Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > TV Talk
Reload this Page >

Jennifer Garner [Alias] extended through 2008

Community
Search
TV Talk Talk about Shows on TV

Jennifer Garner [Alias] extended through 2008

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-01-03 | 06:45 PM
  #26  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 24,492
Received 458 Likes on 350 Posts
From: Daytona Beach, FL
How can they depend on her big screen presence to bring in ratings if her grand total of prominent roles amounts to two and one of them being a cameo?
(The prominent ones being Daredevil and CMIYC of course.)

Does this mean they will actually push her to make some more movies?
Old 08-01-03 | 07:12 PM
  #27  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 6,268
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally posted by mwj
I like the show, but this seems kind of risky for a show that has not had great ratings success.
Where's risk? If more viewers come in, then its a bargain.
If more viewers don't come in, can the show. And its a lot less than they pay Drew Carey an episode and no one is watching that show.
Old 08-01-03 | 08:06 PM
  #28  
Sessa17's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 7,393
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: NJ, the place where smiles go to die
Originally posted by Derrich
ABC just killed Jennifer Garner's movie career just as it was about to take off.
I don't get this? She made Daredevil, appeared in a Spielberg movie, & is currently filming her first starring role in a movie all while being on Alias. But you are right, ABC sure did kill her movie career How about she wouldn't have a movie career if it wasn't for ABC. And there is so much other precident for your theory. Didn't Ashton Kutcher just have 2 huge hits while also signing a long term TV contract?

Alias is good(albiet a watered down LaFemme Nikita),
D
This doesn't make any sense either. IT seems like you pulled this out of a bad magazine review. So what exactly is "watered down" about Alias. I'm a big fan of both shows, but what was done on Nikita that isn't done on Alias? What makes it watered down?
Old 08-01-03 | 08:10 PM
  #29  
Rypro 525's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 28,263
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: a frikin hellhole
actually I think the ending or season2 will/did turn lots off so the dvd might help the first few episodes of season 3 but when they know and hate the ending, then they won't want to go back (I personally loved the ending, and think it'll work well for the season)
Old 08-01-03 | 08:12 PM
  #30  
Rypro 525's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 28,263
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: a frikin hellhole
Originally posted by Sessa17
What makes it watered down?
I personally never watched le femme nikita but my dad did and I think it may have been a bit more sexual with the inuendo's and more action in the show.
Old 08-01-03 | 08:30 PM
  #31  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,042
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Pearland, TX
Good news. But I hope they go back to the stuff that worked in season one. Some of the season two episodes weren't as exciting or entertaining as the ones in season one.
Old 08-01-03 | 09:07 PM
  #32  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 8,466
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Actors do not film a television show all year round.

They have the summer to do anything they want.

Elektra spinoff can be filmed on her time off from Alias.
Old 08-02-03 | 04:54 PM
  #33  
mwj
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Where's risk? If more viewers come in, then its a bargain.
If more viewers don't come in, can the show. And its a lot less than they pay Drew Carey an episode and no one is watching that show.
That's true except the show costs more than just her salary. The article doesn't make it clear, but if they have committed to the show through 2008 that's a significant outlay of cash. Maybe she will only be paid if the show is picked up, then that seems like a good deal all around. As little time as shows get to prove themselves these days, I find it surprising to see a network give a long term commitment to a show which is only a moderate success.

Last edited by mwj; 08-02-03 at 05:07 PM.
Old 08-02-03 | 06:04 PM
  #34  
Rypro 525's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 28,263
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: a frikin hellhole
Anyone know any tid bits on season 3? Like when the preimiere date is,
Spoiler:
where in between the two years it starts
Old 08-02-03 | 07:42 PM
  #35  
Josh Z's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 11,962
Received 350 Likes on 243 Posts
From: Boston
Originally posted by mwj
That's true except the show costs more than just her salary. The article doesn't make it clear, but if they have committed to the show through 2008 that's a significant outlay of cash.
They haven't committed to the show through 2008. They can cancel it at anytime. All they have done is sign Jennifer Garner to a contract which says if the show continues through 2008 she will remain its lead actress for that time. If it doesn't continue, she gets severed with the rest of the cast and crew and will only be paid for the work actually completed.
Old 08-02-03 | 09:13 PM
  #36  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 6,268
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally posted by Rypro 525
Anyone know any tid bits on season 3? Like when the preimiere date is,
Spoiler:
where in between the two years it starts
ABC hasn't announced its premiere dates yet, but the Big 3 seem to be favoring premiering shows the last week of September.

And from the casting news that has surfaced, it seems
Spoiler:
the show picks up after the two years....but flashbacks should be more than expected
Old 08-03-03 | 05:19 AM
  #37  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,094
Received 248 Likes on 152 Posts
From: Warren, MI
A couple sites are listing the premiere date as Sept 28th but nothing is official yet.
Old 08-03-03 | 06:31 AM
  #38  
Rypro 525's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 28,263
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: a frikin hellhole
I guess unless they do alot of "previously on..." stuff, lots of tivos and vcrs will be taping until dec when season 2 hits dvd.
Old 08-03-03 | 07:45 PM
  #39  
Rypro 525's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 28,263
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: a frikin hellhole
Anyone know whos gone for sure/ who's new
I heard that Will didn't get killed because disney liked him, and Evil Francie is gone for sure.
Old 08-03-03 | 08:11 PM
  #40  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 42,232
Received 1,469 Likes on 1,144 Posts
Originally posted by Rypro 525
I wonder if that Elektra spinoff is still gonna happen?
Mark Steven Johnson seems hopefull. He keeps saying Summer 2005. Also, the way he talks about it it's more of a sequel and the next Daredevil film will be part three. Just the vibe I get (like Elektra is meant to continue the story from Daredevil through Elektra's POV and set up a third film were Matt and Elektra share the spotlight rather than have it be a side story a'la Catwoman with Halle Berry).

