Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Weekend Box Office 12/24-12/26

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

Weekend Box Office 12/24-12/26

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-26-04 | 07:17 PM
  #1  
matome's Avatar
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: NY
Weekend Box Office 12/24-12/26

Weekend Estimates for 12/24-12/26 from boxofficemojo.com

<table border="0 cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><<Last Weekend <Last YearView Index 
TWLWTitle (Click to view daily chart)StudioWeekend Gross% ChangeTheater Count/ChangeAverageTotal GrossCost*Week #
1NMeet the FockersUni.$44,679,000-3,518-$12,700$68,513,000$80 / -1
2NFat AlbertFox$12,700,000-2,674-$4,749$12,700,000- / -1
31Lemony Snicket's A Series of Unfortunate EventsPar.$12,500,000-58.4%3,623+3$3,450$59,278,000$140 / -2
414The AviatorMira.$9,415,000997.3%1,796+1,756$5,242$10,755,000$110 / -2
52Ocean's TwelveWB$8,645,000-52.3%3,290-$2,627$86,863,000$110 / -3
6NDarknessDim.$6,432,000-1,700-$3,783$6,432,000$10.6 / -1
74The Polar ExpressWB$6,295,000-25.2%2,618-250$2,404$140,000,000$165 / $607
83SpanglishSony$5,000,000-43.3%2,441+3$2,048$18,538,000$80 / -2
931The Life Aquatic with Steve ZissouBV$4,881,0004840.9%1,105+1,103$4,417$5,264,000$50 / -3
10NThe Phantom of the OperaWB$4,200,000-622-$6,752$6,520,000$70 / -1
116National TreasureBV$4,069,000-32.4%2,201-571$1,848$141,186,000$100 / -6
127Christmas with the KranksSonR$3,100,000-42.2%2,135-806$1,451$69,324,000$60 / -5
138The Flight of the PhoenixFox$2,860,000-43%2,604-$1,098$10,670,000$45 / -2
145Blade: TrinityNL$2,650,000-61.1%2,318-594$1,143$41,728,000$65 / -3
1510The IncrediblesBV$2,615,000-16.2%1,732-198$1,509$242,623,000$92 / $608
169CloserSony$1,700,000-49.3%1,069-21$1,590$22,573,000$27 / -4
1712Finding NeverlandMira.$1,271,000-35.2%933-52$1,362$19,598,000$25 / -7
1813SidewaysFoxS$1,175,000-21.8%356-68$3,300$18,500,000$16 / -10
1911The SpongeBob SquarePants MoviePar.$700,000-65.1%1,316-799$531$78,774,000$30 / -6
2015House of Flying DaggersSPC$668,000-17.8%166+21$4,024$2,769,000- / -4
2122A Very Long EngagementWIP$420,00075.1%166+142$2,530$1,300,000$56.6 / -5
2217KinseyFoxS$325,000-35.8%234+43$1,388$5,700,000$11 / -7
2330Bad EducationSPC$252,000145.8%50+42$5,040$1,233,000- / -6
2416RayUni.$206,000-62.5%273-345$754$70,748,000$40 / -9
-NHotel RwandaUA$111,000-7-$15,857$154,000- / -1
-27Shall We DanceMira.$63,000-44.7%341+19$184$56,763,000$50 / -11
-NThe WoodsmanNM$61,200-6-$10,200$61,200- / -1
-42Beyond the SeaLions$39,000-13.8%6-$6,500$105,000- / -2
-49Vera DrakeFL$20,800-35.8%29-9$717$2,088,000- / -11
-39The Sea InsideFL$15,700-71.8%6-17$2,616$101,000- / -2
<<Last Weekend <Last YearView Index 



Old 12-26-04 | 08:35 PM
  #2  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Fat Albert in second.. ugh.
Old 12-26-04 | 08:59 PM
  #3  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 6,535
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Minnesota
Almost 70mill for The Fockers.... Holy hell.

I was going to wait til its on DVD...but I might have to check it out. I'll haev to see what the 2nd week brings.
Old 12-26-04 | 09:51 PM
  #4  
Cool New Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Pluto
10 mill for The Aviator.Man, that's bad. Does anyone think its Best Picture chances have been hurt. From what I remember, Best Pictures oscar winners tend to be the one that do good at the box office. In recent time: TLOTR, Chicago, A Beautiful Mind, Gladiator ,ect. Has there ever been a Best Picture winner that tanked at the box office?
Old 12-26-04 | 09:56 PM
  #5  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,147
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Some of the costs of movies are insane. $80M for Meet the Fockers & Spanglish!!!!!!!!!! While I haven't seen either one, judging by the commercials, what could possibly costs so much??? It doesn't look like any special effects are needed for them.
Old 12-26-04 | 10:03 PM
  #6  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 12,135
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Times Square
Originally Posted by FiveO
Almost 70mill for The Fockers.... Holy hell.

