View Poll Results: Worse Film: Star Trek I or V?
Voters: 96. You may not vote on this poll
Which Is Worse: Star Trek I or V?
#26
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Which Is Worse: Star Trek I or V?
Well, I just finished watching "Final Frontier", and its not near as bad as I remember. The story is somewhat misguided (especially the "God's in here" line from Kirk), but its way ahead of the painfully slow "Motionless Picture". Sybok was a seeker of truth, but failed to face his own fears, and the evil alien exploited them. The film never details it, but there was probably a good reason why that being was imprisoned in the first place. I'd compare it more to Satan than God, since it was consumed by selfishness.
BTW, I've always believed Shatner "stole" (consciously or subconsciously) the idea for Star Trek V from a 1976 episode of TOMORROW, where Tom Snyder asks DeForest Kelley what he thinks the plot for the new Star Trek movie (which would become Star Trek: The Motion Picture) should be:
Kelley: "I think it should have the crew encounter God, and then we find out that God is actually the Devil."
Snyder: "I don't think we're ready for that one yet, DeForest."
#27
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Which Is Worse: Star Trek I or V?
BTW, I've always believed Shatner "stole" (consciously or subconsciously) the idea for Star Trek V from a 1976 episode of TOMORROW, where Tom Snyder asks DeForest Kelley what he thinks the plot for the new Star Trek movie (which would become Star Trek: The Motion Picture) should be:
Kelley: "I think it should have the crew encounter God, and then we find out that God is actually the Devil."
Snyder: "I don't think we're ready for that one yet, DeForest."
Kelley: "I think it should have the crew encounter God, and then we find out that God is actually the Devil."
Snyder: "I don't think we're ready for that one yet, DeForest."
#28
Banned by request
Re: Which Is Worse: Star Trek I or V?
Both movies were ambitious, it's just that TMP had the budget (and the director) to try and achieve those ambitions. TMP's mistake was trying to be a successor to 2001: A Space Odyssey in the years following Star Wars. It's a better film than it gets credit for, although it's not one I rewatch too often.
Final Frontier was an interesting idea that failed due to a combination of budget restraints (the film looks so, so cheap) and Shatner's poor direction. He doesn't do a bad job with the characters (although, let's face it, the main cast could play those parts in their sleep by that point), but basics of composition and staging seemed lost on Bill. The one exception to this is the scene where Spock and McCoy face their pain. That is a sequence so good that it feels like a different movie entirely. The God stuff at the end was an interesting idea, but so poorly executed.
Final Frontier was an interesting idea that failed due to a combination of budget restraints (the film looks so, so cheap) and Shatner's poor direction. He doesn't do a bad job with the characters (although, let's face it, the main cast could play those parts in their sleep by that point), but basics of composition and staging seemed lost on Bill. The one exception to this is the scene where Spock and McCoy face their pain. That is a sequence so good that it feels like a different movie entirely. The God stuff at the end was an interesting idea, but so poorly executed.
#29
Banned by request
Re: Which Is Worse: Star Trek I or V?
#31
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 7,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Which Is Worse: Star Trek I or V?
I haven't bought that box set yet because I remember how disappointed I was seeing TMP in the theater when it came out (I was 14 or 15). The pace was awful. All I remember is that ship floating in space forever on it's way to wherever it was going. I didn't care for Blade Runner a couple of years later either. I think, as a kid, I was comparing everything to Star Wars. I did recently watch Blade Runner and thought it was amazing. Maybe I need to check out TMP again for the first time in 30+ years.
#32
Banned
Re: Which Is Worse: Star Trek I or V?
I love TMP. It's the most ambitious and cinematic of all the Trek films. Flawed, yes, at times perhaps a noble failure, but it attempted something grand and if it fell short, it still remains an epic adventure true to the spirit of Star Trek and Roddenberry's vision.
Trek V is teh poo
Trek V is teh poo
#33
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Which Is Worse: Star Trek I or V?
Of course not, but a better response would've been, "I think He is." We're not divine, and that's been evidenced by history many times over.
#34
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Which Is Worse: Star Trek I or V?
I haven't bought that box set yet because I remember how disappointed I was seeing TMP in the theater when it came out (I was 14 or 15). The pace was awful. All I remember is that ship floating in space forever on it's way to wherever it was going. I didn't care for Blade Runner a couple of years later either. I think, as a kid, I was comparing everything to Star Wars. I did recently watch Blade Runner and thought it was amazing. Maybe I need to check out TMP again for the first time in 30+ years.
#35
Banned
Re: Which Is Worse: Star Trek I or V?
Reading all the "painfully slow" comments and I find it weird that as time goes by, I find almost all of the summer blockbuster movies to be boring and dull. I am turning into an old fart, although i have always liked TMP more than the piece of shit V.
#36
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Which Is Worse: Star Trek I or V?
Anyway, I look forward to seeing the reaction to INTO DARKNESS here in a few weeks, as, from what I've heard, that movie has some even sillier concepts than TREK V, but it has whiz-bang, state of the art effects...will the majority be distracted enough by them to think it's a "Great" film? We'll see.
#38
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Which Is Worse: Star Trek I or V?
I also noticed a drastic change in Kirk's attitude toward Klingons between "Final Frontier" and "Undiscovered Country". After all, he killed Kruge to avenge David's murder, so why hold the entire race accountable?
#39
Banned by request
Re: Which Is Worse: Star Trek I or V?
Maybe V takes place after VI?
The real answer is that VI is made a better movie by giving Kirk an arc. In V, the Klingon element is just window dressing. In VI, Kirk's relationship to Klingons is central to the theme of the film.
And as for the ending of V, to specifically name check and possibly endorse one religion would go against part of what Star Trek is about, which is inclusiveness.