Here's hoping cos her performance in Daredevil left me wanting more (and I'm not even an Alias/Garner fan).

Last edited by RocShemp; 08-03-03 at 08:18 PM.
Old 08-03-03 | 08:40 PM
  #41  
nny
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,404
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Houston, TX
Originally posted by Josh Z
They haven't committed to the show through 2008. They can cancel it at anytime. All they have done is sign Jennifer Garner to a contract which says if the show continues through 2008 she will remain its lead actress for that time. If it doesn't continue, she gets severed with the rest of the cast and crew and will only be paid for the work actually completed.
I imagine every contract is different and you're probably right, but there is a chance you're wrong. The only reason Drew Carey's show was on last year was because if they canceled it, they still would have had to pay Drew his salary. So there is precedent for ABC having that kind of contract.
Old 08-04-03 | 07:54 AM
  #42  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 37,797
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
From: Duluth, GA, USA
And, contractually speaking, there's one more season of the Drew Carey show left (IIRC)...
Old 08-04-03 | 08:30 AM
  #43  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,583
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Virginia Beach, VA USA
Originally posted by Sessa17
[B]I don't get this? She made Daredevil, appeared in a Spielberg movie, & is currently filming her first starring role in a movie all while being on Alias. But you are right, ABC sure did kill her movie career How about she wouldn't have a movie career if it wasn't for ABC. And there is so much other precident for your theory. Didn't Ashton Kutcher just have 2 huge hits while also signing a long term TV contract?
There's a lot of precidence for a TV actor making an impact in hollywood and then failing to capitalize either by bad decisions or network interference. The first example that comes to mind is Pierce Brosnan. He was all set to replace Roger Moore as James Bond but NBC decided to hold up his Remington Steele contract. Brosnan was very vocal about it but it didn't matter and Timothy Dalton got the 007 job and Brosnan had to wait a decade before getting another shot. Think about what would'v e happened if Bruce Willis re-upped for another 5 years of Moonlighting. Actually, we can just look at Ted Danson's career to see what happens when you stay on TV instead of following up a hit movie.

This doesn't make any sense either. IT seems like you pulled this out of a bad magazine review. So what exactly is "watered down" about Alias. I'm a big fan of both shows, but what was done on Nikita that isn't done on Alias? What makes it watered down?
After watching a few eps of La Femme Nikita its obvious. Lets see:
-Nikita opted to kill another agent by blowing up an embassy with a day care center in it because she decided the agent 'might' have been compromised.

-An entire family was killed because they overheard Nikita's codename.

-Nearly every episode invovled someone going into a room to be tortured.

-A young boy was kidnapped from his home and forced to help with a mission. He was later killed by Section.

-etc, etc.
I'm sure Alias is gritty in its own way but to say it's on par with the things that went on in LFM is offbase.


D
Old 08-04-03 | 08:41 AM
  #44  
Rogue588's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 15,094
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: WAS looking for My Own Private Stuckeyville, but stuck in Liberty City (while missing Vice City)
Originally posted by Derrich
There's a lot of precidence for a TV actor making an impact in hollywood and then failing to capitalize either by bad decisions or network interference. The first example that comes to mind is Pierce Brosnan. He was all set to replace Roger Moore as James Bond but NBC decided to hold up his Remington Steele contract. Brosnan was very vocal about it but it didn't matter and Timothy Dalton got the 007 job and Brosnan had to wait a decade before getting another shot. Think about what would'v e happened if Bruce Willis re-upped for another 5 years of Moonlighting. Actually, we can just look at Ted Danson's career to see what happens when you stay on TV instead of following up a hit movie.
And Tom Selleck as Indiana Jones....er, wait....Magnum, PI.
Old 08-12-03 | 03:31 PM
  #45  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Seattle
hahah maybe they meant 2008 in the SHOW'S timeline, hahah and with that season finale twist...
Old 08-14-03 | 07:39 PM
  #46  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,337
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by nny
I imagine every contract is different and you're probably right, but there is a chance you're wrong. The only reason Drew Carey's show was on last year was because if they canceled it, they still would have had to pay Drew his salary. So there is precedent for ABC having that kind of contract.
I'm pretty sure that that was not the case. I thought that the network had already renewed the show and that they would still have to pay for the epsodes even if they were never shot.
Old 08-15-03 | 01:23 PM
  #47  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 8,210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Arch City
Originally posted by nny
I imagine every contract is different and you're probably right, but there is a chance you're wrong. The only reason Drew Carey's show was on last year was because if they canceled it, they still would have had to pay Drew his salary. So there is precedent for ABC having that kind of contract.
Actually, he's right and you're wrong.

Every actor on every TV show is signed to either a 5 year or 7 year contract. It is standard. Then, if during that time the actor or the show gets hot, they will renegotiate, giving the actor more money and extending the life of the contract. But this is has nothing to do with the shows being picked up or cancelled.

This deal is no different than Tyne Daly renegotiating on Judging Amy, Martin Sheen on West Wing, Calista Flockhart on Ally McBeal, etc., etc.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.