DVD Talk Forum

DVD Talk Forum (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/)
-   Movie Talk (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/movie-talk-17/)
-   -   The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/movie-talk/591846-oscar-rule-changes-discussion-thread.html)

Runaway 04-22-25 11:16 PM

Re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread
 

Originally Posted by Josh-da-man (Post 14587503)
I did a quick scan of the 2025 Oscars, and there were thirty-three feature-length films nominated across the major categories.

To me, that seems like one hell of ask for the Academy members to have seen all of these films. Most of these people are working in the industry and have long hours, crazy schedules, and location shoots, so it's going to be difficult for them to see all of these films in the time frame they're required to. Especially when the studios tend to delay the release of Oscar bait films until the end of the year.

And I doubt this is unique to the Academy, either. The time requirements also likely apply to a lot of other creative arts professions like television, stage, music, and books. And a lot of entertainment industry people are probably eligible to vote in multiple awards to boot.

Aren't most of the voters living in retirement homes? Of course a lot of possbile voters are still working, but the voting body is so huge, because so many retired professionals get to vote.

Tommy Lee Jones once said, that he watches every nominated movie in his trailer, while on set, because waiting is what's taking up most of the time on set and you can still cheat, if you really want to. If you know that you hate musicals, just turn on Wicked and Emilia Perez and go to bed.

Decker 04-23-25 01:18 AM

Re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread
 
It still just pisses me off that the Stunt Oscar kicks in for 2026 movies and here we have Tom Cruise climbing all around the wings of a biplane in a 2025 movie. Dude is gonna die for us on camera. Can't we get him the first-ever Stunt Oscar before he does??

eXcentris 04-25-25 04:34 PM

Re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread
 

The Academy announces all members must watch all nominated movies in each category to be eligible to vote at the #Oscars.


I don't even watch the Oscars for a reason, they are mostly a popularity contest, decisions are made based on who had the best Oscar campaign, or because such and such director is well known. Well, at least this explains the Emilia Perez mystery, i.e. how the fuck did such a mediocre film completely out of touch with it's subject matter, manage to garner 13 Oscar noms. Because of Audiard's reputation, the same reason why the film won 5 Cesars including best film.

Alan Smithee 04-25-25 08:23 PM

Re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread
 
I’d still have even more stringent requirements, like if you’re going to allow streaming it has to be with a good sound system and decent size screen, not on a computer.

The Razzies needs to require this also. I’m sure many voters hadn’t seen all the Worst Picture winners, they just voted on their reputation.

Ash Ketchum 04-26-25 06:18 AM

Re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread
 

Originally Posted by Alan Smithee (Post 14588944)
I’d still have even more stringent requirements, like if you’re going to allow streaming it has to be with a good sound system and decent size screen, not on a computer.

The Razzies needs to require this also. I’m sure many voters hadn’t seen all the Worst Picture winners, they just voted on their reputation.

That's sure to make the voters even happier.
:hscratch:
Computerized ballot sheet:
"Did you see this on a phone?"
(Checks "Yes")
"Your vote is invalid."
(Stream of profanity from frustrated would-be voter)
:brickwl2:

Decker 04-29-25 05:48 PM

Re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread
 

Originally Posted by Decker (Post 14587175)
Okay, but take last year : Say I can't handle body horror films. They churn my stomach. I don't care how good The Substance is, I'm not watching it. Should I not vote for Actress, Director, Original Screenplay or Best Picture now? Or should I grumble through hate-watching it just so I can vote for something else? I'd probably log in on my computer, start playing it, leave the room. I don't know if that really makes for a better voting body. In theory it should, but there are work arounds.

Yup, that's what they do.

IBJoel 04-29-25 05:51 PM

Re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread
 

Originally Posted by Alan Smithee (Post 14588944)
I’d still have even more stringent requirements, like if you’re going to allow streaming it has to be with a good sound system and decent size screen, not on a computer.

The Razzies needs to require this also. I’m sure many voters hadn’t seen all the Worst Picture winners, they just voted on their reputation.

Oh my God, shut up

Draven 04-29-25 06:00 PM

Re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread
 

Originally Posted by Decker (Post 14590607)

Then what's the fucking point of even participating?

I took bowling for a semester in college. It was a 9AM class Tue and Thur. It was really fun - I could get in two and a half games in during classtime. The class always filled up quickly so I was lucky to get a slot.

I'll never forget our TA said on the first day, "this is BOWLING. If you're going to skip this class, just drop it because other people want to take it."

That's how I look at this - if you can't be bothered to watch the movies or have to do some kind of workaround to meet the requirements, just get out of the process altogether.

GoldenJCJ 04-29-25 06:04 PM

Re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread
 

Originally Posted by IBJoel (Post 14590609)
Oh my God, shut up

Yeah, but for Alan, that decent sized screen can be crookedly propped up on a litter box and some old porn VHS tapes. The screen itself can have a fine layer of kitty litter and dust on it. You know, a reference quality display.

RocShemp 04-29-25 09:10 PM

Re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread
 

Originally Posted by Decker (Post 14590607)

Now watch them add a webcam requirement to the app, with eye tracking software. ;)

Ash Ketchum 04-30-25 06:47 AM

Re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread
 
I'm guessing a lot of Academy members like the perks of free screenings, free lunches and other events and find voting an absolute slog, except when a friend of theirs is nominated and they can throw a vote their way to support them. I imagine a lot of old-timers, when voting in categories filled with movies they've never seen and people they've never heard of, simply call out to their spouses, "Pick a number between 1 and 5" and the spouse's choice determines their vote.

