Star Trek Series Questions
#27
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Some people think anything with a continuing storyline is a "Soap Opera" just let them think that. It's fine. 24, Sopranos, 6 Feet Under... ALL SOAP OPERAS WITH BAD WRITING
Star Trek is great. If you can get past the cheesiness of a lot of it, there is a lot of richeness in there. If you can't get past it, you're lost. It's a shame. The movies are all mostly excellent because they have the great characters without a lot of the 60s TV cheese. Nicholas Meyer is a god, IMHO
The Next Generation has a weak start, and many terrible episodes early one. The characters are all enjoyable though. The later seasons are very good, and the characters are writing really make it.
Deep Space Nine is hard to get into, because if you just watch the first few seasons, you're not going to easily get into it. The characters are good, but you are not used to them like you have been used to TNG ones. However, these early seasons are required to get to know the characters. Once you know the characters, then you really love the next few seasons. Not to mention, once you watch it all, you can go back and watch the early seasons and enjoy them that much more since you really know the characters now. DS9 is my favourite.
Yeah, anyways, Voyager is pretty bad, but I watched most of it. After watching it all, the first three seasons are a half baked Star Trek, but overall, it is Star Trek, and it is enjoyable (some of the Tuvok, Neelix, and Doctor episodes are great) aside from a few TERRIBLE episodes that rival anything in the later seasons. Like in Coda, the line "Go back to Hell, coward." is the funniest thing out of ANY Star Trek ever because it's so bad. Almost anything after season 3 is a joke though, in one way or another. It becomes a generic spaceship show. A bad one at that. The whole thing is a disaster. I could go on for hours on this.
I have only seen the first few episodes of Enterprise. I willl probably eventually watch it in syndication. It just seemed like they were doing Voyager again, but set in a different time with ever LESS good characters than Voyager had.
Star Trek is great. If you can get past the cheesiness of a lot of it, there is a lot of richeness in there. If you can't get past it, you're lost. It's a shame. The movies are all mostly excellent because they have the great characters without a lot of the 60s TV cheese. Nicholas Meyer is a god, IMHO
The Next Generation has a weak start, and many terrible episodes early one. The characters are all enjoyable though. The later seasons are very good, and the characters are writing really make it.
Deep Space Nine is hard to get into, because if you just watch the first few seasons, you're not going to easily get into it. The characters are good, but you are not used to them like you have been used to TNG ones. However, these early seasons are required to get to know the characters. Once you know the characters, then you really love the next few seasons. Not to mention, once you watch it all, you can go back and watch the early seasons and enjoy them that much more since you really know the characters now. DS9 is my favourite.
Yeah, anyways, Voyager is pretty bad, but I watched most of it. After watching it all, the first three seasons are a half baked Star Trek, but overall, it is Star Trek, and it is enjoyable (some of the Tuvok, Neelix, and Doctor episodes are great) aside from a few TERRIBLE episodes that rival anything in the later seasons. Like in Coda, the line "Go back to Hell, coward." is the funniest thing out of ANY Star Trek ever because it's so bad. Almost anything after season 3 is a joke though, in one way or another. It becomes a generic spaceship show. A bad one at that. The whole thing is a disaster. I could go on for hours on this.
I have only seen the first few episodes of Enterprise. I willl probably eventually watch it in syndication. It just seemed like they were doing Voyager again, but set in a different time with ever LESS good characters than Voyager had.
#28
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Canada, BC
Posts: 6,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by strife
please explain what you don't like about DS9 and how you can push Voyager over it.
I prefer DS9 over all others. I like the arcs and that the characters are not perfect all the time. The early seasons are sort of cheesy at times, but later seasons are kick butt.
I prefer DS9 over all others. I like the arcs and that the characters are not perfect all the time. The early seasons are sort of cheesy at times, but later seasons are kick butt.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Shelby, NC
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hello all!
I loved DS9 but not until a couple of seasons in. The show took a while to really get going IMHO. When they introduced the Dominion, the show had me hooked. Because of this it is my favorite of the "modern" series.
TNG was good. But like DS9 it took awhile to find it's legs. The show became must see TV for me with the introduction of the Borg. But with the last couple of seasons I felt that the show was running out of steam IMHO.
