View Poll Results: Are the (early) Beatles a boy band?
They're as bad as the New Kids and Menudo
11
17.74%
That's sacrilige and I'm going to punch you like kvrdave does to dogs
51
82.26%
Voters: 62. You may not vote on this poll
Do you consider the Beatles to be a boy band?
#76
DVD Talk Legend
nope.
I consider them one of the best rock bands ever and among one of the most influencial.
I consider them one of the best rock bands ever and among one of the most influencial.
#79
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 15,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No its not. Thats the kind of pathetic arrogance I hate about most Beatles fans. They feel because they came first no one can outdo them. BS. Zeppelin & Floyd were far greater than the Beatles. I dont care how much they were influenced by them. (students can outdo instructors you know)
Last edited by MJKTool; 08-10-04 at 10:50 AM.
#80
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally posted by MJKTool
No its not. Thats the kind of pathetic arrogance I hate about most Beatles fans. They feel because they came first no one can outdo them. BS. Zeppelin & Floyd were far greater than the Beatles. I dont care how much they were influenced by them. (students can outdo instructors you know)
No its not. Thats the kind of pathetic arrogance I hate about most Beatles fans. They feel because they came first no one can outdo them. BS. Zeppelin & Floyd were far greater than the Beatles. I dont care how much they were influenced by them. (students can outdo instructors you know)
It was the first band (along with the Stones) that began my interest in RnR.
I know many who do not like the Beatles and/or Stones (so what... )...and I know many who do not like Led Zep
or Floyd too. My opinion, there are few other bands that I like a hell of a lot more than Zep or Floyd...and I
would put Floyd way ahead of Led Zep. So as you can tell I can get really tired of hearing about Led Zepplin
as the greatest band as well
#81
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 15,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Flashback
So as you can tell I can get really tired of hearing about Led Zepplin as the greatest band as well
So as you can tell I can get really tired of hearing about Led Zepplin as the greatest band as well
Thats why I said it can be debated. But no, tell that to a Beatles fan and your commiting a holy sin
#82
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally posted by MJKTool
Thats why I said it can be debated. But no, tell that to a Beatles fan and your commiting a holy sin
Thats why I said it can be debated. But no, tell that to a Beatles fan and your commiting a holy sin
#84
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 15,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually I am smoking that cigar with my feet on the table and blowing that smoke from the cigar in your face! "In your face! In yo face!!" Zeppelin had a FAAAR greater dummer, lead guitarist & vocalist. Also had a way better way of writing epic songs....just to name a couple things. Care to come at me with something other than "yes they are, no debate...na na na na na"
Last edited by MJKTool; 08-10-04 at 12:06 PM.
#86
Banned
Originally posted by MJKTool
Zeppelin had a FAAAR greater dummer, lead guitarist & vocalist. Also had a way better way of writing epic songs....just to name a couple things. Care to come at me with something other than "yes they are, no debate...na na na na na"
Zeppelin had a FAAAR greater dummer, lead guitarist & vocalist. Also had a way better way of writing epic songs....just to name a couple things. Care to come at me with something other than "yes they are, no debate...na na na na na"
Clearly there are bands who were better at guitar riffs and even musical composition than the Beatles. (Hendrix clearly has no equal as far as guitar work goes imo.) But Zeppelin's songwriting wasn't as consistently touching or profound. A song isn't just strictly music, it's words (vocals/lyrics), it's personality, it's the concept of an entire album.
Beatles songs speak to you like no other songs in the history of rock. It's hard to find the equivalent of A Day in the Life or Something or Blackbird in other bands. They're literary. And that's one of the most important legacies of the blues, an individual pouring their heart out and telling a story. (Some would say that heavy metal misses the point of the blues entirely).
Furthermore, no band went through as many changes in such a short period of time, from I Wanna Hold Your Hand to I Am the Walrus. The Beatles could do soul (Let It Be), blues (Yer Blues), proto-metal (Helter Skelter), love songs (I Will), political songs (Revolution No. 1), trippy songs (Tommorow Never Knows), novelty songs (Continuing Story of Bungalo Bill), country (Rocky Racoon) and just flat-out rock(Everybody's Got.....My Monkey).
Also important is the prominent role played by the piano in their music, as well as the classical influences. They could just put a string arrangement behind McCartney's vocals and have a great track, Eleanor Rigby or She's Leaving Home. Again, not something many bands were capable of.
And this is another thing that made them uniquely modern and revolutionary - their emphasis was always on production, not performance. They'd do a hundred takes to get it down; they'd run their vocals through vocoders; McCartney recorded his vocals in slow-motion and sped the tape to make his voice higher in pitch for When I'm Sixty-Four. They stretched the limits of what a studio was capable of.
Obviously this isn't a black-or-white issue. Tangerine could be a response to much of what i've argued above. Led Zeppelin are no doubt in my Top 3 or 4 favorite bands of all time as well and THEY'RE influence and place in music history is not to be underestimated. When you consider them along with The Kinks and Black Sabbath, then you've got the ingredients for heavy metal for the next three decades.
But the fact is as far as The Beatles' influence and rank is concerned when all is said and done, today we are left with 5 era-changing albums:
Not to mention dozens of B-sides and lesser albums/compliations. No other band did this much great work or had as much of an impact on popular music and culture as a whole. No other.
--
Last edited by Rivero; 08-10-04 at 03:47 PM.
