Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > TV Talk
Reload this Page >

Buffy/Angel crossovers next season

Community
Search
TV Talk Talk about Shows on TV

Buffy/Angel crossovers next season

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-23-01, 03:06 PM
  #1  
DVD Talk Reviewer
Thread Starter
 
Slumbering Fist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Considering the discussion about Angel ond Buffy finales, and the lingering speculation on series crossovers...i ran across this article which seem sto give the final (fairly disheartening) word on the matter...

THIS ARTICLE CONTAINS SPOILERS ABOUT THE SEASON 5 FINALE OF BUFFY UK/European readers beware.

LA TIMES-Wednesday, May 23, 2001

Is It the End of the Road for 'Buffy'-'Angel' Connection?
Television * Crossover episodes appear unlikely for the shows, which will be on different networks come fall.

By T.L. STANLEY, Special to The Times


David E. Kelley did it with "Ally McBeal" and "The Practice," blending story lines and cast members from the two legal eagle shows for a crossover episode a few years back, even though the former airs on Fox and the latter on ABC.
Can the same be done with "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" and "Angel," now that the flagship show and its spinoff will find themselves on different networks come fall?
Not likely, say network executives and the shows' producers, even though Tuesday night's season finale of "Angel" featured an appearance by a "Buffy" regular and seemingly set the stage for further melding of the two comedy-action dramas.
There's too much bad blood after the protracted and public fight over the show between the WB and 20th Century Fox TV, "Buffy's" producer, according to sources on both sides. That battle landed "Buffy" on rival UPN with a 44-episode guarantee at an estimated $2.3 million per. The WB had been paying about $1 million an episode and balked at more than doubling that price, with then-WB chief Jamie Kellner saying it wasn't the network's top-rated program and that it had limited appeal.
"There's acrimony here, and I like to kid myself and say it'll fade," said Joss Whedon, executive producer of "Buffy" and co-creator, with David Greenwalt, of "Angel." "A lot of people got bruised. I haven't broached the subject yet [of future crossovers], and now's not the time."
One crossover that already had been planned for next season was recently dumped. Angel, played by David Boreanaz, was scheduled to drop in on the "Buffy" gang, but another character will fill that role, according to Whedon.
There had been a number of crossovers between "Buffy" and "Angel," particularly in the spinoff's first season. (It just finished its second year.) Boreanaz appeared in a "Buffy" episode this spring.
"[Buffy and Angel] will and can reference each other," Whedon said, "but the big emotions can't be about each other. They haven't been for the past year. There will always be a lingering tie, but both do have to move on."
The WB couldn't agree more.
"In order for 'Angel' to succeed long term on the WB, it must evolve into a self-contained show," a network spokesman said. This season, "Buffy" has averaged 4.4 million viewers, while "Angel" is averaging 4.1 million, retaining more than 90% of the Buffy audience.
The appearance of "Buffy" pal Willow, played by Alyson Hannigan, on Tuesday night's "Angel" season finale was not meant to imply more crossovers were in the offing, Whedon said. The character showed up in Los Angeles to deliver the news in person to Angel that Buffy died while saving her younger sister (Michelle Trachtenberg) and averting an apocalypse.
Crossovers have been used for years as stunts, particularly at sweeps time, and not always with shows by the same producer. Characters from NBC's now-dead "Homicide: Life on the Street" bled into "Law & Order," and vice versa, while sitcom stars have popped up on other same-network series. The WB recently put its "Popstars" in an episode of "Sabrina, the Teenage Witch."
Cross-network crossovers, though, are rarer, with Kelley being one of the few producers with the clout to pull it off. The first one, "Ally"-"The Practice," ran back to back on the same night and ruffled some feathers with Fox affiliates who argued that they would lose viewers for their local news to a highly promoted 10 p.m. episode of "The Practice." And "Ally," at that time in spring '98, was stronger in the ratings.
There was less hubbub when Kelley crossed over newcomer "Boston Public," on Fox, with the now-established "Practice." The story unfolded on consecutive nights. "Buffy" and "Angel" crossed story lines during this past season only occasionally, Whedon said, but keeping them wholly separate will be a creative challenge.
"There are some restrictions that come with it," he said. "But, in a way, it's like other changes you face. If you lose a cast member, for instance, like we did with Seth Green [who played Oz on "Buffy"], you work through it, and inevitably, it can lead to better situations."



