DVD Talk review of 'The Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning'
#1
Thread Starter
CineSchlock-O-Rama
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 2,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Dallas
DVD Talk review of 'The Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning'
I read David Walker's DVD review of The Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning at http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=24225 and...
I had a 4-star helluva time with it. Meat's meat and a man's gotta eat, as R. Lee would say, and this Saw fan's been starvin since Chop Top took a tumble.
I wish they'd gone this route with Jessica Biel and pals in the remake.
Wait. What's that? So shiney!
True fans of the original will be disappointed, and those that enjoy this trash are just as likely to be entertained by any glittering object that catches their attention.
I wish they'd gone this route with Jessica Biel and pals in the remake.
Wait. What's that? So shiney!
#2
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This film would have been better had they not made it less predictable. Making it a prequel and not having new characters let you know exactly who was going to live and die.
I really wish I had seen the same movie everyone else did, because I don’t think this one is as violent and intense as everyone is making it out to be. I mean the R Rated version of High Tension was more intense and had more gore going for it.
I’m surprised the people who didn’t like the 2003 remake like this one. This film had the exact same structure as that one.
I really wish I had seen the same movie everyone else did, because I don’t think this one is as violent and intense as everyone is making it out to be. I mean the R Rated version of High Tension was more intense and had more gore going for it.
I’m surprised the people who didn’t like the 2003 remake like this one. This film had the exact same structure as that one.
#4
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by G. Noel Gross
I read David Walker's DVD review of The Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning at http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=24225 and...
I had a 4-star helluva time with it. Meat's meat and a man's gotta eat, as R. Lee would say, and this Saw fan's been starvin since Chop Top took a tumble.
I wish they'd gone this route with Jessica Biel and pals in the remake.
Wait. What's that? So shiney!
I had a 4-star helluva time with it. Meat's meat and a man's gotta eat, as R. Lee would say, and this Saw fan's been starvin since Chop Top took a tumble.
I wish they'd gone this route with Jessica Biel and pals in the remake.
Wait. What's that? So shiney!
#5
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bareit
Very harsh review. I have a feeling the reviewer is in the camp that thinks all remakes are bad and should never be done. I don't think he went into this movie with an open mind and didn't give it a fair shot.
I didn't like the remake because it was a typical teen slasher film that felt like MTV trying to do horror. I was ready to go into this one liking it because all the reviews stated how gory and intense it was. It ended up being a typical MTV teen slasher film with more blood.
#6
Moderator
the half star review is tad to critical of the film if you ask me... the movie is no where as bad as say a Uwe Boll movie - as I pointed out before, the film suffers from lack of a plot or overall point. The positives were (for me) decent cinmetography, top notch gore efx and tight editing. And the characterization were kept to a severe minimum so as not to care when and how each character was to get bumped off. The overall impression I came away from it though was - this seemed completely unnecessary - it didn't embellish or further story details, but was just made to rehash gore for gore's sake, kind of like the Jason Goes to New York film (which at that point in the series was made for fans to see more slayings and outrageous gore -which sadly was watered down considerably).
#7
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by cerial442
Or the fact that the reviewer thought it was a bad film. Plus this one wasn't a remake. The writers tried to come up with something original, the only thing was it followed the exact same structure as the remake.
I didn't like the remake because it was a typical teen slasher film that felt like MTV trying to do horror. I was ready to go into this one liking it because all the reviews stated how gory and intense it was. It ended up being a typical MTV teen slasher film with more blood.
I didn't like the remake because it was a typical teen slasher film that felt like MTV trying to do horror. I was ready to go into this one liking it because all the reviews stated how gory and intense it was. It ended up being a typical MTV teen slasher film with more blood.
MTV must have gotten a little more hardcore from the days I watched it. Is it the Michael Bay name attached to it? I don't see how either could be seen as MTV horror. They're both hard R and they don't have the ADHD editing to them.
Last edited by Bareit; 10-09-06 at 06:04 PM.
#8
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bareit
He made no attempt to find anything good in the movie but instead, from beginning to end, berated it like it was Gigli or Glitter. There's no way this movie was as bad as he portrays it that it has zero redeeming qualities.
MTV must have gotten a little more hardcore from the days I watched it. Is it the Michael Bay name attached to it? I don't see how either could be seen as MTV horror. They're both hard R and they don't have the ADHD editing to them.
MTV must have gotten a little more hardcore from the days I watched it. Is it the Michael Bay name attached to it? I don't see how either could be seen as MTV horror. They're both hard R and they don't have the ADHD editing to them.
Calling this MTV horror stems from the fact that this is a typical teen slasher film. Yeah it was an R Rated film, but look at the R cuts of High Tension and The Hills Have Eyes, way more brutal and intense. Granted THHE was predictable, but it went way farther than this film dared to go.
The big gore scene everyone keeps talking about was no where near as brutal as say the eye scene in Hostel or the trailer scene in THHE. The chainsaw kills were watered down compared to the "jaws of life" scene in High Tension.
