DVD Talk Forum

DVD Talk Forum (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/)
-   Movie Talk (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/movie-talk-17/)
-   -   Star Wars: What was your ideal vision for the Sequel Trilogy? (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/movie-talk/649422-star-wars-what-your-ideal-vision-sequel-trilogy.html)

JTH182 12-26-19 04:07 AM

Re: Star Wars: What was your ideal vision for the Sequel Trilogy?
 
Snoke should have been Plagueis. Rey should have been a (real) Skywalker or Kenobi. Better treatment of Luke. Leia shown to be a powerful Force user (other than Leia Poppins). More Force ghosts in TRoS.

NO FUCKING BROOM-BOY!!!! (God I HATE that ending of TLJ)


Just my super quick list of things I would change.

Mike86 12-26-19 10:42 AM

Re: Star Wars: What was your ideal vision for the Sequel Trilogy?
 
I actually thought we might see, and not just hear some of the Force ghosts in The Rise of Skywalker. One of the earlier drafts of the ending to Return of the Jedi had the ghosts of Obi-Wan and Yoda there, and I had thought since there was rumors of Hayden being on set that Anakin be there along with maybe Luke. Would have been cool, but also not exactly sure how it would have played out.

candyrocket786 12-26-19 11:03 AM

Re: Star Wars: What was your ideal vision for the Sequel Trilogy?
 

Originally Posted by Mike86 (Post 13661136)
I actually thought we might see, and not just hear some of the Force ghosts in The Rise of Skywalker. One of the earlier drafts of the ending to Return of the Jedi had the ghosts of Obi-Wan and Yoda there, and I had thought since there was rumors of Hayden being on set that Anakin be there along with maybe Luke. Would have been cool, but also not exactly sure how it would have played out.

I believe the leaks indicated Hayden did film actual scenes, but they were cut in the end.

IBJoel 12-26-19 01:20 PM

Re: Star Wars: What was your ideal vision for the Sequel Trilogy?
 

Originally Posted by kefrank (Post 13660875)
On the whole, I think what the first two sequel movies established worked really well - at least for Rey, Kylo, Luke, Leia and Han. I enjoyed the Rise of Skywalker as well, but if it were up to me, I would have done a few things slightly differently to wrap up the trilogy...

I would have made the villain in the Rise of Skywalker a clone of the ancient Jedi that went rogue and founded the Sith, having been cloned/resurrected by the Emperor in secret on Exegol around the time of Return of the Jedi, in order to solidify the dark power of the Empire for all time. With the death of the Emperor and the victory of the rebellion, this ancient Sith clone began pulling strings behind the scenes in secret to establish the First Order and regain power over the galaxy.

I would not have made Rey Palpatine's granddaughter, but instead I would have made her an orphan, discovered to be Force-sensitive by Lor San Tekka or other members of the Church of the Force and believed by them to possibly be descended from one of the original founders of the Jedi, in a bloodline long considered to have ended. Based on this belief, they hid her on Jakku, watching over her from close by to see if she would prove to be what they believed her to be (which she eventually does). It would have validated that her parents were "no one" but her ancestors were someone indeed.

Those two things would have made the "I am all the Sith...and I am all the Jedi" moment make more sense and carry more weight. It also would have given more expanse to the mythology of the Star Wars universe in this sequel trilogy.

Lastly, given the opportunity that Abrams ultimately didn't have, I would have made Leia's role in turning Kylo/Ben back to the Light a bit more fleshed out and given Ben a slightly more direct role in defeating the Sith in the end, finally fulfilling the prophecy of a Skywalker bringing balance to the Force (and in a little more interesting way, fulfilling Ben/Kylo's desire to be as "powerful" as his grandfather).

Finn and Poe mostly ended up being "plot mover" characters in the sequel trilogy, rather than more interesting characters with meaningful arcs. Maybe there was a bit of a missed opportunity there, especially for Finn, but I think that's mostly fine.

I actually think this is pretty good! Although I personally feel that Finn does have an arc, but he's my favorite sequel character, so I'd welcome more of him.

kefrank 12-26-19 03:05 PM

Re: Star Wars: What was your ideal vision for the Sequel Trilogy?
 

Originally Posted by IBJoel (Post 13661219)
I actually think this is pretty good! Although I personally feel that Finn does have an arc, but he's my favorite sequel character, so I'd welcome more of him.

Thanks Joel! Finn does get more of an arc than Poe for sure. I think maybe I really just feel like you do - that more development for him would have been even better.

Jason 12-27-19 09:51 AM

Re: Star Wars: What was your ideal vision for the Sequel Trilogy?
 

