The Rock Equivalent of Van Sant's Psycho
#1
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Legend
The Rock Equivalent of Van Sant's Psycho
I was looking through Popmatters and came across a review of a new Smithereens album. Now, I didn't even realize the Smithereens were still together, let alone releasing new stuff. But there it is.
Except, it's not really new stuff. It's a cover album. And not just any cover album -- it's a complete rerecording of The Who's Tommy. Okay, a recreation of a classic album by another group could be interesting. I mean, imagine a Nine Inch Nails version of Pink Floyd's Meddle. But according to the review, the Smithereen's Tommy is slavishly faithful to the original, bringing no new perspective to the music, no reinterpretation.
Except, it's not really new stuff. It's a cover album. And not just any cover album -- it's a complete rerecording of The Who's Tommy. Okay, a recreation of a classic album by another group could be interesting. I mean, imagine a Nine Inch Nails version of Pink Floyd's Meddle. But according to the review, the Smithereen's Tommy is slavishly faithful to the original, bringing no new perspective to the music, no reinterpretation.
Why?
This is the question every Smithereens fan—and every fan of The Who—must ask when listening to The Smithereens Play Tommy. It is common knowledge that Tommy is terrific, full of songs worth playing. And it’s common knowledge that The Smithereens—a briefly big power-pop outfit from North Jersey that had a small string of hits and fine albums in the 1980s—are a band deeply in love with the British Invasion.
So, we can understand why The Smithereens would want to make a song-for-song re-recording of Tommy. But, critically: Why did they actually do it?
This is not meant as a rhetorical way of saying that it stinks. It doesn’t stink. The Smithereens, packing dosed-up guitars that ring with power and full-throated singing, are up to the task of playing Tommy. The band, in short, sounds a whole lot like The Who. This is an accurate, respectful—too respectful—recreation of a classic.
So, again, why?
Let me venture an answer: business.
In 2007, Pat DiNizio (lead vocals and guitar) and his band released Meet the Smithereens, a track-by-track cover of Meet the Beatles. It was followed within a year-plus by B-Sides - the Beatles, a collection of less common tunes by the Fab Four. On the backs of these heartfelt but relatively unadventurous tributes, The Smithereens toured small theaters all over the country, playing their hits, sure, but also playing these ringingly familiar classics to receptive ears. It is ingenious, really, because releasing new albums of original music and hoping that the new music will be received happily by the band’s now-middle-aged fans is nearly hopeless. Instead, why not lay legitimate claim to playing both your own music and “your” Beatles tunes?
And, now: Tommy too.
Covering these classic Who tunes, there is too little sense that the songs have been remade in the style of The Smithereens. DiNizio’s voice is distinctive, with a downbeat tone that made even the most hopping Smithereens tunes sound doomed. On the Beatles material, his vaguely nasal baritone was often enough to color the covers as distinctive. Here, however, the band recreates Roger Daltrey’s lead vocals in Daltrey’s tenor range, high and often straining some against the edge. As a result, the vocals become more anonymous when they are more urgent.
“Amazing Journey” is, of course, a great tune. And The Smithereens turn up their amps and rock it with pleasure—but it sound just a heck of a lot like the original. It’s not eerie, perhaps, but it’s curious. The opening strains of the classic “Pinball Wizard” give you that thrill as always, with the quick-strummed acoustic guitars giving way to an electric lick. The vocals—particularly the stacked harmonies of “Sure plays a mean pinball!"—should feel distinctive and different. But they sound like they come from guys who have listened to Tommy soooo many times that, . . . well, they just can’t help but sound like Daltrey, Townsend and Company. And they do.
This is the question every Smithereens fan—and every fan of The Who—must ask when listening to The Smithereens Play Tommy. It is common knowledge that Tommy is terrific, full of songs worth playing. And it’s common knowledge that The Smithereens—a briefly big power-pop outfit from North Jersey that had a small string of hits and fine albums in the 1980s—are a band deeply in love with the British Invasion.
