One and only Apple iTunes / iPod thread [merged]
#78
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Alotoffuffin
Posts: 1,636
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
iPod help please...
Anyone here experienced this? I have a 3rd gen 10 gig and have played it for months with no problems. yesterday, the mac I was using it on crashed and upon reboot I found the ipod to be blank. Lost 1800 songs. Not a happy camper. Loaded 1200 back on and when I pushed the "eject" button in iTunes the ipod says "OK to disconnect" with a big checkmark. Well, I disconnect and the checkmark never disappears. So I guess the battery has drained. Now, it wont even power up when plugged into the wall, I just get a dim folder with a question mark on it. what should I do? Thanks in advance...
#79
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i have had a similar outcome but with a much different cause (I left it in the car and the temp. dropped to -15 degrees). There are a few tricks to try to reformat it from the website. Otherwise, like me, you'll have to send it in to be repaired (or, probably, have a different refurb sent to you).
If your ipod is less than 6 months old, it's all free. 6-12 months, you have to pay for shipping which is about $40. I'm in that boat, so I'm going to buy applecare for the ipod (student discount puts it at under $50) which will extend the warranty, pay for the shipping, and replace the battery if it konks out in the first two years.
If your ipod is less than 6 months old, it's all free. 6-12 months, you have to pay for shipping which is about $40. I'm in that boat, so I'm going to buy applecare for the ipod (student discount puts it at under $50) which will extend the warranty, pay for the shipping, and replace the battery if it konks out in the first two years.
#80
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you have an Apple Store within driving distance, take it to their "genius bar." I had this happen with a brand new unit and they just replaced it.
It sounds like the Applecare might be a good deal. My sisters, dad and I each got these for Christmas (4 units) and at least 2 of the batteries are already underperforming.
Does anyone have any tips for maximizing battery life?
And if you haven't seen it, ipodlounge.com offers a lot of help for FAQs.
It sounds like the Applecare might be a good deal. My sisters, dad and I each got these for Christmas (4 units) and at least 2 of the batteries are already underperforming.
Does anyone have any tips for maximizing battery life?
And if you haven't seen it, ipodlounge.com offers a lot of help for FAQs.
#81
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Labels force iTunes price increase
From the "too good to last" file.....
From ...
Major labels 'force 70% price hike' on Apple
Posted by on May 8, 2004 at 3:22 AM
The world's five biggest music labels have successfully forced Apple to increase the prices it charges for songs on the online iTunes Music Store.
As we reported back in April, the major labels have been engaged in negotiations with the Mac maker in a bid to persuade it to put up prices.
According to a New York Post report today, citing sources close to the talks, all five have succeeded.
The sources claim Apple has now signed agreements with EMI, Bertelsmann Music Group (BMG), Sony, Universal and Warner that will see prices on some songs rise from 99c to $1.25, an increase of over 26 per cent.
Still, that's better than the $2.99 price point some labels had been pushing Apple to introduce.
Album prices are going up to. Many are likely to continue to be offered for $9.99, but some are appearing in the ITMS for $16.99, a rise of 70 per cent.
As one music industry source told The Register: "That will really ingratiate the public and discourage piracy, won't it?"
Apple does appear to have had it way in other areas, however. The NYP's sources reckon the company did not agree to label demands that some artists' songs only be sold in album batches and not as individual tracks.
In the past, some acts, most notably Radiohead and Metallica, have said they will not allow their songs to be offered individually. But that clearly runs against what many music consumers want: the ability to pick and choose the songs they want and not be stuck with all or nothing album offers. The old days of buying an entire album for one song are hopefully behind us.
We'd say it's about time the music industry started thinking that way too. There will always remain a place for albums - CDs too - but artists and labels have to start thinking 'outside the disc' if they're to reach a new generation of consumers now empowered to buy exactly what they want.
Other services may face similar demands, but there does seem to be a particular focus on Apple. Having established the market for legal downloads, Apple now seems to be facing a music industry paranoid about the power that success might bring the Mac maker.
You know, it amazes me what a Bizzaro World industry this is
http://www.boycott-riaa.com/article/11982
From ...
Major labels 'force 70% price hike' on Apple
Posted by on May 8, 2004 at 3:22 AM
The world's five biggest music labels have successfully forced Apple to increase the prices it charges for songs on the online iTunes Music Store.
As we reported back in April, the major labels have been engaged in negotiations with the Mac maker in a bid to persuade it to put up prices.
According to a New York Post report today, citing sources close to the talks, all five have succeeded.
The sources claim Apple has now signed agreements with EMI, Bertelsmann Music Group (BMG), Sony, Universal and Warner that will see prices on some songs rise from 99c to $1.25, an increase of over 26 per cent.
Still, that's better than the $2.99 price point some labels had been pushing Apple to introduce.
Album prices are going up to. Many are likely to continue to be offered for $9.99, but some are appearing in the ITMS for $16.99, a rise of 70 per cent.
As one music industry source told The Register: "That will really ingratiate the public and discourage piracy, won't it?"
Apple does appear to have had it way in other areas, however. The NYP's sources reckon the company did not agree to label demands that some artists' songs only be sold in album batches and not as individual tracks.
In the past, some acts, most notably Radiohead and Metallica, have said they will not allow their songs to be offered individually. But that clearly runs against what many music consumers want: the ability to pick and choose the songs they want and not be stuck with all or nothing album offers. The old days of buying an entire album for one song are hopefully behind us.
We'd say it's about time the music industry started thinking that way too. There will always remain a place for albums - CDs too - but artists and labels have to start thinking 'outside the disc' if they're to reach a new generation of consumers now empowered to buy exactly what they want.
Other services may face similar demands, but there does seem to be a particular focus on Apple. Having established the market for legal downloads, Apple now seems to be facing a music industry paranoid about the power that success might bring the Mac maker.
http://www.boycott-riaa.com/article/11982
Last edited by Captain Harlock; 05-08-04 at 10:23 PM.
#82
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Apple has already said that the reports are untrue.
http://biz.yahoo.com/rc/040507/tech_apple_music_2.html
http://biz.yahoo.com/rc/040507/tech_apple_music_2.html
#83
DVD Talk Reviewer
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: WAS looking for My Own Private Stuckeyville, but stuck in Liberty City (while missing Vice City)
Posts: 15,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here's the original "false" article...
Apple Tunes Up
May 7, 2004 -- Music fans may have to start shelling out more to download some of the most popular songs on Apple's iTunes digital music service, The Post has learned.
The five major record labels have been in negotiations recently with Apple over pricing and other issues associated with the year-old download service, which was launched to great fanfare last April.
All five of the deals - with Universal, Sony, BMG, EMI and Warner Music - have already been signed, sources say, and the new pricing is already being rolled out for albums.
EMI and Sony Music, which this week launched its own download service called Sony Connect, were said to be the most aggressive on pricing.
Under the terms of some of the deals, the prices for some of the most popular singles could rise to $1.25, according to sources familiar with the negotiations. Songs have previously been priced at 99 cents across the board.
"It allows for some flexibility down the road," said one source.
Meanwhile, some of the usage rules - such as how many times users can burn downloads - have been altered. For example, full playlists will now only be able to be burned seven times instead of the current 10.
However, Apple chief Steve Jobs stuck to his guns on his rule that artists are not allowed to only offer full albums for sale without offering singles. Some companies, especially EMI, had been pushing to allow artists to only sell albums.
The prices for albums - most of which have been priced at $9.99 - allow for some releases to be priced higher. For example, "Fly or Die," the latest album from rock-rap act N.E.R.D., is currently selling for $16.99 on iTunes.
Spokespersons for the major record companies declined to comment. A spokesperson for iTunes was not available for comment.
Apple's willingness to allow some singles to be priced higher than 99 cents indicates the company feels empowered by its current success in the download market and sees a chance to boost profits from the sales of digital music.
Such sales have mainly been viewed as a method to drive sales of its popular iPod digital music player.
At the 99-cent price, only about 10 cents from each song sale goes to Apple's bottom line, with about 70 cents going to the record labels and the other 20 cents paying for credit-card fees and distribution costs, sources say.
Sony's new service offers over 500,000 songs at 99 cents and full albums for sale at prices beginning at $9.99.
While iTunes has been hailed as a revolutionary service that popularized paid downloads, there are some signs its success has fallen short.
For example, a Pepsi marketing campaign announced last year that was supposed to give away 100 million downloads has resulted in only 5 million downloads by Pepsi drinkers, according to a source. Pepsi spent upwards of $2.5 million on an advertisement during the Super Bowl to promote the campaign.
Apple recently kicked off a new iTunes television campaign featuring the band The Vines' song "Ride."
May 7, 2004 -- Music fans may have to start shelling out more to download some of the most popular songs on Apple's iTunes digital music service, The Post has learned.
The five major record labels have been in negotiations recently with Apple over pricing and other issues associated with the year-old download service, which was launched to great fanfare last April.
All five of the deals - with Universal, Sony, BMG, EMI and Warner Music - have already been signed, sources say, and the new pricing is already being rolled out for albums.
EMI and Sony Music, which this week launched its own download service called Sony Connect, were said to be the most aggressive on pricing.
Under the terms of some of the deals, the prices for some of the most popular singles could rise to $1.25, according to sources familiar with the negotiations. Songs have previously been priced at 99 cents across the board.
"It allows for some flexibility down the road," said one source.
Meanwhile, some of the usage rules - such as how many times users can burn downloads - have been altered. For example, full playlists will now only be able to be burned seven times instead of the current 10.
However, Apple chief Steve Jobs stuck to his guns on his rule that artists are not allowed to only offer full albums for sale without offering singles. Some companies, especially EMI, had been pushing to allow artists to only sell albums.
The prices for albums - most of which have been priced at $9.99 - allow for some releases to be priced higher. For example, "Fly or Die," the latest album from rock-rap act N.E.R.D., is currently selling for $16.99 on iTunes.
Spokespersons for the major record companies declined to comment. A spokesperson for iTunes was not available for comment.
Apple's willingness to allow some singles to be priced higher than 99 cents indicates the company feels empowered by its current success in the download market and sees a chance to boost profits from the sales of digital music.
Such sales have mainly been viewed as a method to drive sales of its popular iPod digital music player.
At the 99-cent price, only about 10 cents from each song sale goes to Apple's bottom line, with about 70 cents going to the record labels and the other 20 cents paying for credit-card fees and distribution costs, sources say.
Sony's new service offers over 500,000 songs at 99 cents and full albums for sale at prices beginning at $9.99.
While iTunes has been hailed as a revolutionary service that popularized paid downloads, there are some signs its success has fallen short.
For example, a Pepsi marketing campaign announced last year that was supposed to give away 100 million downloads has resulted in only 5 million downloads by Pepsi drinkers, according to a source. Pepsi spent upwards of $2.5 million on an advertisement during the Super Bowl to promote the campaign.
Apple recently kicked off a new iTunes television campaign featuring the band The Vines' song "Ride."
#84
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
New iPod commercial...What's the song?
The one where he passes the wall of iPod posters and then the images on the posters start dancing to the song.
Who does it and what is the song called?
Thanks
Who does it and what is the song called?
Thanks
#86
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
#87
DVD Talk Legend
Interesting article about U2's decision to do an iPod commercial
From Rolling Stone:
U2 Talk iPod Strategy
Band's partnership with Apple has deep roots
By Warren Cohen
For two weeks before MTV debuted U2's video for the new single "Vertigo," fans had a chance to see the band perform the song on TV -- in an iPod commercial. The members of U2 are passionate proponents of Apple's iPod -- "It's the most interesting art object since the electric guitar in terms of music," says Bono -- but the band's new partnership with Apple Computer still qualifies as a surprise. In their twenty-five-year history, U2 have never licensed their music for commercial use or even accepted tour sponsorship.
With radio playlists strictly formatted and MTV showing more reality-TV shows than videos, many bands are looking for new ways to bring their music to the public. And so U2 launched the first single from their upcoming album, How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb, with an iPod ad rather than a video. Apple is also releasing a special black U2-edition iPod for $349 with band autographs laser-engraved on the casing. Buyers get a fifty-dollar discount on The Complete U2, a $149 iTunes download package that includes more than 400 songs. "I see this as the beginning of a new era in the distribution of music," says U2 guitarist the Edge. "We're happy to be part of history and the future."
