#26
Josh-da-man , 10-15-25 12:57 AM
DVD Talk Hero
Josh-da-man
DVD Talk Hero
close
05-28-26
- Join DateSep 2000
- LocationThe Bible Belt
- Posts:49,582
Received 4,540 Likes
on
2,986 Posts
Yeah, and I can't believe Warners rejected that Chamber of Secrets poster in favor of bland shit like this...
#27
https://galacticgallery.com/drew-str...her-cool-stuff
Hey folks, just a heads up that some additional signed mini prints have been made available. I placed an order assuming it was a reprint of the signature as well, but the owner just let me know they were signed by Drew. They aren't cheap, but owning a number of them, I can say the print quality is great and they look very sharp. I keep them in a 13 x 19 art portfolio.
Hey folks, just a heads up that some additional signed mini prints have been made available. I placed an order assuming it was a reprint of the signature as well, but the owner just let me know they were signed by Drew. They aren't cheap, but owning a number of them, I can say the print quality is great and they look very sharp. I keep them in a 13 x 19 art portfolio.
#28
candyrocket786 , 10-29-25 01:16 PM
DVD Talk Limited Edition
candyrocket786
DVD Talk Limited Edition
close
- Join DateSep 2001
- LocationHouston, TX
- Posts:6,444
Received 286 Likes
on
195 Posts
Quote:
cool-stuff
Hey folks, just a heads up that some additional signed mini prints have been made available. I placed an order assuming it was a reprint of the signature as well, but the owner just let me know they were signed by Drew. They aren't cheap, but owning a number of them, I can say the print quality is great and they look very sharp. I keep them in a 13 x 19 art portfolio.
Of course the MOTU is sold out.Originally Posted by Artman
https://galacticgallery.com/drew-struzancool-stuffHey folks, just a heads up that some additional signed mini prints have been made available. I placed an order assuming it was a reprint of the signature as well, but the owner just let me know they were signed by Drew. They aren't cheap, but owning a number of them, I can say the print quality is great and they look very sharp. I keep them in a 13 x 19 art portfolio.
#29
Ash Ketchum , 10-31-25 12:32 PM
DVD Talk Legend
Ash Ketchum
DVD Talk Legend
close
05-27-26
- Join DateFeb 2009
- Posts:13,281
Received 496 Likes
on
367 Posts
Just a thought about that poster. Struzan's painted imagery is too reminiscent of STAR WARS. The Harry Potter sequels were marketed to Harry Potter's fanbase which identified those three actors with the roles, so the poster used put photos of the actors front and center since they were much more important to the franchise at that point than any other element that could have been dramatized in the poster. Whereas when STAR WARS first came out, the three leads were virtual unknowns.
#30
Michael Corvin , 10-31-25 09:22 PM
DVD Talk Godfather
Michael Corvin
DVD Talk Godfather
close
05-27-26
- Join DateMay 1999
- LocationLouisville, KY
- Posts:63,463
Received 1,377 Likes
on
943 Posts
Quote:
Children couldn't associate a painting of Radcliffe, Watson and Grint as their characters over photos? what?Originally Posted by Ash Ketchum
Just a thought about that poster. Struzan's painted imagery is too reminiscent of STAR WARS. The Harry Potter sequels were marketed to Harry Potter's fanbase which identified those three actors with the roles, so the poster used put photos of the actors front and center since they were much more important to the franchise at that point than any other element that could have been dramatized in the poster.
Quote:
As opposed to the household super famous actors when Harry Potter came out? Originally Posted by Ash Ketchum
Whereas when STAR WARS first came out, the three leads were virtual unknowns.
