Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-16-13, 09:25 AM
  #51  
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?

Originally Posted by hanshotfirst113
The full version of Robocop amounts to very little, I think it's only seconds, maybe a full minute. I like I because it's what Verhoeven wanted originally, but you can still get both cuts. Though frankly, Verhoeven is a sick man anyway and the film was sort of violent enough.
Thank you; someone else around here's had enough of blood for its own sake.

James Cameron thinks so too, that's why he cut it. The theatrical cut is his preferred version. Though I'm glad he put his money where his mouth is and lets the audience see multiple cuts to decide for themselves.
My main gripe about the theatrical cut is that John suddenly knows the difference between the T-1000 and Sarah at the mill, be we're not told how. The special edition includes the visual cue for him of the cyborg's legs melted into the grate.

Is there an anamorphic version of The Abyss anywhere?
I heard that Cameron's working on a new transfer, to be released on Blu-Ray next year.
Old 06-16-13, 09:35 AM
  #52  
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?

Originally Posted by kd5
I bought that Director's Cut thinking it would add footage previously cut from the movie, I was appalled when I saw all the cartoon crap. Quickly bought the original version on Ebay and sold that DC travesty.
i sold mine before i watched the new one.
if this version was released in 1979 i bet no gang fights in theaters.
Old 06-16-13, 10:12 AM
  #53  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
dhmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Kissimmee, Florida
Posts: 7,422
Received 67 Likes on 58 Posts
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?

Originally Posted by Skorp
Alien. Though the "cocooned Dallas" scene is interesting in itself, its placement in the DC completely kills the narrative drive of the Nostromo's final minutes.
I wish they had called that version of Alien the "Alternative Cut" instead of the "Director's Cut" because Ridley Scott even said on the extras that he has always been proud of the original theatrical cut and that his re-cut version of the movie in 2003 was simply due to him looking back at the film and deciding in hindsight to make some adjustments. So I don't think he ever intended it as a replacement for the original theatrical (which is what "Director's Cut" is supposed to mean), but just as a way to give us fans another version of the film.

Ridley Scott's intro to the (so called) "Director's Cut"
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/-EY_Sz1PzFQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

While the (so-called) DC is not as good as the original theatrical cut, I do like it as an alternate way to see a favorite movie I've seen so many times before. It made the movie "new" to me in a way.
Old 06-16-13, 11:35 AM
  #54  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
Posts: 23,512
Received 204 Likes on 158 Posts
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?

Having viewed all three cuts of T-2, I think the middle one (the one with Kyle Reese but the theatrical ending in tact) is the best. Seems to connect better with the first, though the theatrical is still quite good. I feel the happy ending on the third cut doesn't work at all. Not only is it incredibly cheesy, there is no way John and Sarah could end up leading the kind of lives they portray given all they had done in their past. The only good thing about it is it can nullify parts 3 and 4.

Apocalypse Now is another one that I feel only benefits from some additions. I think the French plantation scene was good, but everything else looked bloated.

Also, I like the Richard Donner cut of Superman II overall, but I HATE using the "turning the world back" device again. I realize that wasn't supposed to be used for part I originally, but I think they should have kept the end scenes from the theatrical version in tact. Just saying none of the events we just saw ever occurred more or less eliminates all of the sacrifices and development given to the movie's characters. Also, instead of going back to the diner for a bit of sweet revenge, Superman is suddenly kicking the ass of some earth person for his own amusement.
Old 06-16-13, 12:26 PM
  #55  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
SterlingBen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Tulsa
Posts: 7,748
Received 329 Likes on 200 Posts
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?

Originally Posted by Mondo Kane
Cinema Paradiso
I thought it was much stronger to never know what happened to his first girlfriend.
I came to post this.
Old 06-16-13, 01:21 PM
  #56  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
hanshotfirst1138's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Livonia MI
Posts: 9,678
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?