So, we can understand why The Smithereens would want to make a song-for-song re-recording of Tommy. But, critically: Why did they actually do it?
This is not meant as a rhetorical way of saying that it stinks. It doesn’t stink. The Smithereens, packing dosed-up guitars that ring with power and full-throated singing, are up to the task of playing Tommy. The band, in short, sounds a whole lot like The Who. This is an accurate, respectful—too respectful—recreation of a classic.
So, again, why?
Let me venture an answer: business.
In 2007, Pat DiNizio (lead vocals and guitar) and his band released Meet the Smithereens, a track-by-track cover of Meet the Beatles. It was followed within a year-plus by B-Sides - the Beatles, a collection of less common tunes by the Fab Four. On the backs of these heartfelt but relatively unadventurous tributes, The Smithereens toured small theaters all over the country, playing their hits, sure, but also playing these ringingly familiar classics to receptive ears. It is ingenious, really, because releasing new albums of original music and hoping that the new music will be received happily by the band’s now-middle-aged fans is nearly hopeless. Instead, why not lay legitimate claim to playing both your own music and “your” Beatles tunes?
And, now: Tommy too.
Covering these classic Who tunes, there is too little sense that the songs have been remade in the style of The Smithereens. DiNizio’s voice is distinctive, with a downbeat tone that made even the most hopping Smithereens tunes sound doomed. On the Beatles material, his vaguely nasal baritone was often enough to color the covers as distinctive. Here, however, the band recreates Roger Daltrey’s lead vocals in Daltrey’s tenor range, high and often straining some against the edge. As a result, the vocals become more anonymous when they are more urgent.
“Amazing Journey” is, of course, a great tune. And The Smithereens turn up their amps and rock it with pleasure—but it sound just a heck of a lot like the original. It’s not eerie, perhaps, but it’s curious. The opening strains of the classic “Pinball Wizard” give you that thrill as always, with the quick-strummed acoustic guitars giving way to an electric lick. The vocals—particularly the stacked harmonies of “Sure plays a mean pinball!"—should feel distinctive and different. But they sound like they come from guys who have listened to Tommy soooo many times that, . . . well, they just can’t help but sound like Daltrey, Townsend and Company. And they do.
#5
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: The Rock Equivalent of Van Sant's Psycho
Phish has covered 5 albums by other artist live
Beatles - White Album
Who - Quadrophenia
Talking Heads - Remian in Light
Velvet Underground - Loaded
Pink Floyd - Dark Side of the Moon
of course they put their own spin on each album, remaining faithful but adding what they do best.
Beatles - White Album
Who - Quadrophenia
Talking Heads - Remian in Light
Velvet Underground - Loaded
Pink Floyd - Dark Side of the Moon
of course they put their own spin on each album, remaining faithful but adding what they do best.
#7
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Atlanta
Re: The Rock Equivalent of Van Sant's Psycho
That band is still damn great live. It's just a little wild how much weight Pat has put on, though. I'm not crazy about a spot on remake either when these guys have so many great tunes of their own.
#8
DVD Talk Special Edition
Re: The Rock Equivalent of Van Sant's Psycho
The Smithereens already 'remade' Meet the Beatles a few years ago - a much better idea on paper than it actually turned out. Definitely not interested in their take on Tommy
Michael
Michael
#9
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: The Rock Equivalent of Van Sant's Psycho
Speaking of Who album covers:

I've been meaning to check this one out for years now, but keep forgetting about it.

I've been meaning to check this one out for years now, but keep forgetting about it.
#11
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Seattle, WA
Re: The Rock Equivalent of Van Sant's Psycho
Speaking of Who album covers:
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/...1L._SS500_.jpg
I've been meaning to check this one out for years now, but keep forgetting about it.
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/...1L._SS500_.jpg
I've been meaning to check this one out for years now, but keep forgetting about it.
#12
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition








