Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Entertainment Discussions > Movie Talk
Reload this Page >

The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread

Community
Search
Movie Talk A Discussion area for everything movie related including films In The Theaters

The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-15-11 | 05:21 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread

Originally Posted by Academy
Beverly Hills, CA — The governors of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences voted on Tuesday (6/14) to add a new twist to the 2011 Best Picture competition, and a new element of surprise to its annual nominations announcement. The Board voted to institute a system that will now produce anywhere between five and 10 nominees in the category. That number won’t be announced until the Best Picture nominees themselves are revealed at the January nominations announcement.

“With the help of PricewaterhouseCoopers, we’ve been looking not just at what happened over the past two years, but at what would have happened if we had been selecting 10 nominees for the past 10 years,” explained Academy President Tom Sherak, who noted that it was retiring Academy executive director Bruce Davis who recommended the change first to Sherak and incoming CEO Dawn Hudson and then to the governors.

During the period studied, the average percentage of first place votes received by the top vote-getting movie was 20.5. After much analysis by Academy officials, it was determined that 5% of first place votes should be the minimum in order to receive a nomination, resulting in a slate of anywhere from five to 10 movies.

“In studying the data, what stood out was that Academy members had regularly shown a strong admiration for more than five movies,” said Davis. “A Best Picture nomination should be an indication of extraordinary merit. If there are only eight pictures that truly earn that honor in a given year, we shouldn’t feel an obligation to round out the number.”

If this system had been in effect from 2001 to 2008 (before the expansion to a slate of 10), there would have been years that yielded 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 nominees.

The final round of voting for Best Picture will continue to employ the preferential system, regardless of the number of nominees, to ensure that the winning picture has the endorsement of more than half of the voters.

Other rules changes approved by the Board include:

In the animated feature film category, the need for the Board to vote to “activate” the category each year was eliminated, though a minimum number of eligible releases – eight – is still required for a competitive category. Additionally, the short films and feature animation branch recommended, and the Board approved refinements to the number of possible nominees in the Animated Feature category. In any year in which eight to 12 animated features are released, either two or three of them may be nominated. When 13 to 15 films are released, a maximum of four may be nominated, and when 16 or more animated features are released, a maximum of five may be nominated.

In the visual effects category, the “bakeoff” at which the nominees are determined will expand from seven to 10 contenders. The increase in the number of participants is related to a change made last year in which the number of films nominated in the visual effects category was increased from three to five.

Previously, the Board approved changes to the documentary feature and documentary short category rules that now put those categories’ eligibility periods in line with the calendar year and thus with most other awards categories. The change means that for the 84th Awards cycle only, the eligibility period is more than 12 months; it is from September 1, 2010 to December 31, 2011.

Other modifications of the 84th Academy Awards rules include normal date changes and minor “housekeeping” changes.

Rules are reviewed annually by individual branch and category committees. The Awards Rules Committee then reviews all proposed changes before presenting its recommendations to the Academy’s Board of Governors for approval.

The 84th Academy Awards nominations will be announced live on Tuesday, January 24, 2012, at 5:30 a.m. PT in the Academy’s Samuel Goldwyn Theater.

Academy Awards for outstanding film achievements of 2011 will be presented on Sunday, February 26, 2012, at the Kodak Theatre at Hollywood & Highland Center®, and televised live by the ABC Television Network. The Oscar presentation also will be televised live in more than 200 countries worldwide.
TL;DR version - there will now be anywhere between 5 to 10 BP nominees, we won't know exactly how many until the moment they're announced, and at least 5% of first-place votes is the qualification for getting in. Also, documentary something something.
Old 06-15-11 | 05:21 PM
  #2  
Mordred's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 12,216
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Austin, TX
re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread

I read about this today and really like the idea.
Old 06-15-11 | 05:26 PM
  #3  
Groucho's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 71,383
Received 130 Likes on 92 Posts
From: Salt Lake City, Utah
re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread

10 is too many, this is a much better system. For the 2010 awards all the movies were pretty good, but for 2009 it seemed like they were scraping the bottom of the barrel.
Old 06-15-11 | 05:28 PM
  #4  
Trevor's Avatar
Challenge Guru & Comic Nerd
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 37,371
Received 951 Likes on 611 Posts
From: spiritually, Minnesota
re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread

Old 06-15-11 | 05:30 PM
  #5  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 39,239
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
From: Formerly known as "Solid Snake PAC"/Denton, Tx
re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread

Yeah, I'm open to this. Flexibility....
Old 06-15-11 | 05:45 PM
  #6  
JTH182's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 6,321
Received 180 Likes on 127 Posts
From: Chicago, IL
re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread

Works for me. Oh, and this thread had 4 replies with 5 views, so I felt guilty if I didn't respond.
Old 06-15-11 | 05:46 PM
  #7  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 20,052
Received 169 Likes on 127 Posts
From: Conducting miss-aisle drills and listening to their rock n roll
re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread

This could become a very good statistic to use to quickly determine if a year was a "good" movie year. If there were 10 nominees it was a very good year, if there were only 5 the year was lean on quality.
Old 06-15-11 | 06:00 PM
  #8  
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread

Are you sure you want to base your idea of a "good movie year" on what Academy members generally like?

I'm skeptical about this -- I think stuff like The Blind Side will still make it in because that kind of thing probably has wider support from the voters with more popular tastes, whereas it could hurt the artsy stuff that has a smaller, yet more passionate, group of fans. In other words, there are more people who like Ron Howard movies than there are people who like David Lynch movies, even in the Academy when taken as a whole.
Old 06-15-11 | 06:15 PM
  #9  
PopcornTreeCt's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 25,913
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread

5 maybe 6 maybe 7 maybe 8 maybe 9 maybe 10? Awesome idea.
Old 06-15-11 | 06:29 PM
  #10  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 20,052
Received 169 Likes on 127 Posts
From: Conducting miss-aisle drills and listening to their rock n roll
re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread

Originally Posted by MoviePage
Are you sure you want to base your idea of a "good movie year" on what Academy members generally like?
And the Best Picture winner usually isn't the best picture of its year. I'm just saying it would be a quick and dirty rule-of-thumb type indicator.