#87
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 15,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Rivero
Beatles songs speak to you like no other songs in the history of rock. It's hard to find the equivalent of A Day in the Life or Something or Blackbird in other bands. They're literary. And that's one of the most important legacies of the blues, an individual pouring their heart out and telling a story. (Some would say that heavy metal misses the point of the blues entirely).
Beatles songs speak to you like no other songs in the history of rock. It's hard to find the equivalent of A Day in the Life or Something or Blackbird in other bands. They're literary. And that's one of the most important legacies of the blues, an individual pouring their heart out and telling a story. (Some would say that heavy metal misses the point of the blues entirely).
Furthermore, no band went through as many changes in such a short period of time, from I Wanna Hold Your Hand to I Am the Walrus. The Beatles could do soul (Let It Be), blues (Yer Blues), proto-metal (Helter Skelter), love songs (I Will), political songs (Revolution No. 1), trippy songs (Tommorow Never Knows), novelty songs (Continuing Story of Bungalo Bill), country (Rocky Racoon) and just flat-out rock(Everybody's Got.....My Monkey).
Also important is the prominent role played by the piano in their music, as well as the classical influences. They could just put a string arrangement behind McCartney's vocals and have a great track, Eleanor Rigby or She's Leaving Home. Again, not something many bands were capable of.
And this is another thing that made them uniquely modern and revolutionary - their emphasis was always on production, not performance. They'd do a hundred takes to get it down; they'd run their vocals through vocoders; McCartney recorded his vocals in slow-motion and sped the tape to make his voice higher in pitch for When I'm Sixty-Four. They stretched the limits of what a studio was capable of.
But the fact is as far as The Beatles' influence and rank is concerned when all is said and done, today we are left with 5 era-changing albums:
Not to mention dozens of B-sides and lesser albums/compliations. No other band did this much great work or had as much of an impact on popular music and culture as a whole. No other.
Last edited by MJKTool; 08-10-04 at 04:47 PM.
#92
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Rivero
We were always talking just Rock and Roll bands here.
We were always talking just Rock and Roll bands here.
#93
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 15,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Rivero
Dark Side isn't even Floyd's best album, let alone one that's better than Revolver.
Dark Side isn't even Floyd's best album, let alone one that's better than Revolver.
#94
DVD Talk Hero
See, each person needs something different from an album - Dark Side is a good album, but it leaves me rather cold, because it has little heart and practically no discernable melodies. That is not a problem with the Beatles.
#95
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 15,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dark Side leaves me rather warm and fuzzy inside personally. And I imagine it does to millions of other people as well, as reflected by it being in the top 20 selling albums of all time...
And how do you measure the amount of "heart" that went into making an album? Are you saying The Beatles put more "heart" into their albums?
And how do you measure the amount of "heart" that went into making an album? Are you saying The Beatles put more "heart" into their albums?
#96
Banned
Originally posted by MJKTool
Dark Side leaves me rather warm and fuzzy inside personally. And I imagine it does to millions of other people as well, as reflected by it being in the top 20 selling albums of all time...
Dark Side leaves me rather warm and fuzzy inside personally. And I imagine it does to millions of other people as well, as reflected by it being in the top 20 selling albums of all time...
This is THE ALBUM. A unique piece of art and one could argue the finest prog rock album ever made. Perfect, deliberate lyrical sequencing, especially with the knowledge that it was written as a sort of memorial for Syd Barrett. Deep insight that had yet to fall into the introspective naval gazing of their later work. An album that has a clear message and vision of what it wants to convey to the listener, offering a snapshot of the band at a specific lyrical and musical peak in their careers. Emotionally uplifting, even moving, Wish You Were Here explores all dimensions of the members' musical talents and the sounds and textures they, as a group, were able to produce. For a time overshadowed by both Dark Side and The Wall, imo Wish You Were Here nevertheless remains Pink Floyd's finest hour.
Last edited by Rivero; 08-11-04 at 02:15 PM.
#98
DVD Talk Hero
Originally posted by MJKTool
Dark Side leaves me rather warm and fuzzy inside personally. And I imagine it does to millions of other people as well, as reflected by it being in the top 20 selling albums of all time...
Dark Side leaves me rather warm and fuzzy inside personally. And I imagine it does to millions of other people as well, as reflected by it being in the top 20 selling albums of all time...
I strongly disagree there.
Originally posted by MJKTool
And how do you measure the amount of "heart" that went into making an album? Are you saying The Beatles put more "heart" into their albums?
And how do you measure the amount of "heart" that went into making an album? Are you saying The Beatles put more "heart" into their albums?
#99
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 15,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by slop101
So you're saying whatever is most popular/has sold the most is best?
So you're saying whatever is most popular/has sold the most is best?
Thats the second time you have put words into my mouth in this thread. Not a great way to get your point across....imo.
#100
Suspended
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 15,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by slop101
What I meant was that PF, especially DSTM, comes more from the mind, than the heart/soul. There's not a lot of emotion running through DSTM - it comes accross far too calculated and rather cold (I won't even go into how OVER-produced it is). Beatles are almost the flip-side to that, where they run almost purely on feelings and emotions.
What I meant was that PF, especially DSTM, comes more from the mind, than the heart/soul. There's not a lot of emotion running through DSTM - it comes accross far too calculated and rather cold (I won't even go into how OVER-produced it is). Beatles are almost the flip-side to that, where they run almost purely on feelings and emotions.