Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

The Wild Bunch - remake (D: Mel Gibson)

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

The Wild Bunch - remake (D: Mel Gibson)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-04-05, 08:45 AM
  #1  
Needs to contact an admin about multiple accounts
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
THE WILD BUNCH remake...

Ayer new 'Wild' man at Warners

By MICHAEL FLEMING


Warner Bros. has set David Ayer to helm "The Wild Bunch," a contemporized remake of the Sam Peckinpah action classic. He will be paid low seven figures for directing and writing the script.

Jerry Weintraub is producing; shoot is expected to start by next summer.

Ayer wrote the script for "Bunch" before making his feature directorial debut with "Harsh Times," a drama he wrote that stars Christian Bale and Eva Longoria.

Ayer considered his work on "Harsh Times" to be more intense and nerve-wracking than his stint as a sonar technician on a nuclear sub while in the Navy. Ayer mortgaged his home to self-finance the film and then watched a bidding war erupt after it bowed at the Toronto Film Festival, where Bauer Martinez bought distribution rights in a deal worth more than $6 million. "Ice cold terror is perhaps the best description of what it is like to violate the cardinal rule of never using your own money to make a film," said Ayer, whose effort paid off with a dream job even before "Harsh Times" reached a theater.

Weintraub and WB brass flipped for the film and gave Ayer the nod for "Wild Bunch."

"This is a film I wanted to make for a long time, and what's nice is this is David's vision," Weintraub said.

"I've introduced a present day setting, but there are very masculine themes and characters from the original that are still very relevant," Ayer said.

Mark Vahradian, president of Jerry Weintraub Prods., will exec produce with Susan Ekins. WB exec Jessica Goodman oversees for the studio.

The original Peckinpah pic followed a band of outlaws staging a robbery along the border of Mexico right before the start of WWI. The remake keeps the locale, but the contemporized version is a complicated tapestry involving drug cartels, the CIA and a heist. There'll be plenty of gunplay and action, something Ayer writes strongly, with credits including "Training Day," "S.W.A.T.," "Dark Blue," "The Fast and the Furious" and "U-571."

"It's not a Western anymore, but it still has the 'Wild Bunch' characters and the elements that made the original film so memorable," Weintraub said.
Old 11-04-05, 09:33 AM
  #2  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 3,227
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
meh. I have no more outrage or surprise left in me.

...The remake keeps the locale, but the contemporized version is a complicated tapestry involving drug cartels, the CIA and a heist...
*yawn*

"It's not a Western anymore, but it still has the 'Wild Bunch' characters and the elements that made the original film so memorable," Weintraub said.
One guess: the line "If they move, kill 'em." will be the only element that survives from the Peckinpah film.
Old 11-04-05, 09:50 AM
  #3  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,738
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
".......but it still has the 'Wild Bunch' characters and the elements that made the original film so memorable," Weintraub said.
Hey that's just great - way to go!

::cough, cough::

Too bad it won't have - William Holden, Robert Ryan, Ernest Borgnine, Edmond O'Brien, Warren Oates, Ben Johnson, L.Q. Jones, Strother Martin, Dub Taylor, etc.
Old 11-04-05, 11:22 AM
  #4  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Sub-basement 3b
Posts: 3,752
Received 25 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by flixtime
Too bad it won't have - William Holden, Robert Ryan, Ernest Borgnine, Edmond O'Brien, Warren Oates, Ben Johnson, L.Q. Jones, Strother Martin, Dub Taylor, etc.
...or Sam Peckinpah...of course the film won't have any of the violence that made it so popular or controversial.
Old 11-04-05, 11:29 AM
  #5  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Johnny Zhivago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Korova Milkbar
Posts: 5,435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Groovy, more shit that I'll never spend a moment of my life watching... Modern day Hollywood.
Old 11-04-05, 11:39 AM
  #6  
Moderator
 
Geofferson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: The Village Green
Posts: 39,765
Received 97 Likes on 80 Posts
Lamest news I've heard in quite some time.
Old 11-04-05, 11:49 AM
  #7  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lower Appalachia
Posts: 2,909
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Sounds as if the only thing it will have in common with the original is the title.

