Why no DTSHD on HD-DVD?
#2
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 5,960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: A far green country
Assuming you really mean DTS-HD Master Audio (the lossless codec), I would ask why is it needed? Both DD TrueHD and DTS-HD MA are lossless, and both support the same sampling depth and rates, so why would anyone have any preference for one over the other?
#3
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RoboDad
Assuming you really mean DTS-HD Master Audio (the lossless codec), I would ask why is it needed? Both DD TrueHD and DTS-HD MA are lossless, and both support the same sampling depth and rates, so why would anyone have any preference for one over the other?
#5
DVD Talk Legend
DTS-HD Master Audio is an optional audio format on HD DVD. It isn't required in the format spec for the players. First generation players do not have the ability to decode or transmit it (much as first generation DVD players couldn't pass regular DTS).
With no way for consumers to use it, the movie studios haven't been in any great rush to include it on their discs, especially not when they can use Dolby TrueHD and get the same results. I expect that it will become more common in a year or two.
I'm not sure why Fox is so keen on using DTS-HD MA on Blu-ray.
With no way for consumers to use it, the movie studios haven't been in any great rush to include it on their discs, especially not when they can use Dolby TrueHD and get the same results. I expect that it will become more common in a year or two.
I'm not sure why Fox is so keen on using DTS-HD MA on Blu-ray.
#6
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Josh Z
DTS-HD Master Audio is an optional audio format on HD DVD. It isn't required in the format spec for the players. First generation players do not have the ability to decode or transmit it (much as first generation DVD players couldn't pass regular DTS).
With no way for consumers to use it, the movie studios haven't been in any great rush to include it on their discs, especially not when they can use Dolby TrueHD and get the same results. I expect that it will become more common in a year or two.
I'm not sure why Fox is so keen on using DTS-HD MA on Blu-ray.
With no way for consumers to use it, the movie studios haven't been in any great rush to include it on their discs, especially not when they can use Dolby TrueHD and get the same results. I expect that it will become more common in a year or two.
I'm not sure why Fox is so keen on using DTS-HD MA on Blu-ray.
#7
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by steak-too
Is this something that could be added in a firmware upgrade?
#9
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,923
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: In the Universe.
Originally Posted by Josh Z
DTS-HD Master Audio is an optional audio format on HD DVD. It isn't required in the format spec for the players. First generation players do not have the ability to decode or transmit it (much as first generation DVD players couldn't pass regular DTS).
With no way for consumers to use it, the movie studios haven't been in any great rush to include it on their discs, especially not when they can use Dolby TrueHD and get the same results. I expect that it will become more common in a year or two.
I'm not sure why Fox is so keen on using DTS-HD MA on Blu-ray.
With no way for consumers to use it, the movie studios haven't been in any great rush to include it on their discs, especially not when they can use Dolby TrueHD and get the same results. I expect that it will become more common in a year or two.
I'm not sure why Fox is so keen on using DTS-HD MA on Blu-ray.
#10
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by jiggawhat
Fox has been a supporter of DTS on DVD so maybe they are willing to support it with BD as well.