I could also see it being politicized by studios anxious to push more product for awards to make sure all ten valuable spots get filled. Let's face it, going out with 5 or 6 after a few years of 8, 9, 10 will look bad, and be seen as a waste of potential proffits for a few films that could have filled those spots.
Old 06-15-11 | 07:16 PM
  #11  
Drexl's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 16,077
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
From: St. Louis, MO
re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread

Originally Posted by Mabuse
This could become a very good statistic to use to quickly determine if a year was a "good" movie year. If there were 10 nominees it was a very good year, if there were only 5 the year was lean on quality.
Maybe, but it could also be a sign that there was no really great film because the voting was spread out more among different films.

I'd rather they just go back to 5. We already know which films have a serious shot based on the Directing nominees. Although I suppose the average joe doesn't, which is what counts.
Old 06-15-11 | 07:53 PM
  #12  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 39,652
Received 1,664 Likes on 1,181 Posts
From: Somewhere between Heaven and Hell
re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread

Fuck nominations... just pick one to present the award to at the show and be done with it. Nominations are marketing tools for the losers anyway.
Old 06-15-11 | 07:57 PM
  #13  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread

Originally Posted by PopcornTreeCt
5 maybe 6 maybe 7 maybe 8 maybe 9 maybe 10? Awesome idea.
Sound like Lebron.
Old 06-15-11 | 08:18 PM
  #14  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 8,629
Received 620 Likes on 434 Posts
From: Sunny Hawaii
re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread

They all sound like reasonable changes to me. Nice to see that they are actively reviewing and modifying their criteria.
Old 06-15-11 | 08:38 PM
  #15  
The Bus's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 54,920
Received 23 Likes on 18 Posts
From: New York
re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread

I h ave to admit reading the title I was filled with a bit of dread but I think the rule change makes a hell of a lot of sense. Have a small field if there are a small group of strong contenders, and have a wide-open field when necessary.

Old 06-16-11 | 11:02 AM
  #16  
islandclaws's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 20,084
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
From: Behind the Orange Curtain
re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread

Count me as another who likes the idea. At least it'll add some real intrigue as to who gets a nom. Last year's 10 nominees had a few that didn't really need to be in there, so this scenario is much more interesting.
Old 06-16-11 | 11:30 AM
  #17  
Giles's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 33,646
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
From: Washington DC
re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread

Originally Posted by bootsy
Sound like Lebron.
please stop
Old 06-16-11 | 12:08 PM
  #18  
Goat3001's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 17,116
Received 24 Likes on 12 Posts
From: NYC
re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread

Originally Posted by bootsy
Sound like Lebron.


Originally Posted by devilshalo
Fuck nominations... just pick one to present the award to at the show and be done with it. Nominations are marketing tools for the losers anyway.
But then how would you know who to invite to the award show?
Old 06-16-11 | 12:56 PM
  #19  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 39,652
Received 1,664 Likes on 1,181 Posts
From: Somewhere between Heaven and Hell
re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread

Originally Posted by Goat3001
But then how would you know who to invite to the award show?
Base it on vote count. Besides... this would only be for the Best Picture award.
Old 06-16-11 | 01:30 PM
  #20  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread

Originally Posted by Giles
please stop
please make me. Have some fun and stop being a square/nerd.
Old 06-16-11 | 01:55 PM
  #21  
Drexl's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 16,077
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
From: St. Louis, MO
re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread

Originally Posted by devilshalo
Base it on vote count. Besides... this would only be for the Best Picture award.
And yet, we would still pretty much know which movies have a shot based on the nominations in other categories, particularly Directing.
Old 06-16-11 | 02:13 PM
  #22  
raven56706's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 21,766
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Back in the Good Ole USA
re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread

Originally Posted by bootsy
please make me. Have some fun and stop being a square/nerd.
lol...
Old 06-16-11 | 02:29 PM
  #23  
Giles's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 33,646
Received 22 Likes on 17 Posts
From: Washington DC
re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread

Originally Posted by bootsy
please make me. Have some fun and stop being a square/nerd.
LeBron + fun (?) = douche
Old 06-16-11 | 02:48 PM
  #24  
Geofferson's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 39,973
Received 156 Likes on 127 Posts
From: The Village Green
re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread

Sounds like a decent enough idea
Old 06-16-11 | 11:35 PM
  #25  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,082
Received 826 Likes on 576 Posts
re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread

Originally Posted by devilshalo
Fuck nominations... just pick one to present the award to at the show and be done with it. Nominations are marketing tools for the losers anyway.
The idea behind nominations is that the vast majority of people can't and won't see every movie released in a given year. The nomination process allows for films that are good but were possibly little seen get a nomination, instead of just the film most people saw and liked winning by default. Then, with the vastly shorter list of nominated films, the voters can catch up on the ones they had missed via special theatrical screenings or screener videos. This is partly why the nominees are announced so far in advance.

Also, the nominations for many of the Oscar categories are only made by members of the Academy that work in that particular field. So only directors nominate Best Director, only actors nominate the Best Actor categories, etc. After the nominations are announced, the final votes for the awards are open to the entire Academy. So it's a form of checks-and-balances, where people are nominated by their pears but win via votes from all members.

http://www.oscars.org/awards/academy...ut/voting.html

So, why nominations can be great marketing tools for a film, it's not the main reason they exist.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.