Originally Posted by Josh-da-man (Post 13660208)
As soon as Lucas decided that the original 1977 Star Wars was actually Episode IV: A New Hope, he was always going to do the prequel trilogy after he did Episode VI. Early on, I think there was supposed to be a movie every three years, so we would have gotten the prequel trilogy in 1986, 1989, and 1992, and then the sequel trilogy in 1995, 1998, and 2001. He didn't end up making "Episode I" until 1999, though. One of the reasons cited was that special effects technology wasn't where Lucas needed it to be, so he sat on the PT for a decade.

The first reference to Return of the Jedi on usenet from the 1980's ponders this very issue.

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!ms...Y/9TIQH0a19xwJ



I wish Lucas & Co. would get the thing going a little faster.
I can't really imagine waiting until 1997 to see all nine parts
of the Star Wars series.
If they only knew...


BTW, the whole collection is really interesting.

80s Usenet (newsgroups) - first cultural references

brayzie 12-27-19 03:04 PM

Re: Star Wars: What was your ideal vision for the Sequel Trilogy?
 

Originally Posted by Jason (Post 13661586)
The first reference to Return of the Jedi on usenet from the 1980's ponders this very issue.

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!ms...Y/9TIQH0a19xwJ




If they only knew...


BTW, the whole collection is really interesting.

80s Usenet (newsgroups) - first cultural references

There was Internet forums in the early 80s?? How common was this?

Draven 12-27-19 06:31 PM

Re: Star Wars: What was your ideal vision for the Sequel Trilogy?
 
The Thrawn trilogy was the way to do it with the existing characters still in their prime.

Since that time passed, there was no way to do that. So I'm fine with what we got instead.

Josh-da-man 12-27-19 07:19 PM

Re: Star Wars: What was your ideal vision for the Sequel Trilogy?
 

Originally Posted by brayzie (Post 13661709)
There was Internet forums in the early 80s?? How common was this?

Usenet pre-dated the world wide web.

It wasn't an actual message board, though very similar. More like public viewable e-mails. It was broken down into thousands of "newsgroups" with names like rec.arts.comics.dc.vertigo and alt.video.dvd.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usenet


Usenet is a worldwide distributed discussion system available on computers. It was developed from the general-purpose Unix-to-Unix Copy (UUCP) dial-up network architecture. Tom Truscott and Jim Ellis conceived the idea in 1979, and it was established in 1980. Users read and post messages (called articles or posts, and collectively termed news) to one or more categories, known as newsgroups. Usenet resembles a bulletin board system (BBS) in many respects and is the precursor to Internet forums that are widely used today. Discussions are threaded, as with web forums and BBSs, though posts are stored on the server sequentially. The name comes from the term "users network".

A major difference between a BBS or web forum and Usenet is the absence of a central server and dedicated administrator. Usenet is distributed among a large, constantly changing conglomeration of servers that store and forward messages to one another via "news feeds". Individual users may read messages from and post messages to a local server, which may be operated by anyone.

Usenet is culturally and historically significant in the networked world, having given rise to, or popularized, many widely recognized concepts and terms such as "FAQ", "flame", Sockpuppet, and "spam". In the 1990s, before access to the Internet became commonly affordable, Usenet connections via Fidonet's dial-up BBS networks made long-distance or worldwide discussions and other communication widespread, not needing a server, just (local) telephone service.

halkilmer 12-28-19 12:07 AM

Re: Star Wars: What was your ideal vision for the Sequel Trilogy?
 
Generally: Assuming our sequel trilogy made is still made in the 2010's instead of the 1990's - which would've been the actual ideal - then what I wanted was a continuation of the story with the original cast: Han, Luke and Leia together on one last adventure before you start killing them off and they pass the torch on. I would've introduced the Rey-type character maybe half through the 1st movie, but kind of have her as a tag along supporting character. But her role in the story increases through the 2nd movie and finally she is the main focus of the story in part 3.

For a few specifics: Han should've died in some self sacrificial act saving Luke and Leia. And before he does this, he should've said, "Hey, Kid. I told you I owe you one..." as a callback to his lines and events in the OT. (Maybe some type of scenario where our heroes are pinned down, and the enemy has some type of surprise way/machine/creature that neutralizes the Force, thereby rendering Luke/Leia useless. So Han takes it out in some type of kamikaze fashion.) I would've made Leia 'Queen' or 'Chancellor' and given her a political enemy to grapple with - kind of like that one treacherous councilman in "300." Making her a General was retarded. I would've made Lando the General - seeing as how he already was one in ROTJ - and have a little comical callback moment showing him frustrated with his administrative duties in the military, like he was with municipal administration in Cloud City. And finally, I think Luke having a Jedi Academy would've also been lame. It'd have been better if he failed at it because during all these years he couldn't find another single Force user in the galaxy, until he stumbles across Rey during whatever adventure they were on in the 1st movie...

