Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Music Talk
Reload this Page >

I thought I had seen it all from recording industry...

Community
Search
Music Talk Discuss music in all its forms: CD, MP3, DVD-A, SACD and of course live

I thought I had seen it all from recording industry...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-09-07 | 12:39 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Seattle
I thought I had seen it all from recording industry...

http://www.floridatoday.com/apps/pbc...707080343/1006.

Next they will start hitting the high school "battle of the bands" for royalties.
Old 07-09-07 | 01:36 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Phoenix
You have GOT to be KIDDING me!

Originally Posted by Lou Andrus
"One guy called and said I had to pay him if I played any gospel music at all."
Andrus said a friend of his who owned a restaurant that did not feature music was contacted by a company looking to charge him because it owned the rights to a Hank Williams Jr. song, "Are You Ready for Some Football?" The song preceded every "Monday Night Football" telecast, which the restaurant carried on its televisions.
This is outright extortion. I have 99 percent classical and film music in my collection, so fortunately I've given the major labels next to nothing in royalties.

And no way will I ever start subsidizing them. Not after this garbage.
Old 07-09-07 | 02:39 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 795
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: the oc (don't call it that)
so if you've purchased a physical/digital copy of a record, then there's no royalties to collect, but if you subscribe to and "pipe in satellite music to a fitness center" you have to pay licensing fees? i thought the only time you pay royalties is when you 'record' a copywritten song, not perform live. if that's not that case, i wouldn't pay a cent.
Old 07-09-07 | 06:28 AM
  #4  
Michael Corvin's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 63,453
Received 1,377 Likes on 943 Posts
From: Louisville, KY
wow. I'm not even sure what to write.
Old 07-09-07 | 07:25 AM
  #5  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 14,020
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Newfoundland, Canada
Originally Posted by spinning plates
so if you've purchased a physical/digital copy of a record, then there's no royalties to collect, but if you subscribe to and "pipe in satellite music to a fitness center" you have to pay licensing fees? i thought the only time you pay royalties is when you 'record' a copywritten song, not perform live. if that's not that case, i wouldn't pay a cent.
Not only satellite radio, but terrestrial radio as well. If you own an establishment, and you have FM, AM, or satellite radio on, you are supposed to pay royalties for it.
Old 07-09-07 | 08:23 AM
  #6  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 5,176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: CT
Originally Posted by palebluedot
http://www.floridatoday.com/apps/pbc...707080343/1006.

Next they will start hitting the high school "battle of the bands" for royalties.
...or karaoke nights... jesus..
Old 07-09-07 | 08:57 AM
  #7  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 26,192
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: in da cloud
Originally Posted by spinning plates
so if you've purchased a physical/digital copy of a record, then there's no royalties to collect, but if you subscribe to and "pipe in satellite music to a fitness center" you have to pay licensing fees? i thought the only time you pay royalties is when you 'record' a copywritten song, not perform live. if that's not that case, i wouldn't pay a cent.
the rules are different since bars and restaraunts are playing it for others and making money off it.
Old 07-09-07 | 08:59 AM
  #8  
wendersfan's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 33,921
Received 168 Likes on 123 Posts
From: America!
Through their own lack of foresight their industry is dying right out from under them, and they are desperate to get income any way they can.
Old 07-09-07 | 09:00 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They've GOT to be kidding...what in the world? This is extremely preposterous!

Now, maybe someone can explain something to me about the regular commercial radio vs. satellite radio. The article says "had to pay a few hundred dollars a year to licensing companies in order to pipe in satellite music to his fitness center. Commercial radio is free to play because the radio stations have already paid the necessary fees."
Doesn't satellite radio pay the fees just like the commercial radio?
Old 07-09-07 | 09:01 AM
  #10  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,547
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Michigan
....