Originally Posted by kd5
I bought that Director's Cut thinking it would add footage previously cut from the movie, I was appalled when I saw all the cartoon crap. Quickly bought the original version on Ebay and sold that DC travesty.
At least the original version is anamorphic. I doubt Hill has any say in it, but hopefully after the commercial disaster of Bullet to the Head, maybe he'll be looking for some cash and will put it out on Blu-Ray. Right.

Originally Posted by moviefan2k4
Thank you; someone else around here's had enough of blood for its own sake.
I'm not a prude, I think there are artistically interesting ways to use violence. And while I initially turned my nose up at Verhoeven as the "perverted little man," as I've gotten older, I've come to see the intelligence and satire in his films, and you could certainly make a compelling case for the excesses as being part of the film's satirical worlds. But films today do have a tenancy to mistake literalism and hyper-realism for content. But I'm glad we have both versions to choose from.

My main gripe about the theatrical cut is that John suddenly knows the difference between the T-1000 and Sarah at the mill, be we're not told how. The special edition includes the visual cue for him of the cyborg's legs melted into the grate.
Yeah, I never quite understood why he cut that stuff. Those little bits with the T-1000 malfunctioning only amount to a few seconds.

I heard that Cameron's working on a new transfer, to be released on Blu-Ray next year.
I've been hearing that for years, but Avatar seems to have quashed it. Whether you like Cameron or not, I'm sure his films look gorgeous on BR. Is there are BR version of True Lies? I think there's an anamorphic version from some European market.

Originally Posted by dhmac
I wish they had called that version of Alien the "Alternative Cut" instead of the "Director's Cut" because Ridley Scott even said on the extras that he has always been proud of the original theatrical cut and that his re-cut version of the movie in 2003 was simply due to him looking back at the film and deciding in hindsight to make some adjustments. So I don't think he ever intended it as a replacement for the original theatrical (which is what "Director's Cut" is supposed to mean), but just as a way to give us fans another version of the film.

Ridley Scott's intro to the (so called) "Director's Cut"
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/-EY_Sz1PzFQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

While the (so-called) DC is not as good as the original theatrical cut, I do like it as an alternate way to see a favorite movie I've seen so many times before. It made the movie "new" to me in a way.
It's an interesting curio, as you said, Scott himself didn't want to call it "The Director's Cut," so the name is a misnomer. The original is damn near perfect, so there really wasn't any need to change it, but the alternate cut is an interesting thing to look at.

Originally Posted by Dr. DVD
Having viewed all three cuts of T-2, I think the middle one (the one with Kyle Reese but the theatrical ending in tact) is the best. Seems to connect better with the first, though the theatrical is still quite good. I feel the happy ending on the third cut doesn't work at all. Not only is it incredibly cheesy, there is no way John and Sarah could end up leading the kind of lives they portray given all they had done in their past.
What do you mean? With the machines gone, it would've been a technically viable ending. Clearly though, Cameron realized that it was sappy as hell and removed it accordingly, I think that it sort of undoes the whole point "No fate but what we make" and the importance of man taking his own responsibilities.

The only good thing about it is it can nullify parts 3 and 4.
That is a pretty good thing .

Apocalypse Now is another one that I feel only benefits from some additions. I think the French plantation scene was good, but everything else looked bloated.
I'm kind of surprised the fabled bootleg work print has never show up on any official release. Though frankly, I haven't even seen Redux yet. The movie was quite long enough as it was.

Also, I like the Richard Donner cut of Superman II overall, but I HATE using the "turning the world back" device again.
Before Donner got kicked off of the project, he and Mankiewicz tamed the Salkind's allegedly unfilmable script into a two-piece one. When they stopped production on the second film to focus on the first, they realized that the ending planned for part 2 would work better for part 1, figuring that they'd decide how to end the second film when they got there. Obviously, Donner got kicked off of the project, and that didn't happen, and they couldn't do reshoots for the Donner Cut 25 years after the fact, so good, bad, or indifferent, they worked with what they had.

