![]() |
Re: Contagion (Dir: Soderbergh) - Sept 9, 2011
There's a few reviews trickling in at Rotten Tomatoes. Currently 80%.
|
Re: Contagion (Dir: Soderbergh) - Sept 9, 2011
Originally Posted by Mr. Cinema
(Post 10912784)
There's a few reviews trickling in at Rotten Tomatoes. Currently 80%.
|
Re: Contagion (Dir: Soderbergh) - Sept 9, 2011
Same here. I have plans to see it on Friday.
|
Re: Contagion (Dir: Soderbergh) - Sept 9, 2011
25 reviews are now in at RT. 76%
|
Re: Contagion (Dir: Soderbergh) - Sept 9, 2011
Originally Posted by Giles
(Post 10901010)
I wonder how IMAX dmr'd a Red One capture and in turn upspeced it to IMAX resolution - that should look pretty interesting.
Thank you, come again. |
Re: Contagion (Dir: Soderbergh) - Sept 9, 2011
I had this pegged as something to check out on DVD, but now that I learn that Soderbergh is directing I'm a lot more interested.
|
Re: Contagion (Dir: Soderbergh) - Sept 9, 2011
Why does it not shock me the Gwenny Paltrow is patient Zero for a devastating disease? She just seems perfect for the role.
|
Re: Contagion (Dir: Soderbergh) - Sept 9, 2011
Down to 72%, but Roeper is raving about it. Lemire's review is also quite positive.
The objections to is largely seem to be about, to borrow a phrase from Lemire's review, its "cool precision." |
Re: Contagion (Dir: Soderbergh) - Sept 9, 2011
Originally Posted by Giantrobo
(Post 10915087)
Why does it not shock me the Gwenny Paltrow is patient Zero for a devastating disease? She just seems perfect for the role.
Such an entitled, pretentious bitch. |
Re: Contagion (Dir: Soderbergh) - Sept 9, 2011
is she? And if so...why does that matter?
|
Re: Contagion (Dir: Soderbergh) - Sept 9, 2011
Originally Posted by Solid Snake PAC
(Post 10915726)
is she? And if so...why does that matter?
I'm sure you have actors/actresses who you don't like for various reasons both real and imagined. |
Re: Contagion (Dir: Soderbergh) - Sept 9, 2011
Originally Posted by Giantrobo
(Post 10915753)
She sure seems that way. It matters because it's a vibe she gives off and it makes one not want to see her in stuff. But that's just my 2 cents.
I'm sure you have actors/actresses who you don't like for various reasons both real and imagined. Everybody has actors they don't like, it's like me with Ben Foster because he constantly picks "bad ass" roles and can't pull them off to save his life. |
Re: Contagion (Dir: Soderbergh) - Sept 9, 2011
43 reviews now and it's hanging at 77%. Ebert gave it 3 stars. Roeper also had a positive review.
|
Re: Contagion (Dir: Soderbergh) - Sept 9, 2011
Originally Posted by redtornado
(Post 10900717)
Wow, so the epidemic causes people to have car accidents and then engage in sex with each other? That sounds almost too good to be true.
Originally Posted by Ash Ketchum
(Post 10900966)
Now that's the movie I want to see.
|
Re: Contagion (Dir: Soderbergh) - Sept 9, 2011
Saw this today. I enjoyed it a lot. It's put together very well and sees the various story lines to satisfying ends. Laurence Fishburne and Jude Law stood out for me. Fishburne was great at keeping his shit together and Law played it smug yet likeable. I know this has inevitably been compared to other movies of this genre but it's easily the best one.
|
Re: Contagion (Dir: Soderbergh) - Sept 9, 2011
Up to 81% now. Warrior is slightly ahead, which I bet no one expected.
|
Re: Contagion (Dir: Soderbergh) - Sept 9, 2011
I thought it was very good, but not great. It stalls a bit 2/3 in, but picks up again. There are a few character strands that kind of die on the vine. Damon and Cotillard don't have much to work with. It's well acted, and really well directed (no surprise there) and the score is very much in the Finch/Reznor TSN vein. The last scene in the film and the accompanying title card is very effective and chilling.
3.5 out 5 stars |
Re: Contagion (Dir: Soderbergh) - Sept 9, 2011
Originally Posted by Giles
(Post 10900947)
it's obvious Soderbegh's staple to shoot this not on film, but the Red One camera photography looks and seems cheap.
Originally Posted by JumpCutz
(Post 10917736)
I thought it was very good, but not great. It stalls a bit 2/3 in, but picks up again. There are a few character strands that kind of die on the vine. Damon and Cotillard don't have much to work with. It's well acted, and really well directed (no surprise there) and the score is very much in the Finch/Reznor TSN vein. The last scene in the film and the accompanying title card is very effective and chilling.
Great cast, but a few of them felt wasted. |
Re: Contagion (Dir: Soderbergh) - Sept 9, 2011
Is it just me or was Tobin Bell (Jigsaw in the Saw franchise) one of the pathologists cutting open the skull during the autopsy scene? It sure looked like him.
Good film, I enjoyed it. Don't see myself purchasing it on BD when it comes out though. |
Re: Contagion (Dir: Soderbergh) - Sept 9, 2011
Originally Posted by Osiris3657
(Post 10918041)
Good film, I enjoyed it. Don't see myself purchasing it on BD when it comes out though.
|
Re: Contagion (Dir: Soderbergh) - Sept 9, 2011
Originally Posted by JumpCutz
(Post 10917736)
I thought it was very good, but not great. It stalls a bit 2/3 in, but picks up again. There are a few character strands that kind of die on the vine. Damon and Cotillard don't have much to work with. It's well acted, and really well directed (no surprise there) and the score is very much in the Finch/Reznor TSN vein. The last scene in the film and the accompanying title card is very effective and chilling.
3.5 out 5 stars |
Re: Contagion (Dir: Soderbergh) - Sept 9, 2011
Originally Posted by Matthew Chmiel
(Post 10915036)
Contagion was the first feature film shot on the Red Epic.
Thank you, come again. I couldn't get pass the fact that Jude Law's teeth looked utterly gnarly. and what actually happened at the end with Marion Cotillard's character that was a bit vague. this movie is a bit odd for Warners to be giving the deluxe IMAX treatment - I thought the movie was a bit down and depressing - but in a good way. |
Re: Contagion (Dir: Soderbergh) - Sept 9, 2011
Originally Posted by Giles
(Post 10918551)
I couldn't get pass the fact that Jude Law's teeth looked utterly gnarly. |
Re: Contagion (Dir: Soderbergh) - Sept 9, 2011
Originally Posted by Giles
(Post 10918551)
and what does the Epic do ??
I couldn't get pass the fact that Jude Law's teeth looked utterly gnarly. and what actually happened at the end with Marion Cotillard's character that was a bit vague. this movie is a bit odd for Warners to be giving the deluxe IMAX treatment - I thought the movie was a bit down and depressing - but in a good way. Spoiler:
|
Re: Contagion (Dir: Soderbergh) - Sept 9, 2011
Originally Posted by celmendo
(Post 10918446)
I agree and also with the "cool precision" comment. I can't say anything bad about it other than I have a detached feeling that keeps me from saying "wow" or "great achievement". I'm still at "hmmm, scary and interesting but..."
Saw it. Pretty much my sentiments. Solid movie from beginning to end, but nothing that made me say "wow". Except possibly: Spoiler:
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:23 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.