X-Men: Apocalypse (D: Singer; May 27th, 2016)
#576
DVD Talk Legend
Re: X-Men: Apocalypse (D: Singer; May 27th, 2016)
He looks better than Quicksilver did, and look how that turned out.
#577
Banned
Re: X-Men: Apocalypse (D: Singer; May 27th, 2016)
I don't see what the big deal is. He looks like Nightcrawler from the comics to me. It's not like he has gangsta tats and grill.
#578
DVD Talk Hero
#580
DVD Talk Hero
#583
DVD Talk Godfather
Re: X-Men: Apocalypse (D: Singer; May 27th, 2016)
Is there a reason why we're already revisiting mutants we already had versus bringing more new ones to the big screen? We don't really need Nightcrawler again do we? Not to mention Azazel is pretty similar.
#584
Banned
Re: X-Men: Apocalypse (D: Singer; May 27th, 2016)
#585
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
Re: X-Men: Apocalypse (D: Singer; May 27th, 2016)
it won't cuz what DoFP mentioned. Well maybe... depending on whether it's something that happened before DoFP.
#586
Banned
#587
Re: X-Men: Apocalypse (D: Singer; May 27th, 2016)
Let's just leave Chuck Austen's contributions to X-Men lore in the corner where it belongs. There's no reason for any of that stuff to bleed over into the movie universe.
#589
#590
DVD Talk Hero
Re: X-Men: Apocalypse (D: Singer; May 27th, 2016)
If they're going to dip into Nightcrawler's parentage, they should run with Chris Claremont's aborted comic story that would have revealed that Mystique was his father.
#591
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
#593
DVD Talk Hero
#595
Re: X-Men: Apocalypse (D: Singer; May 27th, 2016)
Maybe Worthington Senior fucked earlier after all the chaos in caused Washington in DOFP. Wanted to get his seed spread earlier.
#596
Re: X-Men: Apocalypse (D: Singer; May 27th, 2016)
Oh shit... I like the '80s look! Looks like the animated series! Also it looks like film will be taking place in 1983.
#597
DVD Talk Hero
Re: X-Men: Apocalypse (D: Singer; May 27th, 2016)
DOFP acted as an in-continuity reboot. First Class and DOFP are now the only X-films that are still in continuity, so anything that takes place after 1974 or so is up for grabs.
Though if The next movie, Apocalypse, or whatever it will be called, takes place in 1983, it would mean Warren Worthington would have to have been born before 1974 if he's going to be older than nine. Same with Rogue, Kitty, or any other younger X-Men from the earlier movies.
It could be said that in the new timeline that they were born earlier than they were in the old timeline, but the new film isn't set far enough beyond the change point (1974) to accomodate this since anything before that would still be common to both timelines.
Though if The next movie, Apocalypse, or whatever it will be called, takes place in 1983, it would mean Warren Worthington would have to have been born before 1974 if he's going to be older than nine. Same with Rogue, Kitty, or any other younger X-Men from the earlier movies.
It could be said that in the new timeline that they were born earlier than they were in the old timeline, but the new film isn't set far enough beyond the change point (1974) to accomodate this since anything before that would still be common to both timelines.
#598
Banned
Re: X-Men: Apocalypse (D: Singer; May 27th, 2016)
DOFP acted as an in-continuity reboot. First Class and DOFP are now the only X-films that are still in continuity, so anything that takes place after 1974 or so is up for grabs.
Though if The next movie, Apocalypse, or whatever it will be called, takes place in 1983, it would mean Warren Worthington would have to have been born before 1974 if he's going to be older than nine. Same with Rogue, Kitty, or any other younger X-Men from the earlier movies.
It could be said that in the new timeline that they were born earlier than they were in the old timeline, but the new film isn't set far enough beyond the change point (1974) to accomodate this since anything before that would still be common to both timelines.
Though if The next movie, Apocalypse, or whatever it will be called, takes place in 1983, it would mean Warren Worthington would have to have been born before 1974 if he's going to be older than nine. Same with Rogue, Kitty, or any other younger X-Men from the earlier movies.
It could be said that in the new timeline that they were born earlier than they were in the old timeline, but the new film isn't set far enough beyond the change point (1974) to accomodate this since anything before that would still be common to both timelines.
#599
Re: X-Men: Apocalypse (D: Singer; May 27th, 2016)
Don't taffer it. It was a joke.
But I agree, I'm not really crazy about them using characters that don't match up in age. Regardless... the time line is incredibly fucked and convoluted. Professor X walks here, and doesn't walk there... he has hair, he doesn't. They met this year, they didn't.
Moira is another example of a character in X3 who's age doesn't match up with the movies that came after.
I guess just think of it this way... they were essentially rebooting everything, but doing the fans a service and using all the same principles to pass the torch. Instead of rehashing things over and over again, ala Spider-Man. They are just redoing it the way the want, in a way that can keep the franchise going, but still feel like it never "changed".
But I agree, I'm not really crazy about them using characters that don't match up in age. Regardless... the time line is incredibly fucked and convoluted. Professor X walks here, and doesn't walk there... he has hair, he doesn't. They met this year, they didn't.
Moira is another example of a character in X3 who's age doesn't match up with the movies that came after.
I guess just think of it this way... they were essentially rebooting everything, but doing the fans a service and using all the same principles to pass the torch. Instead of rehashing things over and over again, ala Spider-Man. They are just redoing it the way the want, in a way that can keep the franchise going, but still feel like it never "changed".
Last edited by dex14; 04-28-15 at 07:59 AM.
#600
Banned
Re: X-Men: Apocalypse (D: Singer; May 27th, 2016)
Don't taffer it. It was a joke.
But I agree, I'm not really crazy about them using characters that don't match up in age. Regardless... the time line is incredibly fucked and convoluted. Professor X walks here, and doesn't walk there... he has hair, he doesn't. They met this year, they didn't.
Moira is another example of a character in X3 who's age doesn't match up with the movies that came after.
But I agree, I'm not really crazy about them using characters that don't match up in age. Regardless... the time line is incredibly fucked and convoluted. Professor X walks here, and doesn't walk there... he has hair, he doesn't. They met this year, they didn't.
Moira is another example of a character in X3 who's age doesn't match up with the movies that came after.
I agree the continuity of these movies is completely FUBAR. Warren Worthington is just inconsistency #16,239,626.