![]() |
Re: Movies that got the wrong rating
Originally Posted by Nick Danger
(Post 10902246)
Midnight Cowboy and A Clockwork Orange were rated X in the same era. Due to cultural changes (or loss of moral values, YMMV), both are tamer than today's R movies.
And for those wondering. All the current home video releases of the film despite the R rating on the package are the uncut X rated version, and that version was not resubmitted to the MPAA. The only way to see the true edited R version of the film is the early Warner vhs and laserdisc releases that had the large green border on the cases. Here is a photo of the laserdisc version. I found the VHS version for $1 last year, so copies do exist but can be tough to locate. But it's kind of cool finding a rare print of the film. However the difference is not huge and unless you were doing a side by side comparison, I doubt the difference would really be obvious. http://www.lddb.com/laserdisc/38026/...nge-%281971%29 And speaking of comparing the two versions side by side, I just did a search and found this link. Which has a video link that does show both versions playing together. Naturally the video itself is not safe for work, so view it at your own risk. http://www.angelfire.com/film/kubrick4/ |
Re: Movies that got the wrong rating
I think of Clint Eastwood's "The Outlaw Josey Wales". It's rated PG, but the rape scene is graphic (you see T&A).
That and the Swedish film "Thriller: A Cruel Picture" (One of QT's inspirations for Kill Bill). It never got an MPAA rating, but holy shit was I surprised when you see anal penetration and the dude blowing a load on her back. Would have been awkward if my roommate had walked in (was watching it in the living room, again, not expecting it). |
Re: Movies that got the wrong rating
Originally Posted by Boba Fett
(Post 10901821)
The new TRUE GRIT should have been 'R'
I generally think most film's (final) ratings are about right. |
Re: Movies that got the wrong rating
Originally Posted by Artman
(Post 10903051)
The only one that came to mind for me. The severed fingers and shooting definitely caught me by surprise.
I generally think most film's (final) ratings are about right. |
Re: Movies that got the wrong rating
Originally Posted by Rypro 525
(Post 10903059)
the severed fingers bit is in the original too (well you don't see the aftermath, but they do chop off his fingers)
The straw that broke the camel's back was the climax of Bonnie and Clyde. Originally unrated it was released with an R in a double feature with Bullitt which also received an R although unrated when first released. Originally the X rating didn't carry a stigma and was not that big a deal. If you got an X, you got an X. The movie wasn't made with kids in mind so need to recut. It wasn't until adult movies and theaters adopted the XXX that the stigma was attached and mainstream theaters wouldn't carry them, which is what started the trend of avoiding an X, not to increase audience by adding those under 17, but just to get them in the theater. Throughout the 70s filmakers would intentionally shoot for an R because it increased box office. Sometimes theaters would change the ratings. From personal experience Dracula Has Risen From The Grave(GP) and the Matt Helm movie The Wrecking Crew(M) were both changed to R by a local theater. The poster had an R rating sticker attached over the one printed on the poster. The newspaper ads had the R also. In the case of something like Clockwork Orange. Theaters which were happy to show it when first released most likely refused to show it later with an X rating so it had to be edited just to get it re-released. Probably why Midnight Cowboy is one of the few Oscar winners that didn't get re-released(at the time) because by then theater owners wouldn't screen an X. The flip side of the coin. The G rating also carried a stigma. G=boring. Nobody wanted to go to the theater to see "The Waltons". I'm willing to bet an X rated major motion picture would have grossed more than a G rated one in the late 60s/early 70s. Except for Disney. |
Re: Movies that got the wrong rating
Originally Posted by clckworang
(Post 10901571)
This sort of reminds me of Kids. It's rated NC-17 but has zero nudity. Yes, it has a lot of adult situations and language as well as a couple of violent scenes, but it never felt like an NC-17 to me.
|
Re: Movies that got the wrong rating
Not after she blew a dude on film. It's damn near tame!
|
Re: Movies that got the wrong rating
The whole only "1 or 2 f words" in a PG-13 movie is ridiculous. Some movies get away with 3 or more, like As Good As It Gets and Hero (1992).
|
Re: Movies that got the wrong rating
I just re-watched the Coen Bros. "The Man Who Wasn't There" and the R rating seems ridiculous - the content advisory lists "a scene of violence" as its sole issue. The "violent scene" doesn't really seem worth that rating - a character gets stabbed (you see some blood, but you don't see the wound), falls down, and a pool of (B&W) blood grows under him.
