View Poll Results: Which The Jungle Book, 1967 or 2016?
Voters: 7. You may not vote on this poll
Which The Jungle Book: 1967 or 2016?
04-15-16, 07:03 PM
#1
Inane Thread Master, 2018 TOTY
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Are any of us really anywhere?
Posts: 49,427
Received 909 Likes
on
769 Posts
Which The Jungle Book: 1967 or 2016?
Which one gets the nod? Is it even a correct comparison?
Having just seen 2016, but have to see 1967 again or for the first time. I go with 2016. Movie was phenomenal. Breathtaking even. Just gorgeous movie to behold...
4 stars.
Having just seen 2016, but have to see 1967 again or for the first time. I go with 2016. Movie was phenomenal. Breathtaking even. Just gorgeous movie to behold...
4 stars.
04-15-16, 08:06 PM
#2
Re: Which The Jungle Book: 1967 or 2016?
You left the best version out of the poll: the 1942 live-action version starring Sabu and produced by Alexander Korda.
And the best thing about it? It used all REAL animals! What a radical concept!
And the best thing about it? It used all REAL animals! What a radical concept!
04-15-16, 10:56 PM
#3
Re: Which The Jungle Book: 1967 or 2016?
To me the Sabu one was a bit boring as a kid, but that's because I was used to the Disney version. Kind of like going from Homeward Bound (1993) to The Incredible Journey from the 70's. I'm sure if I go back to it, I might appreciate it more.
04-16-16, 03:05 AM
#5
Re: Which The Jungle Book: 1967 or 2016?
What about the one from the 90's with the guy who played Bruce Lee in the biopic "Dragon"?
04-16-16, 08:53 AM
#7
Re: Which The Jungle Book: 1967 or 2016?
Oh yeah? Well, there were a helluva lot more tigers and elephants in existence in 1942 when they were "unprotected" than there are now. But I guess you'd rather have a world of CGI animals instead of real ones.
04-16-16, 10:12 AM
#10
