Sports Talk Discuss all things Sports Related

Yankees Get Another One

Old 12-24-02, 04:40 PM
  #1  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Central Hoosierland
Posts: 3,384
Yankees Get Another One

http://espn.go.com/mlb/news/2002/1224/1482132.html

Details: 4 years, $32 million

I'm amazed that a team with Pettitte, Weaver, Wells, Mussina and Hernandez, AND Clemens waiting in the wings, has the brass (and cash) to go get this guy.

Hideki Matsui and Jose Contreras certainly have a lot of "earning" to do.
indianajdp is offline  
Old 12-24-02, 05:39 PM
  #2  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,506
I wonder how old he really is. He looks pretty old.
Applejack is offline  
Old 12-24-02, 05:43 PM
  #3  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 2,278
"We couldn't, the right word is we wouldn't, sacrifice the opportunity to sign these talents on the basis of reducing payroll first,'' Yankees general manager Brian Cashman said.

I respect that attitude.

Even if they have the money to spend it is still nice that some teams actually want to compete and take chances even if it costs them some profit.
Ralph Wiggum is offline  
Old 12-25-02, 01:05 AM
  #4  
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 8,205
Hopefully they got the next Livan Hernandez.
AndyCapps is offline  
Old 12-25-02, 01:24 AM
  #5  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Columbia, MD, USA
Posts: 11,141
I find it odd that they went after both Matsui and Contreras. Both are getting sizable paychecks for accomplishing jack squat. Why not just trade the Braves a bag of balls and get Millwood over Contreras?

Still, I guess it will help them in these markets when the next big name comes around.

Still, leaves a bitter taste to see the rich get richer while the main competitors (Oakland, Atlanta) see some of their best players walking away.
Jericho is online now  
Old 12-25-02, 01:11 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Houston
Posts: 623
This is just one of the reasons I don't watch Baseball, too many teams buying talent while others sell their talent to the highest bidder because they can't afford to put a competitive team on the field without going bankrupt.

Atleast with the NFL, NBA, NHL you have a chance to be competitive (except the Bengals) but with Baseball you have teams that are out of the playoff race before the season even starts. My family is from Boston so if the Red Sox (another team with lots of money even though they can't seem to win) ever win the world series again I will have to fly back to Boston for the party, but aside from the curse being broken I will just stick to the sports that are actually competitive.

Kind of sucks being a Dolphins fan whos entire family is from Boston, but I guess it is better than being a Yankees fan from Boston.

Last edited by bluntman72; 12-25-02 at 01:14 PM.
bluntman72 is offline  
Old 12-25-02, 02:07 PM
  #7  
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Right Behind You
Posts: 4,986
Don't they have a salary cap? I thought thats why they went on strike. Thats a horribly uneven sport, everyone should watch football where a new team is champion every year.
lesterlong is offline  
Old 12-25-02, 02:20 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Northwest Ohio
Posts: 408
Originally posted by lesterlong
Don't they have a salary cap? I thought thats why they went on strike. Thats a horribly uneven sport, everyone should watch football where a new team is champion every year.
2000 - NY Yankees
2001 - AZ D'Backs
2002 - Anaheim Angels

Uneven?
Ranger02 is offline  
Old 12-25-02, 04:43 PM
  #9  
DVD Talk God
 
Deftones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Arizona
Posts: 74,840
The yankees payroll is now at an estimated $140 million, well over the $117 million established for the luxury tax. The Yanks are screwed b/c they have a ton of high priced players that no team will be willing to accept.
Deftones is offline  
Old 12-25-02, 06:34 PM
  #10  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 2,917
Originally posted by Ranger02
2000 - NY Yankees
2001 - AZ D'Backs
2002 - Anaheim Angels

Uneven?
Not a bad point, but I think 2002 was the only true unpredictable year. 2001 was Dbacks vs. Yanks. 2000, the Yanks won it all. The Yankees have been dominating baseball in the last 6 or 7 years. And a lot of the reason for that is payroll. Similarly, Atlanta dominated much of the 90's because of the ability to spend. Of course, people will argue their farm systems were excellent, which is true, but the reason they were able to keep their players and add new ones was their high payroll.

Football is 100% unpredictable, even the regular season. One never knows how well any team will do. Teams go from last place to first place. That just doesn't happen in baseball.
RJainMJ is offline  
Old 12-25-02, 06:45 PM
  #11  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Columbia, MD, USA
Posts: 11,141
Originally posted by bluntman72
This is just one of the reasons I don't watch Baseball, too many teams buying talent while others sell their talent to the highest bidder because they can't afford to put a competitive team on the field without going bankrupt.

Atleast with the NFL, NBA, NHL you have a chance to be competitive (except the Bengals) but with Baseball you have teams that are out of the playoff race before the season even starts. My family is from Boston so if the Red Sox (another team with lots of money even though they can't seem to win) ever win the world series again I will have to fly back to Boston for the party, but aside from the curse being broken I will just stick to the sports that are actually competitive.