[Edited by iaido on 05-24-01 at 11:20 AM]
Old 05-23-01, 10:39 PM
  #2  
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Alum Rock, Alabama
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm really unhappy that you didn't put a spoiler tag or warning in this post. In the UK, we have yet to see the season finales for these shows.

Please correct this.
Old 05-24-01, 01:25 PM
  #3  
DVD Talk Reviewer
Thread Starter
 
Slumbering Fist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Orson
I'm really unhappy that you didn't put a spoiler tag or warning in this post. In the UK, we have yet to see the season finales for these shows.

Please correct this.
Added a warning before the article. My sympathies for you Europeans, since its going to be damn hard to keep your eyes off this info for an entire year.
Old 05-24-01, 07:26 PM
  #4  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: new england
Posts: 8,173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, it's not an out and out no. The way I look at it is that it may not be probable, it's not impossible. Bottom line, if there's money to be made, they'll do it.
Old 05-25-01, 10:48 AM
  #5  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Portland
Posts: 8,324
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by Orson
I'm really unhappy that you didn't put a spoiler tag or warning in this post. In the UK, we have yet to see the season finales for these shows.

Please correct this.
It seems that if you know people are discussing a show you know that your country is behind in, you would know there would be discussions happening that you don't want to hear.

It's like people putting spoiler tags in the finale discussion. If you haven't seen the finale, why read the thread? Why protect someone who knowingly reads a thread about something they don't want to know about yet?

Old 05-25-01, 11:10 AM
  #6  
DVD Talk Hero
 
das Monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 35,879
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by renaldow
Originally posted by Orson
I'm really unhappy that you didn't put a spoiler tag or warning in this post. In the UK, we have yet to see the season finales for these shows.

Please correct this.
It seems that if you know people are discussing a show you know that your country is behind in, you would know there would be discussions happening that you don't want to hear.

It's like people putting spoiler tags in the finale discussion. If you haven't seen the finale, why read the thread? Why protect someone who knowingly reads a thread about something they don't want to know about yet?

Typically, I would agree with you. Putting spoiler tags in threads that are called "Last night's episode!!!" is just silly. But in this case, from the topic, it's entirely possible that this post was going to be general information ... like "WB officials released a statement yesterday noting that they have outlined 2 crossovers for May sweeps next season." That kind of thing. The real lesson here is that it sucks that anyone has to wait to see Buffy.

das
Old 05-25-01, 12:47 PM
  #7  
DVD Talk Reviewer
Thread Starter
 
Slumbering Fist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by renaldow


It seems that if you know people are discussing a show you know that your country is behind in, you would know there would be discussions happening that you don't want to hear.
Yeah, I kinda thought the same, but, looking back, it does just seem to be an article about the crossovers, which doesnt automatically imply they will talk about specific details of the finale. And the actual spoiler is 2/3rds of the way into the article. I comprimised and put up a WARNING, instead of the requested spoiler swipe.
Old 05-25-01, 12:51 PM
  #8  
DVD Talk Reviewer
Thread Starter
 
Slumbering Fist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 3,272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by electra

Well, it's not an out and out no.
When its coming out of a network executives mouth, I always equate "Not likely" with "Hell No".

Originally posted by renaldow
It seems that if you know people are discussing a show you know that your country is behind in, you would know there would be discussions happening that you don't want to hear.
Yeah, I kinda thought the same, but, looking back, it does just seem to be an article about the crossovers, which doesnt automatically imply they will talk about specific details of the finale. And the actual spoiler is 2/3rds of the way into the article. I comprimised and put up a WARNING, instead of the requested spoiler swipe.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.