I realize that wasn't supposed to be used for part I originally, but I think they should have kept the end scenes from the theatrical version in tact. Just saying none of the events we just saw ever occurred more or less eliminates all of the sacrifices and development given to the movie's characters. Also, instead of going back to the diner for a bit of sweet revenge, Superman is suddenly kicking the ass of some earth person for his own amusement.
Yeah, I never thought about that, although to be fair, the Lester "magic kiss' ending never made damn bit of sense either. I do like the notion that it's Superman's meddling with time and space that causes Zod to get free in the first place. Superman II is an interesting movie on its own, the story about the power struggle between Donner and the Salkinds and Spenger is fascinating in and of itself. That might make for an interesting documentary, though of course it's obviously not something that all of them would want to talk about. Neither cut entirely works, IMO. The Lester cut has some silly stuff that I just can't get around (THE GIANT S!), the Donner cut feels incomplete, which it is, and I think that even if you were to "fan edit" them together, it still wouldn't entirely work. Shame about what happened to Donner, no doubt, would've been a hell of a series of films. But it's a tribute to how the talent and passion of the creative team can trump the production dollars and the machinations of the money men trying to shape the film into commercial junk. RIP, Christopher Reeve. You're missed man.

Incidentally, I think that the old Superman Cinema website is gone, did Warner ever put out a corrected version of the four-disc Superman: The Movie, or would I still have to find and call that number and have my copy replaced with the replacement program, assuming it's still running?
Old 06-16-13, 01:31 PM
  #57  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Mike86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 24,750
Received 1,156 Likes on 902 Posts
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?

I actually think most of the stuff added to Terminator 2 make the film a bit better. Particularly as mentioned the scene with the T-1000 malfunctioning making more sense and the scene with Reese. I like the theatrical cut too but normally if I watch it I go with the extended cut.
Old 06-16-13, 04:35 PM
  #58  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Daytona Beach, FL
Posts: 23,512
Received 204 Likes on 158 Posts
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?

I also think the theatrical cut of Gladiator is better than the extended version. All the extended version does is put all of the deleted scenes back in place. The only one I felt added something was where Maximus glimpses the Christians being thrown to the lions. While it didn't add to his story arc, I liked that they actually acknowledged that aspect of history.
Old 06-16-13, 04:52 PM
  #59  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Matthew Chmiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 13,262
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?

Originally Posted by raven56706
sex drive and troy
You do realize Sex Drive's unrated edit is a parody of unrated cuts, right? The director and writer even state that specifically in the introduction, yet people still don't get it.

Most extended cuts, specifically in the DVD and Blu-ray era, are inferior to the original edit. Example: Any Apatow-related film. It's funny that Knocked Up was listed in the OP as I feel it's the least tarnished of all of the extended Apatow cuts as it's only one additional scene added into the mix.

I think a better and tougher question would be which extended cut actually makes a movie better?
Old 06-16-13, 05:17 PM
  #60  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Pizza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,136
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?

Last of the Mohicans.
Old 06-16-13, 06:03 PM
  #61  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?

Originally Posted by moviefan2k4
My main gripe about the theatrical cut is that John suddenly knows the difference between the T-1000 and Sarah at the mill, be we're not told how.
I'd always taken it as another "Something's wrong she's never this nice" moment.
Old 06-16-13, 09:34 PM
  #62  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Sacramento, Calif.
Posts: 13,525
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?

I see two people have said Amadeus, but I strongly disagree. The DC is worth it for Elizabeth Berridge's bare boobs alone.
Old 06-16-13, 10:30 PM
  #63  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
hasslein's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sunny CA
Posts: 2,600
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?

Originally Posted by mcfly
I see two people have said Amadeus, but I strongly disagree. The DC is worth it for Elizabeth Berridge's bare boobs alone.
Old 06-16-13, 11:53 PM
  #64  
DVD Talk Legend
 
islandclaws's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain
Posts: 20,085
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?

