What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?
#51
Banned
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?
The full version of Robocop amounts to very little, I think it's only seconds, maybe a full minute. I like I because it's what Verhoeven wanted originally, but you can still get both cuts. Though frankly, Verhoeven is a sick man anyway and the film was sort of violent enough.
James Cameron thinks so too, that's why he cut it. The theatrical cut is his preferred version. Though I'm glad he put his money where his mouth is and lets the audience see multiple cuts to decide for themselves.
Is there an anamorphic version of The Abyss anywhere?
#52
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?
if this version was released in 1979 i bet no gang fights in theaters.
#53
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?
Ridley Scott's intro to the (so called) "Director's Cut"
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/-EY_Sz1PzFQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
While the (so-called) DC is not as good as the original theatrical cut, I do like it as an alternate way to see a favorite movie I've seen so many times before. It made the movie "new" to me in a way.
#54
DVD Talk Legend
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?
Having viewed all three cuts of T-2, I think the middle one (the one with Kyle Reese but the theatrical ending in tact) is the best. Seems to connect better with the first, though the theatrical is still quite good. I feel the happy ending on the third cut doesn't work at all. Not only is it incredibly cheesy, there is no way John and Sarah could end up leading the kind of lives they portray given all they had done in their past. The only good thing about it is it can nullify parts 3 and 4.
Apocalypse Now is another one that I feel only benefits from some additions. I think the French plantation scene was good, but everything else looked bloated.
Also, I like the Richard Donner cut of Superman II overall, but I HATE using the "turning the world back" device again. I realize that wasn't supposed to be used for part I originally, but I think they should have kept the end scenes from the theatrical version in tact. Just saying none of the events we just saw ever occurred more or less eliminates all of the sacrifices and development given to the movie's characters. Also, instead of going back to the diner for a bit of sweet revenge, Superman is suddenly kicking the ass of some earth person for his own amusement.
Apocalypse Now is another one that I feel only benefits from some additions. I think the French plantation scene was good, but everything else looked bloated.
Also, I like the Richard Donner cut of Superman II overall, but I HATE using the "turning the world back" device again. I realize that wasn't supposed to be used for part I originally, but I think they should have kept the end scenes from the theatrical version in tact. Just saying none of the events we just saw ever occurred more or less eliminates all of the sacrifices and development given to the movie's characters. Also, instead of going back to the diner for a bit of sweet revenge, Superman is suddenly kicking the ass of some earth person for his own amusement.
#55
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
#56
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?
My main gripe about the theatrical cut is that John suddenly knows the difference between the T-1000 and Sarah at the mill, be we're not told how. The special edition includes the visual cue for him of the cyborg's legs melted into the grate.
I heard that Cameron's working on a new transfer, to be released on Blu-Ray next year.
I wish they had called that version of Alien the "Alternative Cut" instead of the "Director's Cut" because Ridley Scott even said on the extras that he has always been proud of the original theatrical cut and that his re-cut version of the movie in 2003 was simply due to him looking back at the film and deciding in hindsight to make some adjustments. So I don't think he ever intended it as a replacement for the original theatrical (which is what "Director's Cut" is supposed to mean), but just as a way to give us fans another version of the film.
Ridley Scott's intro to the (so called) "Director's Cut"
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/-EY_Sz1PzFQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
While the (so-called) DC is not as good as the original theatrical cut, I do like it as an alternate way to see a favorite movie I've seen so many times before. It made the movie "new" to me in a way.
Ridley Scott's intro to the (so called) "Director's Cut"
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/-EY_Sz1PzFQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
While the (so-called) DC is not as good as the original theatrical cut, I do like it as an alternate way to see a favorite movie I've seen so many times before. It made the movie "new" to me in a way.
Having viewed all three cuts of T-2, I think the middle one (the one with Kyle Reese but the theatrical ending in tact) is the best. Seems to connect better with the first, though the theatrical is still quite good. I feel the happy ending on the third cut doesn't work at all. Not only is it incredibly cheesy, there is no way John and Sarah could end up leading the kind of lives they portray given all they had done in their past.