The U2-Apple partnership has deep roots. In early 2003, when U2 first heard that Apple was planning to launch an iTunes music store, the band met with Apple founder Steve Jobs at the home of Jimmy Iovine, the co-chairman of U2's label, Interscope Records. "Jimmy is a visionary and believes artists should meet with technologists," says Bono.
iPod ads have been helpful in album sales before, most notably for Jet, whose single "Are You Gonna Be My Girl" garnered widespread TV exposure before storming radio. U2 manager Paul McGuinness says, "The commercial was an attractive idea because iTunes was already selling our music, and the amount Apple will spend for airtime is out of reach for the record business." The band accepted no money for the ad but will get royalties on the U2 iPod.
And music execs are eager to see more of these partnerships. In September, the industry held its first-ever "upfront" -- a conference where the major labels showcased upcoming albums for representatives from corporations such as Procter & Gamble, Pepsi and Mercedes-Benz. "Target your brands with our bands," said Atlantic chairman Jason Flom, showing a video featuring bands on his artist roster that might appeal to baby-boomers (Phil Collins, the Doors) or soccer moms (Matchbox Twenty, the Corrs).
Commercials aren't the only route. Shows including The O.C. and One Tree Hill put music from new bands in every episode. When video-game maker Electronic Arts featured songs from Good Charlotte and Blink-182 in its sports games, it helped to break those bands. "We know there are other avenues to talk to consumers about music and other places to market to them," says Phil Quartararo, executive vice president of EMI Music North America. "Kids hear music on the radio, phone, iPod, video game and the Internet, so we have to go to where the consumers are."
As for U2, it's unclear whether their partnership with iPod will result in significantly increased exposure. After all, the band has already sold more than 120 million records worldwide. "U2 is an established act for radio and video, which is still the main driver," says Quartararo. But some think that the glow from Apple's hot product will reflect well on the band. "Whenever you're the first to do something, there's a hipness factor," says Bob Chiappardi, president of Concrete Marketing, a music-promotion firm. "It's a win-win situation." If it goes well, look for other bands to beg Apple for their own iPods too.
Band's partnership with Apple has deep roots
By Warren Cohen
For two weeks before MTV debuted U2's video for the new single "Vertigo," fans had a chance to see the band perform the song on TV -- in an iPod commercial. The members of U2 are passionate proponents of Apple's iPod -- "It's the most interesting art object since the electric guitar in terms of music," says Bono -- but the band's new partnership with Apple Computer still qualifies as a surprise. In their twenty-five-year history, U2 have never licensed their music for commercial use or even accepted tour sponsorship.
With radio playlists strictly formatted and MTV showing more reality-TV shows than videos, many bands are looking for new ways to bring their music to the public. And so U2 launched the first single from their upcoming album, How to Dismantle an Atomic Bomb, with an iPod ad rather than a video. Apple is also releasing a special black U2-edition iPod for $349 with band autographs laser-engraved on the casing. Buyers get a fifty-dollar discount on The Complete U2, a $149 iTunes download package that includes more than 400 songs. "I see this as the beginning of a new era in the distribution of music," says U2 guitarist the Edge. "We're happy to be part of history and the future."
The U2-Apple partnership has deep roots. In early 2003, when U2 first heard that Apple was planning to launch an iTunes music store, the band met with Apple founder Steve Jobs at the home of Jimmy Iovine, the co-chairman of U2's label, Interscope Records. "Jimmy is a visionary and believes artists should meet with technologists," says Bono.
iPod ads have been helpful in album sales before, most notably for Jet, whose single "Are You Gonna Be My Girl" garnered widespread TV exposure before storming radio. U2 manager Paul McGuinness says, "The commercial was an attractive idea because iTunes was already selling our music, and the amount Apple will spend for airtime is out of reach for the record business." The band accepted no money for the ad but will get royalties on the U2 iPod.
And music execs are eager to see more of these partnerships. In September, the industry held its first-ever "upfront" -- a conference where the major labels showcased upcoming albums for representatives from corporations such as Procter & Gamble, Pepsi and Mercedes-Benz. "Target your brands with our bands," said Atlantic chairman Jason Flom, showing a video featuring bands on his artist roster that might appeal to baby-boomers (Phil Collins, the Doors) or soccer moms (Matchbox Twenty, the Corrs).