Dawn Of The Dead (1978)

Way too long, and the music cues are off from the theatrical version. This matters if you're the kind of person who has watched the TC (which, really, is Romero's DC) about a hundred times. The shorter cut is total perfection. Likewise, the Argento cut is terrible. Music playing over every single scene is majorly distracting.
Old 06-17-13, 07:59 AM
  #65  
Senior Member
 
Terminal's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bronx, New York
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?

The 40 Year Old Virgni
Alexander - An awful movie made worse
Apocalypse Now
Old 06-17-13, 08:53 AM
  #66  
DVD Talk Hero - 2023 TOTY Award Winner
 
jfoobar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 46,592
Received 2,174 Likes on 1,223 Posts
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?

Originally Posted by mcfly
I see two people have said Amadeus, but I strongly disagree. The DC is worth it for Elizabeth Berridge's bare boobs alone.
It is hard for me to be objective about this one since I had seen the original version so many times (it is, in fact, my single favorite film) before I saw the DC. So the DC additions really stand out in my mind and I am able to consider them separate from the overall narrative too easily.

Overall, I was thrilled to "get more" of a film I love so dearly so, for me, the DC release was a positive thing.

As for Berridge's boobs, well, I will never turn down a chance to see an attractive woman's boobs, but she really wasn't all that. That one scene, however, was probably the added scene that changed the tone of the film the most.
Old 06-17-13, 08:55 AM
  #67  
Senior Member
 
Mattflix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?

Robocop - Like I mentioned in the other thread, violence is a tool that can be used to tell a better story. Well the theatrical cut did that just fine, and Murphy's execution is already terribly brutal. Now there are a few shots that linger, his arm falling off, the fake looking hand stump. That overhead shot is interesting because it's a really good dummy of Peter Weller that looks like the real thing. Also the ED-209 malfunction has an unnecesary shot of it shooting more chunks out of that suit. It was already pretty brutal, no need to beat a dead horse.


The Abyss - Honestly most of the director's cut material adds to the movie. It's just the new ending

Spoiler:
turns it into a very generic "war is bad" movie. The original ending was different sort of first contact story that had a more subtle criticism of war by showing Coffee's breakdown and insistence on destruction. Now it gives a totally one-dimensional depiction of war. On top of that, I think the first contact is sullied since the aliens threatened the world as well. I can't imagine an easy peace with them afterwards, which was implied in the theatrical cut.


Alien - The Dallas egg scene is interesting as a curiosity but in the end it doesn't work. Ridley Scott was right to cut it for pacing. Also I like the original cut where he's just gone and we image what the alien does to him. And the scene doesn't work when compared to the overall franchise which established a different biology.

Gladiator and Amadeus - Pacing Issues
Old 06-17-13, 09:33 AM
  #68  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,258
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?

Here's a question for people show saw both cuts of Alien. Is Prometheus a prequel to the extended cut or the theatrical cut?
Old 06-17-13, 09:37 AM
  #69  
Senior Member
 
Mattflix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?

Originally Posted by dugan
Here's a question for people show saw both cuts of Alien. Is Prometheus a prequel to the extended cut or the theatrical cut?
Either really. Prometheus only shows

Spoiler:
The creation of the first alien. Who's to say if that alien became a queen that laid eggs, or a solo alien that turned prey into eggs?
Old 06-17-13, 12:07 PM
  #70  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Falc04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Upstate, NY
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?

Originally Posted by dhmac
Which other version of Star Trek: The Motion Picture do you think made it worse than the Theatrical Cut?

The "Special Longer Version" ? (which I think is the same extended version that was broadcast on TV back in the '80s)

Or the "Director's Edition" ? (this is the version on DVD only)
The "Special Longer Version". Basically 12 more minutes of exterior ship shots and the crew's facial expressions. Adds absolutely nothing to the story, and makes a dull and boring portion of the film, even longer.
Old 06-17-13, 12:22 PM
  #71  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
hanshotfirst1138's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Livonia MI
Posts: 9,678
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?