The only good thing about it is it can nullify parts 3 and 4.
Apocalypse Now is another one that I feel only benefits from some additions. I think the French plantation scene was good, but everything else looked bloated.
Also, I like the Richard Donner cut of Superman II overall, but I HATE using the "turning the world back" device again.
I realize that wasn't supposed to be used for part I originally, but I think they should have kept the end scenes from the theatrical version in tact. Just saying none of the events we just saw ever occurred more or less eliminates all of the sacrifices and development given to the movie's characters. Also, instead of going back to the diner for a bit of sweet revenge, Superman is suddenly kicking the ass of some earth person for his own amusement.
Incidentally, I think that the old Superman Cinema website is gone, did Warner ever put out a corrected version of the four-disc Superman: The Movie, or would I still have to find and call that number and have my copy replaced with the replacement program, assuming it's still running?
#57
DVD Talk Legend
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?
I actually think most of the stuff added to Terminator 2 make the film a bit better. Particularly as mentioned the scene with the T-1000 malfunctioning making more sense and the scene with Reese. I like the theatrical cut too but normally if I watch it I go with the extended cut.
#58
DVD Talk Legend
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?
I also think the theatrical cut of Gladiator is better than the extended version. All the extended version does is put all of the deleted scenes back in place. The only one I felt added something was where Maximus glimpses the Christians being thrown to the lions. While it didn't add to his story arc, I liked that they actually acknowledged that aspect of history.
#59
DVD Talk Legend
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?
You do realize Sex Drive's unrated edit is a parody of unrated cuts, right? The director and writer even state that specifically in the introduction, yet people still don't get it.
Most extended cuts, specifically in the DVD and Blu-ray era, are inferior to the original edit. Example: Any Apatow-related film. It's funny that Knocked Up was listed in the OP as I feel it's the least tarnished of all of the extended Apatow cuts as it's only one additional scene added into the mix.
I think a better and tougher question would be which extended cut actually makes a movie better?
Most extended cuts, specifically in the DVD and Blu-ray era, are inferior to the original edit. Example: Any Apatow-related film. It's funny that Knocked Up was listed in the OP as I feel it's the least tarnished of all of the extended Apatow cuts as it's only one additional scene added into the mix.
I think a better and tougher question would be which extended cut actually makes a movie better?
#61
DVD Talk Special Edition
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?
#62
DVD Talk Legend
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?
I see two people have said Amadeus, but I strongly disagree. The DC is worth it for Elizabeth Berridge's bare boobs alone.
#63
DVD Talk Gold Edition
#64
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain
Posts: 20,085
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?
Dawn Of The Dead (1978)
Way too long, and the music cues are off from the theatrical version. This matters if you're the kind of person who has watched the TC (which, really, is Romero's DC) about a hundred times. The shorter cut is total perfection. Likewise, the Argento cut is terrible. Music playing over every single scene is majorly distracting.
Way too long, and the music cues are off from the theatrical version. This matters if you're the kind of person who has watched the TC (which, really, is Romero's DC) about a hundred times. The shorter cut is total perfection. Likewise, the Argento cut is terrible. Music playing over every single scene is majorly distracting.
#66
DVD Talk Hero - 2023 TOTY Award Winner
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?
Overall, I was thrilled to "get more" of a film I love so dearly so, for me, the DC release was a positive thing.
As for Berridge's boobs, well, I will never turn down a chance to see an attractive woman's boobs, but she really wasn't all that. That one scene, however, was probably the added scene that changed the tone of the film the most.
#67
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?
Robocop - Like I mentioned in the other thread, violence is a tool that can be used to tell a better story. Well the theatrical cut did that just fine, and Murphy's execution is already terribly brutal. Now there are a few shots that linger, his arm falling off, the fake looking hand stump. That overhead shot is interesting because it's a really good dummy of Peter Weller that looks like the real thing. Also the ED-209 malfunction has an unnecesary shot of it shooting more chunks out of that suit. It was already pretty brutal, no need to beat a dead horse.
