|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by HN
(Post 12797155)
This ended up exactly where the closed Ghostbusters shemake / shequel thread left off and will likely suffer the same fate.
Originally Posted by Mabuse
(Post 12797162)
We need to get off this backpack thing. Here's my take.
James Cameron has been making feminist action movies his whole career. And I've never heard a complaint. he makes it all seem credible. I still don't think it'll be as terrible as people are making it out to be, but I'm easily amused. |
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
He said it himself on many ocassions that Avatar is a hippie tree hugger movie, I have only seen it once and never again,nor will I watch the sequels.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by HN
(Post 12797124)
bluelite may be joking
Originally Posted by Bluelitespecial
(Post 12797130)
Blah..Blah..Blah... You pick one city with a handful of women who do a man's job.
And the article has a photo of one of the women. http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopo...y11n-1-web.jpg She doesn't look any more buff than McKinnon or Wiig. Maybe you should consider the possibility that the dearth of female garbage collectors isn't due to physical shortcomings. Let me guess you think gender is a construct, which are the same people behind this movie, who are trying to make an indoctrinating piece of trash to force men out of STEM(science, technology, engineering, mathematics) fields. Besides B5Erik is right. |
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by Sean O'Hara
(Post 12797207)
You haven't seen the shit he's posting in Politics. He's a full-on Kool-Aid drinking MRA.
http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopo...y11n-1-web.jpg She doesn't look any more buff than McKinnon or Wiig. Spoiler:
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
There's nothing wrong with being a MGTOW or an MRA (and I am not talking about the extremist, misogynistic type). MRA's especially can have valid concerns. And if they aren't being misogynists, I'd like to think of them as egalitarians (as I would myself). But some of the stuff in this thread is definitely out there. 40 lb. proton packs? That was just weird.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
I don't identify as MGTOW or MRA, but see there are valids concerns from both groups. The world constantly belittles men, feminists who create fake issues about Mansplaining, manspreading, thinking male dominated STEM fields are a problem when men are interested in them and women are not, and deeming any form of masculinity toxic. Then on top of that taking away every thing male centric in pop culture, to fuel their unending sense of entitlement and narcissism. I have said before, but I don't feel safe around women my own age, and don't know when I will Anytime soon.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by Bluelitespecial
(Post 12797234)
I don't identify as MGTOW or MRA, but see there are valids concerns from both groups. The world constantly belittles men, feminists who create fake issues about Mansplaining, manspreading, thinking male dominated STEM fields are a problem when men excel at them and women do not, and deeming any form of masculinity toxic. Then on top of that taking away every thing male centric in pop culture, to fuel their unending sense of entitlement and narcassim. I don't feel safe around women my own age, and don't know if I will anytime soon.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by Mabuse
(Post 12797162)
We need to get off this backpack thing. Here's an argument.
James Cameron has been making feminist action movies his whole career. And I've never heard a complaint. It's because the films themselves are good. This doesn't look good. It's just that simple. If it looked good no one would complain. Just as no one complained about the strong female roles in Aliens and Terminator and The Abyss and True Lies. |
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Jesus. If Andrew Dice Clay walked into this thread even he would say what the fuck is going on.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
maybe, but today's feminism is rooted in Misandry.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by stingermck
(Post 12797265)
Jesus. If Andrew Dice Clay walked into this thread even he would say what the fuck is going on.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by Bluelitespecial
(Post 12797267)
maybe, but today's feminism is rooted in Misandry.
I urge you to go out and have a conversation with real life women. You'll be surprised that all they really want is to be treated as equals and they don't care if you sit with your legs spread open. |
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by EddieMoney
(Post 12797272)
I'd like to see Dice in the next Ghostbusters movie.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Well said Goat.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by Bluelitespecial
(Post 12797234)
I don't identify as MGTOW or MRA, but see there are valids concerns from both groups.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
The Amazing Atheist had a lot to say about the most hated trailer in youtube history. Pretty much saying there is nothing competent about this movie. Rebooting a classic movie, and not for the fans, but for fat tumblr feminists.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Nothing competent? That guy needs to be introduced to the works of Coleman Francis. Truly incompetent films are rare.
While there are a lot of bad movies made every year, the ones that have nothing competent about them are lucky to turn up on a director's YouTube page. |
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by majorjoe23
(Post 12799038)
Nothing competent? That guy needs to be introduced to the works of Coleman Francis. Truly incompetent films are rare.
