Peter Jackson sues New Line over Rings profits

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

03-03-05 | 12:14 AM

Krug

Thread Starter

DVD Talk Special Edition

Joined: Nov 2001

Posts: 1,468

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

From: Thoradin

Peter Jackson sues New Line over Rings profits

http://edition.cnn.com/2005/SHOWBIZ/...eut/index.html

Reply Like

03-03-05 | 12:30 AM

devilshalo

DVD Talk Hero

Joined: Jun 2000

Posts: 39,668

Likes: 609

Received 1,664 Likes on 1,181 Posts

From: Somewhere between Heaven and Hell

http://www.dvdtalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=412062

Reply Like

03-03-05 | 12:33 AM

Cygnet74

Needs to contact an admin about multiple accounts

Joined: Jun 2000

Posts: 2,830

Likes: 0

Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

From: Los Angeles, CA

flux capacitor... fluxing...

Last edited by Cygnet74; 03-03-05 at 12:37 AM.

Reply Like

03-03-05 | 12:38 AM

skiblet

DVD Talk Gold Edition

Joined: Jul 2003

Posts: 2,074

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

From: Im somewhere where I dont know where I am.

well the movie didnt even do that well, so i dont see what the big deal is

Reply Like

03-03-05 | 12:56 AM

Jackskeleton

DVD Talk Godfather

Joined: Jul 2000

Posts: 54,199

Likes: 0

Received 1 Like on 1 Post

From: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.

Jackskeleton sueing because of repost.

Reply Like

03-03-05 | 11:16 AM

scott shelton

Needs to contact an admin about multiple accounts

Joined: Sep 2003

Posts: 2,730

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

From: Las Vegas, NV

Quote:

Originally Posted by skiblet

well the movie didnt even do that well, so i dont see what the big deal is

Because the critical filmmaking foundation lacked a preferable form and context, subjected through missives and nonchalance, which is a lackadaisical response to an anomaly stretching through the auteur theory and Darnell's patterns of directorial parallels. See?