FX's fascination with...
#1
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: PDX
FX's fascination with...
...rear entry.
You can't get through a season, heck usually an episode of any of their (original) programs without someone reenacting a scene from Animal Planet with their partner on screen.
I'm all for storylines involving love making, but at some point doesn't just bending over your partner on an inanimate object get old?
You can't get through a season, heck usually an episode of any of their (original) programs without someone reenacting a scene from Animal Planet with their partner on screen.
I'm all for storylines involving love making, but at some point doesn't just bending over your partner on an inanimate object get old?
#3
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,055
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: PDX
Originally Posted by j123vt_99
:nopics:

But seriously think about it, why is it needed in every episode of Nip/Tuck, The Shield, and/or Rescue Me. Its along the same lines of Mia Kirshner having to be topless or naked in almost every episode of The L Word its NOT NECESSARY.
#4
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,672
Received 2,786 Likes
on
1,852 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
Originally Posted by retihsuhnt
Its along the same lines of Mia Kirshner having to be topless or naked in almost every episode of The L Word its NOT NECESSARY.
#5
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally Posted by retihsuhnt
But seriously think about it, why is it needed in every episode of Nip/Tuck, The Shield, and/or Rescue Me.
#6
DVD Talk Godfather
Originally Posted by retihsuhnt
Its along the same lines of Mia Kirshner having to be topless or naked in almost every episode of The L Word its NOT NECESSARY.
#8
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Well they can get a longer shot and show "more" to the viewer while representing this act, opposed to say missionary.