I was prepared to come in here after seeing the title and just shake my head and go "those silly record companies" again. But... wow. Just wow. They continue to amaze with the depths they'll sink to. It's so sad where the music indistry has been going, and will continue to go. What needs to be done to get these idiotic laws changed??
Old 07-09-07 | 11:00 AM
  #11  
slop101's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 44,034
Received 472 Likes on 327 Posts
From: So. Cal.
I can't wait until they start charging street performers for royalties. Have you seen all those people on the Santa Monica Boardwalk getting rich off of other musician's songs? Something's gotta be done!
Old 07-09-07 | 11:48 AM
  #12  
Giles's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 33,646
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
From: Washington DC
all this does is make the recording industry seem like the leeches they are - they are trying to extort all the money they can, and in every possible way... bunch of greedy twats.
Old 07-09-07 | 12:14 PM
  #13  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: So Cal
RIAA Bans Telling Friends About Songs

LOS ANGELES—The Recording Industry Association of America announced Tuesday that it will be taking legal action against anyone discovered telling friends, acquaintances, or associates about new songs, artists, or albums. "We are merely exercising our right to defend our intellectual properties from unauthorized peer-to-peer notification of the existence of copyrighted material," a press release signed by RIAA anti-piracy director Brad Buckles read. "We will aggressively prosecute those individuals who attempt to pirate our property by generating 'buzz' about any proprietary music, movies, or software, or enjoy same in the company of anyone other than themselves." RIAA attorneys said they were also looking into the legality of word-of-mouth "favorites-sharing" sites, such as coffee shops, universities, and living rooms.
Old 07-09-07 | 12:20 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 719
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Jersey City, NJ
hehe good ole Onion
Old 07-09-07 | 01:03 PM
  #15  
slop101's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 44,034
Received 472 Likes on 327 Posts
From: So. Cal.
You know, I had some friends in my car while I was playing a CD - I hope they don't come after my friends for having listened to my music for free...
Old 07-09-07 | 02:35 PM
  #16  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 1,160
Received 41 Likes on 28 Posts
From: Lawrence, MA
Sorry to be the sole person of dissent here (at least so far), but this has been the case for decades. Every commercial establishment that has music played (either live or piped in) must pay royalty fees, whether it's your local pizza shop or pubs, on up to larger nightclubs and concert halls and convention centers.

ASCAP/BMI/etc have lots of representatives that go around writing down all the songs they hear in various places. These are all put into a database, and the money that's collected then gets divvied up between artists/songwriters.

It's the law, it has been for many many years.

If this cafe sells just one or two extra cups of coffee a week at $4 each, it more than pays for all the rights they need to buy. Don't you think that's a pretty good deal?
Old 07-09-07 | 02:42 PM
  #17  
slop101's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 44,034
Received 472 Likes on 327 Posts
From: So. Cal.
Shit, I've had Brittany's "Toxic" in my head all day (don't ask), does that mean they're gonna come after me now?

But seriously, at the very least, there should be (and I think there is) a size/business income limit applied to this. Smaller restaurants and coffee shops that don't profit from the music being played shouldn't be forced to pay.
Old 07-09-07 | 02:58 PM
  #18  
Giles's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 33,646
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
From: Washington DC
I'm still waiting for the 'Happy Birthday to You' music police
Old 07-09-07 | 03:06 PM
  #19  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: So Cal
Originally Posted by Giles
I'm still waiting for the 'Happy Birthday to You' music police
Most restaurants and rest stops have their own birthday song now, but I wonder how much it would cost them if they used the happy birthday song.
Old 07-09-07 | 05:01 PM
  #20  
DRG
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 13,421
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: ND
Originally Posted by [email protected]
ASCAP/BMI/etc have lots of representatives that go around writing down all the songs they hear in various places. These are all put into a database, and the money that's collected then gets divvied up between artists/songwriters.
It seems to me that whole process, from travel expenses on down, would cost more money than the trickle they could get from shaking down small ma and pa businesses. And besides, they really can't prove anything was played other than on the night they were there.
Old 07-09-07 | 05:01 PM
  #21  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 20,187
Received 344 Likes on 220 Posts
From: behind the eight ball
Originally Posted by [email protected]
Sorry to be the sole person of dissent here (at least so far), but this has been the case for decades. Every commercial establishment that has music played (either live or piped in) must pay royalty fees, whether it's your local pizza shop or pubs, on up to larger nightclubs and concert halls and convention centers.