Voyager I was excited about this show originally but shit happened in the way of lackluster writing. The Doctor was my favorite character but toward the end of the show even the episodes highlighting him were not good IMO. I really wanted to like Chakotey but I felt like he was way underused and the writers really didnt seem to know what to do with him. Paris , Torres, Kim and Tuvok didnt really do anything for me. Then there was Janeway who I found to be just plain annoying. I cant forget about Seven of Nine who was there for the T&A factor so they could get a ratings boost. IMHO Voyager was a cool concept that turned into a one long train wreck.
Which brings me to Enterprise. Yet again I was really excited about the concept of digging into Star Trek's past and seeing how the Federation was formed and the beginnings of starfleet. I watched the first season and the first episode of the second season and walked away. Just plain bad writing IMO.
With that said, I have watched most of the current season and I have been pleasently surprised!!! I hope that whatever the production staff is doing that they keep it up!! I normally do not go back to TV shows after I have dropped them so this is a first for me!!
As for the original series, a great classic series that cant be beat IMHO!
Take care all!!!
I loved DS9 but not until a couple of seasons in. The show took a while to really get going IMHO. When they introduced the Dominion, the show had me hooked. Because of this it is my favorite of the "modern" series.
TNG was good. But like DS9 it took awhile to find it's legs. The show became must see TV for me with the introduction of the Borg. But with the last couple of seasons I felt that the show was running out of steam IMHO.
Voyager I was excited about this show originally but shit happened in the way of lackluster writing. The Doctor was my favorite character but toward the end of the show even the episodes highlighting him were not good IMO. I really wanted to like Chakotey but I felt like he was way underused and the writers really didnt seem to know what to do with him. Paris , Torres, Kim and Tuvok didnt really do anything for me. Then there was Janeway who I found to be just plain annoying. I cant forget about Seven of Nine who was there for the T&A factor so they could get a ratings boost. IMHO Voyager was a cool concept that turned into a one long train wreck.
Which brings me to Enterprise. Yet again I was really excited about the concept of digging into Star Trek's past and seeing how the Federation was formed and the beginnings of starfleet. I watched the first season and the first episode of the second season and walked away. Just plain bad writing IMO.
With that said, I have watched most of the current season and I have been pleasently surprised!!! I hope that whatever the production staff is doing that they keep it up!! I normally do not go back to TV shows after I have dropped them so this is a first for me!!
As for the original series, a great classic series that cant be beat IMHO!
Take care all!!!
#31
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Leandro/San Francisco
Posts: 7,422
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by Fok
I found DS9 to be quite boring and there wasn't enough excitement on the show. There's something cool about flying around on a starship. Also maybe there wasn't enough action for me.
#32
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
We're talking about DS9 right? no flying around on a starship??? not enough action???!!!??
Never seen it but it's so story arc driven that I had to.
Originally Posted by das Monkey
Now, let's be honest ...
das
das
#33
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Yeah, you know, DS9 had no action.
And that whole multi-season galactic war thing, that was kinda boring and all.
I saw most of the first few years of DS9 when it was first on, but didn't really see most of the Dominion War seasons until the last few months on Spike, and I'm enjoying watching them again right now.
Even though I've seen most of the TOS episodes dozens of times, and most of the TNG episodes about 10-15 times each, I have to say that DS9 is, to me, by far the best of the Trek series. (It's certainly the only one where characters were ::gasp:: allowed to change and grow because of their experiences.)
And that whole multi-season galactic war thing, that was kinda boring and all.
I saw most of the first few years of DS9 when it was first on, but didn't really see most of the Dominion War seasons until the last few months on Spike, and I'm enjoying watching them again right now.
Even though I've seen most of the TOS episodes dozens of times, and most of the TNG episodes about 10-15 times each, I have to say that DS9 is, to me, by far the best of the Trek series. (It's certainly the only one where characters were ::gasp:: allowed to change and grow because of their experiences.)
#34
Enormous Genitals
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: a small cottage on a cul de sac in the lower pits of hell.
Posts: 37,245
Received 588 Likes
on
336 Posts
Originally Posted by Fartface
Easy, I can spot bad acting and bad writing when I see them, can you?
Besides, I hate shows that are actually soap operas where you have to watch every episode just to know what's going on. With the original you could watch any single episode of the show without ever having had to see another and know what was going on. In earlier TV days they had to rely on good writers, actors and directors to keep people interested in a show, not 'continuing stories', but then if all you've watched are current TV shows, you wouldn't know that.
#35
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,118
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fok
I found DS9 to be quite boring and there wasn't enough excitement on the show. There's something cool about flying around on a starship. Also maybe there wasn't enough action for me.
