Two Star Trek questions...

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

05-10-04 | 04:07 PM

#26

calhoun07

DVD Talk Legend

Joined: Oct 2001

Posts: 14,401

Likes: 0

Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Quote:

Originally posted by Chew
I would even argue Pulaski is the better doctor of the two. I'm rewatching S2 and three things pop up: she can fix Geordi's eyes (he chooses not to), she wrote a paper that's still the standard (mentioned in "Unnatural Selection") and she's the only doctor to help Picard during his heart surgery.

She also pushed Data for the better and I think helped flesh him out into a better character over all.

Reply Like

05-10-04 | 07:31 PM

#27

Scorpio

DVD Talk Platinum Edition

Joined: Sep 1999

Posts: 3,688

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

From: Chicago

Dr. Crusher had that great red hair though.

Reply Like

05-10-04 | 09:37 PM

#28

Wizdar

DVD Talk Limited Edition

Joined: Mar 2001

Posts: 6,646

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

From: wishing I was in Vegas

C'mon, guys! The broad's older than I am!

Reply Like

05-10-04 | 10:39 PM

#29

strife

DVD Talk Gold Edition

Joined: Apr 2001

Posts: 2,118

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally posted by Wizdar
C'mon, guys! The broad's older than I am!

but still younger the classicman

Reply Like

05-10-04 | 10:45 PM

#30

dhmac

DVD Talk Limited Edition

Joined: Apr 2000

Posts: 7,422

Likes: 51

Received 68 Likes on 59 Posts

From: Kissimmee, Florida

Quote:

Originally posted by calhoun07
She also pushed Data for the better and I think helped flesh him out into a better character over all.

Actually, I think her awful treatment of Data is why the Dr. Pulaski character isn't well liked. It seemed like Pulaski went way out of her way to dis Data anytime she had the chance. How her character can otherwise be so intelligent, yet have almost no respect for Data as a Being never really made much sense.