Sex and The City Movie Question
#1
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Briarwood Sanatarium
Sex and The City Movie Question
I have a quick q about SATS theatrical vs Extended, is there any additional nudity in the EE or just character stuff?
#3
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 4,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Briarwood Sanatarium
My wife wants it for christmas and that means I will have to sit down and watch it and if I get to see extra Tots or Pie then I will get her the EE, if not I will just get the theatrical
#4
TOTY Winner 2018 and Inane Thread Master
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 54,145
Received 1,729 Likes
on
1,417 Posts
From: "Are any of us really anywhere?"
your married and still need to see extra tots or pie? i don't think extending a bad movie will help
#5
Member
^^^ Ha, as if being married sucks the need for extra tots and pie. Wait, we are talking about food, right?
#8
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Pontiac,Mi
Yes but you also have to see more Sarah Jessica Parker-homeliest leading lady in the business.
#10
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
I didn't see it in the theater, but I did watch the extended cut with my wife on DVD. According to her, the only real extra stuff is a trick-or-treating scene and a few other character bits. You're not going to sit through a longer cut and get any extra "tots or pies" for your trouble.
As far as I was concerned, it felt less like an actual film and more like an abbreviated season edited together. About every half hour had its own subplot and resolution, while the overarching plot ran the course of the film, and it was not dissimilar from watching a season in marathon form. I think this has more to do with disappointment for fans than anything, because it never really felt like it needed to be a film.
As far as I was concerned, it felt less like an actual film and more like an abbreviated season edited together. About every half hour had its own subplot and resolution, while the overarching plot ran the course of the film, and it was not dissimilar from watching a season in marathon form. I think this has more to do with disappointment for fans than anything, because it never really felt like it needed to be a film.
#11
DVD Talk Godfather
I didn't see it in the theater, but I did watch the extended cut with my wife on DVD. According to her, the only real extra stuff is a trick-or-treating scene and a few other character bits. You're not going to sit through a longer cut and get any extra "tots or pies" for your trouble.
As far as I was concerned, it felt less like an actual film and more like an abbreviated season edited together. About every half hour had its own subplot and resolution, while the overarching plot ran the course of the film, and it was not dissimilar from watching a season in marathon form. I think this has more to do with disappointment for fans than anything, because it never really felt like it needed to be a film.
As far as I was concerned, it felt less like an actual film and more like an abbreviated season edited together. About every half hour had its own subplot and resolution, while the overarching plot ran the course of the film, and it was not dissimilar from watching a season in marathon form. I think this has more to do with disappointment for fans than anything, because it never really felt like it needed to be a film.
#12
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Allow me to clarify. I thought the plot lines worked just fine for the characters and their universe. I just thought that it would have been as effective as a five-episode season, or even a mini-series. There was nothing about the story they told that I felt made it special enough to warrant being a film instead of being televised. A lot of Trekkies feel the same way about most of the Next Generation movies.