OK I can underestand that. I would suggest trying a few episodes in seasons 5-7 had a war arc that were interesting.
I could see in the first couple of seasons were it would be boring cause they were on the station 99% of the time, with the addition of the Defiant it added more flying in a ship.
#36
DVD Talk Hero
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Bartertown due to it having a better economy than where I really live.
Posts: 29,834
Received 18 Likes
on
12 Posts
voyager was on a ship, but lets be honest, the writing sucked overall
don't even get me started on the never ending supply of shuttles, or them being able to build not 1 but 2 delta flyers, although granted at that point they had met some friendlies and possibly done some trading, but the shuttle thing was early when they had shit for supplies and couldn't even replicate 3 meals a day for each crew member yet they pumped out a shit load of shuttles
don't even get me started on the never ending supply of shuttles, or them being able to build not 1 but 2 delta flyers, although granted at that point they had met some friendlies and possibly done some trading, but the shuttle thing was early when they had shit for supplies and couldn't even replicate 3 meals a day for each crew member yet they pumped out a shit load of shuttles
#37
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
While I enjoy a good long-term arc on a television show, there are dangers with that.
1. You have too little arc for the number of shows you have to fill. There were times, to me, when the last season of Buffy felt like that to me and several times when 24 has felt like that. It's like they've got an arc that's good for eight shows, but they have to fill twelve, so they just stretch it out. And that can lead to boring television.
2. With that, there can also be times when the story arc is doled out in pieces that are too small. I think this happens when the arc is an essential piece of the show or the characters, so much so that the arc can never really be resolved until the show ends. So, you never give too much because you're having to hold things back until that final episode, which might well be five years or more down the line.
3. And that can lead to adding so much to the story arc that it becomes ridiculous or too convoluted. The writers know they have to put out clues and whatnot over the course of the entire show, but they didn't bother to think out enough of an arc, so they keep taking it in new directions so they can stretch it out further. Somestimes, that doesn't so much work.
4. Sometimes the balance isn't there between making episodes that are entertaining enough to stand on their own but which also include enough nuggets of information to push the overall story arc forward. That balance can be hard to achieve, and many times you end up with episodes that don't serve either purpose very well.
But I like a show with some deep mythology and long, continuing story arcs. I just need them to also be entertaining in and of themselves and not just be filler episodes because they had too little story and too many episodes to fill.
1. You have too little arc for the number of shows you have to fill. There were times, to me, when the last season of Buffy felt like that to me and several times when 24 has felt like that. It's like they've got an arc that's good for eight shows, but they have to fill twelve, so they just stretch it out. And that can lead to boring television.
2. With that, there can also be times when the story arc is doled out in pieces that are too small. I think this happens when the arc is an essential piece of the show or the characters, so much so that the arc can never really be resolved until the show ends. So, you never give too much because you're having to hold things back until that final episode, which might well be five years or more down the line.
3. And that can lead to adding so much to the story arc that it becomes ridiculous or too convoluted. The writers know they have to put out clues and whatnot over the course of the entire show, but they didn't bother to think out enough of an arc, so they keep taking it in new directions so they can stretch it out further. Somestimes, that doesn't so much work.
4. Sometimes the balance isn't there between making episodes that are entertaining enough to stand on their own but which also include enough nuggets of information to push the overall story arc forward. That balance can be hard to achieve, and many times you end up with episodes that don't serve either purpose very well.
But I like a show with some deep mythology and long, continuing story arcs. I just need them to also be entertaining in and of themselves and not just be filler episodes because they had too little story and too many episodes to fill.
#38
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by das Monkey
Now, let's be honest ...
das
das
Last edited by Fartface; 12-08-04 at 08:33 AM.
#39
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Leandro/San Francisco
Posts: 7,422
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by dstrauss
(It's certainly the only one where characters were ::gasp:: allowed to change and grow because of their experiences.)
#40
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Canada, BC
Posts: 6,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by riley_dude
Yeah, what they need is more special effects like in the last two Star Wars movies. All look but little else to hold your interest.
I'm not just interested in special effects. The action does make it more interesting. The fact that the other series were on starships, I think that opened more doors from a storyline point of view.
Last edited by Fok; 12-08-04 at 03:46 PM.
#41
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Leandro/San Francisco
Posts: 7,422
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by Fok
I'm not just interested in special effects. The action does make it more interesting. The fact that the other series were on starships, I think that opened more doors from a storyline point of view.
