View Poll Results: which version of "Let it Be should I buy
Let It Be Original 1987 master



8
36.36%
Let It Be... Naked 2003 remaster



0
0%
both



12
54.55%
neither



2
9.09%
Voters: 22. You may not vote on this poll
which version of let it be should i buy?
#1
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Hero
which version of let it be should i buy?
I don't know which version to get. Also can someone try to explain the backstory of the album. As I understand, Paul didn't like the 2 or 3 songs with strings on them that Phil Spector put on there, and on "naked" he got rid of them. Are there any other diferences between the two albums? Also, I hear that "Naked" is reastered, so, does it sound much better then the original since i never have been a real fan of the 87 remasters.
#2
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: The Rock
The best version of these recordings is to search out the Vigotone "Get Back" cd. It is the way the album should have been released originally.
LIB was Spectorized hence the reason Macca hated it
LIBN is Macca's version of it with allot of the good Lennon bits left off. This is his version. Maybe in a few years we'll get Ringo's take on it.
LIB was Spectorized hence the reason Macca hated it
LIBN is Macca's version of it with allot of the good Lennon bits left off. This is his version. Maybe in a few years we'll get Ringo's take on it.
#3
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: which version of let it be should i buy?
Originally posted by Rypro 525
I don't know which version to get. Also can someone try to explain the backstory of the album. As I understand, Paul didn't like the 2 or 3 songs with strings on them that Phil Spector put on there, and on "naked" he got rid of them. Are there any other diferences between the two albums? Also, I hear that "Naked" is reastered, so, does it sound much better then the original since i never have been a real fan of the 87 remasters.
I don't know which version to get. Also can someone try to explain the backstory of the album. As I understand, Paul didn't like the 2 or 3 songs with strings on them that Phil Spector put on there, and on "naked" he got rid of them. Are there any other diferences between the two albums? Also, I hear that "Naked" is reastered, so, does it sound much better then the original since i never have been a real fan of the 87 remasters.
The album was originally to be raw and let the music do the talking, warts and all. After the recording completed, no one was really too happy with it, so it was shelved. The band then recorded the wonderful Abbey Road.
John Lennon gave Phil Spector the masters of the Get Back sessions, and instructed him to improve the tracks. Phil introduced his patented, "Wall of Sound" to the tracks by adding string sections, brass, vocals, anything and everything that made a sound. Also, in studio chatter was inserted inbetween tracks to make it feel live.
The band listened to the album and all but 1 member voted for releasing it. Paul was displeased with the mix (probably because Phil and John were so close, and he was beginning to dispise John). The album was released to some confusion and sadness, because shortly after they broke up.
#6
New Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
LIB was Spectorized hence the reason Macca hated it
LIBN is Macca's version of it with allot of the good Lennon bits left off. This is his version.
LIBN is Macca's version of it with allot of the good Lennon bits left off. This is his version.
Rypro - LIBN has been remastered, and sounds amazing compared to LIB. That said, I would get both for the same reasons as sataniko. The original also has small bits of music and spoken word that are only buried in the Fly On The Wall disc.



