![]() |
Re: Doctor Strange (201?) (D: Derrickson)
I'm happy with Cumberbatch, although I think Phoenix or Hawke would've been more interesting he's been quite good (and is able to play more than Sherlock if you've seen him in other roles). Just glad they didn't cast some 22-year-old as IMHO Strange needs to at least be in his late 30s (Cumberbatch is 38).
|
Re: Doctor Strange (201?) (D: Derrickson)
He's good for it but I would have preferred to see what Phoenix could have rolled with it.
|
Re: Doctor Strange (201?) (D: Derrickson)
I am so sick of Cumberbatch.
|
Re: Doctor Strange (201?) (D: Derrickson)
As long as Doctor Strange doesn't have to say "penguin" for any reason, we should be okay.
|
Re: Doctor Strange (201?) (D: Derrickson)
I'm ok with that.
|
Re: Doctor Strange (201?) (D: Derrickson)
I'm actually interested if Cumberbatch is involved.
|
Re: Doctor Strange (201?) (D: Derrickson)
|
Re: Doctor Strange (201?) (D: Derrickson)
Originally Posted by superdeluxe
(Post 12283018)
bleh.
|
Re: Doctor Strange (201?) (D: Derrickson)
Originally Posted by Solid Snake
(Post 12283043)
He's good for it but I would have preferred to see what Phoenix could have rolled with it.
|
Re: Doctor Strange (201?) (D: Derrickson)
Originally Posted by DVD Josh
(Post 12283128)
Yeah, this one has been relegated to watching on Epix whenever it comes out. I like BC but this role does not suit him.
|
Re: Doctor Strange (201?) (D: Derrickson)
Not a fan of Cumberbatch but I can see fans being happy with this news. I'll reserve my opinion until I see him in action.
|
Re: Doctor Strange (201?) (D: Derrickson)
I'm happy with Cumberbatch. I also wonder how Phoenix would have turned out but you never know with these things. I thought Norton was gonna be amazing but then he wasn't
|
Re: Doctor Strange (201?) (D: Derrickson)
Originally Posted by superdeluxe
(Post 12283137)
I'll still watch it in the theaters, especially if this is all interconnected to the MCU (Although I saw something saying it is a stand alone movie?, bad idea imho)
But.... Stephen Strange is way too interconnected to the Marvel Universe to just be stand alone. He is a whole another section of a universe like The Guardians are. And those guys were interconnected very well to the rest of it. Different spectrums but still.... connected in plain sight. |
Re: Doctor Strange (201?) (D: Derrickson)
Meh. I'm fine with the choice of Cumberbatch I suppose but the news doesn't thrill me. I don't really like or dislike him.
|
Re: Doctor Strange (201?) (D: Derrickson)
I think he's a solid actor who can jump around in genres really well. Overrated? Maybe but he is talented.
|
Re: Doctor Strange (201?) (D: Derrickson)
Yawn. Predictable casting.
|
Re: Doctor Strange (201?) (D: Derrickson)
Very happy with Cumberbatch.
|
Re: Doctor Strange (201?) (D: Derrickson)
Disappointing news if true.
|
Re: Doctor Strange (201?) (D: Derrickson)
why do people hate him?
|
Re: Doctor Strange (201?) (D: Derrickson)
Originally Posted by Bob_Bobbson
(Post 12283111)
|
Re: Doctor Strange (201?) (D: Derrickson)
Originally Posted by Solid Snake
(Post 12283340)
why do people hate him?
|
Re: Doctor Strange (201?) (D: Derrickson)
I'm good with this choice. I'll render full judgement until I see the movie.
|
Re: Doctor Strange (201?) (D: Derrickson)
Originally Posted by Solid Snake
(Post 12283340)
why do people hate him?
|
Re: Doctor Strange (201?) (D: Derrickson)
Originally Posted by DVD Josh
(Post 12283347)
He's too everywhere these days.
|
Re: Doctor Strange (201?) (D: Derrickson)
Originally Posted by superdeluxe
(Post 12283137)
I'll still watch it in the theaters, especially if this is all interconnected to the MCU (Although I saw something saying it is a stand alone movie?, bad idea imho)
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:50 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.