![]() |
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
[baritone]Tee hee hee[/baritone]
|
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Jaymole
(Post 11711050)
Never was a fan of his music but here are 2 incidents that occurred which showed me the type of person he was:
Back in the early 90's I worked at a comic book store in midtown Manhattan and MJ wanted to come in with his bodyguards and look around. His bodyguard came into the store and said all the customers must leave the store or MJ wouldn't come in. The owner then told all the customers they had to leave the store. I told the owner he should have refused his request...but the owner would always suck up to the celebrities that came in. The other involved my friend who at that time managed a movie theater in Manhattan. MJ wanted to come and see a film (I forgot which film it was), but he did not want anybody else in the theater except him and his bodyguards. My friend did the right thing and refused his request...however he did say that MJ can sit in the last row and he will make sure that nobody else is sitting in the last 2 rows of the theater. MJ accepted and sat after the lights went out. |
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by moviefan2k4
(Post 11708041)
Michael wasn't a saint by any means, and I'm not one of those people who practically deify him, but I admire his genius. He trusted a lot of the wrong people, and made some impulsive decisions, but he seemed to have a lot of love for most people he met
|
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by moviefan2k4
(Post 11708041)
Michael wasn't a saint by any means, and I'm not one of those people who practically deify him, but I admire his genius. He trusted a lot of the wrong people, and made some impulsive decisions, but he seemed to rape most people he met
Just kidding, geez!! |
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
I wrote this for my Facebook page, to commemorate the anniversary today.
* * * In Loving Memory Michael Joseph Jackson August 29, 1958 - June 25, 2009 One of the most talented and dedicated musicians and humanitarians of the last century, Michael Jackson was also a troubled individual. He suffered from major depression, made all the worse by much of the mass media consistently slandering him. Late in his career, he was fully acquitted of child-molestation charges, and in the summer of 2009, he was working on a concert series called "This Is It". Sadly, the world never got to witness the King of Pop's return, as he died of a propofol overdose four years ago. On this day, may all who knew and loved him celebrate his music, life and legacy. God Bless your spirit forever, Michael; we miss you. |
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by moviefan2k4
(Post 11743138)
On this day, may all who knew and loved him celebrate his music, life and legacy. God Bless your spirit forever, Michael; we miss you.
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/4Y16Tzksgko" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> BTW : the Cirque show debuts on the 29th. I'll be going a week from tonight. I'll be sure to post impressions here. My mom saw a preview performance and said it's great. |
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
|
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
rotfl so wrong... and yet :lol:
|
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
Cungar, you have no respect at all for the dead.
|
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
The best thing about not having respect for the dead is that the dead will never know.
|
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by moviefan2k4
(Post 11745142)
Cungar, you have no respect at all for the dead.
He probably doesnt have any respect for dead freaky cross dressing weirdo dipshit child molesters. You can keep defending him all you want but that is exactly what he was. |
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Deadman31
(Post 11748650)
He probably doesnt have any respect for dead freaky cross dressing weirdo dipshit child molesters. You can keep defending him all you want but that is exactly what he was.
Also, when did you ever see Michael cross-dressing? Some of his outfits were a little strange, but nothing like what you're suggesting. |
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
|
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by moviefan2k4
(Post 11745142)
Cungar, you have no respect at all for the dead.
|
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by windom
(Post 11748816)
|
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
Two men who have been in a loving relationship for decades want to get married: "We must stop these evil-doers!"
Michael Jackson wants to molest a child: "Rape away, pal!" |
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by The Infidel
(Post 11711604)
Forward to the 9:00 mark. I remember seeing this when it was shown live, and thinking "holy crap, his speaking voice sure sounds different!"
<object width="420" height="315"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/idg8TNknvDU?version=3&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/idg8TNknvDU?version=3&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="420" height="315" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object> |
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Groucho
(Post 11749161)
Two men who have been in a loving relationship for decades want to get married: "We must stop these evil-doers!"
Michael Jackson wants to molest a child: "Rape away, pal!" |
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Groucho
(Post 11749161)
Two men who have been in a loving relationship for decades want to get married: "We must stop these evil-doers!"
Michael Jackson wants to molest a child: "Rape away, pal!" |
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
I guess I'm one of the few that never believed Michael did any of this. He was weird no doubt but I just don't believe because all of it from what I've seen has been about getting money and lying and backtracking off the allegations. Michael put himself in a bad position but that doesn't mean he's guilty.
|
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by bootsy
(Post 11749509)
I guess I'm one of the few that never believed Michael did any of this. He was weird no doubt but I just don't believe because all of it from what I've seen has been about getting money and lying and backtracking off the allegations. Michael put himself in a bad position but that doesn't mean he's guilty.