Commercials aren't the only route. Shows including The O.C. and One Tree Hill put music from new bands in every episode. When video-game maker Electronic Arts featured songs from Good Charlotte and Blink-182 in its sports games, it helped to break those bands. "We know there are other avenues to talk to consumers about music and other places to market to them," says Phil Quartararo, executive vice president of EMI Music North America. "Kids hear music on the radio, phone, iPod, video game and the Internet, so we have to go to where the consumers are."
As for U2, it's unclear whether their partnership with iPod will result in significantly increased exposure. After all, the band has already sold more than 120 million records worldwide. "U2 is an established act for radio and video, which is still the main driver," says Quartararo. But some think that the glow from Apple's hot product will reflect well on the band. "Whenever you're the first to do something, there's a hipness factor," says Bob Chiappardi, president of Concrete Marketing, a music-promotion firm. "It's a win-win situation." If it goes well, look for other bands to beg Apple for their own iPods too.
#89
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Cloud Cuckoo Land
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In their twenty-five-year history, U2 have never licensed their music for commercial use or even accepted tour sponsorship.
#90
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Motor City
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hey guys I have an ipod question, rather than start a new thread I thoughtt I'd just post it here. Since this is the one and only!
I haven't used one so I feel ipod-dumb. I want to get an ipod mini for my sister, but she's spending the semester in Europe and won't have access to her own computer. Would she still be able to use it (other than just pre-loading a crapload of songs) on a shared computer, for example? Or should I put it off for next year?
I haven't used one so I feel ipod-dumb. I want to get an ipod mini for my sister, but she's spending the semester in Europe and won't have access to her own computer. Would she still be able to use it (other than just pre-loading a crapload of songs) on a shared computer, for example? Or should I put it off for next year?
#91
DVD Talk Legend
I also bought my sister an iPod, and synced hers up with my computer since she doesn't have one yet. She should be able to use it on someone else's computer. I've hooked up my friends iPods to mine, and given them some songs to check out. At the worst, she could just upload her songs to the new computer, resync her ipod to the new computer, and then go to town.
If you have other questions, or need any other help from ipod super-genuises (most of the time), check out ipodlounge.com.
If you have other questions, or need any other help from ipod super-genuises (most of the time), check out ipodlounge.com.
#92
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Motor City
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Right, but you need to install software on the computer in order to sync the ipod to it, right? She couldn't just use a school computer over there or a public computer, right?
#93
DVD Talk Legend
Someone was telling me that once you load your mp3's into Itunes you can't play them using anything else (can't even burn them to a CD) - is this true?
I don't have Itunes and am not sure how it works, but could I just keep an additional copy of all my mp3's seperate? (double the gigs, but I've got room)
I don't have Itunes and am not sure how it works, but could I just keep an additional copy of all my mp3's seperate? (double the gigs, but I've got room)
#94
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Artman
Someone was telling me that once you load your mp3's into Itunes you can't play them using anything else (can't even burn them to a CD) - is this true?
I don't have Itunes and am not sure how it works, but could I just keep an additional copy of all my mp3's seperate? (double the gigs, but I've got room)
I don't have Itunes and am not sure how it works, but could I just keep an additional copy of all my mp3's seperate? (double the gigs, but I've got room)
#95
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 4,681
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Artman
Someone was telling me that once you load your mp3's into Itunes you can't play them using anything else (can't even burn them to a CD) - is this true?
One of the formats iTunes can convert to is AAC, which is different from mp3, wav, etc.
#96
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by apeoples
Right, but you need to install software on the computer in order to sync the ipod to it, right? She couldn't just use a school computer over there or a public computer, right?
Right, she'll have to have itunes to add or remove music from the ipod.
#97
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: I was here but I disappear
Posts: 8,407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
$2 off Grammy winning albums at iTunes
Just got an email: the big grammy winning albums are $2 off, which would make most $7.99. I might finally get College Dropout.
#100
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,044
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ummm...College Dropout is $9.99 for the CD and case and etc...why not have it and then rip it to your iPod? I don't get this whole buying albums off iTunes.