The real answer is that VI is made a better movie by giving Kirk an arc. In V, the Klingon element is just window dressing. In VI, Kirk's relationship to Klingons is central to the theme of the film.
And as for the ending of V, to specifically name check and possibly endorse one religion would go against part of what Star Trek is about, which is inclusiveness.
#40
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Which Is Worse: Star Trek I or V?
Maybe V takes place after VI?
The real answer is that VI is made a better movie by giving Kirk an arc. In V, the Klingon element is just window dressing. In VI, Kirk's relationship to Klingons is central to the theme of the film.
And as for the ending of V, to specifically name check and possibly endorse one religion would go against part of what Star Trek is about, which is inclusiveness.
The real answer is that VI is made a better movie by giving Kirk an arc. In V, the Klingon element is just window dressing. In VI, Kirk's relationship to Klingons is central to the theme of the film.
And as for the ending of V, to specifically name check and possibly endorse one religion would go against part of what Star Trek is about, which is inclusiveness.
#41
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Which Is Worse: Star Trek I or V?
Nemesis is underrated actually if you ask me. The biggest problems it has if you ask me was it tried taking a page from Wrath of Khan but it didn't really work out and also the fact that it was a weak entry for the TNG crew to go out on. Overall it has it's moments though.
As for the poll I'd say The Final Frontier is pretty much crap all around. The Motion Picture is slow in spots and I can see why some people dislike it but I think it's enjoyable.
As for the poll I'd say The Final Frontier is pretty much crap all around. The Motion Picture is slow in spots and I can see why some people dislike it but I think it's enjoyable.
#43
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: Which Is Worse: Star Trek I or V?
I love TMP. It's the most ambitious and cinematic of all the Trek films. Flawed, yes, at times perhaps a noble failure, but it attempted something grand and if it fell short, it still remains an epic adventure true to the spirit of Star Trek and Roddenberry's vision.
Trek V is teh poo
Trek V is teh poo
TMP may be my favorite ST film, precisely for having goals *opposite* to those of a summer action blockbuster. It's not at all slow--for a Robert Wise roadhouse scenery epic. I lump it in with Sound of Music & Sand Pebbles more than with the Star Trek films to follow. I only wish it had an intermission as well as the overture.
#44
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Which Is Worse: Star Trek I or V?
I don't love Nemesis but I think it's a pretty big exaggeration for it to be called the worst Star Trek film to be honest. The Final Frontier and Insurrection are both worse if you ask me. The Final Frontier just for not being very well made and having a poorly executed story, and Insurrection for feeling more like a two part episode of TNG rather than a film.
I actually just watched Nemesis a couple weeks back. I don't think it's by any means perfect but while I was watching it I could help but wonder why it gets shit on so much. Shinzon was a decent villain but I think the character would have been more effective if he had been introduced in TNG or something or at least alluded to. The battle at the end between the Enterprise E and the Romulan ship is also pretty cool if you ask me.
I also liked
What killed the film is the fact that it seemed lacking in some character moments. I think a big problem with a lot of the TNG films is they basically became all about Data or Picard. I love the characters but the rest of the crew kind of took a back seat. Also there really should have been a follow up to this movie if you ask me. As it is it's not the strongest note for the crew to have gone out on. Also like I said earlier it seemed like the creators of this film were trying to re-create The Wrath of Khan but it just didn't work out as well as it should have.
I actually just watched Nemesis a couple weeks back. I don't think it's by any means perfect but while I was watching it I could help but wonder why it gets shit on so much. Shinzon was a decent villain but I think the character would have been more effective if he had been introduced in TNG or something or at least alluded to. The battle at the end between the Enterprise E and the Romulan ship is also pretty cool if you ask me.
I also liked
Spoiler:
What killed the film is the fact that it seemed lacking in some character moments. I think a big problem with a lot of the TNG films is they basically became all about Data or Picard. I love the characters but the rest of the crew kind of took a back seat. Also there really should have been a follow up to this movie if you ask me. As it is it's not the strongest note for the crew to have gone out on. Also like I said earlier it seemed like the creators of this film were trying to re-create The Wrath of Khan but it just didn't work out as well as it should have.
Last edited by Mike86; 05-02-13 at 06:12 PM.
#45
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: Which Is Worse: Star Trek I or V?
V was pretty bad because of that stupid "Row,row,row your boat." song. Couldn't they sing any better campfire song than that crap.
#46
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Cape Ann, Massachusetts
Posts: 10,928
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: Which Is Worse: Star Trek I or V?
I think with TMP they went a bit overboard with the approach of "this is not the old tv show, this is a BIG CINEMATIC, WIDESCREEN, EXPENSIVE MOTION PICTURE". However, I love that vibe, so the fact that it's a bit slow and ponderous doesn't bother me. It DOES feel cinematic, and it's the combined fun of having the characters reunited with each other and the Enterprise, and all that slow, big grandeur, with the great score and effects....I can see why many would find it boring, and I"m not arguing it's a perfect movie, but its excesses were in the service of a vibe I really like, so it works for me.
#49
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Which Is Worse: Star Trek I or V?
I've always had a soft spot for it. Maybe because it's the first Trek film I saw in theaters to my recollection but I've always kind of enjoyed it. I thought Soran was an okay villain and the nexus stuff was kind of interesting. I think the concept could have been explored a bit more though. I also thought it was pretty cool seeing Kirk and Picard interact. Data having the emotion chip installed also provided for some fun moments. I think the film gets a lot of shit for the fact that they
I wasn't a big fan of how the film felt the need to destroy the Enterprise D as it was my favorite Enterprise. The saucer crash was pretty cool though I'll give the film that much at least.
Spoiler:
Last edited by Mike86; 05-02-13 at 06:44 PM.