Mel Gibson Wants to Bring Unedited 'Passion' to TV
04-14-04 | 10:44 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Guest
Mel Gibson Wants to Bring Unedited 'Passion' to TV
http://entertainment.excite.com/arti...7|reuters.html
Apr 14, 11:12 am ET
By Cynthia Littleton
LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) - Will "The Passion of the Christ" play in primetime?
Mel Gibson's Icon Prods. has quietly started the process of shopping for TV licensing deals for "Passion," which is the first hugely successful film to come down the pike as a true free agent for pay TV and broadcast/basic cable licensing in more than five years, since Fox scooped up the rights to George Lucas' "Star Wars: Episode I -- The Phantom Menace."
Industry sources say each of the Big Four broadcast networks has been pitched the movie, along with HBO, Showtime and other major cable outlets.
Were it not for the movie's intense subject matter -- chronicling the painful last hours in the life of Jesus Christ -- broadcasters would likely be competing with big-money offers for the blockbuster, which has taken in more than $353 million domestically after less than two months in theaters.
But sources say Icon has made it clear to prospective buyers that the film must run in its entirety and that even some of the more graphic scenes of beatings cannot be edited down. That makes it a tough sell for the broadcast networks, which would undoubtedly have a hard time lining up advertisers for the controversial film even if edits were made.
Sources said Icon hopes to have "Passion" make its TV debut not too long after the film's home video release, expected to hit later this year through 20th Century Fox.
Reps for Icon declined comment.
Reuters/Hollywood Reporter
It will be interesting to see if this does in fact air, unedited, on network television.
Chris
Apr 14, 11:12 am ET
By Cynthia Littleton
LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) - Will "The Passion of the Christ" play in primetime?
Mel Gibson's Icon Prods. has quietly started the process of shopping for TV licensing deals for "Passion," which is the first hugely successful film to come down the pike as a true free agent for pay TV and broadcast/basic cable licensing in more than five years, since Fox scooped up the rights to George Lucas' "Star Wars: Episode I -- The Phantom Menace."
Industry sources say each of the Big Four broadcast networks has been pitched the movie, along with HBO, Showtime and other major cable outlets.
Were it not for the movie's intense subject matter -- chronicling the painful last hours in the life of Jesus Christ -- broadcasters would likely be competing with big-money offers for the blockbuster, which has taken in more than $353 million domestically after less than two months in theaters.
But sources say Icon has made it clear to prospective buyers that the film must run in its entirety and that even some of the more graphic scenes of beatings cannot be edited down. That makes it a tough sell for the broadcast networks, which would undoubtedly have a hard time lining up advertisers for the controversial film even if edits were made.
Sources said Icon hopes to have "Passion" make its TV debut not too long after the film's home video release, expected to hit later this year through 20th Century Fox.
Reps for Icon declined comment.
Reuters/Hollywood Reporter
It will be interesting to see if this does in fact air, unedited, on network television.
Chris
04-14-04 | 11:13 AM
#5
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally posted by Red Dog
My guess is that the FCC will have zero problem with this.
My guess is that the FCC will have zero problem with this.
04-14-04 | 11:14 AM
#6
DVD Talk God
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 133,159
Received 898 Likes
on
742 Posts
From: Directionally Challenged (for DirecTV)
Originally posted by Rypro 525
as long as nobody is naked in the movie, the fcc has no problems
as long as nobody is naked in the movie, the fcc has no problems
There could be a half-hour of nudity in this movie and the FCC would still look the other way.
04-14-04 | 11:50 AM
#9
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
I think Sci-Fi is trying hard to pick this up.
04-14-04 | 01:08 PM
#12
DVD Talk Legend
I'm just surprised in this day and age of DVD/video/etc. that network TV airings of theatrical movies are even a big deal anymore. I could understand when your only two options were the theater or a tv broadcast, but now? Just go rent/buy the dang thing.
