most overrated movie of 2004 so far?
#1
Thread Starter
Needs to contact an admin about multiple accounts
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
most overrated movie of 2004 so far?
See any movie in the 2 months of this year that you felt were overrated? Got a lot of critical and/or audience priase but was just lacking for you?
I know it technically came out in 2003, but my most overrated movies would have to bee Last Samurai and Monster.
was I missing something? What a dull movie. Talk about a movie that just sat there. Yea, Charlize did a great job as well as her makeup people, but naomi watts totally deserves the oscar over her. And the movie was just really bland. It played like a shitty tv movie with a bit more cussing and violence. A real by the numbers job. Big dissapointment.
I know it technically came out in 2003, but my most overrated movies would have to bee Last Samurai and Monster.
was I missing something? What a dull movie. Talk about a movie that just sat there. Yea, Charlize did a great job as well as her makeup people, but naomi watts totally deserves the oscar over her. And the movie was just really bland. It played like a shitty tv movie with a bit more cussing and violence. A real by the numbers job. Big dissapointment.
#2
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Palm Beach County, Florida
I don't think anything has been released yet in 2004 that has been over-praised. Most pics in theaters last two months have received fairly dismal notices. I just saw Bernardo Bertolucci's "The Dreamers" yesterday. I really enjoyed it. I would imagine many film enthusiasts (people who refer to motion pictures as "film" and not "movies") will be quite taken by it.
Last edited by Tarnower; 02-21-04 at 10:43 PM.
#4
DVD Talk Legend
The only movies I thought were blah so far in 2004 are Battle Royale II (it was finally made available to English speakers/readers this year so I can count it), Starsky and Hutch, and the awful Along Came Polly.
But what? It's barely two months into the year so far... there's tons of films that haven't been released yet... some bad... some good...
But what? It's barely two months into the year so far... there's tons of films that haven't been released yet... some bad... some good...
#8
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Hong Kong
The Passion of Christ, regardless of the quality. It could be the next Magnificent Ambersons, and it would still be overblown, overhyped, and overdiscussed. I am so sick of the supposed "controversies" - it is only a movie, for Christ's sakes! And one by Mr. Mad Max, at that.
Other films which already ARE overrated, despite not playing in the US yet:
Young Adam
Goodbye Lenin!
Other films which already ARE overrated, despite not playing in the US yet:
Young Adam
Goodbye Lenin!
#9
DVD Talk Legend
Originally posted by Grimfarrow
The Passion of Christ, regardless of the quality. It could be the next Magnificent Ambersons, and it would still be overblown, overhyped, and overdiscussed. I am so sick of the supposed "controversies" - it is only a movie, for Christ's sakes! And one by Mr. Mad Max, at that.
The Passion of Christ, regardless of the quality. It could be the next Magnificent Ambersons, and it would still be overblown, overhyped, and overdiscussed. I am so sick of the supposed "controversies" - it is only a movie, for Christ's sakes! And one by Mr. Mad Max, at that.
#12
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally posted by Shannon Nutt
Yes, but who's overhyping it? I haven't seen many ads or trailers on TV for the movie - but I have seen it on every news program and website forum in the past few months. Can't blame Gibson for taking advantage of free press.
Yes, but who's overhyping it? I haven't seen many ads or trailers on TV for the movie - but I have seen it on every news program and website forum in the past few months. Can't blame Gibson for taking advantage of free press.
Same thing here . . . admittedly, Gibson is doing his best to promote his film, but it is everyone else, many of whom who are against what he has done, who are creating th over-hype.
#13
Senior Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Emerson College - Boston, MA
It was released in 2003, but it's still playing, so it still counts.
I thought Mystic River was hideously over-rated. Sure, it was good, but nowhere near Best Picture good. Moreover, I don't really understand what was so special about it in the first place. For me, it seemed no different than any other movie in its genre. People keep telling me it was the acting--please. I thought Sean Penn did an awful job and I sincerely hope he doesn't win. And I was no big fan of Tim Robbins in his role, either.
I just don't get it.
I thought Mystic River was hideously over-rated. Sure, it was good, but nowhere near Best Picture good. Moreover, I don't really understand what was so special about it in the first place. For me, it seemed no different than any other movie in its genre. People keep telling me it was the acting--please. I thought Sean Penn did an awful job and I sincerely hope he doesn't win. And I was no big fan of Tim Robbins in his role, either.
I just don't get it.
#15
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Papillion, NE!
Outside of Big Fish, 2004 releases haven't interested me much. Although, I have caught up with the Oscar movies:
House of Sand and Fog: B+
21 Grams: B
Big Fish: B+
Monster: B+
The Cooler: B+
Mystic River: A-
Ask me this question mid-year.
House of Sand and Fog: B+
21 Grams: B
Big Fish: B+
Monster: B+
The Cooler: B+
Mystic River: A-
Ask me this question mid-year.
#17
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Palm Beach County, Florida
Originally posted by futbol
It was released in 2003, but it's still playing, so it still counts.
I thought Mystic River was hideously over-rated. Sure, it was good, but nowhere near Best Picture good. Moreover, I don't really understand what was so special about it in the first place. For me, it seemed no different than any other movie in its genre. People keep telling me it was the acting--please. I thought Sean Penn did an awful job and I sincerely hope he doesn't win. And I was no big fan of Tim Robbins in his role, either.
I just don't get it.
It was released in 2003, but it's still playing, so it still counts.
I thought Mystic River was hideously over-rated. Sure, it was good, but nowhere near Best Picture good. Moreover, I don't really understand what was so special about it in the first place. For me, it seemed no different than any other movie in its genre. People keep telling me it was the acting--please. I thought Sean Penn did an awful job and I sincerely hope he doesn't win. And I was no big fan of Tim Robbins in his role, either.
I just don't get it.
#19
DVD Talk Hero
naomi watts totally deserves the oscar over her.
Agree, Monster did play out like a made-for-TV special, but it was decent non-the-less, kind of uncomfortable to watch, Theron was amazing though.
I loved Last Samurai as well, but I'm a samurai nut and completely loved the world they created for it (moreso than plot, the period they spend just walking around the town was by far my favorite part.) Still need to see Twilight Samurai.
Actually, not too many films I've seen lately I would consider "overrated". Monster was rated about right, House of Sand and Fog was a bit overrated, Last Samurai was underrated, and everything else I've seen in 2004 has been slammed already. Really liked Big Fish, LotR, LiT, etc; as well. Cold Mountain was a bit 'eh.
Last edited by RichC2; 02-22-04 at 05:44 PM.
#21
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: harpers ferry, wv
Originally posted by MGBGT
That's actually from 2003.
That's actually from 2003.
along with the majority of the movies that everybody else listed on here. i only see 1 or 2 movies in this thread that are from 2004.
Last edited by dyerjp; 02-22-04 at 08:41 PM.




