Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

The Wolf of Wall Street (Scorsese, 2013) — The Reviews Thread

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

The Wolf of Wall Street (Scorsese, 2013) — The Reviews Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-19-13 | 10:42 AM
  #26  
DaveyJoe's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 19,475
Received 318 Likes on 202 Posts
From: Maryland
Re: The Wolf of Wall Street (Scorsese, 2013) — The Reviews Thread

Am I the only one who thinks Scorsese has been largely underwhelming since Gangs of New York? I'd like to see a return to form, but these reviews aren't encouraging me since a lot of people said good things about The Departed as well.
Old 12-19-13 | 10:44 AM
  #27  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 46,634
Received 1,374 Likes on 1,079 Posts
Re: The Wolf of Wall Street (Scorsese, 2013) — The Reviews Thread

His last few have focused more on the plots than the characters and lifestyles, which is why most of his older movies worked so well. So honestly, I think this has a great shot at being a return to form

Though I never did see Hugo.
Old 12-19-13 | 11:12 AM
  #28  
EddieMoney's Avatar
RIP
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 9,981
Received 79 Likes on 54 Posts
From: Paradise, USA
Re: The Wolf of Wall Street (Scorsese, 2013) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by DaveyJoe
Am I the only one who thinks Scorsese has been largely underwhelming since Gangs of New York? I'd like to see a return to form, but these reviews aren't encouraging me since a lot of people said good things about The Departed as well.
I think The Departed is great, and Hugo even better. It's difficult to gauge him at this point, as he has set the bar so high.
Old 12-19-13 | 11:29 AM
  #29  
Ash Ketchum's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 13,268
Received 487 Likes on 361 Posts
Re: The Wolf of Wall Street (Scorsese, 2013) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by DaveyJoe
Am I the only one who thinks Scorsese has been largely underwhelming since Gangs of New York? I'd like to see a return to form, but these reviews aren't encouraging me since a lot of people said good things about The Departed as well.
The last Scorsese movie I liked was KUNDUN (1997).

There was a time in the early 1990s when I thought Scorsese, Oliver Stone and Spike Lee were the greatest working American filmmakers. That all changed by the late '90s.
Old 12-19-13 | 11:33 AM
  #30  
Why So Blu?'s Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 40,388
Received 1,759 Likes on 1,337 Posts
From: Los Angeles
Re: The Wolf of Wall Street (Scorsese, 2013) — The Reviews Thread

Hugo is a masterpiece, a love letter to film. Shutter Island was also great and it was Scorsese doing horror.
Old 12-19-13 | 11:33 AM
  #31  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Re: The Wolf of Wall Street (Scorsese, 2013) — The Reviews Thread

Hugo was awesome. It had shit trailers but the film was a wonderful and loving tribute to the history of film.

I've mostly liked all his films in the more modern period of his work. Gangs is a flawed film though. I wouldn't blame on it his direction though. That shit was solid. More like issues with the script and casting. Really, Marty? Diaz in your film? DiCaprio acting against DDL? He wasn't as strong as he was now but even now DiCaprio can't face off DDL.

It's an epic with flaws that resonate. Otherwise I've no grand issue with the films after Gangs. Though The Departed was overrated and at times trying too hard. Loved Shutter Island, pretty old school.
Old 12-19-13 | 11:41 AM
  #32  
Why So Blu?'s Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 40,388
Received 1,759 Likes on 1,337 Posts
From: Los Angeles
Re: The Wolf of Wall Street (Scorsese, 2013) — The Reviews Thread

The Aviator also rocked.
Old 12-19-13 | 11:57 AM
  #33  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Re: The Wolf of Wall Street (Scorsese, 2013) — The Reviews Thread

Indeed. Though sometimes I feel the film should have ended when the camera goes in close to Hughes eyes once he got the Hercules in the air. Something about that bit made it feel like a finale but then it kept going just a bit longer to a point where I felt it didn't need to. But...the character needed that cuz he did end up all fucked up.
Old 12-19-13 | 12:18 PM
  #34  
inri222's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 50,673
Received 186 Likes on 122 Posts
Re: The Wolf of Wall Street (Scorsese, 2013) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Solid Snake
Gangs is a flawed film though. I wouldn't blame on it his direction though. That shit was solid. More like issues with the script and casting. Really, Marty? Diaz in your film? DiCaprio acting against DDL? He wasn't as strong as he was now but even now DiCaprio can't face off DDL.

