![]() |
Re: 2025 Academy Awards
Originally Posted by rocket1312
(Post 14542840)
So what are some 2024 movies that lots of people have seen that you guys think should have been nominated? Because I look at the 2024 box office and I see mountains of garbage. And regardless of it's quality, Emilia Perez is probably one of the most seen nominees by virtue of it being on Netflix.
Katy O'Brien, Love Lies Bleeding - Supporting Actress Joan Chen, Didi - Supporting Actress Hugh Grant, Heretic - Supporting Actor Civil War - Sound or Editing ETA: I missed the part about "lots of people have seen". Although I think these are generally more mainstream-oriented picks |
Re: 2025 Academy Awards
Originally Posted by IBJoel
(Post 14544150)
Justice Smith, I Saw the TV Glow - Lead Actor over Fiennes (yes, I did not see Conclave, but does he need more recognition? The guy is an all-timer)
|
Re: 2025 Academy Awards
Originally Posted by IBJoel
(Post 14544150)
Justice Smith, I Saw the TV Glow - Lead Actor over Fiennes (yes, I did not see Conclave, but does he need more recognition? The guy is an all-timer)
Katy O'Brien, Love Lies Bleeding - Supporting Actress Joan Chen, Didi - Supporting Actress Hugh Grant, Heretic - Supporting Actor Civil War - Sound or Editing ETA: I missed the part about "lots of people have seen". Although I think these are generally more mainstream-oriented picks |
Re: 2025 Academy Awards
Originally Posted by Decker
(Post 14544153)
I’m sorry, but I just need to interject here : That is a HORRIBLE take. #1 : Fiennes is wonderful in the role, You shouldn’t oust a nominated performance you haven’t seen yet — especially a universally acclaimed one, #2 : He’s never won an Oscar, so yes, he does need more recognition, #3 Conclave is exactly the sort of old-fashioned Oscar films they used to make in the 80s and 90s, the type that was just bemoaned above for not existing anymore,
Originally Posted by rocket1312
(Post 14544216)
I'm sure you could make a compelling case for any of those, but none of them are changing the narrative around the awards. Hugh Grant is the only one who would maybe move the needle. And not that it matters, but he had been running in best actor, not best supporting.
|
Re: 2025 Academy Awards
Originally Posted by IBJoel
(Post 14544225)
My biggest issue with the Oscars is not that no one has seen the nominees, it's that they're all so stuffy. Oh, another biopic? How daring. And then with something like Emilia Perez, which has gotten criticism from both the trans and Mexican communities, they're full steam ahead.
An American in Paris wasn't filmed in France. Have we now decided that representation applies to nationality and not just race? Somehow it's not a problem when Brits and Aussies play Americans. And has the Trans community so quickly moved on from complaining about the lack of representation to the kind of representation? |
Re: 2025 Academy Awards
Originally Posted by IBJoel
(Post 14544150)
Justice Smith, I Saw the TV Glow - Lead Actor over Fiennes (yes, I did not see Conclave, but does he need more recognition? The guy is an all-timer)
Katy O'Brien, Love Lies Bleeding - Supporting Actress Joan Chen, Didi - Supporting Actress Hugh Grant, Heretic - Supporting Actor Civil War - Sound or Editing ETA: I missed the part about "lots of people have seen". Although I think these are generally more mainstream-oriented picks |
Re: 2025 Academy Awards
Originally Posted by IBJoel
(Post 14544225)
WOW, I actually didn't know that. I'd take out Brody then, which I don't know why I didn't go for him in the first place.
|
Re: 2025 Academy Awards
Originally Posted by Count Dooku
(Post 14544258)
When I read that Emilia Perez is facing criticism because its cast isn't Mexican (or even Spanish-speakers) and it wasn't filmed in Mexico, I seriously roll my eyes. It's a movie.
An American in Paris wasn't filmed in France. Have we now decided that representation applies to nationality and not just race? Somehow it's not a problem when Brits and Aussies play Americans. And has the Trans community so quickly moved on from complaining about the lack of representation to the kind of representation? And MY point has NEVER been that "not enough people saw this stuff". That's a business issue on what the industry chooses to put money into greenlighting and promoting. |
Re: 2025 Academy Awards
Originally Posted by IBJoel
(Post 14544294)
FOH with this entire, bad faith take.
