin

About "Not Fade Away" - that's a prime example of what we're talking about: You neglected to mention that it was co-written by Jeffery Bell, so it sounded as though Joss did the whole thing himself, which isn't right, because it makes it seem like Bell's name was there for nothing, even though he also directed it. Joss was supposed to but was busy prepping "Serenity".

Sorry, meant to say "co-wrote". Is that better? :)


You don't like it when Joss doesn't get credit for everything he's done, and I don't like when Joss or anyone, for that matter, gets more credit than everyone else.
I believe everyone on the show deserves HUGE credit, but I also believe Whedon most likely deserves at least a little more credit than most and that he is one of the main driving creative forces behind Angel or any series that he's done. He may not have been on the set as much as he would have liked to be, but he still gave plenty of his input and polished MANY scripts. I simply think it wouldn't have been as great without him. The entire show has his style of dialogue for one. All of his series do really. It's so easy to tell when I'm watching a Whedon series. I think even if I didn't know what Firefly was I'd be able to tell it was Whedon series. All of his shows have his trademark style of dialogue and that's definitely important, because it's a big part of the series. I definitely do not think he deserves all the credit though. Just a little more than most or at least more than not much at all. :) Plus, had Whedon chose not to develop Angel's charater there would be no Angel the series. :)


I want to take credit away from Whedon...now THAT is a bit much. Actually it's way too much, and way too ridiculous.

I wasn't basing anything I've said on bias, just observation and interviews.
Fair enough.

Slayer2005 07-08-06 01:23 AM


Originally Posted by darkessenz
Yeah I am gonna stick it out-I bought ssons 1-4 anyway, might as well watch:)

BTW, Sessa is in the minority with his opinion regarding the first season of Angel. It's definitely an unpopular opinion. Infact, if you had ever read his Buffy and Angel marathon threads it's almost hard to tell that he liked either series, because had tons of really negative opinions during both. Way more than most fans, that's for sure. It's actually odd that Angel somehow made his top 3 of all time. :)

The first season, while not on the level of the rest, is very good overall. I believe, like everyone else I know who has gotten hooked, you will actually appreciate the first season more after you've gotten a lot further.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:31 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.