It's an epic with flaws that resonate. Otherwise I've no grand issue with the films after Gangs.
If it wasn't for DDL I wouldn't even bother with GONY. Only reason worth watching it.


Originally Posted by Why So Blu?
Shutter Island was also great and it was Scorsese doing horror.
I liked Shutter Island but I liked it even better when it was called The Ninth Configuration.

Last edited by inri222; 12-19-13 at 12:26 PM.
Old 12-19-13 | 12:26 PM
  #35  
Why So Blu?'s Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 40,388
Received 1,759 Likes on 1,337 Posts
From: Los Angeles
Re: The Wolf of Wall Street (Scorsese, 2013) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by inri222
If it wasn't for DDL I wouldn't even bother with GONY. Only reason worth watching it.




I liked Shutter Island but I liked it even better when it was called The Ninth Configuration.

We need a remastered Blu-ray so bad for that one! Hell, I'll take an anamorphic version DVD!
Old 12-19-13 | 12:34 PM
  #36  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Re: The Wolf of Wall Street (Scorsese, 2013) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by inri222
If it wasn't for DDL I wouldn't even bother with GONY. Only reason worth watching it.
Ehhhh. I'd argue that Neeson and Gleeson, while small bits in comparison, is worth it as well. They seemed to be the only ones to act against DDL and do fine. Broadbent's character didn't need a versus against DDL's but he was cool too.

Poor DiCaprio though. I like the guy but goddamn. He was NOWHERE near what was needed to be against DDL. And Diaz...is... well she's shit.
Old 12-19-13 | 12:41 PM
  #37  
inri222's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 50,673
Received 186 Likes on 122 Posts
Re: The Wolf of Wall Street (Scorsese, 2013) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Why So Blu?
We need a remastered Blu-ray so bad for that one! Hell, I'll take an anamorphic version DVD!
I wish.
Old 12-19-13 | 12:45 PM
  #38  
JumpCutz's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 13,540
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: south of heaven
Re: The Wolf of Wall Street (Scorsese, 2013) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by inri222
If it wasn't for DDL I wouldn't even bother with GONY. Only reason worth watching it.




I liked Shutter Island but I liked it even better when it was called The Ninth Configuration.


I couldn't believe the similarities when I was watching Shutter Island. It's almost a complete rip-off, albeit with better production values and the A-list cast.
Old 12-19-13 | 01:45 PM
  #39  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
Re: The Wolf of Wall Street (Scorsese, 2013) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Ash Ketchum
The last Scorsese movie I liked was KUNDUN (1997).

There was a time in the early 1990s when I thought Scorsese, Oliver Stone and Spike Lee were the greatest working American filmmakers. That all changed by the late '90s.
Now it's The Coen Bros, Steven Soderbergh, and Woody Allen.
Old 12-19-13 | 01:51 PM
  #40  
Ash Ketchum's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 13,268
Received 487 Likes on 361 Posts
Re: The Wolf of Wall Street (Scorsese, 2013) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Supermallet
Now it's Quentin Tarantino--period!
Fixed.
Old 12-19-13 | 02:33 PM
  #41  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
Re: The Wolf of Wall Street (Scorsese, 2013) — The Reviews Thread

Old 12-19-13 | 02:44 PM
  #42  
EddieMoney's Avatar
RIP
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 9,981
Received 79 Likes on 54 Posts
From: Paradise, USA
Re: The Wolf of Wall Street (Scorsese, 2013) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Supermallet
Now it's The Coen Bros, Steven Soderbergh, and Woody Allen.
No.
Old 12-19-13 | 03:06 PM
  #43  
Cool New Member
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: The Wolf of Wall Street (Scorsese, 2013) — The Reviews Thread