Kind of sucks being a Dolphins fan whos entire family is from Boston, but I guess it is better than being a Yankees fan from Boston.
I'd argue the NHL is a lot like the MLB, more so than like the NBA or NFL. Although the NHL isn't nearly as bad as MLB, it will still hurt smaller teams like Edmonton which routinely gives away good players because they can't afford them.
Jericho is online now  
Old 12-25-02, 11:09 PM
  #12  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Region 1
Posts: 16,291
I hope the Yanks don't sign Clemens. They need to trade El Duque too.
zuffy is offline  
Old 12-26-02, 01:21 AM
  #13  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 10,614
I wonder when the Yankees' payroll will reach $200 million
Da Thrilla is offline  
Old 12-26-02, 08:56 AM
  #14  
DVD Talk God
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Directionally Challenged (for DirecTV)
Posts: 122,926
The luxury tax is a joke compared to the salary cap in the NFL.
Red Dog is offline  
Old 12-26-02, 03:59 PM
  #15  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Columbia, MD, USA
Posts: 11,141
You do wonder what the Yanks will do with their staff next year. Assuming they sign Clemens which seems like a safe assumption I'm guessing the starting staff is:

Clemens
Mussina
Pettitte
Conteras
Wells

Which leaves...
Weaver
El Duque
Hitchcock in the bullpen

Combined with the salaries of Karsay and Rivera, that's a lot of $$$$. But they got some decent prices on Mussina and likely Clemens so I guess it could be worse.
Jericho is online now  
Old 12-26-02, 04:16 PM
  #16  
DVD Talk Hero
 
das Monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 35,881
I love it. A nice F U to the Luxury Tax. While I will root against the Yankees in nearly every conceivable scenario, I respect the way they do business. Smart business decisions and huge fan support gives them the freedom to do these things. They also take chances ... expensive ones. These may be stupid moves ... maybe not ... but I like that they're not running for the hills after all the whiney bitch owners got their way crying over their inability to run a business properly.

das
das Monkey is offline  
Old 12-26-02, 05:04 PM
  #17  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 2,278
Originally posted by das Monkey
I love it. A nice F U to the Luxury Tax. While I will root against the Yankees in nearly every conceivable scenario, I respect the way they do business. Smart business decisions and huge fan support gives them the freedom to do these things. They also take chances ... expensive ones. These may be stupid moves ... maybe not ... but I like that they're not running for the hills after all the whiney bitch owners got their way crying over their inability to run a business properly.

das
Amen.

I wish that the MLB would contract at least four teams and get some of the AAAA ballclubs out of baseball.

The Yankees also develop talent and make the most of what they have - even if it is the best hand in baseball. It's not like the other teams are owned by middle-class families. If they don't want to spend the necessary money to compete, they don't belong.
Ralph Wiggum is offline  
Old 12-26-02, 09:24 PM
  #18  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Region 1
Posts: 16,291
Originally posted by das Monkey
I love it. A nice F U to the Luxury Tax. While I will root against the Yankees in nearly every conceivable scenario, I respect the way they do business. Smart business decisions and huge fan support gives them the freedom to do these things. They also take chances ... expensive ones. These may be stupid moves ... maybe not ... but I like that they're not running for the hills after all the whiney bitch owners got their way crying over their inability to run a business properly.

das
I agree with the F U to the Luxury Tax somewhat. It's cool that they're going after players that they think it will help the team, even though it will increase their payroll. The problem I have is the raise in ticket prices they did a couple of months ago.
zuffy is offline  
Old 12-26-02, 10:58 PM
  #19  
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
Rogue588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: WAS looking for My Own Private Stuckeyville, but stuck in Liberty City (while missing Vice City)
Posts: 15,094
Believe it or not, I never saw it the way you guys are describing it.

...and i'm a Yankee fan!

I suppose the major problem I have is management's treatment of some players.

I didn't like Georgie's handling of the Tino Martinez situation. [I was also hoping for a Oakland/St. Louis series -- which would've been poetic justice]. And from what i'm reading, I don't like the way Stanton was dismissed. [and i'm not even a Stanton fan...]

But you definitely guys are right.

Also, let's not forget that the fans are somewhat accountable too. Let's not try waiting until the team makes it to the playoffs &/or world series...cough, Arizona, cough, Anaheim...before giving them support, going to the games, etc...
Rogue588 is offline  
Old 12-26-02, 11:25 PM
  #20  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Region 1
Posts: 16,291
I didn't like losing Tino, but when you get a Giambi as a replacement, it's very easy to forgive.