MLBFan24 12-29-19 11:00 PM

Re: Star Wars: What was your ideal vision for the Sequel Trilogy?
 
Just saw the final movie today and gave it a B+, so there are some things I would have preferred done differently for these films.


I wish Rey accepted Kylo Ren’s invitation to the dark side in Last Jedi (after killing Snoke). And they would have ruled the galaxy as king and queen (as the audience, we would have known they weren’t siblings or related in any way).

Sure, it doesn’t follow the Sith rule of two, but it would be something different for the series.

and then in a 3rd film, Rey would redeem herself, and try to convince Kylo Ren to abandon the dark side too. He doesn’t and Rey and Kylo would battle each other to the death! Haha


Michael Corvin 12-29-19 11:34 PM

Re: Star Wars: What was your ideal vision for the Sequel Trilogy?
 

Originally Posted by Draven (Post 13661788)
The Thrawn trilogy was the way to do it with the existing characters still in their prime.

Since that time passed, there was no way to do that. So I'm fine with what we got instead.

Pretty much this. Thrawn Trilogy if this was made 20 years ago. We were never going to get Luke kicking ass in his prime. He's 68 (holy shit, I had to look that up). Carrie Fisher was 60, Harrison, 77 and Billy Dee is 82. We were never going to get a sequel trilogy starring these actors as the leads in 2015-2019.

Anyway, about the only thing I'd change is a reunion between Luke, Han and Leia. That's truly the only missed opportunity for me. Also not a fan of Rey being a Palpatine but that's minor compared to the lack of a reunion.

Josh-da-man 12-30-19 12:44 PM

Re: Star Wars: What was your ideal vision for the Sequel Trilogy?
 

Originally Posted by Michael Corvin (Post 13662606)
Pretty much this. Thrawn Trilogy if this was made 20 years ago. We were never going to get Luke kicking ass in his prime. He's 68 (holy shit, I had to look that up). Carrie Fisher was 60, Harrison, 77 and Billy Dee is 82. We were never going to get a sequel trilogy starring these actors as the leads in 2015-2019.

Luke wouldn't need to be "kicking ass" to do something interesting and satisfying, though.

Just looking at the end of TFA, there are any number of things that Luke could be doing on Ach-To that didn't involve being an asshole loser. He's protecting something there. He was on a quest to find something and got stranded there.

dex14 12-31-19 10:11 PM

Re: Star Wars: What was your ideal vision for the Sequel Trilogy?
 

Originally Posted by stingermck (Post 13660345)
I really just wanted a bad ass Jedi Master Luke. When he showed up at Crait I was hoping for the scene from Dark Empire. Crushing AT AT with the force. In fact a lot of stuff from Dark Empire would have been great.

I wonder if they’d consider doing some sort of animated series with the OT characters filling in between ROTJ and TFA.

brayzie 01-01-20 03:27 AM

Re: Star Wars: What was your ideal vision for the Sequel Trilogy?
 

Originally Posted by Michael Corvin (Post 13662606)
Pretty much this. Thrawn Trilogy if this was made 20 years ago. We were never going to get Luke kicking ass in his prime. He's 68 (holy shit, I had to look that up). Carrie Fisher was 60, Harrison, 77 and Billy Dee is 82. We were never going to get a sequel trilogy starring these actors as the leads in 2015-2019.

I agree. That said...


Originally Posted by Josh-da-man (Post 13662818)
Luke wouldn't need to be "kicking ass" to do something interesting and satisfying, though.

Just looking at the end of TFA, there are any number of things that Luke could be doing on Ach-To that didn't involve being an asshole loser. He's protecting something there. He was on a quest to find something and got stranded there.

I agree with this too.
I would have preferred that each of the original trio not show up just to die in each sequel. They pretty much pass the torch and die. Telling the stories of old people is boring I guess?
I think there would have been a better way to intertwine the stories of the original trio with the new cast, and have them fighting the good battle concurrently and together.


Abob Teff 01-01-20 07:06 PM

Re: Star Wars: What was your ideal vision for the Sequel Trilogy?
 
I'll read the rest of the thread and work on my ideas later, but my initial gut-reaction to the question:

First mistake: TRILOGY

Don't tell me how many films and then figure out how to fill them. Tell me a good coherent story and take as many (or as few) films as you need. There is no reason any of this needed to be trilogies just because the first set was. Oh, I forgot ... IT RHYMES! -rolleyes-

Meathead 06-30-20 11:04 AM

Re: Star Wars: What was your ideal vision for the Sequel Trilogy?
 
Well this seems the best place for this... Considering the source -rolleyes- I'm taking this with a grain of salt but Disney may erase the entire sequel trilogy.

https://cosmicbook.news/disney-reset...sing-last-jedi

Rob V 06-30-20 12:37 PM

Re: Star Wars: What was your ideal vision for the Sequel Trilogy?
 