I was going to wait til its on DVD...but I might have to check it out. I'll haev to see what the 2nd week brings.
You actually decide what to see based on box office receipts ??????
Old 12-26-04 | 10:17 PM
  #7  
Adam Tyner's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,744
Received 2,839 Likes on 1,877 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
Originally Posted by resinrats
Some of the costs of movies are insane. $80M for Meet the Fockers & Spanglish!!!!!!!!!! While I haven't seen either one, judging by the commercials, what could possibly costs so much???
The talent. Adam Sandler's standard salary is $25 million (or 25% of the gross, presumably whatever's larger), and writer/director James L. Brooks probably got a pretty hefty payday. Meet The Fockers' budget is understandably high (the first one made a lot of money, so the producers, high-profile cast, etc. are lining their pockets as much as possible). Spanglish probably could've been made for less, but because its director/star have made other successful movies, Sony really wasn't putting any pressure on the movie to come in at a reasonable level.
Old 12-27-04 | 12:46 AM
  #8  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Travis66
10 mill for The Aviator.Man, that's bad. Does anyone think its Best Picture chances have been hurt. From what I remember, Best Pictures oscar winners tend to be the one that do good at the box office. In recent time: TLOTR, Chicago, A Beautiful Mind, Gladiator ,ect. Has there ever been a Best Picture winner that tanked at the box office?
Well, keep in mind that Aviator was in less than 1,800 screens (that's about half of what Fockers and many of the other big releases) not to mention that those numbers reflect a two day weekend for Aviator, as it was rolled out nationally on saturday, not friday. So, it's not a bad opening. It had the second biggest per screen average of the top ten also. Lots of films open on christmas day with so so openings, then display legs to gain their grosses. I imagine Aviator is intended as one of those releases, and it's too early to call on that one.

But many films get nominated with very little box office. Fargo, Shawshank, Secrets and Lies, LA Confidential, the list could go on all day long.
Old 12-27-04 | 01:29 AM
  #9  
fumanstan's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 55,349
Received 27 Likes on 15 Posts
From: Irvine, CA
Some big drops this weekend too. Blade dropped all the way to 14th.

Polar Express keeps chuggin along.
Old 12-27-04 | 02:23 AM
  #10  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Does anyone think its Best Picture chances have been hurt.
Because all Oscar winners are huge block busters.....

Usually making less money and being played in art houses and lower theater count is a good thing for a movie come oscar season.
Old 12-27-04 | 05:24 AM
  #11  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 4,400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: howell nj
i wanted Fat Azz to fail so bad!!!
Old 12-27-04 | 06:40 AM
  #12  
Charlie Goose's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 20,195
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
From: Sesame Street (the apt. next to Bob's)
Originally Posted by tommy28
i wanted Fat Azz to fail so bad!!!
Maybe the sequel will bomb.

Hotel Rwanda with almost a $16 thousand per screen average!
Old 12-27-04 | 07:24 AM
  #13  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 6,535
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by marty888
You actually decide what to see based on box office receipts ??????

Did you read the last part? I'll have to wait to see what the 2nd week brings and see what the drop off is. If there isn't much drop off....then the word of mouth is good...and yes....I'll probably go see it.

Finish reading the posts man!
Old 12-27-04 | 08:19 AM
  #14  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Phantom of the Opera looks like its not going to do so well long term. I think WB really screwed up that film's promotion. I saw not a single tv ad for it in the past two weeks. I remember Fox and Miramax hyping the hell out of Moulin Rouge and Chicago, and Moulin went on to gross around 70 million and Chicago about 150 million. WB gave Phantom no help whatsoever. They better be hoping for foreign returns and DVD sales.

