Simpsons 1/6
#5
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally posted by Groucho
I missed this one. Did Milhouse saying anything funny?
I missed this one. Did Milhouse saying anything funny?
We could just play "Edna Krabapp-oly".
#9
Moderator
Originally posted by rfduncan
We could just play "Edna Krabapp-oly".
We could just play "Edna Krabapp-oly".
#10
DVD Talk Hero
I liked Homer tacking one more "Stanford" as they were taunting Lisa.
#12
Aside from a few good jokes I thouhgt it was weak, especailly since they went back and forth, having a new focus every commercial break. To end it with bringing back the women from the lame "Homer and Flanders in Vegas" episode was all I could take. Was anyone really wanting to see those women again?
#13
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally posted by Slumbering Fist
Aside from a few good jokes I thouhgt it was weak, especailly since they went back and forth, having a new focus every commercial break. To end it with bringing back the women from the lame "Homer and Flanders in Vegas" episode was all I could take. Was anyone really wanting to see those women again?
Aside from a few good jokes I thouhgt it was weak, especailly since they went back and forth, having a new focus every commercial break. To end it with bringing back the women from the lame "Homer and Flanders in Vegas" episode was all I could take. Was anyone really wanting to see those women again?
#15
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
They'be been doing the self-refferential thing for the last couple of seasons and I think its wearing thin. "Think we'll get cancelled now?"
Also, they never used to be this unrealistic (the wolves and lions conspiring) - its like they're running out of ideas and so we're just getting hodge-podge, almost like the Flintstones introducing the Great Gazoo (sp?). The Simpsons need to have some writers who can do actual plots, not a bunch of sight gags.
Also, they never used to be this unrealistic (the wolves and lions conspiring) - its like they're running out of ideas and so we're just getting hodge-podge, almost like the Flintstones introducing the Great Gazoo (sp?). The Simpsons need to have some writers who can do actual plots, not a bunch of sight gags.
#17
Moderator
Originally posted by MrN
Also, they never used to be this unrealistic (the wolves and lions conspiring)
Also, they never used to be this unrealistic (the wolves and lions conspiring)
#18
DVD Talk Legend
Originally posted by MrN
Also, they never used to be this unrealistic (the wolves and lions conspiring)
Also, they never used to be this unrealistic (the wolves and lions conspiring)
Anyway, I thought this particular episode was pretty strong and I enjoyed the sort of "stream of consciousness" approach to the plot.
#19
Cool New Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Alexandria (represent)
Funny moments, but not as good as it could have been. The plot was pretty poor overall. I had almost lost hope in the Simpsons these days until I saw an episode a few weeks ago where Homer kept screaming uncontrollably. Frickin Hilarious. Restored my faith, so this one is forgivable.
#20
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
I do remember the bears in season one, and I realize 'realism' isn't what the show is about - it is animated with yellow people with 4 fingers - I get that.
I also don't mind sight gags and little shots to make a point, but once a show sets its rules, it should follow them. Breaking the rules does pull the viewer out of the story. Like in the bear scene, it was done not only to be funny but to provide drama and a poignant moment.
Now, if any one can think of any example where something even more unrealistic has happened (and no, I'm not counting the halloween episodes), then I would stand corrected.
I also don't mind sight gags and little shots to make a point, but once a show sets its rules, it should follow them. Breaking the rules does pull the viewer out of the story. Like in the bear scene, it was done not only to be funny but to provide drama and a poignant moment.
Now, if any one can think of any example where something even more unrealistic has happened (and no, I'm not counting the halloween episodes), then I would stand corrected.
#21
DVD Talk Legend
Originally posted by draven-x
I liked Homer tacking one more "Stanford" as they were taunting Lisa.
I liked Homer tacking one more "Stanford" as they were taunting Lisa.
#23
Moderator
Originally posted by MrN
I also don't mind sight gags and little shots to make a point, but once a show sets its rules, it should follow them. Breaking the rules does pull the viewer out of the story.
I also don't mind sight gags and little shots to make a point, but once a show sets its rules, it should follow them. Breaking the rules does pull the viewer out of the story.
Now, if any one can think of any example where something even more unrealistic has happened
* Chewbacca and Alf turning up
* Musical numbers where everybody spontaneously breaks into song
* Osmodio
* Leonard Nimoy beaming out
* Etc Etc Etc
#24
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally posted by MrN
Now, if any one can think of any example where something even more unrealistic has happened (and no, I'm not counting the halloween episodes), then I would stand corrected.
Now, if any one can think of any example where something even more unrealistic has happened (and no, I'm not counting the halloween episodes), then I would stand corrected.

- Krusty's monkey chauffer
- Their dog and cat juggling fire after they got Laddy
- Fat Tony milking rats
- Homer being raped by a Panda
- When Home faked his death beavers swam out and attacked/ate the dummy
Those are just off the top of my head. Thinking about, the only animal that has acted like an animal on the show was the wild boar when the kids got stranded on the island.
#25
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Originally posted by Groucho
What rules? The Simpsons has always operated without a net.
What rules? The Simpsons has always operated without a net.
I would say they have very lax rules yes, but I wouldn't say they have no rules at all. They follow certain rules at least to let the viewer follow the narrative.
* Just about any of Professor's Frink's inventions
* Chewbacca and Alf turning up
* Musical numbers where everybody spontaneously breaks into song
* Osmodio
* Leonard Nimoy beaming out
* Etc Etc Etc
Almost all of the above are sight gags. And to me, the song episodes don't show things that break my suspension of disbelief - at least on a physical level. I realize the threshold on this is purely subjective, but last night's episode crossed that line.
To restate my opinion - I don't mind sight gags. They're what keeps the show on a laugh-a-second level. Having 2 second scenes of penguins flying fall into this category. But to have a three minute scene with wolves and lions conspiring and coming up with Wiley Coyote schemes was tasking believability. Now, if this happened in Futurama, I wouldn't blink an eye. Its understood that things like that can and do happen on that show. But, after 11 years of the Simpsons, I was used to a certain level of 'realism' and the last two years they seem to be trying really hard to break the consistency. Maybe that's just the new direction of the show.



