![]() |
Swamp Thing (D: Mangold)
“Swamp Thing” Easily the most extreme example of Gunn and Safran’s conviction to diversify the DCU, “Swamp Thing” will “investigate the dark origins of Swamp Thing,” Safran said, through the prism of horror. By way of explaining further, Gunn referenced the initial reactions to the Guardians of the Galaxy joining the Marvel Cinematic Universe and initial questions about how Rocket Raccoon would work standing next to Thor. “That mashup quality” wound up being one of the highlights of “Avengers: Infinity War” and “Avengers: Endgame,” Gunn argued. Gunn said they’re “one-upping” that approach with “Swamp Thing.” “This is a much more horrific film, but we’ll still have Swamp Thing interact with the other characters,” he added. |
re: Swamp Thing (D: Mangold)
Did anyone here watch the long cancelled TV series that was on DC Universe and later aired on The CW. I heard it was good, but once it was canceled after one episode, it deflated my interest in it. Not sure there is a real interest in a theatrical movie.
|
re: Swamp Thing (D: Mangold)
Originally Posted by DJariya
(Post 14228317)
Did anyone here watch the long cancelled TV series that was on DC Universe and later aired on The CW. I heard it was good, but once it was canceled after one episode, it deflated my interest in it. Not sure there is a real interest in a theatrical movie.
|
re: Swamp Thing (D: Mangold)
As long as it's not an answer to seeing Man-thing in Werewolf by Night... anything is better than the two former films with Adrienne Barbeau and Heather Locklear....
|
re: Swamp Thing (D: Mangold)
Originally Posted by DJariya
(Post 14228317)
Did anyone here watch the long cancelled TV series that was on DC Universe and later aired on The CW. I heard it was good, but once it was canceled after one episode, it deflated my interest in it. Not sure there is a real interest in a theatrical movie.
|
re: Swamp Thing (D: Mangold)
Originally Posted by DJariya
(Post 14228317)
Did anyone here watch the long cancelled TV series that was on DC Universe and later aired on The CW. I heard it was good, but once it was canceled after one episode, it deflated my interest in it. Not sure there is a real interest in a theatrical movie.
|
re: Swamp Thing (D: Mangold)
A tease maybe?
|
re: Swamp Thing (D: Mangold)
Originally Posted by DJariya
(Post 14228647)
Mangold is in discussions with the Warner Bros. arm to take on the feature adaptation of Swamp Thing, the supernatural horror-based hero who is a focal point in the first chapter of DC Studios’ slate. |
re: Swamp Thing (D: Mangold)
Damn, I always love seeing some old Berni Wrightson Swampy artwork.
|
re: Swamp Thing (D: Mangold)
If Mangold does get hired, they would be a great start. I know he's busy with a Bob Dylan bio right now, so don't expect to see this anytime soon.
|
re: Swamp Thing (D: Mangold)
Swamp Thing sound interesting but I have zero intentions of ever watching any future Batman, Superman or Wonder Woman films and I am sure this would tie into them. Same reason I never got into comic books.
|
re: Swamp Thing (D: Mangold)
Originally Posted by DJariya
(Post 14228317)
Did anyone here watch the long cancelled TV series that was on DC Universe and later aired on The CW. I heard it was good, but once it was canceled after one episode, it deflated my interest in it. Not sure there is a real interest in a theatrical movie.
Indeed. And the canceled series was produced by James Wan. The only way I'd care about future Swamp Thing films/series is if Gunn and Co. brought in Alan Moore and gave him carte blanche on the script. I doubt that will ever happen, though. |
re: Swamp Thing (D: Mangold)
Any chance the could rope in Guillermo Del Toro? I believe Swamp Thing is his favorite DC character.
|
re: Swamp Thing (D: Mangold)
Originally Posted by Why So Blu?
(Post 14229104)
Indeed. And the canceled series was produced by James Wan. The only way I'd care about future Swamp Thing films/series is if Gunn and Co. brought in Alan Moore and gave him carte blanche on the script. I doubt that will ever happen, though.