The theme of the time of the classic western era passing the Bunch by (it's set in 1913) is so central to the movie that I don't think the period could be changed without making it a remake in name only. This whole theme of them being past their prime is pretty depressing when you think about it so anything resembling it will probably be gone (I'm speculating of course). Not to mention the inevitable Vietnam vibe, given the time the movie was made and the themes of violence and amorality by those on both sides of the law.

Who knows, the movie may be terrific, but I wish they would call it something else.

At least we'll be getting a (presumably) superior DVD of the original early next year.
Old 11-04-05, 12:12 PM
  #8  
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Montreal
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's just plain WRONG!

You don't need to remake a virtually perfect movie.

Come On!
Old 11-04-05, 01:31 PM
  #9  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 8,085
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Geofferson
Lamest news I've heard in quite some time.
Ditto.
Old 11-05-05, 12:23 AM
  #10  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
mike45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,314
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Peckinpah is turning over in his grave.
Old 11-05-05, 12:34 AM
  #11  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 12,306
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
fuck this.
Old 11-05-05, 01:01 AM
  #12  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Rampaging across DVDTalk.
Posts: 4,046
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Apart from the title, I don't see the connection.
Old 11-05-05, 01:24 AM
  #13  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
lukewarmwater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: United States of HELL YEAH!!!
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hate to quote tina fey but,
"this is great for people who liked the original, but wish it was crap"

At least it's not a casablanca remake with ben affleck and jennifer lopez
Old 11-05-05, 01:54 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[QUOTE=lukewarmwater At least it's not a casablanca remake with ben affleck and jennifer lopez[/QUOTE]


Not yet!!!
Old 11-05-05, 05:53 PM
  #15  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Posts: 17,184
Received 843 Likes on 589 Posts
Much like King Kong, another pointless remake.
Old 11-05-05, 07:03 PM
  #16  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: New England
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
I guess churning out countless sequels is now considered "Soooo ninetees"

Perhaps next up for Hollywood, will be a remake of Taxi Driver with Orlando Bloom as Travis Bickle.
Old 11-06-05, 12:22 AM
  #17  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Charlie Goose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Sesame Street (the apt. next to Bob's)
Posts: 20,195
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Coral
Much like King Kong, another pointless remake.
No no no, although the original is a classic that remake is okay because it's being directed by the hobbit dude. I guarantee that if the fanboy idol Jackson were directing the Wild Bunch remake, this thread would be filled to bursting with huzzahs.
Old 11-06-05, 07:34 AM
  #18  
DVD Talk Legend
 
LorenzoL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 23,722
Received 460 Likes on 373 Posts
Originally Posted by Geofferson
Lamest news I've heard in quite some time.
I couldn't have said it better.
Old 11-06-05, 10:36 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Only if...

Originally Posted by Charlie Goose
No no no, although the original is a classic that remake is okay because it's being directed by the hobbit dude. I guarantee that if the fanboy idol Jackson were directing the Wild Bunch remake, this thread would be filled to bursting with huzzahs.
it was a real remake instead of a film that has little to nothing incommon with the original. This is another script that should have been made under an original title, but studio heads thought it would get more people in the seats if it had a tie-in to a classic. Though a remake would be bad in anyway to me, that it's simply a money play to make a few thousand dollars on the back of the original is what pisses me off.
Old 11-06-05, 10:50 AM
  #20  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
The Bus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 54,916
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts
As a fan of Ocean's Eleven, I can't say that this bothers me. Some remakes are good, most remakes are bad. At least now by remaking this the Wild Bunch DVD will finally get an upgrade.

Old 11-06-05, 12:35 PM
  #21  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,738
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Linn1
it was a real remake instead of a film that has little to nothing incommon with the original. This is another script that should have been made under an original title, but studio heads thought it would get more people in the seats if it had a tie-in to a classic. Though a remake would be bad in anyway to me, that it's simply a money play to make a few thousand dollars on the back of the original is what pisses me off.
What you've said pretty much captures my feelings on this. It's just such a "cash grab" to try and call it "The Wild Bunch" (if they do stick with the title). Call it something else and I'd have far less venom for the project. As a matter of fact (and reminded by the DVD Bargain forum thread on the movie), wasn't the recent "Four Brothers" described by some as being a new spin on the classic John Wayne Western (and personal favorite of mine) "The Sons of Katie Elder".