While there are a lot of bad movies made every year, the ones that have nothing competent about them are lucky to turn up on a director's YouTube page. |
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by Bluelitespecial
(Post 12798994)
The Amazing Atheist
I think we should give the guy who raped you a medal. I hope you fucking drown in rape semen, you ugly, mean-spirited cow Or is it this TJ Rape isn't fatal. So imagine my indignation when I saw a chatroom called 'Rape Survivors.' Is this supposed to impress me? Someone fucked you when you didn't want to be fucked and you're amazed that you survived? Unless he used a chainsaw instead of his dick, what's the big deal? I don’t mean to be horrendously offensive and insensitive here, but everyone survives rape. The word survivor applies to people who are alive after being stabbed 73 times with an ice pick or mauled by rabid wolverines, not to a woman who gets dick when she doesn't want it. Just because you got raped, you have to rape the English language? You vindictive bitch! Also, don't you ever get tired of being the victim? How many failed relationships are you going to blame on a single violation of your personal space? Just trying to figure out if you're linking to the right person claiming not to be a complete pile of shit. |
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
^^^I don't know what your getting at? Just figured I would post this video here since he was mentioned in the Regressive left thread. We all have a part to play in making sure this version of Ghostbusters is destroyed and an utter failure. Amy Pascal thankfully lost her job after the Sony hack. I honestly don't know how Tom Rothman got another job after the countless movies he destroyed at Fox. Since Paul Feig thinks we are all too stupid to understand his genius, hopefully this movie kills his career.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by Bluelitespecial
(Post 12799211)
^^^I don't know what your getting at? Just figured I would post this video here since he was mentioned in the Regressive left thread. We all have a part to play in making sure this version of Ghostbusters is destroyed and an utter failure. Amy Pascal thankfully lost her job after the Sony hack. I honestly don't know how Tom Rothman got another job after the countless movies he destroyed at Fox. Since Paul Feig thinks we are all too stupid to understand his genius, hopefully this movie kills his career.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
We do know he hates the womens.... well... most of them... for some wrongs they've done to him.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by Bluelitespecial
(Post 12799211)
We all have a part to play in making sure this version of Ghostbusters is destroyed
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
I know they are out to get me, this movie proves my point of that. That's what I mean I hope it fades into insignificance. I mean a fan4stic level of a bomb.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
You need a hug.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
No, I know what the hidden agenda behind this movie is. They want to destroy the original because four men in the lead is now offensive. Oh no Sigourney Weaver is a damsel, oh no someone made a period joke, oh no someone made a blowjob joke.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by Bluelitespecial
(Post 12799261)
I know they are out to get me, this movie proves my point of that. That's what I mean I hope it fades into insignificance. I mean a fan4stic level of a bomb.
I don't think anyone is really saying anything of value in the negative towards Ghostbusters 1. It's pretty much held pretty high in regard. Just get a fleshlight and fuck yourself to not feel so wronged by the vagina. |
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by Solid Snake
(Post 12799285)
I can't tell if you're being serious now or not.
I don't think anyone is really saying anything of value in the negative towards Ghostbusters 1. It's pretty much held pretty high in regard. Just get a fleshlight and fuck yourself to not feel so wronged by the vagina. |
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by EddieMoney
(Post 12799289)
I'm actually in the market for one of these if anyone has any suggestions. Thanks.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by HN
(Post 12799293)
I think there's a few on Craigslist, some barely used.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by Bluelitespecial
(Post 12799282)
No, I know what the hidden agenda behind this movie is. They want to destroy the original because four men in the lead is now offensive. Oh no Sigourney Weaver is a damsel, oh no someone made a period joke, oh no someone made a blowjob joke.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
but its not funny, or scary.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Your tears only make Paul Feig more powerful!
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by Bluelitespecial
(Post 12799305)
but its not funny, or scary.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by robin2099
(Post 12796246)
Not really. Ghostbusters was an organic concept that came from Dan Akroyd's mind. The story that he had envisioned four males. That story became one of the most popular and iconic movies ever. You can't have something which was never seen before be a gimmick. By the same token, Paul Feig's entire pitch for this was "Hey Ghostbusters with women!" So yes, it is a gimmick and it's not hard for most people with the exception of you and Guru to see.
If the first Ghostbusters would've had four female leads: original If 30 years later, a reboot with four male leads: gimmick. Not sure why this concept is so hard to grasp for some people. What if '39's The Women which had an all-female cast been remade with basically the same premise but with an all-male cast, would that not be a gimmick as well? It can work both ways. |
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
^^ that got me thinking -- what other movies that are female centric without having words denoting that in the title ("The Women", "Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants", "Bridesmaids", etc.) ? (besides pr0n and everyone's soon to be favorite Ghostbusters movie, of course).
I've got: -Set It Off -Spring Breakers |
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Brave, High Tension, The Descent
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
[QUOTE=Sean O'Hara;12797207]You haven't seen the shit he's posting in Politics. He's a full-on Kool-Aid drinking MRA.
Don't move the goalposts. Your claim was, "no women are garbage men". "A handful of women" is not "no women". And the article has a photo of one of the women. http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopo...y11n-1-web.jpg -confused- I'm confused. Where's her Proton Pack? |
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by EddieMoney
(Post 12799289)
I'm actually in the market for one of these if anyone has any suggestions. Thanks.
|
Re: Ghostbusters (2016) - The Trailer
Originally Posted by Hokeyboy
(Post 12799329)
The Jesse Jane model is exquisite.
Always surprising. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:56 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.