Originally Posted by KillerCannibal
Dawn Of The Dead (1978)

Way too long, and the music cues are off from the theatrical version. This matters if you're the kind of person who has watched the TC (which, really, is Romero's DC) about a hundred times. The shorter cut is total perfection. Likewise, the Argento cut is terrible. Music playing over every single scene is majorly distracting.
Romero thinks so too, that's why he considers the theatrical version his cut.

Originally Posted by Mattflix
Robocop - Like I mentioned in the other thread, violence is a tool that can be used to tell a better story. Well the theatrical cut did that just fine, and Murphy's execution is already terribly brutal. Now there are a few shots that linger, his arm falling off, the fake looking hand stump. That overhead shot is interesting because it's a really good dummy of Peter Weller that looks like the real thing. Also the ED-209 malfunction has an unnecesary shot of it shooting more chunks out of that suit. It was already pretty brutal, no need to beat a dead horse.
I've always wondered if the loss of the arm was supposed to have some sort of symbolic value or something that went over my head. Verhoeven mention the overhead shot as being a "Mary holding the beaten Christ after the passion" kind of thing, and apparently the shot in the head has the blood splatter in a "crown of thorns" kind of way. I've never though about it that way, but hey, he's the director, not me.
Old 06-17-13, 12:44 PM
  #72  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Sacramento, Calif.
Posts: 13,525
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?

Originally Posted by jfoobar
That one scene, however, was probably the added scene that changed the tone of the film the most.
I only saw the theatrical cut once back in the 90s when I rented the VHS from Blockbuster, so I couldn't even tell you what was added in the DC other than the topless scene with Stanzi. That's also the only scene I can think of that would've given the DC its R rating.
Old 06-17-13, 01:58 PM
  #73  
RIP
 
EddieMoney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Paradise, USA
Posts: 9,904
Received 54 Likes on 41 Posts
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?

Originally Posted by mcfly
I see two people have said Amadeus, but I strongly disagree. The DC is worth it for Elizabeth Berridge's bare boobs alone.
Yeah, I dunno. She's really not much to look at. I love big, juicy sweater puppets as much as the next guy, but...I dunno, she kinda looks like a dude.
Old 06-17-13, 03:04 PM
  #74  
DVD Talk Hero - 2023 TOTY Award Winner
 
jfoobar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 46,592
Received 2,174 Likes on 1,223 Posts
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?

Originally Posted by mcfly
I only saw the theatrical cut once back in the 90s when I rented the VHS from Blockbuster, so I couldn't even tell you what was added in the DC other than the topless scene with Stanzi. That's also the only scene I can think of that would've given the DC its R rating.
Here is an entire list of the changes, including some screen caps:

http://www.movie-censorship.com/report.php?ID=2234

The changes mostly just make Salieri look even more sinister than he did in the theatrical cut and flesh out a little more Mozart's financial problems. It is the prior that causes a little bit of a tonal shift in the film and one that I could see some people having a problem with. In the theatrical cut, Salieri is obviously not seen in a positive light but is someone that the audience ends up likely feeling a little sympathy for. It is much tougher to feel any sympathy at all for the DC Salieri and he comes across as more of a pure antagonist.

As for the attractiveness of Berridge, she was a cute woman with very average/normal-looking breasts. The wig she wore in the scene in question was especially unflattering for her face, which didn't help that scene. If she had worn the same wig she had on in her first meeting with Salieri, the scene might have been a little more...titillating.
Old 06-17-13, 07:51 PM
  #75  
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 142
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: What extended cut of a movie did you think made it worse?

Aliens. I don't like the extra footage of Newt's family heading out and finding the Alien ship. It kills the suspense of waiting to find out exactly what happened to the colonists and the revelation that Burke sent them out in the first place. The other extra footage doesn't bother me.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.