IBJoel 04-30-25 12:03 PM

Re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread
 

Originally Posted by Ash Ketchum (Post 14590819)
I'm guessing a lot of Academy members like the perks of free screenings, free lunches and other events and find voting an absolute slog, except when a friend of theirs is nominated and they can throw a vote their way to support them. I imagine a lot of old-timers, when voting in categories filled with movies they've never seen and people they've never heard of, simply call out to their spouses, "Pick a number between 1 and 5" and the spouse's choice determines their vote.

The opposite is my big issue with Alan's "requirements". Like if you're a younger working filmmaking professional, you've most likely got a few jobs, and being able to pop stuff on your computer or phone is a great way to be able to get in more watches. One of my favorite films I first saw on my phone on a plane. I watched Mission: Impossible - Fallout on a plane. I watched 12 Angry Men on a plane. Great films both and the setting/setup didn't detract from my enjoyment. My old roommate was an Academy member and while he did have a great setup at home, he also saw a lot of stuff on his devices while he was on location.

Mobile watching is such a boon to people who are actually putting in the work to make these movies and they allow a broader range of voters than some old guys picking the same kind of shit over and over again.

GoldenJCJ 04-30-25 12:22 PM

Re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread
 
Are these people able to vote in only certain categories? Like, they don’t NEED to watch every movie in every category to vote, they just need to watch every movie in the categories they vote in, right? So if they watch all the best picture nominations they CAN vote for Best Picture but if they don’t get around to seeing all the movies for Best Actor, they CAN’T vote for best actor.

Is that right or is the expectation that they see ALL the nominated movies to vote at all?

story 04-30-25 12:28 PM

Re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread
 
My understanding is it's always been the former, and it's ridiculous that even the bare minimum of 5-15 movies for the biggest award in your industry gas been too much for some people.

Don't want to vote? Fine. I'll take your place!

Bluelitespecial 06-17-25 06:28 PM

Re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread
 
I didn't know where to put this news but Tom Cruise is getting an honorary Oscar at the Governor Awards this fall for his contributions to film. I thought he would have won an Oscar eventually but it's still deserved.
https://www.aol.com/tom-cruise-recei...180100176.html

Decker 06-17-25 06:35 PM

Re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread
 
Good for him. I wanted him to win the Stunt Oscar, but that won't be in effect for 2 more years. This is a decent start at least. Jackie Chan won the same Oscar in 2016.
https://cimg2.ibsrv.net/gimg/dvdtalk...16194d671c.png

Decker 11-16-25 11:41 PM

Re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread
 
Tom accepted his honorary Oscar tonight.

Decker 05-02-26 12:46 AM

Re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread
 
Very happy about these new rule changes :


The Oscars just announced some juicy, long-overdue rule changes. One biggie: An actor can now be nominated twice in the same category for separate films, as long as both performances receive enough votes. Also…

Now, in addition to being selected by country, International Film contenders can also qualify by winning a major film festival award. It’ll be invaluable for dissident directors whose home countries would never select them. And the statuette will now include the director’s name

https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/dvdtalk...82c6c91d1a.jpg
https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/dvdtalk...08469451c6.jpg
https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/dvdtalk...e8737fbc43.jpg
https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/dvdtalk...55567936be.jpg
​​​​​​​

MisterMike 05-02-26 04:12 AM

Re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread
 
Decker how can they prove a human wrote a screenplay though? Seems like a tough verification step…?

Decker 05-02-26 10:06 AM

Re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread
 

Originally Posted by MisterMike (Post 14736795)
Decker how can they prove a human wrote a screenplay though? Seems like a tough verification step…?

I'm not sure they can, 100%. But it's future proofing. And it's precedent‐setting -- No AI.
This probably came about because of The Brutalist, which was nominated for Set Decoration & Production Design (the Oscar formerly known as Art Decoration). It was the heavy favorite to win (it was a film about an architect with brilliant original sets) until it was revealed that there was AI used in the set decoration (blueprint designs on the wall of an art exhibition celebration of the lead actor, in the coda) were made with AI. The backlash kept it from winning that Oscar and there was a bit of panic -- understandably-- that thwy never want to award an Oscar to an AI. This is a step to remedy that by making a film that uses AI screenwriting tools ineligible.
The Brutalist should have still won that Art Decoration Oscar. AI didn't design those incredible sets.

Josh-da-man 05-02-26 12:52 PM

Re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread
 
I'm not really sure there's any way to prove that a writer didn't use AI to assist with a screenplay unless they actually admit it. A fully AI generated script might be detectable, but either using AI to assist in the writing or rewriting an AI written script would likely be impossible to detect or prove.

As I mentioned elsewhere regarding visual art, AI is getting better all the time and human artists will start being influenced by AI, so it seems like something that can become a feedback loop.

MisterMike 05-03-26 08:52 AM

Re: The Oscar Rule Changes - Discussion Thread
 

Originally Posted by Josh-da-man (Post 14736906)
I'm not really sure there's any way to prove that a writer didn't use AI to assist with a screenplay unless they actually admit it. A fully AI generated script might be detectable, but either using AI to assist in the writing or rewriting an AI written script would likely be impossible to detect or prove.

As I mentioned elsewhere regarding visual art, AI is getting better all the time and human artists will start being influenced by AI, so it seems like something that can become a feedback loop.

Thats probably the best we can hope - that an obvious full-AI script can be detected. Otherwise, I bet they can use AI for some things and you wont be able to tell.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:28 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.