Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

I think they spent to much time on the battle of Helms Deep.

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

I think they spent to much time on the battle of Helms Deep.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-22-02 | 03:57 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,774
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Oklahoma
I think they spent to much time on the battle of Helms Deep.

They could have moved to story on a little and maybe gotten to Shelob,which was one of the parts I was looking forward to. The sequence takes forever. I realize that in this day in age people want to see more action, but not to that much expense.
Old 12-22-02 | 05:10 PM
  #2  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 20,179
Received 341 Likes on 217 Posts
From: behind the eight ball
I think it was about right. The early reports were of a 45 minute battle, which would have been overwhelming.

ROTK is shorter, and TTT covers a lot of ground, so it's no surprise that elements from the second book will end up in the 3rd movie.
Old 12-22-02 | 08:15 PM
  #3  
Retired
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 27,449
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I loved it as is. It's the turning point in the war, and the rise of men, and needs to be shown in great detail IMO.

Plus, as Jason said, ROTK is shorter than the other two books, especially with the Scouring of the Shire not being included. This allowed Jackson to give Helm's Deep the time it deserved, and save the Shelob sequence for ROTK.

It's best to look at these films as one long movie, rather than 3 seperate ones. After all, LOTR is one book, not a trilogy. The books and movies all run together with no real breaks inbetween.

If you could edit them together, just cutting out the credits, and sit down and watch it all, you'd never know it wasn't one movie.

Thus it really doesn't matter which film events are put in.
Old 12-22-02 | 09:29 PM
  #4  
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,774
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Oklahoma
They should have left Scouring of the Shire in the movie
Old 12-23-02 | 09:17 AM
  #5  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Little Rock, AR
I don't think that section would work too well on film ... too anti-climactic and unneccessary since not too much of the film was set in the Shire (meaning, why should we care about the land and inhabitants that we haven't really heard about on screen).
Old 12-23-02 | 06:16 PM
  #6  
Retired
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 27,449
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The Scouring of the Shire has nothing to do with the quest to destroy the ring, and hence doesn't belong in the movies.

There's simpy not enough time to cover what is basically and epilogue in the movies, given how much they still have to cover in the main story.

I liked the chapter too, but it's best left just to the book IMO.
Old 12-24-02 | 03:56 AM
  #7  
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: IL
what is the scouring of the shire?
Old 12-24-02 | 05:47 AM
  #8  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Germantown, MD
Originally posted by HitManX
what is the scouring of the shire?
The second to last chapter in the book where
Spoiler:
the heroes return to a Shire under attack and defeat the enemies. It shows how the hobbits have grown from their journey and how they will never really be the same again.
Old 12-24-02 | 06:33 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually, PJ said in an interview that he wanted to save Shelob for ROTK because Sam and Frodo would otherwise have very little to do in the third movie. at least until the end.
Old 12-24-02 | 12:45 PM
  #10  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Atlanta
I'm glad the battle scene was long. I felt like part of the movie was dragging up to that point. Funny thing is, I'm not really a big action fan, but I thought that was well done.
Old 12-24-02 | 12:53 PM
  #11  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,459
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: The house that boredom built.
If it keeps the hobbit scenes at a minumum, I welcome it.
Old 12-24-02 | 03:26 PM
  #12  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Germantown, MD
Originally posted by sexy_overlord
If it keeps the hobbit scenes at a minumum, I welcome it.
um......oook.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.