And MY point has NEVER been that "not enough people saw this stuff". That's a business issue on what the industry chooses to put money into greenlighting and promoting. |
Re: 2025 Academy Awards
Originally Posted by Count Dooku
(Post 14544342)
I can't tell if you are agreeing or disagreeing with me.
yeah, but the ongoing discussion was about them not nominating more popular movies like they used to |
Re: 2025 Academy Awards
Originally Posted by Count Dooku
(Post 14544258)
When I read that Emilia Perez is facing criticism because its cast isn't Mexican (or even Spanish-speakers) and it wasn't filmed in Mexico, I seriously roll my eyes. It's a movie.
An American in Paris wasn't filmed in France. Have we now decided that representation applies to nationality and not just race? Somehow it's not a problem when Brits and Aussies play Americans. And has the Trans community so quickly moved on from complaining about the lack of representation to the kind of representation? |
Re: 2025 Academy Awards
Originally Posted by IBJoel
(Post 14544355)
It's the other way around. Movies that had greater all-around artistic merit were more successful and then got nominations. Now audience turn out is primarily about spectacle (in addition and due to the reasons we talked about earlier) and studios are more concerned with short-term ROI than they used to be.
|
Re: 2025 Academy Awards
Originally Posted by Paff
(Post 14544452)
It was an issue 20 years ago when Zhang Ziyi starred in Memoirs of a Geisha
|
Re: 2025 Academy Awards
Originally Posted by Count Dooku
(Post 14544463)
Based on my need to google what you are referring to, I'm gonna guess that what happened was that there was complaining, and then it turned out not enough people gave a shit, and "the controversy" went away.
Although as a staff member of an Asian Film Festival, it was probably bigger news in that circle than for most filmgoers, that's why I was a little more aware of it. |
Re: 2025 Academy Awards
Originally Posted by Count Dooku
(Post 14544260)
The point was that the Oscars have moved away from nominating movies that most people have seen, so Didi may be more "mainstream-oriented," but who saw it?
in the Bay Area. The movie isn't all that great though, so if you missed it, you didn't miss much :lol: |
Re: 2025 Academy Awards
Originally Posted by IBJoel
(Post 14544355)
It's the other way around. Movies that had greater all-around artistic merit were more successful and then got nominations. Now audience turn out is primarily about spectacle (in addition and due to the reasons we talked about earlier) and studios are more concerned with short-term ROI than they used to be.
|
Re: 2025 Academy Awards
Of course last year a 3 hour movie about a nuclear physicist made nearly a billion dollars, was nominated for 13 Oscars and won 7 including Best Picture. So it's not like those days are completely behind us.
|
Re: 2025 Academy Awards
It also featured one of those really big explosions that audiences like so much...
|
Re: 2025 Academy Awards
She was always a long shot, but this really isn’t gonna help her Oscar campaign.
|
Re: 2025 Academy Awards
I deleted X over a month ago but seems odd she would make some of those posts.
|
Re: 2025 Academy Awards
That’s not an apology. That’s an “Oh shit, these old posts could come back and bite me in the ass, I better try to get in front of it.” statement.
|
Re: 2025 Academy Awards
Originally Posted by GoldenJCJ
(Post 14545887)
That’s not an apology. That’s an “Oh shit, these old posts could come back and bite me in the ass, I better try to get in front of it.” statement.
|
Re: 2025 Academy Awards
Originally Posted by TomOpus
(Post 14545885)
I deleted X over a month ago but seems odd she would make some of those posts.
Originally Posted by GoldenJCJ
(Post 14545887)
That’s not an apology. That’s an “Oh shit, these old posts could come back and bite me in the ass, I better try to get in front of it.” statement.
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/dvdtalk...65141fae76.png |
Re: 2025 Academy Awards
Generally speaking claiming ignorance about significant events in history while playing down their impact is not a way to win friends and influence people.
|
Re: 2025 Academy Awards
I get what Decker is saying, but the true reality is that Gascon does not have an Oscar campaign. She is not going to win. Moore or Madison is going to win. Case closed. It's that simple. And Gascon is not going to come in third.
Right now she is trying to salvage whatever career she has. Again, the true reality is that roles for a 52 year old Spanish trans actress, who kind of looks like Javier Bardem in drag, are going to be very few and very far between. Her immediate concerns has to be avoiding being labeled as toxic, which would destroy whatever opportunities might have come her way as a result of this movie. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:34 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.