^^ Except Disney won't explain the reset, we'll have to fetch it for ourselves and it won't make sense or be good or be cohesive, etc. I can't see a "reset" ever happening anyhow with all our heroes dead.

ddrknghtrtns 06-30-20 12:56 PM

Re: Star Wars: What was your ideal vision for the Sequel Trilogy?
 
With Carrie gone (rip), that ship has sailed. Better to just to sweep the sequel trilogy under a rug and go with a new story based inside the Star Wars universe. Similar to what they are doing with the Mandalorian.

Just wonder if the massive loss they are taking from COVID 19 is making them desperate for a safe bet blockbuster?

Hulkabrgr 06-30-20 02:29 PM

Re: Star Wars: What was your ideal vision for the Sequel Trilogy?
 
Release the unaltered original trilogy in the theaters as a way to get people to go back to the theaters when they re-open and it is safe.

Josh-da-man 06-30-20 02:31 PM

Re: Star Wars: What was your ideal vision for the Sequel Trilogy?
 
I really wish they would just shitcan Abrams and Johnson's folly, and completely remake VII-VIII-IX while Mark Hamill is still alive and well.

I don't even need Han and Leia in it, just Luke and his kid(s), and niece(s)/nephew(s), and the Republic and Jedi Order being rebuilt.

God, it's a crying shame that Disney and Lucasfilm fucked the Sequel Trilogy up so badly.

Still, I don't trust "Doomcock" as far as I can throw him. The chances the ST gets remake is about as close to zero as you can get. The best we can probably hope for is that, moving forward, the events and characters of the Sequel Trilogy will never be mentioned again, and they'll pretend like it never happened.

I dunno, I can't say I'm too pleased, though. Vindicated if it does happen, but the Sequel Trilogy so damaged the brand for me that I'm only really a casual fan these days, if even that. :(

milo bloom 06-30-20 03:28 PM

Re: Star Wars: What was your ideal vision for the Sequel Trilogy?
 
I could see Hamill possibly agreeing but not Ford and they wouldn’t dare recast Leia at this point.

It’s not like comics where the fans can understand resetting timelines and such, these are major movies.

To be honest, at this point it would simply work better to reboot the entire saga. Go 1 through 9, maybe even work in some Rogue One and Solo, but just get a whole new cast and do it again.

And then make sure the unaltered original trilogy is available.

Mike86 06-30-20 04:20 PM

Re: Star Wars: What was your ideal vision for the Sequel Trilogy?
 
While I would prefer a better set of sequels and personally do view the Sequel Trilogy as not being canon (in my mind Return of the Jedi is just the end at this point) I don’t really see this happening. It just seems like a very non-Disney move to admit they screwed up and to brush the Abrams and Johnson films to the side as not counting.

Also at this point I’m not sure what you could do to rectify the sequels. Hamill might be talked into coming back, but even he’s said he’s done. Ford I can’t see coming back. Fisher is gone and like was mentioned to recast her would be blasphemy and something the fans would shit all over.

The best thing that could maybe happen is a an animated show that takes place after Return of the Jedi. Maybe it would be easier to talk Hamill into coming back to voice Luke. It wouldn’t be ideal, but you could get others to voice Han, Leia, and Lando. Even then though I still don’t see being told that the Sequel Trilogy we got is no longer canon so shortly after it happened.

TGM 06-30-20 04:32 PM

Re: Star Wars: What was your ideal vision for the Sequel Trilogy?
 
they'll never reboot it this way. They have a fucking entire playland at Disney based off of it.

Fisher is dead. Ford came out of Han retirement primarily to kill the character off - mission accomplished.

Just push forward. Or backwards... KOTOR.... or the story of the first Jedi.... or a different area of space....

or, do a sequel with the new characters which weren't bad.... just make it a coherent story for once.

GoldenJCJ 06-30-20 05:12 PM

Re: Star Wars: What was your ideal vision for the Sequel Trilogy?
 
I was thinking about the end of Rise of Skywalker the other day and thought how much more impactful the “there are more of us!” line would have been if the filmmakers had played that angle up throughout the sequel trilogy. If they had started planting the seeds that the resistance was searching the galaxy far and wide for supporters from the beginning of The Force Awakens and had Lando out searching from the beginning, that finale scene would have been so much better.

I would have liked them to see the Resistance start out with hope that there were people willing to fight with them and their plans to find those people. Then have them lose hope that anybody was still out there willing to help. Then end the trilogy with the “there are more of us” stuff. Had that played out across all three movies, I would have felt more emotion at the end. Instead it all just felt like an unearned payoff.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:42 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.