Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

Ghostbusters (Feig, 2016) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters
View Poll Results: Ghostbusters (Feig, 2016) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread
0
0%
1.79%
12.50%
17.86%
17.86%
7.14%
12.50%
8.93%
1.79%
1.79%
12.50%
What are you high?
5.36%
Voters: 56. You may not vote on this poll

Ghostbusters (Feig, 2016) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-30-17, 04:33 PM
  #176  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Rosemount, MN
Posts: 43,409
Received 1,656 Likes on 1,033 Posts
Re: Ghostbusters (Feig, 2016) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by jjcool
Terrible.
Not terrible. Just OK.
Old 08-30-17, 04:38 PM
  #177  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 7,114
Received 78 Likes on 63 Posts
Re: Ghostbusters (Feig, 2016) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by DaveyJoe
The heavy proton pack thing was beyond stupid, but unfortunately logical complaints got drowned out because both sides wanted to focus on misogyny. Yeah, some guys were being assholes about this movie, and one of them was Paul Feig. Having your director generalize about fans who might be on the fence was just a bad call.
I remembered something like that but when apparently it was a comment that came out more than a year before the movie came out, and it was in regards to a book he was writing about.

source

Scroll to the bottom where it says "Update".
Old 08-30-17, 07:40 PM
  #178  
DVD Talk Hero
 
GoldenJCJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Colorado
Posts: 27,327
Received 3,211 Likes on 2,071 Posts
Re: Ghostbusters (Feig, 2016) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Daytripper
Thank you! Not terrible, just not special. I cannot believe this movie is still getting beat up after all this time. And fans of the original are still butt sore. It really is time to let it go. Honestly, it truly doesn't deserve the attention.
Ironically the people who are keeping this movie at the forefront of the public (DVDTalk) consciousness are the same people who want it to disappear forever.

Originally Posted by RichC2
It got roughly the same score as Jurassic World and Kingsman: The Secret Service, but won't be getting a sequel. *GASP*
I liked Jurassic World and Kingsman is one of my favorite action movies in recent years.
Old 08-30-17, 07:49 PM
  #179  
DVD Talk Legend
 
DaveyJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 19,337
Received 186 Likes on 129 Posts
Re: Ghostbusters (Feig, 2016) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by fumanstan
Good one!
It was/is a controversial release. It makes sense we'd be discussing it longer than the average movie.
Old 08-30-17, 09:02 PM
  #180  
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Conducting miss-aisle drills and listening to their rock n roll
Posts: 20,052
Received 168 Likes on 126 Posts
Re: Ghostbusters (Feig, 2016) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by RichC2
It got roughly the same score as Jurassic World and Kingsman: The Secret Service, but won't be getting a sequel. *GASP*

I got nothing, this subject is boring, I don't know how I got here.
Jurassic World was one of the biggest pieces of shit I've ever seen. If the people who made it are 1/10 the assholes that the characters are then I can confidently say that movie was made by complete assholes.
Old 08-30-17, 11:37 PM
  #181  
DVD Talk Legend
 
DaveyJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 19,337
Received 186 Likes on 129 Posts
Re: Ghostbusters (Feig, 2016) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by brayzie
I remembered something like that but when apparently it was a comment that came out more than a year before the movie came out, and it was in regards to a book he was writing about.

source

Scroll to the bottom where it says "Update".
http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Ghost...ers-70293.html

It’s so dramatic. Honestly, the only way I could ruin your childhood is if I got into a time machine and went back and made you an orphan.


<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

This was a Josh Trank level PR nightmare for the movie which is why he suddenly was scrambling to differentiate misogynists from fans with genuine concerns in every subsequent interview. But the lesson is to ignore vitriol, act professional, and don't tell the fanbase of a series to go fuck themselves.

Then you get stuff like this:

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/TQ85g2Al1ZA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

And the bizarre parading of the original stars to reassure fans how funny the new cast is and how great the new movie will be. It was all very forced, manipulative and insulting to fans who had been spurned until Sony realized the mess they were in.
Old 08-31-17, 01:43 AM
  #182  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Hazel Motes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 7,507
Received 398 Likes on 266 Posts
Re: Ghostbusters (Feig, 2016) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Its been just over a year since this movie and it already feels like its forgotten. Like it never happened.
Old 08-31-17, 08:14 AM
  #183  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 45,335
Received 1,022 Likes on 812 Posts
Re: Ghostbusters (Feig, 2016) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Yeah, imo the thing with it is it isn't particularly bad or terrible, it's mostly just forgettable.

