Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

The Hunger Games (Ross, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters
View Poll Results: The Hunger Games (Ross, 2012) — The Reviews Thread
5.56%
17.78%
26.67%
17.78%
12.22%
6.67%
6.67%
0
0%
1.11%
1.11%
1.11%
I will not be privy to the annilhation of kiddies for entertainment in this new fangled republic!
3.33%
Voters: 90. You may not vote on this poll

The Hunger Games (Ross, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-07-12, 06:21 PM
  #176  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Cellar Door's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 11,729
Received 1,021 Likes on 630 Posts
Re: The Hunger Games (Ross, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by DJariya
but what I thought was the weak point of the movie was the whole forced star crossed lovers angle with Peeta. I don't think it was really developed well enough for me to care about them as a couple.
I agree. That aspect is developed better in the book.
Old 09-07-12, 07:36 PM
  #177  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Michael Corvin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 62,520
Received 913 Likes on 648 Posts
Re: The Hunger Games (Ross, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Sure it's done better in the book but in both cases the triangle was supposed to come across as forced.
Old 09-09-12, 11:47 AM
  #178  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
DJLinus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 8,994
Received 44 Likes on 39 Posts
Re: The Hunger Games (Ross, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

I watched this last weekend and thought it was okay, a decent way to spend a couple of hours before college football started. The performances were great, but it did feel very condensed compared to the book, naturally.

I really wanted to see how they handled
Spoiler:
the mutts, what with their resemblances to the fallen tributes and standing on their hind legs. Yeah, it could've ended up being silly-looking, but using regular dogs didn't really have much of an emotional impact on that last fight.


Reading the book was a much better experience, not just because the story was fully fleshed out, but because I didn't bob and weave my head around while doing so, making the pages unreadable. Really, the shaky cam was terrible in this movie. Action scenes? Yeah, I understand it a bit, but still hate it (sure, it may "tone down" the violence between young characters, but it also gives an "I don't know how shoot an action scene" vibe, IMO.) But during static, dialogue-driven scenes it's ridiculous and unnecessary.

I'm shedding no tears for the loss of the director. In fact, I'm pulling for a "reverse Bourne series", bringing in a director who owns a tripod and is able to show restraint during times when handheld cameras are used.

Originally Posted by Abob Teff
The shaky cam element was pointless, yet I blame Battlestar Galactica and The Office for making everybody think that "shaky = real."
Is it really bad on BSG? That show just came to Amazon Prime and I was thinking about giving it a go, given its rep. Honestly, I largely don't mind it much on The Office, but that may be because my love of the writing and performances eclipses any shaky cam nitpicks that I have. (This past dreadful season, notwithstanding.)
Old 10-12-12, 02:14 AM
  #179  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Under a dead Ohio sky
Posts: 5,820
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: The Hunger Games (Ross, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Jennifer Lawrence was good, everything else was kinda meh. Every adult character was a caricature, I wasn't sure if this was intentional or not.

The "Romance" between Katniss and Peeta didn't work at all. Those two had zero chemistry. Katniss had more sexual tension with Cinna. At first I thought maybe they were faking the romance to get sympathy and aid from sponsors. Then they made that Romeo and Juliet pact at the end with the berries, which was completely ridiculous. Thats your solution?! Really?! Who's gonna look after your sister?
Old 10-12-12, 02:59 AM
  #180  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Lower Beaver, Iowa
Posts: 10,521
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Re: The Hunger Games (Ross, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by Thrush
At first I thought maybe they were faking the romance to get sympathy and aid from sponsors.
They were. It was made pretty clear, along with the fact that Katniss is really in love with Gale and is worried how they're going to maintain the fake relationship now that they're back in District 12.

Then they made that Romeo and Juliet pact at the end with the berries, which was completely ridiculous. Thats your solution?! Really?! Who's gonna look after your sister?
I'm pretty sure Katniss did that knowing the officials would stop them to avoid a backlash from the audience.
Old 03-03-13, 01:39 AM
  #181  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,626
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
Re: The Hunger Games (Ross, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

The movie was decent, but I'm quite surprised that it earned $700 million wordwide.
Old 03-03-13, 09:42 PM
  #182  
DVD Talk Godfather & 2020 TOTY Winner
 
Decker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Vegas, Baby!
Posts: 75,933
Received 6,210 Likes on 4,236 Posts
Re: The Hunger Games (Ross, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

After Ice Age : Continental Drift earned $877M worldwide, no absurdly huge gross should surprise anyone any more.
Old 03-03-13, 10:37 PM
  #183  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,626
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
Re: The Hunger Games (Ross, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

But that was a known francise, and kid friendly. This one was not.
Old 03-03-13, 10:41 PM
  #184  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
hanshotfirst1138's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Livonia MI
Posts: 9,678
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Re: The Hunger Games (Ross, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Shaky cam was really, really, really, really irritating, but otherwise thoroughly enjoyed this. Loved the little bit they added at the end about what happened to Seneca. Nice touch with the berries.
Old 03-03-13, 10:46 PM
  #185  
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: The Hunger Games (Ross, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by wearetheborg
But that was a known francise, and kid friendly. This one was not.
I'm not sure if you just don't talk to kids, or just haven't had contact with one in years, but The Hunger Games is a well-known franchise with YA readers.
Old 03-03-13, 11:05 PM
  #186  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,626
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
Re: The Hunger Games (Ross, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

By kids I mean less than 10 year old. Is Hunger Games for that age group?
Old 03-04-13, 12:00 AM
  #187  
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: The Hunger Games (Ross, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by wearetheborg
By kids I mean less than 10 year old. Is Hunger Games for that age group?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Young-adult_fiction
Old 03-04-13, 12:35 PM
  #188  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Puyallup
Posts: 16,430
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Re: The Hunger Games (Ross, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by wearetheborg
But that was a known francise, and kid friendly. This one was not.
This was a known franchise, Its books were very popular.
Old 03-04-13, 12:36 PM
  #189  
DVD Talk Legend
 
JumpCutz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: south of heaven
Posts: 13,540
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Re: The Hunger Games (Ross, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

wearethepwned.
Old 03-04-13, 12:36 PM
  #190  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Puyallup
Posts: 16,430
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Re: The Hunger Games (Ross, 2012) — The Reviews Thread

Originally Posted by wearetheborg
By kids I mean less than 10 year old. Is Hunger Games for that age group?
No, I would say 11-17 is the wheel house for Hunger Games. It was actually a movie where the guys didn't have to be completely dragged to like the Twilight series.

The two biggest trends right now for movies are comic books and Sci-fi/fantasy YA.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.