Of course, the lousy reviews for the lead actor and Schumacher's directing probably aren't helping either...
Old 12-27-04 | 08:52 AM
  #15  
Geofferson's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 39,974
Received 156 Likes on 127 Posts
From: The Village Green
Glad to see The Polar Express still pulling in respectable numbers.
Old 12-27-04 | 08:57 AM
  #16  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: The Archives, Indiana
Meet The Fockers is faring well because of alot of factors. People liked the first so well, people are ready to get out of the house after Christmas day, the snow has people wanting to go to a movie once they can get out again, getting to see Hoffman, DeNiro and Streisand in one movie isn't hurting, either. Snicket is falling harder than I would have guessed. Isn't alot of The Polar Express revenue due to it being shown on IMAX screens?
Old 12-27-04 | 09:50 AM
  #17  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 3,393
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by NitroJMS
Phantom of the Opera looks like its not going to do so well long term. I think WB really screwed up that film's promotion. I saw not a single tv ad for it in the past two weeks. I remember Fox and Miramax hyping the hell out of Moulin Rouge and Chicago, and Moulin went on to gross around 70 million and Chicago about 150 million. WB gave Phantom no help whatsoever. They better be hoping for foreign returns and DVD sales.
It's only playing in 622 theaters right now.
Old 12-27-04 | 10:01 AM
  #18  
Decker's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather & 2020 TOTY Winner
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 94,501
Received 10,626 Likes on 7,231 Posts
From: Vegas, Baby!
Originally Posted by NitroJMS
Phantom of the Opera looks like its not going to do so well long term. I think WB really screwed up that film's promotion. I saw not a single tv ad for it in the past two weeks. I remember Fox and Miramax hyping the hell out of Moulin Rouge and Chicago, and Moulin went on to gross around 70 million and Chicago about 150 million. WB gave Phantom no help whatsoever. They better be hoping for foreign returns and DVD sales.

Of course, the lousy reviews for the lead actor and Schumacher's directing probably aren't helping either...
I was really suprised that Phantom didn't do better. Saw it last night and the theater was half full (MTF was sold out on two screens, BTW). I would think that Phantom would do exceptionally well, because it has a built-in devoted following that Moulin Rouge and (for the most part) Chicago didn't have -- those who have seen the musical, many several times. I guess having a no-name cast really hurt them.
Old 12-27-04 | 10:21 AM
  #19  
OldBoy's Avatar
TOTY Winner 2018 and Inane Thread Master
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 54,210
Received 1,736 Likes on 1,423 Posts
From: "Are any of us really anywhere?"
Originally Posted by FiveO
Did you read the last part? I'll have to wait to see what the 2nd week brings and see what the drop off is. If there isn't much drop off....then the word of mouth is good...and yes....I'll probably go see it.

Finish reading the posts man!
basically you said you see movies based on box office receipts and then you just re-iterated it in the 2nd sentence.

Have a clue what you're writing man! Perplexed
Old 12-27-04 | 11:34 PM
  #20  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,182
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: New York City
I can't believe Fat Albert came in 2nd. What were people thinking? Was the movie any good?
Old 12-27-04 | 11:46 PM
  #21  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 781
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Illinois
There is an incredible amount of movies playing, and it is kind of dissapointing to see movies like Closer, Finding Neverland, Sideways, and Kinsey struggle to find an audience. I can only hope that The Aviator will continue to grow as it is a great film and a must see.

I also saw Phantom of the Opera this past weekend, and it is a visual delight in many ways. Enjoyment almost comes fully on a visual much in the way Hero did for me. Hopefully, that too, will find a bigger audience.
Old 12-28-04 | 12:16 AM
  #22  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 12,306
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by QuikSilver
I can't believe Fat Albert came in 2nd. What were people thinking? Was the movie any good?
With the star of Good Burger how can you go wrong
Old 12-28-04 | 09:24 AM
  #23  
matome's Avatar
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: NY
Old 12-28-04 | 09:34 AM
  #24  
Needs to contact an admin about multiple accounts
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Las Vegas, NV
Originally Posted by Adam Tyner
The talent. Adam Sandler's standard salary is $25 million (or 25% of the gross, presumably whatever's larger), and writer/director James L. Brooks probably got a pretty hefty payday.
Sandler did not get 25 mil for SPANGLISH. He gets 25 mil for 50 FIRST DATES and THE LONGEST YARD, not SPANGLISH.

While I don't doubt the 80 mil price tag (the film took time to film and lengthy post - same with GIGLI), some of the budgets listed on Mojo are questionable at best. I wouldn't take their numbers to heart.
Old 12-28-04 | 09:38 AM
  #25  
Needs to contact an admin about multiple accounts
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Las Vegas, NV
Originally Posted by QuikSilver
I can't believe Fat Albert came in 2nd. What were people thinking? Was the movie any good?
The film is fine. It sets very small goals for itself, and achieves them with minimal sweat. Kids love it, and considering some of the other offerings made to them this past year, this wasn't nearly as offensive.

Was it rocket science? No. But you'll get what you pay for - if you even choose to pay for it.

The bigger crime this past weekend is the dung pile known as DARKNESS. Funny how nobody was quick to jump on that garbage.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.