They would have had a better movie if it wasn’t about four teenage kids again, but maybe about the bikers. Add one or two members of the family and kill them off. Don’t call Leatherface “Tommy” the whole damn movie. Get some more creative and graphic kills. Avoid the obvious plot holes.
Is the half a star rating low? Possibly, it isn’t the worst horror film I’ve seen. It is better than TCM 3. I would have given it one star. I really wanted to like this one, and wanted to see something intense, but it was just more of the same.
#9
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,749
Received 2,840 Likes
on
1,878 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
Originally Posted by nodeerforamonth
Shouldn't this be in "Horror Talk"? That subforum isn't getting any traffic because no one's putting horror threads in there!
#10
DVD Talk Hero
I thought it was decent. I didn't hate it but I didn't like it enough to consider it worth revisiting. R. Lee Ermey was great, though. So was a lot of the cinematography. But calling this a remake of the remake is rather spot on.
#12
Thread Starter
CineSchlock-O-Rama
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 2,828
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Dallas
Originally Posted by cerial442
There really wasn't much good going for it, except for R. Lee Emery.
Same as Saw 2 is Chop Top's movie.
I truly believe if the remake didn't exist, there'd be no debate.
But, then, I'm no a fan of the Hills remake (other than the backstory) and hated, hated, hated Hostel.
High Tension? Why that's nothing short of a modern classic.
#13
DVD Talk Hero
That's my dillema in a nutshell. This prequel would have been a heck of a lot more entertaining if it had been the remake in the first place. There are no suprises if you have already seen the remake.
#14
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Papillion, NE!
What this needed was more of a "why" than a "show". They showed too many things without explanation. If you're gonna do a prequel, then make it worthwhile. No as brutal as people have been saying, except the cow vs. jeep.
Grade: C
Grade: C
#15
Senior Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Bucks County, PA
I gave the movie a 8.5/10 and have no idea how someone could give it worse. Great gore, eye candy, atmosphere, and character development (not too much) which is all i need for a good horror movie.
#16
DVD Talk Limited Edition
The big gore scene everyone keeps talking about was no where near as brutal as say the eye scene in Hostel
#17
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Seantn
huh? That eyeball looked extremely fake. I liked Hostel, but that scene was about as brutal as Beauty & the Beast.
The big gore scene in TCM:TB left a "that's it" feeling. NECA released a figure of that scene and it is more gory and brutal than what was shown on screen. I think the lighting was too dark in that scene.
#18
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by G. Noel Gross
I truly believe if the remake didn't exist, there'd be no debate.
But, then, I'm no a fan of the Hills remake (other than the backstory) and hated, hated, hated Hostel.
High Tension? Why that's nothing short of a modern classic.
But, then, I'm no a fan of the Hills remake (other than the backstory) and hated, hated, hated Hostel.
High Tension? Why that's nothing short of a modern classic.
I agree on High Tension.
#19
DVD Talk Limited Edition
I remember in the dinner scene in this movie, Chrissy says something like "Do you fuck all your cousins, or just the ones you find attractive!?", and it's supposed to be a real "Fuck You!" moment...but it comes off as just a bad line, didn't really work for me. I guess I expected more from the dinner scene. I know the chick got
, but I thought it would be a more hard to endure scene for Chrissy.
Spoiler:
#20
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Just watched this yesterday, at the movies.
My overall impression was positive - it delivered entertainment, it delivered scares. I don't have any major problems with this movie, it was ok - but there is one thing that bugged me and it's almost a cliche now. the main characters are just too stupid. Rather, all the good guys are just too stupid. I know, it's easy for me to sit here and rationally analyze this and that and when you actually ARE in a "chainsaw massacre" setting well you can replace sound, rational thought with pure terror.
But I disagree with that! - why? Well, consider this.
I know what you may say, "then there wouldn't be any movie". But there would, you could easily make a movie where the victims - or atleast some of them - are handy, smart, know how to adapt without sacrificing quality but probably boosting it. You just plot the story line around that fact.
My overall impression was positive - it delivered entertainment, it delivered scares. I don't have any major problems with this movie, it was ok - but there is one thing that bugged me and it's almost a cliche now. the main characters are just too stupid. Rather, all the good guys are just too stupid. I know, it's easy for me to sit here and rationally analyze this and that and when you actually ARE in a "chainsaw massacre" setting well you can replace sound, rational thought with pure terror.
But I disagree with that! - why? Well, consider this.
Spoiler:
I know what you may say, "then there wouldn't be any movie". But there would, you could easily make a movie where the victims - or atleast some of them - are handy, smart, know how to adapt without sacrificing quality but probably boosting it. You just plot the story line around that fact.
#22
DVD Talk Special Edition
I would say 99% of the time I agree with Mr. Gross, but this time i have to say i agree with the reviewer in question. Other than the 20 minutes of backstory this pretty much was a remake of the remake. I love TCM 1-3, i really liked the remake, but this one just seemed like the same film. I actually walked out of it around 20 minutes early. Now i will probably rent it when it comes out and if the last 20 minutes just turned the film around and made it one of the best horror films ever then i will come on here and apologize and get the saw tattooed on my forehead
.
.