ASCAP/BMI/etc have lots of representatives that go around writing down all the songs they hear in various places. These are all put into a database, and the money that's collected then gets divvied up between artists/songwriters.

It's the law, it has been for many many years.

If this cafe sells just one or two extra cups of coffee a week at $4 each, it more than pays for all the rights they need to buy. Don't you think that's a pretty good deal?
I agree. This is a well established and very straightforward practice. If they were doing this in their home and ASCAP went after them, I could see the outrage, but this is a business, and this is part of the cost of doing business.

But seriously, at the very least, there should be (and I think there is) a size/business income limit applied to this. Smaller restaurants and coffee shops that don't profit from the music being played shouldn't be forced to pay.
I imagine this is the reduced fee. It seems rather small for a blanket license fee.
Old 07-09-07 | 05:08 PM
  #22  
wendersfan's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 33,921
Received 168 Likes on 123 Posts
From: America!
Originally Posted by Giles
I'm still waiting for the 'Happy Birthday to You' music police

"It took two people to write that song?"
Old 07-09-07 | 05:42 PM
  #23  
Giles's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 33,646
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
From: Washington DC
Originally Posted by Aphex Twin
Most restaurants and rest stops have their own birthday song now, but I wonder how much it would cost them if they used the happy birthday song.

I remember the one they sang at American Cafe

'Up Down, Turn Around have a happy birthday
Up, Down Turn Around Have a Happy Day!"

repeat

everyone!...

Old 07-09-07 | 05:46 PM
  #24  
Mordred's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 12,216
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by Jason
I agree. This is a well established and very straightforward practice. If they were doing this in their home and ASCAP went after them, I could see the outrage, but this is a business, and this is part of the cost of doing business.
I agree, despite thinking it's horribly lame. Them's the rules and they've been enforced this way for years. This isn't a new development.

But seriously, at the very least, there should be (and I think there is) a size/business income limit applied to this. Smaller restaurants and coffee shops that don't profit from the music being played shouldn't be forced to pay.
I find it hard to believe that ANY business establishment would do something that made them no money. If there really is zero positive effect on income, then they wouldn't do it, and would replace the corner where the musician sets up with another table or two. Now maybe they can't measure the economic impact and maybe most patrons only order one cup, whether there is music or not, the music is obviously there to get people to stay, and to keep them coming back.
Old 07-09-07 | 10:05 PM
  #25  
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Seattle
Originally Posted by [email protected]
Sorry to be the sole person of dissent here (at least so far), but this has been the case for decades. Every commercial establishment that has music played (either live or piped in) must pay royalty fees, whether it's your local pizza shop or pubs, on up to larger nightclubs and concert halls and convention centers.

ASCAP/BMI/etc have lots of representatives that go around writing down all the songs they hear in various places. These are all put into a database, and the money that's collected then gets divvied up between artists/songwriters.

It's the law, it has been for many many years.

If this cafe sells just one or two extra cups of coffee a week at $4 each, it more than pays for all the rights they need to buy. Don't you think that's a pretty good deal?

Yes it's the law and has been around for a long time. Large clubs/bars have paid these fees to remain legit. My band also paid royalties becuase we were doing national tours and some clubs didn't pay them, we often recouped this money from the promoter though. It wasn't until recently though that these agencies started to go after tiny places like this which is all part of the crack down by the recording industry to scrape as much money together as they can. If I am not mistaken though there is a loop-hole for "open mike night" but that was a long time ago, I am sure they tightened their rules up by now.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.