The Abyss - Honestly most of the director's cut material adds to the movie. It's just the new ending
Alien - The Dallas egg scene is interesting as a curiosity but in the end it doesn't work. Ridley Scott was right to cut it for pacing. Also I like the original cut where he's just gone and we image what the alien does to him. And the scene doesn't work when compared to the overall franchise which established a different biology.
Gladiator and Amadeus - Pacing Issues
The Abyss - Honestly most of the director's cut material adds to the movie. It's just the new ending
Spoiler:
Alien - The Dallas egg scene is interesting as a curiosity but in the end it doesn't work. Ridley Scott was right to cut it for pacing. Also I like the original cut where he's just gone and we image what the alien does to him. And the scene doesn't work when compared to the overall franchise which established a different biology.
Gladiator and Amadeus - Pacing Issues
#68
DVD Talk Special Edition
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?
Here's a question for people show saw both cuts of Alien. Is Prometheus a prequel to the extended cut or the theatrical cut?
#69
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#70
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Upstate, NY
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?
Which other version of Star Trek: The Motion Picture do you think made it worse than the Theatrical Cut?
The "Special Longer Version" ? (which I think is the same extended version that was broadcast on TV back in the '80s)
Or the "Director's Edition" ? (this is the version on DVD only)
The "Special Longer Version" ? (which I think is the same extended version that was broadcast on TV back in the '80s)
Or the "Director's Edition" ? (this is the version on DVD only)
#71
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?
Dawn Of The Dead (1978)
Way too long, and the music cues are off from the theatrical version. This matters if you're the kind of person who has watched the TC (which, really, is Romero's DC) about a hundred times. The shorter cut is total perfection. Likewise, the Argento cut is terrible. Music playing over every single scene is majorly distracting.
Way too long, and the music cues are off from the theatrical version. This matters if you're the kind of person who has watched the TC (which, really, is Romero's DC) about a hundred times. The shorter cut is total perfection. Likewise, the Argento cut is terrible. Music playing over every single scene is majorly distracting.
Robocop - Like I mentioned in the other thread, violence is a tool that can be used to tell a better story. Well the theatrical cut did that just fine, and Murphy's execution is already terribly brutal. Now there are a few shots that linger, his arm falling off, the fake looking hand stump. That overhead shot is interesting because it's a really good dummy of Peter Weller that looks like the real thing. Also the ED-209 malfunction has an unnecesary shot of it shooting more chunks out of that suit. It was already pretty brutal, no need to beat a dead horse.
#72
DVD Talk Legend
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?
I only saw the theatrical cut once back in the 90s when I rented the VHS from Blockbuster, so I couldn't even tell you what was added in the DC other than the topless scene with Stanzi. That's also the only scene I can think of that would've given the DC its R rating.
#73
RIP
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?
Yeah, I dunno. She's really not much to look at. I love big, juicy sweater puppets as much as the next guy, but...I dunno, she kinda looks like a dude.
#74
DVD Talk Hero - 2023 TOTY Award Winner
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?
http://www.movie-censorship.com/report.php?ID=2234
The changes mostly just make Salieri look even more sinister than he did in the theatrical cut and flesh out a little more Mozart's financial problems. It is the prior that causes a little bit of a tonal shift in the film and one that I could see some people having a problem with. In the theatrical cut, Salieri is obviously not seen in a positive light but is someone that the audience ends up likely feeling a little sympathy for. It is much tougher to feel any sympathy at all for the DC Salieri and he comes across as more of a pure antagonist.
As for the attractiveness of Berridge, she was a cute woman with very average/normal-looking breasts. The wig she wore in the scene in question was especially unflattering for her face, which didn't help that scene. If she had worn the same wig she had on in her first meeting with Salieri, the scene might have been a little more...titillating.
#75
Member
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?
Aliens. I don't like the extra footage of Newt's family heading out and finding the Alien ship. It kills the suspense of waiting to find out exactly what happened to the colonists and the revelation that Burke sent them out in the first place. The other extra footage doesn't bother me.