As for the Stanton situation, I don't think it's a good move. They replaced a 35 years old reliever with a 36 years old. Sure, Hammond's stat is great in 2002, but that was only 1 season and he was away from baseball for 4 years before 2002!
zuffy is offline  
Old 12-27-02, 12:29 AM
  #21  
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
Rogue588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: WAS looking for My Own Private Stuckeyville, but stuck in Liberty City (while missing Vice City)
Posts: 15,094
Originally posted by zuffy
I didn't like losing Tino, but when you get a Giambi as a replacement, it's very easy to forgive.
Yeah, but IMO Tino was a better fielder than Giambi. [DEFINITELY a better base runner -- which is probably why he tries/hits home runs at all his at bats -- but I digress] Giambi's ego didn't allow him to come to the Yanks as a DH. Though, as I type this, i'm sure Georgie woulda put the [then] golden boy Johnson at first anyways...
Rogue588 is offline  
Old 12-27-02, 08:56 AM
  #22  
DVD Talk God
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Directionally Challenged (for DirecTV)
Posts: 122,926
Originally posted by Ralph Wiggum
Amen.

I wish that the MLB would contract at least four teams and get some of the AAAA ballclubs out of baseball.

The Yankees also develop talent and make the most of what they have - even if it is the best hand in baseball. It's not like the other teams are owned by middle-class families. If they don't want to spend the necessary money to compete, they don't belong.

I agree about contraction.

However, you still have to realize that this is a business. These are not hobbies. If the other clubs want to compete with the Yankees they have to spend spend spend. If they do this, they will lose millions because they don't come close to generating the revenue that the Yankees do and unless the cities they represent triple or quadruple in population, they never will. Steinbrenner would not be spending this kind of money if he did not make it. The system is set up in a way where the Yankees will always generate the big revenues. Kudos to George for not pocketing a huge profit - he could if he wanted to.

Unless the other owners want to lose lots of money, they cannot touch the Yankees when it comes to spending. There are other aspects to building a successful franchise, but it is clear that the Yankees have a big head start over everyone else.
Red Dog is offline  
Old 12-27-02, 09:46 AM
  #23  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicago->D.C.
Posts: 6,524
Have to agree with most here and I hate the Yankees. You cannot blame General George for playing within the rules. Face it, the guy hates to lose and will do ANYTHING to win but MLB is screwed and the luxury tax only hurts those who do not have the money. The Yankees are very rich and can probably afford any fines they are faced with.

Agree that there has to be some teams axed. Fewer teams would make baseball a much better product.

Also, I thought Tino was a great Yankee 1st baseman.

Any word that Clemens may go back to the Red Sox.
Flashback is offline  
Old 12-27-02, 03:43 PM
  #24  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Columbia, MD, USA
Posts: 11,141
Originally posted by Rogue588
I didn't like Georgie's handling of the Tino Martinez situation. [I was also hoping for a Oakland/St. Louis series -- which would've been poetic justice]. And from what i'm reading, I don't like the way Stanton was dismissed. [and i'm not even a Stanton fan...]
But the handling of the Tino situation is basically why the Yankees are successful. Tino may be a good guy, he's vastly overpaid at $10 million per year he's getting.

Signing a vastly superior player in Giambi makes the team better, and it also allows the team more money to sign pitching. Giambi makes more than Tino, but having $10 million of dead weight with Martinez in the line-up means they'll have to spend to get more offense and then spend even more for pitching.

I admire Steinbrenner for going for everything and not falling under the "we're broke, poor us" motto the owners have been pushing. However, one has to understand that even now the Yanks will still make tons of money.

A team like the Diamondbacks, which can't support a huge payroll and goes into debt to win is so much more impressive to me. They really went for it. The Yanks? Well they'll make less money than before, but they still make oodles of cash. One less ivory backscratcher I guess...

The Yanks win partly because they do make good decisions. However there are teams that I believe that have made better decisions over the years (Oakland and Houston for example) and don't win in large part because they can't afford their better players. I can't help but imagine what Oakland would have been last year with their line-up AND Giambi, Damon, and Isringhausen.

The Yanks should win. Not only due they have the advantage at the major league level, but with the salaries the top prospects get, most teams pass on them too. And some of the best prospects never are even in the draft. Among the Yankees, Jeter was a draft pick, but Rivera, Soriano, Williams, and so forth weren't ever in the draft. Not to say they bought those players too, but the extra money they have for signing bonuses and scouting certainly can't hurt.

Still the problem is in the rules, and thus with baseball and not the Yankees. The new system in place is better than the older one, but I still don't see how it helps that much. Some teams will always have huge advantages over others. And that isn't true in the NBA or the NFL.
Jericho is online now  
Old 12-27-02, 06:10 PM
  #25  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 2,278
Teams have to make an effort to market and grow the audience for the sport. Obviously, teams in N.Y. and L.A. have an advantage, but if they don't put out a decent product people aren't going to come. The Florida teams are in large markets and still manage to embarass the game.

Seattle was a small market team for years, but with some good decisions and bit of luck (A-Rod, Junior, Johnson) they expand their market and compete with the big boys. A lot of the midwest teams never adapted after the 80s and have fallen apart. I have a hard time believing that the baseball market in St. Louis is inherently better than the one in Kansas City. Detroit is a great sports town, but the Tigers are still garbage.

It all starts with the owner and front office.
Ralph Wiggum is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.