#42
DVD Talk Hero
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Bartertown due to it having a better economy than where I really live.
Posts: 29,834
Received 18 Likes
on
12 Posts
not only that, but plenty of TNG eps didn't need to be set on a starship, and between the runabouts and the defiant ds9 could have a "starship" ep whenever they wanted
Originally Posted by riley_dude
How many starship shows did we need. TNG was already on and they didnt want to put another one. If they had people would have complained that there was no originality in the franchise and now we are hearing that it is too boring because it deals with characters???
#43
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Canada, BC
Posts: 6,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by riley_dude
How many starship shows did we need. TNG was already on and they didnt want to put another one. If they had people would have complained that there was no originality in the franchise and now we are hearing that it is too boring because it deals with characters???
I thought the other series were better. They were on starships and they did deal with characters.
#44
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Leandro/San Francisco
Posts: 7,422
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by Fok
Yeah you're missing my point again
I thought the other series were better. They were on starships and they did deal with characters.
I thought the other series were better. They were on starships and they did deal with characters.
#45
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Canada, BC
Posts: 6,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by riley_dude
And I think you are missing mine (ours). Just because Trek is set on a starship doesn't make it any better i.e. Voyager. DS9 was richer and more textured than the others.
#46
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Voyager puts me to sleep every time I try to watch it, and the couple episodes I've seen of Enterprise have been wretched. Glad to hear that maybe it's improving--I should give it another chance.
As for DS9--it's a great show with characters that grow and change as if they didn't even live in the Trek universe. Unfortunately the first few seasons are kind of slow, so you need an attention span to watch it. I enjoy TNG, but don't find it engrossing like DS9. I'm not a good judge of TOS cause I hate the cheese, but I don't think it's a "bad" show in the sense that Voyager is and Enterprise seems to be. I don't like it and think its goofy-laughable, but that's a personality thing and may have more to do with my taste than TOS itself.)
As for DS9--it's a great show with characters that grow and change as if they didn't even live in the Trek universe. Unfortunately the first few seasons are kind of slow, so you need an attention span to watch it. I enjoy TNG, but don't find it engrossing like DS9. I'm not a good judge of TOS cause I hate the cheese, but I don't think it's a "bad" show in the sense that Voyager is and Enterprise seems to be. I don't like it and think its goofy-laughable, but that's a personality thing and may have more to do with my taste than TOS itself.)
#47
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally Posted by flmfreakcentral
If you think about it, they're not really any cheesier than the Commodore64-level CGI of ST:TNG. And I always did find the original series' transporter effect more convincing than that of any of the spin-offs.
Have you seen any of the movies? They're collectively better than either "DS9" or "Voyager", in my humble opinion. STAR TREK II: THE WRATH OF KHAN is genuinely one of the best films ever made.
Bill C
filmfreakcentral.net
Have you seen any of the movies? They're collectively better than either "DS9" or "Voyager", in my humble opinion. STAR TREK II: THE WRATH OF KHAN is genuinely one of the best films ever made.
Bill C
filmfreakcentral.net
Maybe but not in special effects. TNG had incredible SFX and at least as good and often times better than the Original crew movies. The SFX keep getting better and better with each series.
#48
DVD Talk Hero
DS9 - This is my favorite post-TOS Trek. In many ways, it's the anti-Star Trek. Instead of having a crew aboard a ship flying to the planet of the week, fixing the problem, and leaving on the next mission. With DS9, we got a crew aboard a space station charged with keeping the peace and re-building an alien world ravaged by decades of war. Later, we find them on the frontline of an intergalactic war. It's the get-your-hands-dirty nuts and bolts side of the Trek universe, and it turned off a lot of hardcore Trekkies. But just as many, if not more, appreciated seeing the other side.
Voyager - Proceed with caution. I bailed early on this, as I found it tedious and boring.
Voyager - Proceed with caution. I bailed early on this, as I found it tedious and boring.
#49
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Leandro/San Francisco
Posts: 7,422
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
Voyager - Proceed with caution. I bailed early on this, as I found it tedious and boring.
#50
Cool New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Up til now I actually thought B5 was part of Star Trek
Where did this series originate?
I think the last 3 seasons of TNG are by far the best.
I have bought the first 2 seasons of DS9 and will start them soon.
Where did this series originate?
I think the last 3 seasons of TNG are by far the best.
I have bought the first 2 seasons of DS9 and will start them soon.