![]() |
Originally posted by badger1997 [rant]I just don't get all this whining from you anti-sports people. Sports SHOULD always get priority. It usually brings in more viewers and the other thing is that the games are LIVE. You can always postpone a recorded show and show it in a later slot, whereas the game is happening now!!!! Get it. I know you don't like sports, but this isn't going to change any time soon, so just pop in your tape of old Futrama episodes and shut the hell up for once.[/rant] |
Originally posted by badger1997 once? Just because you're not a sports fan doesn't mean there isn't something worthwhile in a sport. I find your dismissal |
Originally posted by Darren Garrison Well, as far as I define "worthwhile", I see nothing of that in sports. If you like them as entertainment, fine. But worthwhile? No. Things that are worthwhile are are medicine, science, feeding the hungry, ect. Sports are just a bunch of guys taking hitting balls WAY too seriously. I see nothing "worthwhile", as fundamentally valuable to life, in sports. (To be fair, I can say the same about the TV shows that I like, too). |
We'll have to simply agree to disagree. I'm admittedly bigoted against jocks. I've seen too many instances-- both in high school and college-- when jocks were given special treatment, when sports were given priority over academics, and when coaches were hired for teachers and thrown a couple of classes to teach with no concern for their skills as a teacher, just where they could have a larger supply of coaches. If I had ever liked sports, that would have been enough to turn me against them, and I honestly and truly think the very best thing that could be done to improve our failing public schools would be to entirely eliminate sports from them. IMHO, nothing would be lost.
|
Originally posted by mllefoo Fox should dump baseball and football. Give it to CBS because nobody watches that channel anyway, and then we'd have our beloved cartoons back. |
Originally posted by Darren Garrison We'll have to simply agree to disagree. I'm admittedly bigoted against jocks. I've seen too many instances-- both in high school and college-- when jocks were given special treatment, when sports were given priority over academics, and when coaches were hired for teachers and thrown a couple of classes to teach with no concern for their skills as a teacher, just where they could have a larger supply of coaches. If I had ever liked sports, that would have been enough to turn me against them, and I honestly and truly think the very best thing that could be done to improve our failing public schools would be to entirely eliminate sports from them. IMHO, nothing would be lost. But, on the topic of athletics. Sure, some people get preferential treatment because they're athletic, but people also get preferential treatment because they're good looking, because they put out, because they're charming, and yes ... because they're smart. Just because some people's priorities are skewed does not condemn athletic competition. You'll find that students who participate in some form of athletic competition learn many essential skills that allow them to suceed in the real world: including teamwork, discipline, personal motivation, and setting aside personal objectives for the good of the whole, just to name a few. Sure, I was a brainiac in high school, and some jerks got preferential treatment because they could run fast or jump high, but they are the minority. Athletic competition is by and large an incredibly positive experience, and isolating a few spoiled individuals or negative personal experiences is unfair. The failing of our public schools is because people (students, teachers, and parents) refuse to take responsibility for their own actions and are always trying to blame the world's problems on someone else instead of looking in a mirror. Back on topic, though, seeing all these anti-World Series posts is just sad. If you don't like baseball, fine. If you don't like sports, fine. If you don't like 'The Simpsons', fine (you're an idiot, but fine :)). But claims that Major League Baseball is in any way the cause of you (collective "you" ... not the quoted poster) having to watch your beloved halloween episode a week late is childish and absurd and dare I say ... idiotic. EVERYTHING got pushed back a few weeks. The Emmys got moved. 24 got moved. The West Wing was moved. Family Guy, The Tick, Alias, Philly, NYPB Blue, etc, etc ... all were moved. Baseball is not the cause of The Simpsons being moved. Focus your aggressions on the terrorists for disrupting our television schedule, not some childish hatred of our national pasttime. das |
Originally posted by mllefoo By the same token the BBC doesn't preempt decent shows for baseball. every other week Buffy or Trek/Sliders/Simpsons is bumped in favor of...Snooker!!! :eek: seriously, we've never seen a whole season of Buffy without dozens of gaps for indoor sports, and even when we do see it, they're inevitably cut versions. the BBC has complete contempt for programming not produced by themselves. |
Originally posted by scott27 Just FYI, FOX just completed the first year of a new $2.5 billion, 5 year deal to carry MLB games, including every playoff and World Series game, so you're stuck with baseball on FOX until at least 2005. That's beautiful. I for one will gladly wait a week for the premiere of my favorite show, The Simpsons, to watch that World Series. And I'm not even a huge baseball fan. But man those were awesome games. |
Read an AP report today that pretty much said Fox got the best ratings it has ever had (outside of NFL games) for game 7.
|
OK, to try to make this back on-topic... did anyone catch the Simpsons yesterday? What are your opinions?
|
Originally posted by MrN Read an AP report today that pretty much said Fox got the best ratings it has ever had (outside of NFL games) for game 7. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:07 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.