04-14-04 | 01:39 PM
#13
Retired
Network airings aren't really a big deal, and even the airing of an extremely violent movie like this probably wouldn't have been a big deal if not for the ridiculous over-reaction to the Janet Jackson thing and the subsequent censorship of some network shows afterwards.
04-14-04 | 01:44 PM
#14
DVD Talk Special Edition
I somehow can't see this film chopped up with commercial interuptions. I know people who wouldn't even bring refreshments into the theater when viewing it.
04-14-04 | 01:47 PM
#15
DVD Talk Legend
Originally posted by Josh Hinkle
Network airings aren't really a big deal
Network airings aren't really a big deal
04-14-04 | 01:57 PM
#16
DVD Talk Legend
Originally posted by Red Dog
My guess is that the FCC will have zero problem with this.
My guess is that the FCC will have zero problem with this.
Obscene Broadcasts Are Prohibited at All Times
Obscene speech is not protected by the First Amendment and cannot be broadcast at any time. To be obscene, material must meet a three-prong test:
An average person, applying contemporary community standards, must find that the material, as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;
The material must depict or describe, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by applicable law; and
The material, taken as a whole, must lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
Obscene speech is not protected by the First Amendment and cannot be broadcast at any time. To be obscene, material must meet a three-prong test:
An average person, applying contemporary community standards, must find that the material, as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;
The material must depict or describe, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by applicable law; and
The material, taken as a whole, must lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
They would consider nudity (full) to be indecent, not obscene (depending on the context), where it would be limited to broadcasting at only certain times of day.
By their own standards, violence doesn't fall into the "indecent" standard, but may be considered obscene.
04-14-04 | 02:03 PM
#17
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally posted by DodgingCars
Doesn't this make sense though? Not that I agree with it, but the FCC defines what obscene is:
By their standards, I don't believe The Passion falls into the category of obscene.
They would consider nudity (full) to be indecent, not obscene (depending on the context), where it would be limited to broadcasting at only certain times of day.
By their own standards, violence doesn't fall into the "indecent" standard, but may be considered obscene.
Doesn't this make sense though? Not that I agree with it, but the FCC defines what obscene is:
By their standards, I don't believe The Passion falls into the category of obscene.
They would consider nudity (full) to be indecent, not obscene (depending on the context), where it would be limited to broadcasting at only certain times of day.
By their own standards, violence doesn't fall into the "indecent" standard, but may be considered obscene.
04-14-04 | 08:03 PM
#21
DVD Talk Hero
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 29,850
Received 23 Likes
on
16 Posts
From: Bartertown due to it having a better economy than where I really live.
hey Mel, I get it, you're religious
now that Lucas is done using the studio space in Australia it's time for you to make Fury Road
now that Lucas is done using the studio space in Australia it's time for you to make Fury Road
04-14-04 | 09:18 PM
#22
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Raleigh, NC
Another thing...would a broadcast network actually want to air a movie with subtitles throughout? I dont think Ive ever seen a non-English movie on American television that wasnt dubbed.
04-14-04 | 09:44 PM
#23
DVD Talk Legend
Originally posted by flashburn
Too bad its not supposed to be the FCC's job to decide what is Obscene or not. That is supposed to be the courts decision, the FCC should only be enforcing those rulings.
Too bad its not supposed to be the FCC's job to decide what is Obscene or not. That is supposed to be the courts decision, the FCC should only be enforcing those rulings.
And I disagree. I think its Congress's job to define obscenity. It is the court's job to determine whether or not their definition/restrictions are Constitutional.
04-14-04 | 10:20 PM
#24
So are they saying that Howard Stern lacks any artistic value? Humor doesn't count as art?
04-14-04 | 10:23 PM
#25
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally posted by rfduncan
Nor will the general public who was all up in arms about the Janet Jackson thing at the Super Bowl. I'm sorry, the majority of the populace in this country is just F'd in the H. Looks like another 4 years with Bush....
Nor will the general public who was all up in arms about the Janet Jackson thing at the Super Bowl. I'm sorry, the majority of the populace in this country is just F'd in the H. Looks like another 4 years with Bush....