Pedophilia allegations aside, do you believe Michael Jackson was heterosexual? |
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by JumpCutz
(Post 11749529)
Pedophilia allegations aside, do you believe Michael Jackson was heterosexual?
|
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by antspawn
(Post 11749532)
Is Prince heterosexual?
I have no idea. :shrug: I was just asking bootsy a question. |
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by JumpCutz
(Post 11749529)
Pedophilia allegations aside, do you believe Michael Jackson was heterosexual?
Seems like he's had a lot of relationships with women or at least some connection: Cher, Madonna, Lisa Marie Presley, Diana Ross, etc. I don't see too many connections with men in his past. |
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by bootsy
(Post 11749549)
I don't know. I don't really care tbh.
Seems like he's had a lot of relationships with women or at least some connection: Cher, Madonna, Lisa Marie Presley, Diana Ross, etc. I don't see too many connections with men in his past. But yeah, Madonna, Diana Ross and Cher...he was quite the pussyhound. -wink- The Lisa Marie Presley marriage was a tad bit awkward though. |
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
FWIW I don't believe MJ ever molested children. That said, I do believe he was completely incapable of realizing what appropriate behavior with children entailed, e.g. having sleepovers where they'd share the same bed, no matter HOW innocent in intention and behavior, is really fucking WRONG. :shrug:
Just a feeling, anyhow. I could be wrong. I blame the parents who put their children in that situation. |
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Hokeyboy
(Post 11749596)
FWIW I don't believe MJ ever molested children. That said, I do believe he was completely incapable of realizing what appropriate behavior with children entailed, e.g. having sleepovers where they'd share the same bed, no matter HOW innocent in intention and behavior, is really fucking WRONG. :shrug:
Just a feeling, anyhow. I could be wrong. I blame the parents who put their children in that situation. |
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by moviefan2k4
(Post 11749437)
Mocking me gets you nowhere.
|
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by bootsy
(Post 11749509)
I guess I'm one of the few that never believed Michael did any of this. He was weird no doubt but I just don't believe because all of it from what I've seen has been about getting money and lying and backtracking off the allegations. Michael put himself in a bad position but that doesn't mean he's guilty.
Originally Posted by JumpCutz
(Post 11749575)
The Lisa Marie Presley marriage was a tad bit awkward though.
|
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
Why did Zombie Michael Jackson decide to visit Hell's K-Mart?
He heard Prepubescent Ghost Boy's Pants were half off. |
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
Okay.
So I went to see Michael Jackson : One last night at Mandalay Bay (it premiered on Saturday, and the story was immediately overshadowed by the death of a performer onstage at Ka the same night). I think any fan of MJ's music will love the show. It has far less acrobatics than any Circque show I've seen before, though there is still a little like a cool floor exercise routine and a surprisingly entertaining fedora-juggling bit with Chinese acrobats. Mostly it's lots and lots of dancing. There's an artistic shadow dancing performance of "What About Us (Earth Song), an impressive solo dance number that felt sort of like the world's best So You Think You Can Dance audition and mostly lots of Michael-less recreations of his greatest music videos with dancers perfectly copying his moves and costumes in songs like "Beat It", "Smooth Criminal", "The Way You Make Me Feel" and of course"Thriller". There wasn't a ton of video tributing on stage, though Michael appears in lots of clips and thanks to a sharkscreen appears to dance with the cast during "Man In The Mirror". It wasn't nearly as reverential to deifying the icon as the touring show Immortal was (Thankfully "Childhood" is nowhere to be found in this show). I was a little worried that it would take on the tone of "poor persecuted Michael" since it opens with a Tabloid theme, thankfully they quickly leave that topic behind. This one is much more about the music (and the music videos). I liked it a lot. Any fan of the music will certainly have a good time. Check it out the next time you're in Vegas. BTW : For those curious, they do bleep out the anti-Semitic slurs in "They Don't Really Care About Us", but leave in the f-bomb and Janet's middle finger in "Scream". |
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Decker
(Post 11750085)
Did you read my post on the first page of this thread? All the cancer kids in Southern California waited all year for the day that their unit was invited to Neverland Ranch. It was a goal they literally lived for. If you were the parent of one of those kids, pre-public alligations, how could you tell your kid they couldn't go to Neverland? And why? Once Michael made his "special friends" during the day trips, things progressed from there. But again these are sick kids from poor families. It's hard to know, in the moment, what would or wouldn't be appropriate. Everyone knew about Michael & Webster, Michael & Macaulay Culkin. He liked to hang around with cute kids in his big house. He was a superstar. If you're laying this all on the parents, you need to re-think things
To put it simply: Pre-allegations, I'd have no problem with my children visiting the Neverland Ranch. Pre-allegations, I'd have no problem with my children spending the day with Michael Jackson. Pre-allegations, I'd have no problem with my children staying overnight at the Neverland Ranch. But you bet your hairy ass, pre-allegations, I would have checked into the accommodations and have been ABSOLUTELY POSITIVE that my children would not be sharing a bed with a grown adult, no matter whether or not "he was a superstar" or was buddying around with Webster or McCauley Culkin or whomever else. Anyone who let their children share a bed with an adult male is a failure as a parent and have no one but themselves to blame if their child was sexually assaulted. Other than the pedophile, of course. And that said, no, I don't think Michael Jackson molested children. |
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
I can't say whether or not he had sexual contact with children. But I think you can assume that, barring any medical issues, he had the normal sex drive of an average adult male his age. And I think Michael was clearly VERY confused about what types of relationships were appropriate between children and adults---I think he had a very hazy concept of himself as an adult. He did not seem to be comfortable hanging out with other male buddies his own age, nor going the Charlie Sheen route with tons of sexual conquests, nor with really having long-term romantic relationships with women.