"Brick" also has a R rating that seems unjust - I think it was given because the titular object is heroin (though you never see anyone use), and due to a character getting shot (though it was bloodless and shot from a distance and in the the shadows). |
Re: Movies that got the wrong rating
What's interesting to note is the amount of violence that now gets passed with a PG-13. As someone who saw numerous rough cuts of Serenity months prior to its release, things that weren't included in the PG-13 final edit due to the MPAA included shots like:
Now, in 2011, we have a film like Captain America: The First Avenger where the PG-13 edit include:
Both instances shocked me that those two instances were in a PG-13. I think most films, if re-rated, would probably receive "tamer" ratings than received before. I think the "Unrated" (i.e. NC-17) edits of films like American Pie would receive an R with no questions asked based upon the precedent that has been set by films now. On the same hand, there would be films that would easily get a harsher rating. I don't think Jaws would get a PG, but a hard PG-13. I would've said R, but the violence indicated in more recent PG-13 fare has set a standard. ... and remember, as long as the violence is not caused by humans, you can get away with as much graphic violence and gore as you want without receiving an NC-17. Whereas the first Final Destination originally received an NC-17 (thanks Columbine!), the sequels have all passed with an R with no edits involved and the level of gore being pushed to a higher standard in each one. |
Re: Movies that got the wrong rating
Again this brings my thinking that they should get people educated in film to rate films instead of the soccer mom, regular working joe, etc to do it.
The red clouds have been around for a while, but yeah the Hydra guy going trough the propellar surprised me. Maybe cuz it's a CG kill it's ok? |
Re: Movies that got the wrong rating
Both of these were cut to get a PG-13, and I still think they should have gotten R ratings in their theatrical versions. A few seconds of cuts didn't do anything to lessen the intense and extremely violent tone and scenes in the films. So I'm curious exactly how explicit and or 'intense' Don't Be Afraid of the Dark is to be R rated over PG-13?
Taken (2008) Limitless (2011) |
Re: Movies that got the wrong rating
Taken is PG-13 as most of the violence is bloodless, making it completely acceptable.
|
Re: Movies that got the wrong rating
Originally Posted by rw2516
(Post 10903102)
And it's rated G. I believe originally a G was given as long as a film didn't variate from conventional content. True Grit could have been released in 1959 and the finger chopping wouldn't have been a big deal.
<object width="480" height="390"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bSELRi1EoQk?version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/bSELRi1EoQk?version=3&hl=en_US&rel=0" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="390" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object> |
Re: Movies that got the wrong rating
Originally Posted by Gunde
(Post 10903130)
Chloe Sevigny's bush isn't nudity?
|
Re: Movies that got the wrong rating
You can see it when Casper is raping her. It's obscured slightly, but it's there.
|
Re: Movies that got the wrong rating
Originally Posted by AnonomusBob15
(Post 10906201)
You can see it when Casper is raping her. It's obscured slightly, but it's there.
The zoom button is your best friend. |
Re: Movies that got the wrong rating
Originally Posted by Solid Snake PAC
(Post 10902103)
Really? I dunno about that. I can't think of anything pushing it to NC-17. The D-Day sequence wasn't that graphic. It was graphic sure but it wasn't gore porn.
|
Re: Movies that got the wrong rating
Originally Posted by AnonomusBob15
(Post 10906201)
You can see it when Casper is raping her. It's obscured slightly, but it's there.
Originally Posted by inri222
(Post 10906216)
This is true.
The zoom button is your best friend. |
Re: Movies that got the wrong rating
Through the years I've seen several that didn't deserve the R rating and several I thought could have been R.
'Conspiracy Theory' was R but was in no way deserving of it. I feel the same for 'The Ghost and The Darkness'. 'There Will Be Blood' was a movie where I left thinking, "why was that rated R again?" There have been plenty of PG-13 Comedies that I think were more deserving of an R rating than some dramas that were R. |
Re: Movies that got the wrong rating
Originally Posted by foofighters7
(Post 10906282)
I feel the same for 'The Ghost and The Darkness'.
Spoiler:
Awesome movie though. One of my favorites actually. |
Re: Movies that got the wrong rating
AIRPLANE! had a PG rating even though a woman runs topless across the screen and the entire film is one big sexual innuendo/double entendre.
|
Re: Movies that got the wrong rating
Originally Posted by sracer
(Post 10906758)
AIRPLANE! had a PG rating even though a woman runs topless across the screen and the entire film is one big sexual innuendo/double entendre.
I agree about True Grit. That's why, as a parent, you have to take into account your child and their individual level of maturity, i.e. severed fingers would have freaked my 13-year old out. Being a Cohen Bros. movie, I wasn't shocked at the level of violence though. You have to play it by ear. |
Re: Movies that got the wrong rating
GYMKATA had an R rating but I don't see anything in the film that would warrant it.
|
Re: Movies that got the wrong rating
Originally Posted by sracer
(Post 10909160)
GYMKATA had an R rating but I don't see anything in the film that would warrant it.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:29 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.