On the general subject of remakes, or borrowing heavily from previous films, and the like - generally speaking (as I've been watching a much greater variety of cinema lately), I'm more at ease with it as I learn more and more about the history of cinema.

Although, as I've been watching a lot of foreign cinema over the past couple of years, I am growing a little concerned by the trend that a lot of foreign cinema (both Asian and European) seems to be losing touch with its "uniqueness"; basically, I feel that I'm watching the same Hollywood/American films except now being done by Asians or Europeans. To clarify, I mean stuff like, "this is a Korean or French version of "Dead Poet's Society"". I'm not well-versed enough in the long history of foreign cinema to know for certain that this hasn't always been the case, I know to some degree "yes", but my personal perception (wrong as it may be), is that the Americanization of foreign cinema is more predominant now than it used to be.

Back to what I meant to say earlier, I don't mind remakes but it seems to me that right now mainstream Hollywood cinema is way, way, way over-saturated with remakes, theatrical versions of TV shows, sequels, and the like --- "Bewitched", "The Manchurian Candidate", "Willy Wonka", "All the King's Men"......I'm personally weary of it all (aside: the over-reliance on CGI isn't helping me personally - what should have been a useful tool is now more a barren, lifeless, and sterile cinematic crutch). I'm sure there are many great writers out there......stop playing it safe and give 'em a chance to show me something fresh. I enjoyed the Edward Zwick/Tom Cruise film "The Last Samurai" but wasn't nearly as high on it as some others and while it wasn't a remake the recipe was, while readily acknowledged by Zwick/Cruise, too obvious (dash of Kurosawa, sprinkle of "Glory", and a couple of others that escape me right now). Actually, sometimes I don't understand why Quentin Tarantino gets dumped on so much (by a segment of people) for copying other films, a lot of Directors seem to do the same thing......Tarantino, at least, is very aboveboard about it and at least draws inspiration from a lot of foreign cult cinema that is less known to the general U.S. public. I'm most definitely not one of his fanboys and his films are hit and miss with me but at least his efforts, while not unique perhaps, play to me as more inspired than the normal rehash coming out of Hollywood. Heck, Spielberg can be seen as being just as guilty as Tarantino with his latest "War of the Worlds"......in remembrance of a fellow DVDTalkers sig - hey Steven show me what you can do not what you've watched ("The War of the Worlds" ('53), "ID4", "Signs", etc.).

All in all, I suppose it varies by viewer, what one may see as unique, inspired, and revelatory.......another may see as respectful homage........and another as derivative.......another as pointless clone.......or at the lower end maybe offensively plagiaristic. Which now makes me wonder why I bothered typing this ramble of a post...as long as I'm happy, who cares what you guys think ..........well except, how about you guys clicking over into the "11-minute Chen Kaige's "The Promise"" thread in this same forum.....there's a lot to chew on in that 11-minutes of material.
Old 11-08-05, 07:31 PM
  #22  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Trencher's Farm
Posts: 2,089
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts
How about a film about a bunch of Hollywood studio execs who realize that time has passed them by - another sign that Hollywood is in it's death throes as mass entertainment. This is roughly equivalent to that oily trend of using pop songs as movie titles. Pointless remake in the extreme.
Old 11-09-05, 07:18 AM
  #23  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
The Bus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 54,916
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by flixtime
As a matter of fact (and reminded by the DVD Bargain forum thread on the movie), wasn't the recent "Four Brothers" described by some as being a new spin on the classic John Wayne Western (and personal favorite of mine) "The Sons of Katie Elder".
Yes, it is an updating of that movie. I honestly don't have a problem with remaking movies, much less if the origin of the first movie is from a book/play/etc. There's been some very very good remakes (Ocean's Eleven) and some very very bad ones (Solaris). I think in the end they will sort themselves out. That is, studios making lots of bad movies will sink.
Old 11-09-05, 08:17 AM
  #24  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Jazzbutcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: NYC Burbs
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wild Bunch remake
Old 11-09-05, 03:14 PM
  #25  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Jupiter and Beyond the Infinite
Posts: 1,952
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by mike45
Peckinpah is turning over in his grave, in slow motion, with blood, flesh, and dirt flying off his corpse in a glorious arc.
fixed


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.