MusicTalk Draft Game Draft Thread (All are welcome to play!)
10-26-05 | 02:54 PM
#126
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally Posted by mano365
I know you can pick only one boxset per player but can there be only one boxset picked per artist/band?
Originally Posted by ryuryu2949
If both boxsets basically just contain all of the individual albums (but maybe one has a bonus feature or two, or a new box), I think the second should not be allowed. But if the second boxset has live albums, for instance, and the first is studio only, then I would say that is ok. For instance, it would seem like cheating to me if someone tried to take another edition of the Beatles boxset that I took. However, if someone wanted a collection of the Beatles Anthology cds that were released individually, I think that is fair game.
10-26-05 | 03:07 PM
#127
DVD Talk Limited Edition
3. Bob Marley - Songs of Freedom (Box Set)
10-26-05 | 04:33 PM
#129
Video Game Talk Reviewer
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 13,856
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
From: Formerly known as "Vryce"/Detroit, Michigan
Originally Posted by maxfisher
Damn, there goes my round 4!
10-26-05 | 06:30 PM
#130
DVD Talk Godfather
Originally Posted by Numanoid
a-ha - Minor Earth|Major Sky
Wait, I'm playing...
10-26-05 | 11:15 PM
#131
Originally Posted by Hollowgen
i hate you, lokimok. stealing my pick for today! 
I hate DJLinus & jimdrix for stealing my 2 best boxset possibilities.Quality picks by the way.
10-27-05 | 08:16 AM
#132
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
I still need a 3rd round pick from Flynn.
We are still accepting players!
We still need 2 players!
C'mon lurkers. Do you really want me to play?
We are still accepting players!
We still need 2 players!
C'mon lurkers. Do you really want me to play?
10-27-05 | 09:11 AM
#133
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally Posted by auto
I still need a 3rd round pick from Flynn.
We are still accepting players!
We still need 2 players!
C'mon lurkers. Do you really want me to play?
We are still accepting players!
We still need 2 players!
C'mon lurkers. Do you really want me to play?
10-27-05 | 09:18 AM
#134
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally Posted by maxfisher
I didn't realize you weren't playing auto. Did you not want to? Or was it feeling obligated not to since you're running the game? If it's the latter, you should join in. I don't think anyone would have a problem with the organizer participating in the tournament. It's not like there'd be any way for you to cheat or anything.
That being the case, if we get one more player (bringing the field up to 31), and nobody else wants to play, I may throw my hat in the ring just to fill the field.
10-27-05 | 10:27 AM
#137
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Split time between DC and NYC
This is fun, I hope I get my pick for the next round.
On another note, there is a dvdtalk video game draft that has just started. Check it out: http://forum.dvdtalk.com/showthread.php?t=443010
On another note, there is a dvdtalk video game draft that has just started. Check it out: http://forum.dvdtalk.com/showthread.php?t=443010
10-27-05 | 10:32 AM
#140
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Portland, OR
Originally Posted by auto
I hadn't planned on playing. In order to moderate a game like this, I think it is unwise to also participate. For instance, even though the match-ups in the voting rounds will be random, it may seem unfair to some if I am playing. What does everybody else think?
That being the case, if we get one more player (bringing the field up to 31), and nobody else wants to play, I may throw my hat in the ring just to fill the field.
That being the case, if we get one more player (bringing the field up to 31), and nobody else wants to play, I may throw my hat in the ring just to fill the field.
10-27-05 | 10:39 AM
#142
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally Posted by auto
I hadn't planned on playing. In order to moderate a game like this, I think it is unwise to also participate. For instance, even though the match-ups in the voting rounds will be random, it may seem unfair to some if I am playing. What does everybody else think?
That being the case, if we get one more player (bringing the field up to 31), and nobody else wants to play, I may throw my hat in the ring just to fill the field.
That being the case, if we get one more player (bringing the field up to 31), and nobody else wants to play, I may throw my hat in the ring just to fill the field.
Or, if you just wanted to play normally, we could always enlist the help of someone who's not playing to randomly number all of our usernames from 1-32. I'm guessing someone in Otterville would be happy do it.
10-27-05 | 10:48 AM
#143
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally Posted by maxfisher
Well, if people are worried about that, I suppose you could always wait until everyone had picked their 10 selections and only pick your 10 out of what's left. In that scenario, I can't see anyone thinking you'd be at an 'advantage' no matter how you did the match-ups.
Originally Posted by maxfisher
Or, if you just wanted to play normally, we could always enlist the help of someone who's not playing to randomly number all of our usernames from 1-32. I'm guessing someone in Otterville would be happy do it.