/dəˈlo͞oZH(ə)nəl/ adjective
|
re: Swamp Thing (D: Mangold)
Originally Posted by stvn1974
(Post 14229113)
de·lu·sion·al
/dəˈlo͞oZH(ə)nəl/ adjective
|
re: Swamp Thing (D: Mangold)
Alan Moore would set himself on fire before working with DC again. You might as well expect Jesus to write the script.
|
re: Swamp Thing (D: Mangold)
Originally Posted by majorjoe23
(Post 14229167)
Alan Moore would set himself on fire before working with DC again. You might as well expect Jesus to write the script.
The point of no return would come, though, thanks to a cascading series of misadventures seeing his work adapted to film. Moore was not creatively involved with 2001's From Hell, based (loosely) on his and Eddie Campbell's Jack the Ripper story, but remained generally ambivalent about the movie. 2003's League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, though, caused Moore problems beyond the Sean Connery vehicle's being an inexcusably poor representation of his book with Kevin O'Neil; a lawsuit against Warner Bros. compelled Moore to testify for ten hours that he didn't create the graphic novel as a way for the studio to plagiarize the litigating writers. From then, he asked his name be removed from film versions of his work, including V for Vendetta and Watchmen, and his film royalties instead allocated to the artists who co-created the comics. |
re: Swamp Thing (D: Mangold)
Originally Posted by RocShemp
(Post 14229171)
I forgot all about his feud with DC. However, this part is perplexing:
Wasn't it 20th Century Fox that was sued over The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen? |
re: Swamp Thing (D: Mangold)
Originally Posted by RocShemp
(Post 14229153)
Is he really? I know Moore hates adaptations of his work because he feels a comic book should be a co.if book. However, he has written novels and screenplays. Has anyone ever approached him to write an original screenplay about a comic book character, that is not an adaptation of his previous work?
No, he's saying I'm delusional. :lol: I know it will never happen, but had to spitball that. |
re: Swamp Thing (D: Mangold)
Alan Moore’s run was stellar, but Swamp Thing has had perhaps the greatest high quality story hit to miss ratio in comic book history. Plenty of good stories to crib from, if they go that route.
|
re: Swamp Thing (D: Mangold)
Originally Posted by Why So Blu?
(Post 14229304)
No, he's saying I'm delusional. :lol:
I know it will never happen, but had to spitball that.
Originally Posted by majorjoe23
(Post 14229210)
his big issue was Fox settled the suit, which he took as throwing him under the bus and admitting that the League of Extraordinary Gentleman comic was essentially created to cover for for the theft of the Cast of Characters script.
Originally Posted by Trevor
(Post 14229440)
Alan Moore’s run was stellar, but Swamp Thing has had perhaps the greatest high quality story hit to miss ratio in comic book history. Plenty of good stories to crib from, if they go that route.
|
re: Swamp Thing (D: Mangold)
My guess is whoever wrote the article just made a mistake and typed Warner Bros. when they meant Fox.
|
re: Swamp Thing (D: Mangold)
I hope the approach they take is to do the origin like that of the comic, and then have the twist be what Moore implemented to reinvigorate that character for his run.
|
re: Swamp Thing (D: Mangold)
Originally Posted by Dr. DVD
(Post 14229552)
I hope the approach they take is to do the origin like that of the comic, and then have the twist be what Moore implemented to reinvigorate that character for his run.
If the movie manages to take the best of the show and ditch what didn't work, they could have a solid hit on their hands. I hope if Man gold does indeed helm this, he gives it the kind of nuanced care he gave Logan. |
re: Swamp Thing (D: Mangold)
The show had promise in the early going but I wouldn't call it a complete success. I actually think Swamp Thing is one of the tougher DC properties to adapt to the screen and I have no idea why Hollywood seems fascinated by it.
I suspect all of the development work done for Justice League Dark will creep into elements of Gunn's DC plans. It's much easier getting executives to greenlight something they've already worked on in some capacity. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:34 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.