It was like a lateral move from Ghostbusters 2, it's just extremely different.
Old 08-31-17, 08:50 AM
  #184  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
fumanstan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 55,349
Received 26 Likes on 14 Posts
Re: Ghostbusters (Feig, 2016) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by DaveyJoe
It was/is a controversial release. It makes sense we'd be discussing it longer than the average movie.
Well the thread only got bumped because someone saw the movie recently, it's not like debating whether the movie was mediocre vs terrible is any new discussion. Anyway, it was just a throwaway comment on my part and not intended to be taken seriously.

Not to get in to this again with you as with the Superhero movie threads, but since you cited the recent Game of Thrones thread weren't you the one telling me and others to stop complaining?

Last edited by fumanstan; 08-31-17 at 09:13 AM.
Old 08-31-17, 09:50 AM
  #185  
DVD Talk Legend
 
DaveyJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 19,337
Received 186 Likes on 129 Posts
Re: Ghostbusters (Feig, 2016) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by fumanstan
Well the thread only got bumped because someone saw the movie recently, it's not like debating whether the movie was mediocre vs terrible is any new discussion. Anyway, it was just a throwaway comment on my part and not intended to be taken seriously.

Not to get in to this again with you as with the Superhero movie threads, but since you cited the recent Game of Thrones thread weren't you the one telling me and others to stop complaining?
Not exactly, I've had my fair share of complaints about season 7 of GoT, but I am trying to balance them out with what I've liked about them. I mentioned that I lowered my bar back in season six when I started to notice the writing slip, but I think complaints about deus ex machina and sloppy pacing for season 7 are valid. Superhero threads I've mostly stayed out of because I just can't keep up with Marvel's frequent releases.
Old 08-31-17, 10:01 AM
  #186  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Troy Stiffler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Under an I-10 Overpass
Posts: 25,822
Received 366 Likes on 266 Posts
Re: Ghostbusters (Feig, 2016) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Truth be told, I didn't watch this yet.

I was never crazy about the original Ghostbusters either. I sat and watched the original one time, and the sequel a couple times. Really liked the original, but never revisited. And then I've seen clips here and there on TV for nearly 30 years (I was born in 1983).

My observation is that people hold Ghostbusters near and dear. And it was painful to see a so-so followup film. Like trying to put the two new Die Hard films in with the first three. Or Lethal Weapon 4. It can leave you feeling helpless. It happens with sequels.

I'll always look forward to whatever Feig has coming out next.
Old 08-31-17, 10:12 AM
  #187  
DVD Talk Legend
 
d2cheer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 11,486
Received 266 Likes on 194 Posts
Re: Ghostbusters (Feig, 2016) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

The thread that keep on giving!!
Old 08-31-17, 10:51 AM
  #188  
Inane Thread Master, 2018 TOTY
Thread Starter
 
OldBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Are any of us really anywhere?
Posts: 49,448
Received 913 Likes on 773 Posts
Re: Ghostbusters (Feig, 2016) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by fumanstan
I can't believe the same people are still arguing about this movie.
Yeah, why the hell are we still talking about this movie? It happened, it's done, it was mediocre to some, there will be no more, with this cast, at least, let's move on...
Old 08-31-17, 10:56 AM
  #189  
Banned by request
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Goodbye and Good Luck
Posts: 17,800
Received 778 Likes on 582 Posts
Re: Ghostbusters (Feig, 2016) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Let's make it easier on all of us and merge this thread with the Lord of the Flies remake.
Old 08-31-17, 11:06 AM
  #190  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Giantrobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Gateway Cities/Harbor Region
Posts: 63,299
Received 1,815 Likes on 1,131 Posts
Re: Ghostbusters (Feig, 2016) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by E Unit
Let's make it easier on all of us and merge this thread with the Lord of the Flies remake.
Old 08-31-17, 02:54 PM
  #191  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
jjcool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 7,672
Received 129 Likes on 103 Posts
Re: Ghostbusters (Feig, 2016) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Draven
Not terrible. Just OK.
Not OK. Just terrible.
Old 08-31-17, 03:24 PM
  #192  
DVD Talk Legend
 
DaveyJoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 19,337
Received 186 Likes on 129 Posts
Re: Ghostbusters (Feig, 2016) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by OldBoy
Yeah, why the hell are we still talking about this movie? It happened, it's done, it was mediocre to some, there will be no more, with this cast, at least, let's move on...
New DVDTalk rule: no discussion of a film 12 months after it's release.
Old 08-31-17, 10:30 PM
  #193  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Abob Teff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Not necessarily Formerly known as Solid Snake
Posts: 29,261
Received 1,245 Likes on 856 Posts
Re: Ghostbusters (Feig, 2016) — The Spoiler Filled Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Troy Stiffler
I was never crazy about the original Ghostbusters either.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.