I wouldn't put a lot of money on Michael really having a strong grasp of the idea that "No--this type of behavior is normal and pleasurable for adults like myself, but it's completely inappropriate between myself and and my young friends". Maybe I'm wrong, and you can certainly argue that weirdness and arrested development don't necessarily lead to sexual abuse of children---but if you don't even know why you shouldn't share your bed with young children that aren't related to you, then you've already got some major problems, IMO. |
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Ky-Fi
(Post 11753043)
I can't say whether or not he had sexual contact with children. But I think you can assume that, barring any medical issues, he had the normal sex drive of an average adult male his age. And I think Michael was clearly VERY confused about what types of relationships were appropriate between children and adults---I think he had a very hazy concept of himself as an adult. He did not seem to be comfortable hanging out with other male buddies his own age, nor going the Charlie Sheen route with tons of sexual conquests, nor with really having long-term romantic relationships with women.
I wouldn't put a lot of money on Michael really having a strong grasp of the idea that "No--this type of behavior is normal and pleasurable for adults like myself, but it's completely inappropriate between myself and and my young friends". Maybe I'm wrong, and you can certainly argue that weirdness and arrested development don't necessarily lead to sexual abuse of children---but if you don't even know why you shouldn't share your bed with young children that aren't related to you, then you've already got some major problems, IMO. |
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Hokeyboy
(Post 11752990)
was buddying around with Webster or McCauley Culkin or whomever else.
|
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Ky-Fi
(Post 11753043)
I think Michael was clearly VERY confused about what types of relationships were appropriate between children and adults---I think he had a very hazy concept of himself as an adult.
He did not seem to be comfortable hanging out with other male buddies his own age, nor going the Charlie Sheen route with tons of sexual conquests, nor with really having long-term romantic relationships with women. I wouldn't put a lot of money on Michael really having a strong grasp of the idea that "No--this type of behavior is normal and pleasurable for adults like myself, but it's completely inappropriate between myself and and my young friends". Maybe I'm wrong, and you can certainly argue that weirdness and arrested development don't necessarily lead to sexual abuse of children---but if you don't even know why you shouldn't share your bed with young children that aren't related to you, then you've already got some major problems, IMO. |
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
I was hoping to steer this thread towards the music and the new Cirque du Soleil show, but since we're on this instead.
Originally Posted by moviefan2k4
(Post 11753437)
For the record, I don't recall Michael ever saying he shared the same bed with a child during the night. Many times, he and others described the kids having Michael's bed, while he took another or slept on the floor.
1:08 "I have slept on the bed with many children. I sleep in the bed with all of them." |
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by moviefan2k4
(Post 11753437)
I guess that would depend which standard of appropriateness you're talking about. Michael grew up sharing bed space with his brothers, so the notion of it being wrong to just watch TV with a kid in that scenario never seemed odd to him. In his mind, those kids were his friends, nothing more or less.
Michael knew all too well how wrong sexual contact was with children; that's why he often said he'd rather slit his wrists than harm them. |
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
Originally Posted by Decker
(Post 11753463)
1:08 "I have slept on the bed with many children. I sleep in the bed with all of them."
|
Re: MICHAEL JACKSON - Unofficial Discussion Thread
It's sort of pointless to argue about what really happened as it's pretty unknowable at this point. The arguement can go round and round, but it'll never get anywhere.
Besides, if the question is his legacy, I'd say it's VERY secure. My daughter is a 12 year old girl, and among her friends, he is so revered (much more so than when he died four years ago). It seems a lot to me the way John Lennon was remembered by my generation after he was shot in 1980. They all love him and his music. They actively search his videos on You Tube. Mirroring the Cirque shows, it's the Elvis fans who have to worry about legacy -- even in Vegas, it's slipping away as the nostalgia for him and his music wanes (especially with young people). Michael Jackson seems to be the only artist besides the Beatles whose popularity is transcending generations. (And yes, my daughter insisted on getting a pink Michael Jackson t-shirt last night). |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:36 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.