Saw a screening last night. LOVED it. Here's my review:

http://mmmfilm.net/2013/12/19/review...f-wall-street/
Old 12-19-13 | 07:20 PM
  #44  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
Re: The Wolf of Wall Street (Scorsese, 2013) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by EddieMoney
No.
Yep.
Old 12-20-13 | 12:03 AM
  #45  
Suspended
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,872
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
From: Earth
Re: The Wolf of Wall Street (Scorsese, 2013) — The Reviews Thread

Some editing would have been a god send to trim it down to 2 hours 30 mins. It did felt a little long after they repeat the same negative consequences of Jordan's actions over and over again. With just that little faster pace, it would have been much more enjoyable. Overall, it's a pretty predictable film. How DID it avoided NC-17 rating I'll never understand. MPAA definitely fucked it up this time. This film made Showgirls look like a sesame street picture. It literally had everything that is just begging for a NC-17, drugs, violence, penis, vagina, full frontal nudity of both sexes, several orgies and fuck or fucking every other minutes. Although I would have to give credit to Scorsese for not showing the end of the film in the first 3 minutes and then tell the story from the beginning. That tactic piss me off to no end.
Old 12-20-13 | 12:33 AM
  #46  
Why So Blu?'s Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 40,388
Received 1,759 Likes on 1,337 Posts
From: Los Angeles
Re: The Wolf of Wall Street (Scorsese, 2013) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by SuperJim88
Some editing would have been a god send to trim it down to 2 hours 30 mins. It did felt a little long after they repeat the same negative consequences of Jordan's actions over and over again. With just that little faster pace, it would have been much more enjoyable. Overall, it's a pretty predictable film. How DID it avoided NC-17 rating I'll never understand. MPAA definitely fucked it up this time. This film made Showgirls look like a sesame street picture. It literally had everything that is just begging for a NC-17, drugs, violence, penis, vagina, full frontal nudity of both sexes, several orgies and fuck or fucking every other minutes. Although I would have to give credit to Scorsese for not showing the end of the film in the first 3 minutes and then tell the story from the beginning. That tactic piss me off to no end.
Can't fucking wait!

Old 12-20-13 | 01:14 AM
  #47  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
Re: The Wolf of Wall Street (Scorsese, 2013) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by SuperJim88
Some editing would have been a god send to trim it down to 2 hours 30 mins. It did felt a little long after they repeat the same negative consequences of Jordan's actions over and over again.
Uh oh, I usually don't like movies where that happens. Blow comes to mind.
Old 12-20-13 | 07:43 AM
  #48  
EddieMoney's Avatar
RIP
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 9,981
Received 79 Likes on 54 Posts
From: Paradise, USA
Re: The Wolf of Wall Street (Scorsese, 2013) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Supermallet
Yep.
k
Old 12-20-13 | 08:08 AM
  #49  
inri222's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 50,673
Received 186 Likes on 122 Posts
Re: The Wolf of Wall Street (Scorsese, 2013) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by SuperJim88
Some editing would have been a god send to trim it down to 2 hours 30 mins. It did felt a little long after they repeat the same negative consequences of Jordan's actions over and over again.
I saw Scorsese & DiCaprio last night on Charlie Rose and Scorsese said that the original cut was 4 hrs 5 min long.


Originally Posted by SuperJim88
How DID it avoided NC-17 rating I'll never understand.
Martin Scorsese director/ co-producer & Leonardo DiCaprio star / co-producer with a film that cost $100,000,000 to make, that's why.

That troublemaker Billy Friedkin (who's films I love) doesn't like to play ball or have the pull that those 2 do so Killer Joe gets an NC-17.

Last edited by inri222; 12-20-13 at 08:24 AM.
Old 12-20-13 | 08:15 AM
  #50  
Ash Ketchum's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 13,268
Received 487 Likes on 361 Posts
Re: The Wolf of Wall Street (Scorsese, 2013) — The Reviews Thread

The victims of Jordan Belfort on being left out of the movie:

http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2013/12/...dayspaper&_r=0


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.